[SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

Aaron Young wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Bryan Hoover wrote: > > > Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're DCC is > > hitting with SA? > > DCC is working fine for me. I have three spams out of eight that arrived > in the last 30 minutes that have a DCC match. Yes. Prese

RE: [SAtalk] DCC incidence

> Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're > DCC is hitting with SA? A quick grep from last month's logfile reveals DCC hits on 3248 emails out of 4365 quarantined => a good 74% -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GSM +358-40-767 8282 Oy Arrak Software Ab http://www.arrak.fi ---

[SAtalk] Re: DCC incidence

Kai, Nice, informative whitepaper (http://www.arrak.fi/files/arska_white_paper.pdf) on SA oriented spam handling. Bryan Kai Risku wrote: > > > Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're > > DCC is hitting with SA? > > A quick grep from last month's logfile reveals DCC hits > o

[SAtalk] spamc (+mysql) user setting looking at local.cf !!

Hello, sorry to say that this is not the first post of mine to show a bug in spamc with mysql support. Spamc with mysql support have to duplicate the same set of filtering rules/setting on .cf file from mysql before getting the user-based rules works. I have to conditionally restart spamassassinc

[SAtalk] empty e-mails

Hi I want mark e-mails with empty body as spam. Ho can I do this? -- Korchmenuk Nickolay --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code?

[SAtalk] Save user rules in mysql?

Hello, Spamc can read user preference from mysql. This is working fine. However, how can I store the user filtering rules / setting on mysql and let spamc to read it? I have tried insert some rules into mysql but failed. Any one can help? Patrick Tsang

Re: [SAtalk] Penalty for small emails

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 12:55:16AM -0500, Aaron Young wrote: > Has anyone experimented with applying a penalty for small emails? With > bayes or without I always seem to get a mail or two in my inbox. They're > all pretty small, under 1k for the message body. SA finds spammy stuff in > them b

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin -r failed to remove SA markup

On December 01, 2003 01:06 am, Aaron Young wrote: > On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Pedro Sam wrote: > > > > My messages are in mbox format, so I report/learn spam by: > > > > "formail -s spamassassin -r < SPAM_MBOX" > > > > But when I dump the contents of the bayes database, I found many tokens > > unique

[SAtalk] Re: Another Procmail question

On 29 Nov 2003 mairhtin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I asked this on the sendmail usenet group and was basically > told to flip off, they don't do procmail. How RUDE! :) And the person directed followups to comp.mail.misc and I posted a reply, which was in fact posted to comp.mail.misc, and w

[SAtalk] RE: [RD] Ideas

Hi Bob, Sorry for the long delay in my response. I have taken a little break. Thanks for running the rules through masscheck against your corpus. I have no where near the corpus that you do and find the testing methodology in your first and second run, and results very interesting. Thanks again

[SAtalk] Filtering after Spamassassin

Hi, I'm using qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin and they are working great. Now I would like to introduce some more filtering, such as moving tagged items to a separate mailbox/mailboxes (depending on recipient), etc. Can this be done in SA ? Any advice ?? Thanks ---

Re: [SAtalk] Re: An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

"Logan Harbaugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had to locate the RPM on the RedHat disks, install the package, > then go back and then install the dependencies that hadn't been > installed in the first place. Then I had to go through the > documentation and see what files needed to be changed an

Re: [SAtalk] Evil rules, popcorn, etc too much?

>> The FP rate for all of these is just about zero. > >Has anyone run these on a large corpus to see how it goes? > >(I've seen no mass-check-style output for these rules.) > here are the rules on my corpus... about 5k spam and ham.. 10k total. http://engelken.net/masses/testrule.BLACKHAIR.txt.ou

[SAtalk] Curious how this works

I was looking at the contents of a piece of spam this morning, when I saw something I've never seen before. I'm sure that its been around for some time, but I'm interested to know how this actually works. My guess is that the second address is the one used, but I'm not certain why it works. Is i

[SAtalk] Installing DCC after the fact RH 9

I have SA 2.6 with razor2 running.   I want to get DCC working as well.  I am having a problem getting DCC going.  Does anyone have a resource to point to to help with installing and integrating DCC?   Thanks,   Bill NicholsSystems Admin

[SAtalk] Cannot open bayes

Hello all, I have collected 1000+ emails to being training SA-Learn. I am recieving the error "Cannot open Bayes_path C:\documents and settings . etc. Is there a way to start from scratch or reinstall SA-Learn module? Thanks Josh --- Th

Re: [SAtalk] Curious how this works

Fred Bacon said: > I was looking at the contents of a piece of spam this morning, when I > saw something I've never seen before. I'm sure that its been around for > some time, but I'm interested to know how this actually works. > > My guess is that the second address is the one used, but I'm not c

[SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

Hi all, Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to do it. However these same people don't mention how this can be done, so do any of you nice people out there know how to delete / reject tagged spam with a score of greater than say 15. My guess looking at the docs is tha

Re: [SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

Robert Harrison wrote: Hi all, Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to do it. Well I guess lots of helpful people are wrong then. However these same people don't mention how this can be done, Thats because SA can't do it so do any of you nice people out there know h

Re: [SAtalk] Similar anti SPAM like this but, for Windows ?

Hello, Please use this reference for installing SA on Win32. http://www.openhandhome.com/howtosa260.html Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. http://www.i-is.com/ Efren Pedroza wrote: > Thanks for everyone that answer this question, I'm really newbie on > this mater, I did

Re: [SAtalk] Re: An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 02:39:29PM +, Graham Murray wrote: > "Logan Harbaugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I had to locate the RPM on the RedHat disks, install the package, > > then go back and then install the dependencies that hadn't been > > installed in the first place. Then I had to

RE: [SAtalk] Evil rules, popcorn, etc too much?

Hi Dallas Thanks for posting your tests. Bob found the same type thing on the weeds set when he ran the rules against his monster corpus. I realize those hit on ham, but for the most part, they don’t hit it hard. There were however some emails that weeds did push over the threshold. I tag at 7.0

Re: [SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

Well this is not the best place to post this message to but ;-) I'm using qmail-scanner to call SA SA works beautifully Now I would like to reject or at least delete SPAM taged at > 15 Really this is back to qmail-scanner or indeed qmail but if anyone is in the know I would love to hear. r -

[SAtalk] bayes

Does anyone know where I can find more info on bayes? I have it turned on in my local.cf. But Im sure there is more to setting it up! ha ha ha ha Thanks Dan --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net h

[SAtalk] Re: Delete Spam

Rich H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now the boring questions. > Has anyone on this list successfully written a .procmailrc file that > will delete all tagged spam (send to /dev/null)? I don't enable SA > for all of my users only a few, and have been watching the email that > is getting tagged as s

Re: [SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

On Dec 1, 2003 at 16:30, Robert Harrison wrote: >Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to do it. False. >However these same people don't mention how this can be done, > >so do any of you nice people out there know how to delete / reject >tagged spam with a score of great

[SAtalk] Re: How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

On 1 Dec 2003 Robert Harrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to do it. I have never seen anyone say that. > so do any of you nice people out there know how to delete / reject > tagged spam with a score of greater than say 15. This i

RE: [SAtalk] Evil rules, popcorn, etc too much?

> -Original Message- > From: Dallas L. Engelken > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Evil rules, popcorn, etc too much? > > > >> The FP rate for all of these is just about zero. > > > >Has anyone run these on a large corpus to see how

RE: [SAtalk] Evil rules, popcorn, etc too much?

> -Original Message- > From: jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 11:05 AM > To: Dallas L. Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Evil rules, popcorn, etc too much? > > > Hi Dallas > Thanks for posting your tests. Bob found the same type thin

Re: [SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

--On Monday, December 01, 2003 4:30 PM + Robert Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Lots of helpful people say this can be done by configuring SA to do it. Really? Where? > However these same people don't mention how this can be done, Because it can't. > so do any of you ni

Re: [SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

We need to know how you integrate SA with your mail server. Procmail, milter, etc. Thanks! Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. http://www.i-is.com/ Robert Harrison wrote: > Hi all, > > Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to do > it. > > Howeve

Re: [SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

--On Monday, December 01, 2003 5:06 PM + Robert Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well this is not the best place to post this message to but ;-) > > I'm using qmail-scanner to call SA > SA works beautifully > > Now I would like to reject or at least delete SPAM taged at > 15 > > Real

Re: [SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

At 11:30 AM 12/1/2003, Robert Harrison wrote: Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to do it. However these same people don't mention how this can be done, so do any of you nice people out there know how to delete / reject tagged spam with a score of greater than say 15.

Re: [SAtalk] Re: An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

Graham Murray wrote: > Would it not have been a lot simpler to just done > > #perl -MCPAN -e shell; > cpan> install Mail::SpamAssassin > > which is the 'standard' way of installing almost any Perl based > package? Among other reasons, it doesn't play nicely with package managers. Debian and the

[SAtalk] A special new website

<>

Re: [SAtalk] bayes

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:31:56AM -0800, Dan wrote: > Does anyone know where I can find more info on bayes? I have it turned on in > my local.cf. But Im sure there is more to setting it up! ha ha ha ha "man sa-learn" may give you some help. :) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "When all else fails

RE: [SAtalk] Re: How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 1 Dec 2003 Robert Harrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> >> Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to do >> it. > > I have never seen anyone say that. I've seen mention of it many times, but this is not the point. > > >> so do any of yo

Re: [SAtalk] bayes

At 01:31 PM 12/1/2003, Dan wrote: Does anyone know where I can find more info on bayes? I have it turned on in my local.cf. But Im sure there is more to setting it up! ha ha ha ha You need to manually train it.. see man sa-learn. (yes, SA does autolearn some email, but you can't rely entirely on

Re: [SAtalk] empty e-mails

At 04:59 AM 12/1/2003, Korchmenuk Nickolay wrote: I want mark e-mails with empty body as spam. Ho can I do this? That would be pretty difficult to do in SA using a rule. The big problem is that SA's "body" ruletype also includes the subject line text (this avoids massive duplication of rules).

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering after Spamassassin

At 09:08 AM 12/1/2003, Vee Persaud wrote: I'm using qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin and they are working great. Now I would like to introduce some more filtering, such as moving tagged items to a separate mailbox/mailboxes (depending on recipient), etc. Can this be done in SA ? Any advice

RE: [SAtalk] Re: How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.x x

> > so do any of you nice people out there know how to delete / reject > > tagged spam with a score of greater than say 15. > > This is described in the SA documentation and lots of other > places, for example here: > > > > If you can't figure

[SAtalk] spamc -d setting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am confused about how the -d setting works in spamc. Can I set two different domains for the domain setting in spamc without using DNS for the two spamd servers? I was think I could have the setting like: spamc -d primary.spamd.com, secondary.sp

Re: [SAtalk] bayes

thanks guys! I took a peek, and I guess my question is this.. How do I train on what is spam, if the spam has already been relayed onto the exchange server ( my setup is a SMTP gateway ) I dont have the spam messages. Any ideas? Do I have to get all the users to send there spam to me? Thank

[SAtalk] Rules Modification /Content Filtering Results

Hi Everybody, This is a long post but i would REALLY appreciate your input, criticism, flaming, and what not. I'm working on integrating spamassassin into our own spam filtering mechanism. Currently, with a score of 5 or greater we modify the subject line to indicate the spammishness of the me

[SAtalk] I see allot of bantering about procmail/maildrop

Ok I see allot of other talking about procmail but not many talking about maildrop. I'm not here to say which one is better I dont really care but I prefer the syntax to maildrop and have put much time into a set of filters. To this end i figure others may also gain some help from seeing my .ma

Re: [SAtalk] How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 01 December 2003 09:53, Matt Kettler wrote: > to quote and trim a bit from Rich H's post on Sat, 29 Nov 2003 "Re: > [SAtalk] Delete Spam" he suggests this procmailrc: > > :0fw: spamc.lock > * < 256000 > | spamc > > # Alternatively to delet

RE: [SAtalk] Re: How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:spamassassin- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Campbell > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > > x.xx > > > > so do any of

Re: [SAtalk] A special new website

And the point of the mail with the attached jpg would be.? - C --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and he

[SAtalk] SA questions

I have some questions: 1)I see a lot about "special" rules on this list, but I don't know whether they would be useful for me. I get about 500 emails a day, about 300 of which are mailing lists and about 200 of which are spam. I use SA and bayes, and I am still seeing about 20 - 30 spams s

RE: [SAtalk] bayes

> -Original Message- > From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 14:22 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matt Kettler > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes > > > I took a peek, and I guess my question is this.. How do I > train on what > is spam, if the spam has already be

Re: [SAtalk] RE: [RD] Ideas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Larry Gilson writes: >Hi Bob, > >Sorry for the long delay in my response. I have taken a little break. >Thanks for running the rules through masscheck against your corpus. I have >no where near the corpus that you do and find the testing methodology

[SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA

Hi All RH8.0 with SA2.60 installed as sitewide. Procmailrc is handling spam for all users and creates ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs ok. Now 1 customer has decided he does not like spam filtered emails (cannot please all). tried |/usr/bin/spamassasin -x in procmailrc since i read no user_prefs no s

RE: [SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA

all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should do it. -Original Message- From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA Hi All RH8.0 with SA2.60 installed as sitewide. Procma

RE: [SAtalk] SA questions

> -Original Message- > From: Chuck Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] SA questions > > > I have some questions: > > 1)I see a lot about "special" rules on this list, but I don't > know whether > th

Re: [SAtalk] empty e-mails

At 04:59 AM 12/1/2003, Korchmenuk Nickolay wrote: > I want mark e-mails with empty body as spam. > Ho can I do this? In .procmailrc: :0B: * ! ^[^ ] spam That's a caret, a space, and a tab between the square brackets. --- This SF.ne

Re: [SAtalk] Rules Modification /Content Filtering Results

> I'm working on integrating spamassassin into our own spam filtering > mechanism. Currently, with a score of 5 or greater we modify the > subject line to indicate the spammishness of the message... with a > score of 10 or greater we delete the email automatically and do not > deliver it to the use

Re: [SAtalk] spamc -d setting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 01 December 2003 12:54, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 02:26 PM 12/1/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote: > >I am confused about how the -d setting works in spamc. Can I set two > >different domains for the domain setting in spamc without using DNS for t

[SAtalk] Puzzled

SA works fine catching Spams, but when I look at the headers after passing through spamc filter, no parameters, there are no headers added by SA! What am I missing? I use Evolution and SA2.60 installed from CPAN on a stand alone RH9 with all the updates -- Sincerely: Masoud Pajoh [EMAIL PROTECT

[SAtalk] [uninitialized value]

Hello, I have installed Spamassasin 2.60, Qmail-Scanner 1.20 Final, and Razor2, sdk and build package all have work fine, so, i'm finding this error message on my syslog : Dec 1 22:25:44 Linux spamd[1427]: connection from Linux [127.0.0.1] at port 1053 Dec 1 22:25:44 Linux spamd[1468]: Can't exe

[SAtalk] Evilrules update and some more notes.

I waited until after the holiday to update evilrules. Some interesting notes: I've since implemented 3 DNSRBLs on my MTA level. I'm getting MUCH fewer spams, which means a smaller corpus. This also means these tend to now be VERY evil rules :) As they have worked to get past 3 of the most popular

Re: [SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA

--On Monday, December 01, 2003 8:25 PM + Obantec Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Procmailrc is handling spam for all users and creates > ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs ok. > > Now 1 customer has decided he does not like spam filtered emails (cannot > please all). Just checked "man procmailr

RE: [SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA

If you use amavisd-new ans you have a line like read_hash(\%spam_lovers, '/var/amavisd/spam_lovers'); in you amavisd.conf you can just add the persons email address to that text file. -Original Message- From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:25

[SAtalk] Re: Installing DCC after the fact RH 9

I'll give you a dollar if you turn off html in your email composer :). There's right much documentation on the DCC web site: http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/ - installation link just a bit down the page. Basically, you need to install the client program - dccproc.  Instructions on the site

Re: [SAtalk] spamc -d setting

At 04:12 PM 12/1/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote: If i understand this now. By using DNS then one server will be used for the most of the time because it will want to use the IP address that it got from the first lookup of the DNS address? adding -H will cause it to randomize the order of the result

Re: [SAtalk] Puzzled

Masoud Pajoh said: > SA works fine catching Spams, but when I look at the headers after > passing through spamc filter, no parameters, there are no headers added > by SA! > What am I missing? > > I use Evolution and SA2.60 installed from CPAN on a stand alone RH9 with > all the updates Masoud, Whe

[SAtalk] RE: Re: How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

On 1 Dec 2003 Vee Persaud ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> so do any of you nice people out there know how to delete / reject > >> tagged spam with a score of greater than say 15. > > > > This is described in the SA documentation and lots of other > > places, for example here: > > > >

Re: [SAtalk] Rules Modification /Content Filtering Results

At 02:41 PM 12/1/2003, Arlo Gilbert wrote: The same goes for me for mortgages.. i dont have one and dont need one. so anything about mortgages, home financing etc is definitely spam for me. Ahh, but do you want to automatically declare any email which mentions such things to be spam? Do you have

Re: [SAtalk] Rules Modification /Content Filtering Results

My grandmother. She recieves only emails from family. So for example if the standard spamassassin ruleset were implemented and somebody sent her UBE about free porn but the message did not score enough points to be "flagged", then the email would get through. This is spamassassin doing it's job

Re: [SAtalk] Rules Modification /Content Filtering Results

<--- snip > My Question/Concerns Does anybody have any ideas about how this would affect the bayesian learning system? If i suddenly changed my mind about liking porn one day and decided to block all porn, would I need to clear out my bayesian learning database so that it would begin t

Re: [SAtalk] Re: An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

On 12/1/03 11:39 PM, "Graham Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (B (B> "Logan Harbaugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: (B> (B>> I had to locate the RPM on the RedHat disks, install the package, (B>> then go back and then install the dependencies that hadn't been (B>> installed in the first plac

[SAtalk] Timeout message

I am using SA 2.60 under OS X with AmaVis-new. Today, I began to receive several SA TIMED OUT errors in my log. One is quoted below. Any ideas what this points to? Dec 1 17:31:02 KenG3.local. amavisd[2098]: (02098-10) SA TIMED OUT, backtrace: at /opt/perl/lib/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssa

Re: [SAtalk] empty e-mails

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:02:35 -0500 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 04:59 AM 12/1/2003, Korchmenuk Nickolay wrote: > >I want mark e-mails with empty body as spam. > >Ho can I do this? > > That would be pretty difficult to do in SA using a rule. > > The big problem is that SA's "body"

Re: [SAtalk] SA questions

Hello Chuck, Monday, December 1, 2003, 11:55:28 AM, you wrote: CC> I have some questions: CC> 1)I see a lot about "special" rules on this list, but I don't know CC> whether they would be useful for me. I get about 500 emails a day, CC> about 300 of which are mailing lists and about 200 of whi

Re: [SAtalk] Rules Modification /Content Filtering Results

My grandmother. She recieves only emails from family. So for example if the standard spamassassin ruleset were implemented and somebody sent her UBE about free porn but the message did not score enough points to be "flagged", then the email would get through. This is spamassassin doing it's job

[SAtalk] Re: hit-frequencies (was: Ideas/RD)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Menschel writes: >Hello Justin, > >Monday, December 1, 2003, 10:19:32 AM, you wrote: > >JM> Robert, BTW -- > >JM> were you saying previously that you couldn't get hit-frequencies >JM> working? Could you remind me what was up there? I might be

Re: [SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA

Hi, On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Obantec Support wrote: > Hi All > > RH8.0 with SA2.60 installed as sitewide. > > Procmailrc is handling spam for all users and creates > ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs ok. > > Now 1 customer has decided he does not like spam filtered emails (cannot > please all). > > tried |/u

Re: [SAtalk] Re: An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

--On Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:57 AM +0900 alan premselaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > vi ~/.procmail (and add appropriate config lines to call spamassassin or > spamc) > chkconfig spamd on > service spamd start Instead of chkconfig, one could also use ntsysv (console graphics) or tksysv (X

[SAtalk] [RD] Proposed Rules -- Received

Last week I proposed some header rules that might be suitable for a future distribution. Thanks to those who gave feedback. Continuing this process, I've identified some header rules that might be suitable. I'd appreciate any testing/feedback on these: header RM_hr_HeloMail Received =

Re: [SAtalk] Re: An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:20:42 -0800 Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Granted, that first one can be tricky if you don't RTFM. i'm pretty sure > > even the SpamAssassin RPM includes readme files. not sure where they are? rpm has many nifty features. One of them is the list option, wh

[SAtalk] Announce: CMOScript version 0.00.0.0001g available for download (REPOST)

Greetings all! (I'm reposting this announcement as the original seems to have gotten lost in the SourceForge scheduled downtime) CMOScript version 0.00.0.0001g is now available for download. CMOScript (Chris's Mediocre Obfuscation Script) generates rules for SpamAssassin that match on obfuscated

[SAtalk] Re: [RD] Proposed Rules -- Misc Headers

Last week I proposed some header rules that might be suitable for a future distribution. Thanks to those who gave feedback. Continuing this process, I've identified some miscellaneous header rules that might be suitable. I'd appreciate any testing/feedback on these: header RM_hxl_ForgedIndy

Re: [SAtalk] Re: How to config Spam Assassin to reject spam > x.xx

On 1 Dec 2003 Robert Harrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to > do it. Hello Robert, What you are looking for, it seems, is a way to reject messages at the SMTP level, right? Indeed, recent comments to the contrary despite, this can