I use xemacs for development and it's great. It highlights syntax, it auto-indents, and it's got a bunch of quick tags. It is much larger than Vi, but for development it's worth it. -Tricia On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, jennyw wrote: |Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for good HTML (non-WYSIWYG or |WYSIWYG that supports non-WYSIWYG) for Linux? Pros and cons would be great, |and also whether they require KDE or Gnome (I run Gnome usually). | |Thanks! | |Jen _______________________________________________ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
- [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux? jennyw
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux? Charl Pretorius
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux? Karl-Heinz Zimmer
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Lin... Eva Fenrich
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for... Karl-Heinz Zimmer
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for... jennyw
- Vim and regular expressions (was Re:... Mary Gardiner
- Re: Vim and regular expressions... Conor Daly
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors... Julie
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Lin... Vinnie
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux? Tricia Bowen
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux? Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux? Rebecca J. Walter
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux? Christian MacAuley
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Lin... John Elliott
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux? James A . Sutherland
- [techtalk] How about SGML editors? (was: Any goo... jenn
- Re: [techtalk] Any good HTML editors for Linux? Anthony Russello