Re: [techtalk] FTP server

2001-04-03 Thread Martin . Caitlyn
Hi, Julie, and everyone else, > One of the things about programs like wuftp is that > they have vulnerabilities because they are being used > and maintained. For my $0.02 I'd rather go with > something like wuftp that is being maintained and poked > and prodded than with something I've never he

Re: [techtalk] More XP vs UML

2001-04-03 Thread Shari
Many thanks to all the valuable postings regarding this topic. It's interesting to hear the other war stories and approaches. I think I just have to take a more involved approach with the team members, get everyone deep into it at all levels. This really *isn't* a hierarchy here, I think it

[techtalk] gdm returning error mesgs

2001-04-03 Thread Kristin Ziel
Hi all-- I rebooted my machine the other day, and now gdm returns error messages and won't start. Here's what I've tracked down so far. -The X server starts -I get error messages stating that the client is not authorized to connect to the Xserver AUDIT: Mon Apr 2 01:08:55 2001: 4531 X: c

[techtalk] Linux and routers

2001-04-03 Thread Kath
Will Linux share its routing table with a Cisco 2500 series router?  This box isn't even running ipmasq, it is just a web server.  I don't even think there is a way to enable rip or any other routing proto (IGRP, EIGRP, OSPF) in Linux. I'm saying no that it doesn't share it, but my friend ke

[techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread jennyw
Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG or WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for Linux? Pros and cons would be great, and also whether they require KDE or Gnome (I run Gnome usually). Thanks! Jen ___ techtalk mailin

[techtalk] port purposes...

2001-04-03 Thread Walt
Well, I'm working on securing up my server a bit. I did a portscan and came up with the following unlabled ports: gandalf [10.0.0.1] 6001 (?) open gandalf [10.0.0.1] 5901 (?) open gandalf [10.0.0.1] 5801 (?) open gandalf [10.0.0.1] 3904 (?) open gandalf [10.0.0.1] 688 (?) open gandalf [10.0.0.1]

Re: [techtalk] More XP vs UML

2001-04-03 Thread jennyw
Hi, everyone, UML and XP are not mutually-exclusive. Unified Modeling Language, as the name implies, is a way of describing things. XP is a process for software development. The inventors of UML (Booch, Jacobson, and Rumbaugh) all now work at Rational and are promoting Rational Unified Process (R

Re: [techtalk] dual boot/ linux writing into win98 partition

2001-04-03 Thread Conor Daly
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 03:34:52PM -0600 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Vinnie thought: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Terry Yesse wrote: > > > something similiar I've done, that might work well in your environment, is > put the windows cab files out on a shared drive then booted linux, mounted > the

Re: [techtalk] grip stalling with gtcd

2001-04-03 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 08:28:57AM -0800 or thereabouts, buddy guy wrote: > Hoping someone out there might have some advice > I am using grip with cdparanoia as my ripper and lame > as my encoder. > Periodically I will get this error (pop up window > produced by grip) while ripping a cd > ___

Re: [techtalk] More XP vs UML

2001-04-03 Thread Julie
From: BiOFH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hehehe ...to avoid those uncomfortable moments months later when they > say "OK, now we want to add X and put this baby live on the > Internet"? And the programmers reply "Uhh... couldn't you have told > us this 'before' we did it all with UDP instead of TCP"?

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Charl Pretorius
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 03:10, jennyw wrote: > Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG or > WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for Linux? Pros and cons would be > great, and also whether they require KDE or Gnome (I run Gnome usually). > > Thanks! > > Jen > > > >

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Karl-Heinz Zimmer
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 03:10, jennyw wrote: > Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG or > WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for Linux? Just take vim ! http://www.vim.org Pro: vim is extremely fast - once have learned how to use the keyboard Con: (sorry

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Tricia Bowen
I use xemacs for development and it's great. It highlights syntax, it auto-indents, and it's got a bunch of quick tags. It is much larger than Vi, but for development it's worth it. -Tricia On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, jennyw wrote: |Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIW

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Caitlyn Martin
jennyw wrote: > Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG or > WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for Linux? Pros and cons would be great, > and also whether they require KDE or Gnome (I run Gnome usually). Hi, Jen, For Gnome, I'd really recommend Bluefish. Very,

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Rebecca J. Walter
EMACS!!! it is very NONwysiwyg. but it color codes tags and has an option you can activate to have it autoload in the browser every time you save. i find it easy to work with. smart people like my husband configure it to complete file names and that sort of cool stuff. telsa probably knows how

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Eva Fenrich
Hi! On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:55:52PM +0200, Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote: > On Tuesday 03 April 2001 03:10, jennyw wrote: > > Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG or > > WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for Linux? > > Just take vim ! > > http://www.vim.org

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Christian MacAuley
> Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG or > WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for Linux? Pros and cons would be great, > and also whether they require KDE or Gnome (I run Gnome usually). Gee, i've been lurking a lot ... I think Bluefish rocks. It's not WYSIW

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread John Elliott
I have been using Quanta+ V2.0beta5 and found it to be quite decent. It has a preview of the page that you are editing as well. It is very easy to use. On April 3, 2001 12:57 pm, Christian MacAuley wrote: > > Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG > > or WYSIW

Re: [techtalk] port purposes...

2001-04-03 Thread ktb
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 07:41:37AM -0400, Walt wrote: > Well, I'm working on securing up my server > a bit. I did a portscan and came up with the > following unlabled ports: > > gandalf [10.0.0.1] 6001 (?) open > gandalf [10.0.0.1] 5901 (?) open > gandalf [10.0.0.1] 5801 (?) open > gandalf [10.0.

Re: [techtalk] port purposes...

2001-04-03 Thread Melissa Plunkett
Walt, First try looking in /etc/services and if it is not listed there go to http://www.snort.org/ and under the "Rules" subsection of the side menu choose "Port Search". It is a pretty good look up site, for example 6001 is X Windows :) Good luck! Melissa Walt wrote: > > Well, I'm working on

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread James A . Sutherland
Oops - sent it directly to Jen instead of to the list... On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 18:10:17 -0700, you wrote: >Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG or >WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for Linux? Pros and cons would be great, >and also whether they require KDE or G

Re: [techtalk] port purposes...

2001-04-03 Thread Walt
Ok, that listing was from netcat which automagically check /etc/services. The entries I pasted were ones that weren't listed there. Upon searching snort I have found most of them. However, I don't understand their function or what is utilizing them, namely: gandalf [10.0.0.1] 688 (?) open REALM-R

Re: [techtalk] Linux and routers

2001-04-03 Thread Kath
To my knowledge, the machine does not have any routing protocols on it. Still would it share it? (It is Debian 2.2 btw, and if there is no .deb for it, this kid I'm working with would have no idea how to install it from tarball) - Kath - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Karl-Heinz Zimmer
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 19:18, Eva Fenrich wrote: .. > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 04:55:52PM +0200, Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 April 2001 03:10, jennyw wrote: > > > Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML > > > (non-WYSIWYG or WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for

Re: [techtalk] Linux and routers

2001-04-03 Thread James A . Sutherland
On Tue, 03 Apr 2001 14:32:53 -0400, you wrote: >To my knowledge, the machine does not have any routing protocols on it. It certainly shouldn't be running one at the moment - it's not a router. Just install the appropriate daemon, and it will be... >Still would it share it? (It is Debian 2.2 btw

Re: [techtalk] Linux and routers

2001-04-03 Thread Kath
> Hang on... if this person can't install a tarball, how on earth do you > expect him/her to configure routing properly?!?! Obviously individuals > differ, but I'd have thought routing was a great deal more complex > than installing a tarball... Here is the issue: We have a school web server wit

[techtalk] cdrecord

2001-04-03 Thread Raven Brooke
I am having an odd problem with this, hope someone can help. I am able to record/erase cdrw's just fine, but after one or two successful sessions I get a segfault(see below) unless i *reboot*. After a reboot, the same command works fine. Any idea where to begin debugging this? Thanks! Raven

Re: [techtalk] port purposes...

2001-04-03 Thread Laurel Fan
Finding out what process is actually using the port might help. Assuming this is your machine that you're trying to find out about, and you have root, you can use 'lsof' (LiSt Open Files) to check what has things open. Something listening on a tcp port will show up like: inetd 172 root

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread jennyw
Wow, it looks like Bluefish and Emacs look like the most popular ones out there. I must admit that I've been doing my best to avoid Emacs ever since my first horrible encounter with it eight years ago. I guess I should get over my fear of meta keys and counter-intuitive default key-mappings (of c

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Vinnie
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote: > Just take vim ! > > http://www.vim.org > > Pro: vim is extremely fast - once have learned how to use the keyboard > > Con: (sorry, I don't know of any con's) Con: the learning curve goes straight up :) that said, it's worth learning, for

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread jennyw
I always thought vim was just another vi with a few extras. I guess it's got more than a few extras ... I'm installing it now. It'll be nice to try something familiar ... Jen - Original Message - From: "Eva Fenrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Karl-Heinz Zimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EM

Re: [techtalk] cdrecord

2001-04-03 Thread Samuel Tesla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A good place to start looking would be the driver cdrecord is using. If you have a squirelly drive, it may need a special driver to get optimal usage. You should peruse the cdrecord website at: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling/cdrecord.html

Re: [techtalk] port purposes...

2001-04-03 Thread Walt
Installed lsof; lsof | grep LISTEN and it shows that ports 659, 678, 683, and 688 belong to incarnations of nfs. Neato, gotta say that was exactly the type of thing I was looking for! Thanks much all, esp. Laurel! Walt -~ A man about to speak the truth should keep one foot in the

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Anthony Russello
If you want a great all purpose editor for console that is robust and light, try using jed. I currently use if for perl, html, and C++. It does syntax highlighting, and in the menus, you can specify custom colours hsould you so desire. I've been using that editor since I started in Linux, some

Re: [techtalk] gdm returning error mesgs

2001-04-03 Thread Marie Fischer
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Kristin Ziel wrote: > I rebooted my machine the other day, and now gdm returns error messages > and won't start. i think i know this ... with reboot intervals longer than 3 weeks, i just don't remember everything i changed in between. just some odd thoughts (i don't use gdm

[techtalk] Linux jre - oracle 8i problem

2001-04-03 Thread Mary E. Mulderrig
Hi: I am hoping someone can help me before I lose my mind trying to beat this machine into submission ;-) I am running Mandrake 7.0 on a bi-processor pentium box. I just installed Java (jdk 1.3.0) in /usr/local/java. When I am in root I can use it fine. I made the necessary changes to my PATH and

RE: [techtalk] Linux jre - oracle 8i problem

2001-04-03 Thread Davida Schiff
Title: RE: [techtalk] Linux jre - oracle 8i problem Hi Mary, I did a google search on your error message (CreateOUIProcess(): -1) & came up with this link: http://www.linuxvoodoo.org/howto/HOWTO/Oracle-8-HOWTO/Oracle-8-HOWTO-3.shtml HTH, Davida -Original Message- From: Mary E.

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:13:35PM -0700 or thereabouts, jennyw wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Rebecca J. Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > EMACS!!! > > it is very NONwysiwyg. but it color codes tags and has an option you > > can activate to have it autoload in the browser every

[techtalk] Yet another specific question.

2001-04-03 Thread Mary Gardiner
Hi, Is anyone familiar with the via82cxxx_audio driver on the 2.4.* kernels, or sound drivers in general. Basically, this is a 2.4.2 kernel. The driver starts correctly on startup about two thirds of the time. The other times I discover it isn't work when I try to run mpg123. modprobe via82cxxx

Vim and regular expressions (was Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?)

2001-04-03 Thread Mary Gardiner
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:24:13PM -0700, jennyw wrote: > I always thought vim was just another vi with a few extras. I guess it's got > more than a few extras ... I'm installing it now. It'll be nice to try > something familiar ... > > Jen Some of the features include syntax highlighting, suppo

[techtalk] How about SGML editors? (was: Any good HTML editors for Linux?)

2001-04-03 Thread jenn
jennyw wrote: > Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG or > WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for Linux? Pros and cons would be great, > and also whether they require KDE or Gnome (I run Gnome usually). Have you tried Amaya? Available from the W3C (http://www.w

Re: [techtalk] cdrecord

2001-04-03 Thread Raven Brooke
This is a wonderful site, lots of good links for advanced topics there also, but unfortunately nothing like my problem is described there. : / As for the driver, it is the ide-scsi emulation driver it should be using, as described in the How-to at http://www.nber.org/cdrecord.html, so i think t

[techtalk] Preferred e-mail server setups?

2001-04-03 Thread jennyw
I'm going to setup an e-mail server at home since my ISP has issues from time to time. I was wondering if anyone wanted to offer suggestions on a setup. One issue I deal with a lot is accessing e-mail from several locations. My current idea is to setup postfix as the MTA, cyrus-deliver as the MD

Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?

2001-04-03 Thread Julie
From: jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I always thought vim was just another vi with a few extras. I guess it's got > more than a few extras ... I'm installing it now. It'll be nice to try > something familiar ... Vim is the evil spawn of Satan. It looks enough like vi to fool you into believing it'