Wow, it looks like Bluefish and Emacs look like the most popular ones out
there. I must admit that I've been doing my best to avoid Emacs ever since
my first horrible encounter with it eight years ago. I guess I should get
over my fear of meta keys and counter-intuitive default key-mappings (of
course, things may have changed in eight years -- the syntax highlighting is
new). I'll also check out Bluefish and maybe even Quanta.
Thanks all!
Jen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rebecca J. Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jennyw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux?
> EMACS!!!
> it is very NONwysiwyg. but it color codes tags and has an option you
> can activate to have it autoload in the browser every time you save.
> i find it easy to work with. smart people like my husband configure it
> to complete file names and that sort of cool stuff. telsa probably
> knows how to do that. that is too complicated for me.
> but emacs for html and sgml is the BEST!
>
> _______________________________________________
> techtalk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
>
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
