Thank you again Reindl.
Oh! It was a mistake on my part to enable a hell lot of repos. list.
Sorry,to bother you Friend.
What I'm doing now is,whenever any update/upgrade is available,I uncheck
those packages which has ending as "*.fc17" .The rest packages with
updates(*.fc16) are fine in updating.
But Friend,please help me with this:
[root@localhost kgtaban]# yum update
Loaded plugins: aliases, auto-update-debuginfo, changelog, dellsysid,
downloadonly, etckeeper,
: fastestmirror, filter-data, fs-snapshot,
fusioninventory-agent, keys, langpacks,
: list-data, local, merge-conf, post-transaction-actions,
presto, priorities,
: protectbase, ps, puppetverify, refresh-packagekit,
refresh-updatesd, remove-with-
: leaves, rpm-warm-cache, security, show-leaves, tmprepo,
tsflags, upgrade-helper,
: verify, versionlock
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
updates-debuginfo/metalink
| 5.6 kB 00:00
* fedora: fedora.iitm.ac.in
* fedora-debuginfo: ftp.kddilabs.jp
* fedora-source: ftp.kddilabs.jp
* rpmfusion-free: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in
* rpmfusion-free-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-free-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in
* rpmfusion-free-updates-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-free-updates-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-nonfree: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in
* rpmfusion-nonfree-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-nonfree-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.cse.iitk.ac.in
* rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-debuginfo: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-source: mirror.de.leaseweb.net
* updates: fedora.iitm.ac.in
* updates-debuginfo: ftp.kddilabs.jp
* updates-source: ftp.kddilabs.jp
rpmfusion-free-updates-debuginfo
| 2.7 kB 00:00
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-debuginfo
| 2.7 kB 00:00
updates-debuginfo
| 3.1 kB 00:00
updates-debuginfo/primary_db
| 328 kB 00:02
Skipping filters plugin, no data
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
Skipping filters plugin, no data
--> Running transaction check
---> Package mplayer-doc.x86_64 0:1.0-0.126.20110816svn.fc16 will be updated
---> Package mplayer-doc.x86_64 0:1.0-0.128.20110816svn.fc17 will be an
update
---> Package npapi-vlc.x86_64 0:1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc16 will be updated
---> Package npapi-vlc.x86_64 0:1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc17 will be an update
---> Package python-vlc.noarch 0:1.1.0-2.20100825git.fc14 will be updated
---> Package python-vlc.noarch 0:1.1.0-3.20100825git.fc17 will be an update
---> Package qtractor.x86_64 0:0.5.2-1.fc16 will be updated
---> Package qtractor.x86_64 0:0.5.2-1.fc17 will be an update
---> Package vlc-devel.x86_64 0:1.1.13-3.fc16 will be updated
---> Package vlc-devel.x86_64 0:1.1.13-74.fc16 will be an update
--> Processing Dependency: vlc = 1.1.13 for package:
vlc-devel-1.1.13-74.fc16.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package vlc.x86_64 0:1.1.13-74.fc16 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libgoom2.so.0()(64bit) for package:
vlc-1.1.13-74.fc16.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libmpcdec.so.6()(64bit) for package:
vlc-1.1.13-74.fc16.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libxosd.so.2()(64bit) for package:
vlc-1.1.13-74.fc16.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libgoom2.x86_64 0:0-3.fc16 will be installed
---> Package musepack-tools.x86_64 0:sv8-3.svn435.fc16 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libcuefile.so.0()(64bit) for package:
musepack-tools-sv8-3.svn435.fc16.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libreplaygain.so.1()(64bit) for package:
musepack-tools-sv8-3.svn435.fc16.x86_64
---> Package xosd.x86_64 0:2.2.14-14.fc15 will be installed
--> Running transaction check
---> Package cuetools.x86_64 0:1.4.0-0.7.svn305.fc16 will be installed
---> Package libreplaygain.x86_64 0:0.9.1-0.1.svn453.fc16 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Dependencies Resolved
=====================================================================================================
Package Arch Version
Repository Size
=====================================================================================================
Updating:
mplayer-doc x86_64 1.0-0.128.20110816svn.fc17
_local 1.5 M
npapi-vlc x86_64 1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc17
_local 50 k
python-vlc noarch 1.1.0-3.20100825git.fc17
_local 58 k
qtractor x86_64 0.5.2-1.fc17
_local 1.0 M
vlc-devel x86_64 1.1.13-74.fc16
_local 143 k
Installing for dependencies:
cuetools x86_64 1.4.0-0.7.svn305.fc16
_local 56 k
libgoom2 x86_64 0-3.fc16
_local 78 k
libreplaygain x86_64 0.9.1-0.1.svn453.fc16
_local 8.4 k
musepack-tools x86_64 sv8-3.svn435.fc16
_local 108 k
vlc x86_64 1.1.13-74.fc16
_local 9.1 M
xosd x86_64 2.2.14-14.fc15
_local 47 k
Transaction Summary
=====================================================================================================
Install 6 Packages
Upgrade 5 Packages
Total download size: 12 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Setting up and reading Presto delta metadata
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 39
MB/s | 12 MB 00:00
warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID
8296fa0f: NOKEY
Public key for npapi-vlc-1.2.0-0.3gitf568362.fc17.x86_64.rpm is not
installed
[root@localhost kgtaban]#
How do I proceed regarding the above matter?
Thanks to all Fedora Friends.
-Kaushik
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>wrote:
>
>
> Am 28.01.2012 06:11, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
> > I did uncheck/disable the Fedora "Rawhide" repos
>
> why were they enabled?
> this is a road to hell!
>
> > What about the "ATrpms" repositories? I've disabled it
> > earlier...should I enable it?
>
> only if you want to kill yur system over the long
>
> ATrpms is known to replace base-packages with own versions
> and sometimes other packaging (sub-packages) as the original
> one and sooner or later this will end in massive depsolv
> troubles - the only good at ATrpms is that after some time
> if you want get rid of the troubles you are learning
> how to deal with "rpm -e --nodpes" and what packages
> you must not remove and after all that you know all
> core packages by her first name (i was there years ago)
>
> you should avoid to enable as much repos as you can find
> in case of repos "more helps more" is totally wrong
>
> your current problems are coming from enable things you
> are not knowing what they are (rawhide as best example)
>
> rawhide is the devel-tree and currently F17 and was
> never designed for machines which should work all the time
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
