On 14/09/2012 17:40, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> PMIC MAX8997 is now ready to work with single and multibus soft I2C
> implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/pmic_max8997.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/pmic_max8997.c b/drivers/misc/pmic_max8997.c
> index 62dbc05..4943f66 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/pmic_max8997.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/pmic_max8997.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <common.h>
> #include <pmic.h>
> #include <max8997_pmic.h>
> +#include <i2c.h>
>
> int pmic_init(void)
> {
> @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ int pmic_init(void)
> p->number_of_regs = PMIC_NUM_OF_REGS;
> p->hw.i2c.addr = MAX8997_I2C_ADDR;
> p->hw.i2c.tx_num = 1;
> - p->bus = I2C_PMIC;
> + p->bus = I2C_0;
>
I do not see so useful to add an enum for each instance of the I2C bus.
And we have to add it if the number of i2c busses grows. IMHO it is
better to use directly the constant, so later in another patch
pmic_init(5) instead of pmic(I2C_5).
Regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de
=====================================================================
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
