On 09/17/12 09:29, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > [...] > >>> If no one else has anything against, I will change the name of the >>> new target to u-boot-pad.bin >> >> I think I'm OK with that. > > What about having CPU-overridable targets ? So omap can have it's own .ubl > result and commands leading to it ... and so can s3c24xx. Such targets would > have to be shifted into CPU-specific dirs, is that possible?
The problem I see first is that "UBL" doesn't seem to mean anything in the context of s3c24xx, it just happens to be doing some of what the system wants. -- Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
