Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] phy: Add support for Marvell 88E1118R

On 09/14/2012 06:17 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote: Hi Michal, On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Michal Simek wrote: Hi Tom and Joe, On 08/07/2012 02:23 PM, Michal Simek wrote: Marvell 88E1118R has different uid then 88E1118. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek CC: Andy Fleming CC: Zang Roy-R61911 C

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On 09/17/2012 07:47 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: Hi, On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: On 09/14/2012 08:08 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 06:29:01PM +0100, Jos?? Miguel Gon??alves wrote: Samsung's S3C24XX SoCs need this in order to generate a binary

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

On 09/17/2012 07:28 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: Hi, On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear José Miguel Gonçalves, On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear José Miguel Gonçalves, On 09/15/2012 07:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear José Miguel Gonçalves, Jumping to b

Re: [U-Boot] AR8031 Ethernet on mx6

On 15.09.2012 05:06, Fabio Estevam wrote: Hi Jason, I don't have a mx6qarm2 and would like to ask you if you could please confirm that Ethernet is functional on mx6qarm2 running the latest U-boot. I am trying to get Ethernet working on mx6qsabresd, which also uses the same AR8031 PHY, but it is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

Hi, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:34 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: > On 09/17/2012 07:28 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> >>> Dear José Miguel Gonçalves, >>> On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear José M

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:30 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: > On 09/17/2012 07:47 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves >> wrote: >>> >>> On 09/14/2012 08:08 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 06:29:01PM +0100, Jo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

Hi Christian, On 09/17/2012 10:03 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: Hi, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:34 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: On 09/17/2012 07:28 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: Hi, On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear José Miguel Gonçalves, On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Ma

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On 09/17/2012 10:10 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:30 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: On 09/17/2012 07:47 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: Hi, On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: On 09/14/2012 08:08 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/16] pmic:i2c: Add I2C byte order to PMIC framework

On 14/09/2012 17:40, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Since the pmic_reg_read is the u32 value, the order in which bytes > are placed to form u32 value is important. > > This commit adds the reverse (which is default) and normal byte order. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Pa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/16] pmic:max8997: Switch the MAX8997 PMIC to be used with multibus I2C

On 14/09/2012 17:40, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > PMIC MAX8997 is now ready to work with single and multibus soft I2C > implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > drivers/misc/pmic_max8997.c |3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/16] pmic:muic: Support for MUIC built into MAX8997 device

On 14/09/2012 17:40, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Support for MUIC (Micro USB Integrated Circuit) built into the MAX8997 > power management device. > > The MUIC device will work with redesigned PMIC framework. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > Cc: Stefano Babic >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/5] OMAP: networking support for SPL

Hi Joe, On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile > > index d37b22d..f042078 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makef

[U-Boot] [i2c] Pull request

Hello Tom, The following changes since commit a6f0c4faa4c65a7b7048b12c9d180d7e1aad1721: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-avr32 (2012-09-04 09:17:27 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-i2c.git master Koen Kooi (1): omap4 i2c: add

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 41/71] serial: arm: Implement CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI into atmel serial driver

Dear Andreas Bießmann, > Dear Marek Vasut, > > I have to admit that when reading this patch I got attention of your > UDM-serial.txt for the first time. However when reading this patch some > questions come to my mind. [...] > > -void serial_setbrg(void) > > +static void atmel_serial_setbrg(void

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 41/71] serial: arm: Implement CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI into atmel serial driver

Dear Marek Vasut, On 17.09.2012 12:00, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Andreas Bießmann, > >> Dear Marek Vasut, >> >> I have to admit that when reading this patch I got attention of your >> UDM-serial.txt for the first time. However when reading this patch some >> questions come to my mind. > [...] >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 41/71] serial: arm: Implement CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI into atmel serial driver

Dear Andreas Bießmann, [...] > > They have multiple drivers so far and a default_serial_console call. That > > is indeed stupid, but fixing this is not part of this patchset, but a > > subsequent one. This one is only a preparation, trying not to break > > anything and unify the drivers under the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx28evk: extend default environment

On 15/09/2012 20:26, Otavio Salvador wrote: > The environment has been based on mx53loco and m28evk but keeping the > possibility to easy change the default console device as Freescale and > mainline kernels differ on the device name. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > --- > include/configs/mx

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

Hi Marek, On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear José Miguel Gonçalves, NAND Flash driver with HW ECC for the S3C24XX SoCs. Currently it only supports SLC NAND chips. Signed-off-by: José Miguel Gonçalves [...] +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#define MAX_CHI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx35pdk: README: Remove NAND references

On 15/09/2012 00:14, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam > > Booting from NAND is currently not supported, so remove its references. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks to drop the confusion ! Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ==

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] mx6q: Factor out common DDR3 init code

On 13/09/2012 15:18, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Factor out common DDR3 initialization code, allowing easier maintainance of > such > scripts. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, next branch. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] arm: exynos4: universal_C210: add display support

Dear Minkyu, > -Original Message- > From: Minkyu Kang [mailto:proms...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 10:46 AM > To: Piotr Wilczek; Donghwa Lee > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Kyungmin Park > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] arm: exynos4: universal_C210: add > display support

Re: [U-Boot] AR8031 Ethernet on mx6

Hi Dirk, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Dirk Behme wrote: > Trying the recent mainline U-Boot (a6f0c4faa4c65a7b7048b) on an ARM2 board > we get [1] after manually setting an ethaddr and the IP addresses. Thanks for confirming that Ethernet works on mx6qarm2. I will debug more on mx6qsabresd

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm:exynos4:universal_c210: implement software SPI

Dear Minkyu, > -Original Message- > From: Minkyu Kang [mailto:proms...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 11:06 AM > To: Piotr Wilczek > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Kyungmin Park > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm:exynos4:universal_c210: implement > software SPI > > Dear Piotr

[U-Boot] [GIT PULL] Pull request: u-boot-imx

Hi Albert, please pull from u-boot-imx, thanks. The following changes since commit a9f1a4893364ddbb8b7942cded91d4c17c4f5948: lsxl: support power switch (2012-09-03 17:48:51 +0530) are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-imx.git master for you to fetch changes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 50/71] serial: arm: Implement CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI into imx serial driver

On 17/09/2012 01:21, Marek Vasut wrote: > Implement support for CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI into imx serial driver. > This driver was so far only usable directly, but this patch also adds > support for the multi method. This allows using more than one serial > driver alongside the imx driver. Also, add a w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 50/71] serial: arm: Implement CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI into imx serial driver

Dear Stefano Babic, > On 17/09/2012 01:21, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Implement support for CONFIG_SERIAL_MULTI into imx serial driver. > > This driver was so far only usable directly, but this patch also adds > > support for the multi method. This allows using more than one serial > > driver alongsid

[U-Boot] Weekly status

Hey all, I had intended to send this last thing Friday but it slipped my mind. But with my intention to do -rc1 this Friday, this works too. That said... Here's where I'm at so far: - Locally, I believe I have all outstanding pull requets queued up and MAKEALL'd when there's an ELDK toolchain.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/11] S3C24XX: Add support to MINI2416 board

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:11:07AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: > On 09/14/2012 07:58 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 06:29:02PM +0100, Jos?? Miguel Gon??alves wrote: > > > >>The MINI2416 board is based on a Samsung's S3C2416 SoC and has 64MB DDR2 > >>SDRAM, > >>256MB NAND Fl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:24:34AM +0100, Jos?? Miguel Gon??alves wrote: > On 09/17/2012 10:10 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Jos?? Miguel Gon??alves > > wrote: > >>On 09/17/2012 07:47 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/11] S3C24XX: Add support to MINI2416 board

On 17-09-2012 15:39, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:11:07AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: On 09/14/2012 07:58 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 06:29:02PM +0100, Jos?? Miguel Gon??alves wrote: The MINI2416 board is based on a Samsung's S3C2416 SoC and has 64MB DDR2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/11] S3C24XX: Add support to MINI2416 board

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:47:46PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: > On 17-09-2012 15:39, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:11:07AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: > >>On 09/14/2012 07:58 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>>On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 06:29:02PM +0100, Jos?? Miguel Gon??alves

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] tegra: enable lp0 on paz00

Marc, > -Original Message- > From: Marc Dietrich [mailto:marvi...@gmx.de] > Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2012 9:17 AM > To: Tom Warren > Cc: Stephen Warren; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tegra: enable lp0 on paz00 > > Tom, > > On Monday 10 September 2012 12:32:00 Tom War

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On 09/17/2012 04:24:34 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: On 09/17/2012 10:10 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:30 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: On 09/17/2012 07:47 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: Hi, On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: On 09/14

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

Dear Tom Rini, [...] > > If no one else has anything against, I will change the name of the > > new target to u-boot-pad.bin > > I think I'm OK with that. What about having CPU-overridable targets ? So omap can have it's own .ubl result and commands leading to it ... and so can s3c24xx. Such t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On 09/17/12 09:29, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > [...] > >>> If no one else has anything against, I will change the name of the >>> new target to u-boot-pad.bin >> >> I think I'm OK with that. > > What about having CPU-overridable targets ? So omap can have it's own .ubl > result and

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx6: Remove lowlevel_init.S

lowlevel_init.S is not used on mx6, so remove the file and the associated calls. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Makefile|1 - arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/lowlevel_init.S | 25 - arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S | 24 --

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On 09/17/12 09:27, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/17/2012 04:24:34 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: [snip] >> If no one else has anything against, I will change the name of the new >> target to u-boot-pad.bin > > What exactly is u-boot-pad.bin supposed to be? I hope that's not being > proposed as the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: > On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: > >>On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>>Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > >>> > NAND Flash driver with

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] spi: add atmel at25df321 serial flash support

Dear Bo Shen, On 16.08.2012 06:44, Bo Shen wrote: Add atmel at25df321 serial flash support Signed-off-by: Bo Shen --- since this patch did not appear to be merged by Mike as mentioned earlier ([1], [2], [3]) I did apply it to u-boot-atmel/master, thanks! Best regards Andreas Bießmann [1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] spiflash: at25: using common spi flash operation

Dear Bo Shen, On 20.08.2012 08:32, Bo Shen wrote: Using common spi flash operation function to replace private operation funtion This patch is based on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/177896/ which has been merged by Mike frysinger Signed-off-by: Bo Shen --- applied to u-boot-atmel/master

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

On 09/17/2012 11:57:57 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: > On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: > >>On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>>Dear Jos? Migue

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Atmel: sam9g10/9m10/9x5: Add support to boot DT kernel

Dear Bo Shen, On 05.09.2012 11:22, Bo Shen wrote: The mainline linux kernel is moving to flatten device tree support Add the CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT option to support booting DT linux kernel Signed-off-by: Bo Shen --- applied to u-boot-atmel/master, thanks! Best regards Andreas Bießmann _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/5] OMAP: networking support for SPL

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 02:55, Ilya Yanok wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Joe Hershberger > mailto:joe.hershber...@gmail.com>> > wrote: [snip] >> diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c index e8ff066..bbd1a6d 100644 >> --- a/net/net.c +++ b/net

[U-Boot] [PULL} please pull u-boot-atmel/master into u-boot-arm/master

Dear Albert Aribaud, as mentioned before there are some fixes left for this upcoming release, here they are. The following changes since commit 057df193b40d31799d41d43bc832a972f658bfe4: Merge remote-tracking branch 'u-boot-ti/master' into m (2012-09-05 20:20:04 +0200) are available in the gi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: On 14-09-2012 19:21, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, NAND

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

On 09/17/12 10:03, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/17/2012 11:57:57 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: >> > On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> > >On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: >> > >>On 14-09-2012

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

On 09/17/2012 12:08:17 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On 09/17/12 10:03, Scott Wood wrote: > Weak symbols are not OK for configuring printf out of the SPL, as you'll > still have all the format strings and caller code in the binary. It > should be a macro (or an inline function that replaces the standar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:36:47PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > > On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > > > > >> On 09/15/2012 07:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > >>> Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > >>> > > Jumping to bo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

On 09/17/2012 12:18:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:36:47PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > > On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > > > > >> On 09/15/2012 07:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > >>> Dear Jos? Miguel

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot's stack space on a Sequoia board

On 09/15/2012 01:27 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Corey Ashford, In message <5053ccb5.3070...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> you wrote: The board I am using is a Sequoia, powerpc 440EPx board running U-boot 1.2.0-gc0c292b2 (Jun 5 2007 - 07:16:12). Frankly: we don't really care any longer about 5 years

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

Dear Tom Rini, > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:36:47PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > > > > On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > > > > > > >> On 09/15/2012 07:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > >>> Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

On 17-09-2012 18:18, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:36:47PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, On 09/15/2012 07:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, Jumping to board_ini

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:23:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/17/2012 12:18:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:36:47PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > >> > >> > On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On 09/17/2012 11:51:52 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On 09/17/12 09:27, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/17/2012 04:24:34 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: [snip] >> If no one else has anything against, I will change the name of the new >> target to u-boot-pad.bin > > What exactly is u-boot-pad.bin supposed to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:26:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:36:47PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > > > > > > On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > > > > > > > > >> O

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

Dear Tom Rini, > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:26:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:36:47PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, > > > > > > > > > On 09/16/2012 11:06 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > > Dear Jos? Miguel Go

Re: [U-Boot] Weekly status

Dear Tom Rini, > Hey all, > > I had intended to send this last thing Friday but it slipped my mind. > But with my intention to do -rc1 this Friday, this works too. That > said... > > Here's where I'm at so far: > - Locally, I believe I have all outstanding pull requets queued up and > MAKEALL

[U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-usb/master

I'm not sure if we want them in current release or next, I'll leave that to you to decide. I don't see much danger for current though. The following changes since commit a6f0c4faa4c65a7b7048b12c9d180d7e1aad1721: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-avr32 (2012-09-04 09:17:27 +020

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On 09/17/12 10:32, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/17/2012 11:51:52 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On 09/17/12 09:27, Scott Wood wrote: >> > On 09/17/2012 04:24:34 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: >> [snip] >> >> If no one else has anything against, I will change the name of the new >> >> target to u-boot-pad.bi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/5] OMAP: networking support for SPL

Hi Tom, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > I agree it's not the best place... config_cmd_spl.h sounds a little > > bit crazy as we don't have any commands at all in SPL... > > > How about config_uncmd_spl.h then and a nice big comment up top > Well, it will be at least less co

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 10:08, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: > On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves >> wrote: >>> On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 07:45:40PM +010

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/7] gpt:doc: GPT (GUID Partition Table) documentation

On 09/13/2012 02:10 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Documentation of the GPT format. > diff --git a/doc/README.gpt b/doc/README.gpt > +Example usage: > +== > + > +To restore GUID partition table one needs to: > +1. at ./include/configs/{board}.h > + - define "partitions=" environment v

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: fix relocation on ARM926EJS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 10:48, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:26:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> Dear Tom Rini, >>> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 05:36:47PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Jos? Miguel Gon?alves, >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

On 17-09-2012 18:56, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 10:08, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: On 09/14/2012 08:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Sep 1

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/5] OMAP: networking support for SPL

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 10:54, Ilya Yanok wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Tom Rini > wrote: > >> I agree it's not the best place... config_cmd_spl.h sounds a >> little bit crazy as we don't have any commands at all in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/7] gpt: Support for GPT (GUID Partition Table) restoration

On 09/13/2012 02:10 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > The restoration of GPT table (both primary and secondary) is now possible. > Simple GUID generation is supported. > diff --git a/include/part.h b/include/part.h > +int set_gpt_table(block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, > + gpt_header *gpt_h, g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/5] OMAP: networking support for SPL

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > That's not really about garbage collection in this case (net-spl). > > I want to disable some functionality of generic net code not some > > stuff used only by commands implementation. The confusion comes > > from the fact that this code is pr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/5] OMAP: networking support for SPL

BTW, I'm going to repost this serie soon. Shouldn't I rebase it on top of your SPL rework patches? Where can I find the tree? Regards, Ilya. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

On 09/17/2012 12:53:41 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On 09/17/12 10:32, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/17/2012 11:51:52 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On 09/17/12 09:27, Scott Wood wrote: >> > On 09/17/2012 04:24:34 AM, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: >> [snip] >> >> If no one else has anything against, I will change the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/5] OMAP: networking support for SPL

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 11:10, Ilya Yanok wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Tom Rini > wrote: > >> That's not really about garbage collection in this case >> (net-spl). I want to disable some functionality of generic net >> co

Re: [U-Boot] Problem Booting RTEMS with u-boot on Phycore LPC3250

Dear Wolfgang, Where exactly did you get the U-Boot source code from? Various sources in fact: http://bitshrine.org/gpp/u-boot-1.3.3-lpc32xx.patch http://git.lpclinux.com/?p=uboot-2009.03-lpc32xx.git;a=summary http://git.lpclinux.com/?p=uboot-2011.12-lpc32xx.git;a=summary https://github.com/sobc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:05:48PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: > On 17-09-2012 18:56, Tom Rini wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA1 > > > >On 09/17/12 10:08, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: > >>On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote: > >>>On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:16:47AM +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

On 17-09-2012 19:27, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:05:48PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: On 17-09-2012 18:56, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 10:08, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves wrote: On 17-09-2012 17:57, Tom Rini wrote: On Sun, Sep 16,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/5] OMAP: networking support for SPL

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Ilya Yanok wrote: > > +#include >> > +#include >> > +#include >> >> What in here needs this header? >> > > Looks like it's unneeded. Thanks, I'll remove it. > Nope, it's needed for spl_parse_image_header. Regards, Ilya.

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot's stack space on a Sequoia board

Dear Corey Ashford, In message <50575cb3.20...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> you wrote: > > > Please update, then try again. > OK, and thank you for your quick reply. I don't have physical access to > this board, but I'll ask around to find if this is something we can do. No physical access is needed fo

Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-usb/master

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 10:52, Marek Vasut wrote: > I'm not sure if we want them in current release or next, I'll > leave that to you to decide. I don't see much danger for current > though. I believe all of this made it by the merge window and looks good. But

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] S3C24XX: Add NAND Flash driver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 11:34, José Miguel Gonçalves wrote: > On 17-09-2012 19:27, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:05:48PM +0100, Jos? Miguel Gon?alves >> wrote: >>> On 17-09-2012 18:56, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: S

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mx51evk: Add CONFIG_REVISION_TAG

FSL 2.6.35 kernel assumes that the bootloader passes the CONFIG_REVISION_TAG information. If this data is not present, the kernel misconfigures the TZIC, which results in the timer interrupt handler never being called, so the kernel deadlocks while calibrating its delay. Suggested-by: Greg Topmil

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix checkpatch warnings about externs in *.c

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/16/12 05:59, Pavel Herrmann wrote: > On Sunday 16 September 2012 14:37:16 Marek Vasut wrote: >> Dear Pavel Herrmann, ... Won't include/sata.h work just fine ? > > I feel include/sata.h is a "consumer-facing" header, and > implementation details

Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-usb/master

Dear Tom Rini, > On 09/17/12 10:52, Marek Vasut wrote: > > I'm not sure if we want them in current release or next, I'll > > leave that to you to decide. I don't see much danger for current > > though. > > I believe all of this made it by the merge window and looks good. It's been stuck in there

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] Add u-boot-ubl.bin target to the Makefile

Dear Tom Rini, In message <505763a5.1030...@ti.com> you wrote: > > Right. So I'm saying we need to set new expectations for everyone and > some human helper symlinks to help. A new top-level out or images or > something, with symlinks inside. Why would we need that? For the end user, any name

Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-usb/master

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:52:26PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > I'm not sure if we want them in current release or next, I'll leave that to > you > to decide. I don't see much danger for current though. > > The following changes since commit a6f0c4faa4c65a7b7048b12c9d180d7e1aad1721: > > Merge

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 2/4] OMAP: spl: call timer_init() from SPL

We need to initialize timer properly, otherwise all delays inside SPL will be wrong. Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok --- Changes in v6: - fix typo in patch name arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/spl.c b/arch

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 0/4] OMAP: SPL networking support

These series provides support for networking in SPL. In this version some effort is done to minimize the resulting SPL size and now Net-only SPL is <50KB in size. So theoretically it can be used on boards with enough SRAM space like AM3517. But real testing was done only on AM335x. Changes in v3

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 4/4] am335x_evm: enable networking in SPL

This patch adds support for networking in SPL on TI AM335x based boards. Vendor Class Identifier used by SPL during BOOTP is "AM335x U-Boot SPL". Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok --- Changes in v3: - set Vendor Class Identifier for SPL Changes in v4: - SPL_BOARD_INIT is not needed anymore include/

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 3/4] OMAP: networking support for SPL

This patch adds support for networking in SPL. Some devices are capable of loading SPL via network so it makes sense to load the main U-Boot binary via network too. This patch tries to use existing network code as much as possible. Unfortunately, it depends on environment which in turn depends on o

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 1/4] net/bootp: add VCI support for BOOTP also

Vendor Class Identifier option is common to BOOTP and DHCP and can be useful without PXE. So send VCI in both BOOTP and DHCP requests if CONFIG_BOOTP_VCI_STRING is defined. Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok --- Changes in v4: - used strlen instead of sizeof - moved vci_strlen var inside macro net/bo

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] i.MX6: mx6qsabrelite: Add splash screen support

Series includes one patch to fix a register name in imx6/crm_regs.h and a second that's a re-base of Fabio's patch from 5/31. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/162206/ Note that I'm not sure whether this should have been based on u-boot-video because it's video-related or u-boot imx becau

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] i.MX6: change register name for CCM_CHSCCDR to match ref. manual

Register CCM_CHSCCDR (offset 0x34 in CCM) is named CCM_CHSCCDR in reference manual, but was named chscdr in struct mxc_ccm_reg. Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/crm_regs.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/a

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] i.MX6: mx6qsabrelite: Add splash screen support

Adds support for the Hannstar 1024 x 768 LVDS panel (Freescale part number MCIMX-LVDS1) to SABRE-Lite board. This commit is a rebase Fabio Estevan's patch from 5/31 to u-boot-video/master: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/162206/ Modifications include: removal of i2c setup (unneeded)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] i.MX6: mx6qsabrelite: Add splash screen support

Hi Eric, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: > +int board_late_init(void) > +{ > + setenv("stdout", "serial"); > + return 0; > +} I was told not to do this way. Please follow this approach instead: commit 3e0773708dd4e502c127a589be5779708eb7ba69 Author: Stefano Bab

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] usb: ehci: rework to take advantage of new lowlevel interface

Dear Lucas Stach, [...] > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxs.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxs.c > index 6e21669..a74c1c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxs.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxs.c > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ > #include > #include > > -#include "ehci-core.h" > #include "ehci.h"

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] i.MX6: mx6qsabrelite: Add splash screen support

Hi Eric, On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:20:49 -0700 Eric Nelson wrote: > Series includes one patch to fix a register name in imx6/crm_regs.h > and a second that's a re-base of Fabio's patch from 5/31. > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/162206/ > > Note that I'm not sure whether this should hav

[U-Boot] [PATCH] video/powerpc: don't touch DIU registers that we don't need

Several DIU registers were being initialized either unnecessarily or to wrong values. 1) All interrupts were enabled even though there's no interrupt handler. Interrupts were left enabled when booting Linux. 2) Don't configure a dummy area descriptor, since we don't support ADs in U-Boot.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/16] arm:trats:pmic: Support for charging battery at Samsung's TRATS board

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/12 13:55, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Tom , > >> If I read this right we'll pause in the middle of start up to >> charge the battery for possibly a long time right? And this >> could be a while loop even, yes? If so to the first one, this >

Re: [U-Boot] using initrd with U-boot on the imx28evk

Dear Bill, I'm CCing Fabio ... he might have some idea for you. > Marek, > > Yes, I checked the kernel and it is enabled for ramdisk support in > Linux, gzip compression, and loop back block driver. I did find some > other posts where some folks added the address of the ram drive. So I >

Re: [U-Boot] Cache alignment warnings on Tegra (ARM)

Hi Thierry, On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 07:45:30PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Thierry Reding >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:11:54PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> >> Dear Thierry Reding, >

Re: [U-Boot] using initrd with U-boot on the imx28evk

Bill, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Bill, > > I'm CCing Fabio ... he might have some idea for you. What about starting a thread in linux-arm-kernel for this? Regards, Fabio Estevam ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.den

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/16] pmic:i2c: Add I2C byte order to PMIC framework

Hi Stefano, > On 14/09/2012 17:40, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Since the pmic_reg_read is the u32 value, the order in which bytes > > are placed to form u32 value is important. > > > > This commit adds the reverse (which is default) and normal byte > > order. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewsk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/16] pmic:max8997: Switch the MAX8997 PMIC to be used with multibus I2C

Hi Stefano, > On 14/09/2012 17:40, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > PMIC MAX8997 is now ready to work with single and multibus soft I2C > > implementation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > > --- > > drivers/misc/pmic_max8997.c |3 ++- > > 1 files changed,

  1   2   >