Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin blocking by words

At 05:12 PM 11/13/03 +1100, you wrote: Can SA block messages that contain certain words in the /header/body/subject ? Yes.. you can create a custom rule for a given word and assign it a ridiculously high score. Of course, procmail does all that too. One of the benefits of SA is having the flexi

Re: [SAtalk] help (how to unsubscribe from a sourceforge list 101)

At 10:27 PM 11/12/03 -0500, you wrote: Please remove me from the mailing list... Thanks in advance. Every message posted to the list has the information you need to unsubscribe yourself in the headers... List-Unsubscribe: , Go ther

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin blocking by words

Zlatko Hristov wrote: Can SA block messages that contain certain words in the /header/body/subject ? Thank you. Zlatko. Yes =P --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest deve

Re: [SAtalk] management GUI

> > Further I created accounts for all these "spamboxes". As a result every > > user has two mailboxes: his "normal" mailbox, e. g. peter and a second, > > the"spambox", e. g. peter_spam. > > Now a user may (if he misses a mail) or may not look at his spambox to > > control whether Spamassassin i

[SAtalk] how to 'redirect' messages for autolearn with various MUAs?

Sirs, could you share your workarounds for forwarding messages to sa-learn with various MUAs ? At this moment, need to know is there any way to redirect messages with Kmail without adding oddy "by way of [user] [EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Or such addings doesn't affect sa-learn efficient too much ? -

[SAtalk] Exchange 2000 + SpamAssassin + Postfix

Hello list I have successfully installed spamassassin on my linux server which runs postfix as mta. Our Exchange 2000 server pops the emails from the linux server which stands in the dmz. spamassassin recognizes spam very well and adds the X-SPAM tag. Now i am able to set rules in my outlook to

[SAtalk] Re: Off topic: Threads

Terry Milnes wrote: > This list seems to be worse than most though, go figure . More newbies here than elsewhere? BTW I see the thread stealing more and more lately. Bob pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[SAtalk] SecuritySage spam filters and Postfix/SpamAssassin integration

--On Friday, November 07, 2003 12:42 AM -0500 Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You might want to look at SecuritySage for some configuration details. http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce.html I just got some mail bounced by an ISP using this setup and after reviewing the detail

[SAtalk] SA 2.60-1 installation

I am installing 2.60-1 via RPM packages on a redhat 7.2 system, and running into dependency problems. Putting all three packages (spamassassin, perl-Mail-SpamAssassin and spamassassin tools) on the same command line still gave dependency errors, so I installed those 3 packages with nodeps. Errors

[SAtalk] Changing a default message

how do i go about changing a default message that SA sends out.. ie.. Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If

Re: [SAtalk] Changing a default message

On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 12:58, Johnno wrote: > how do i go about changing a default message that SA sends out.. ie.. > > Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1", has identified this > incoming email as possible spam. The original message > has been attached to this so you can view it (

RE: [SAtalk] Changing a default message

Man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf Look for "report" Isn´t there a FAQ somewhere ??? Surely this question must be answered there ?? - Rikhardur -Original Message- From: Johnno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 November, 2003 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA

RE: [SAtalk] Exchange 2000 + SpamAssassin + Postfix

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Guentert Matthias > > I have successfully installed spamassassin on my linux server which > runs postfix as mta. Our Exchange 2000 server pops the emails from the > linux server which stands in th

RE: [SAtalk] SecuritySage spam filters and Postfix/SpamAssassin integration

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Kenneth Porter > > http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce.html > > I just got some mail bounced by an ISP using this setup and > after reviewing the details, it looks like the system is se

Re: [SAtalk] management GUI

Margit Meyer wrote: Further I created accounts for all these "spamboxes". As a result every user has two mailboxes: his "normal" mailbox, e. g. peter and a second, the"spambox", e. g. peter_spam. Now a user may (if he misses a mail) or may not look at his spambox to control whether Spamassassin is

RE: [SAtalk] SecuritySage spam filters and Postfix/SpamAssassin i ntegration

Your point is well taken with respect to Postfix smtpd restrictions. The degree to which each administrator uses them is usually some combination of personal preference and policy. My personal philosophy is to minimize the use of smtp header and body checks while enforcing the client, helo, sende

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin blocking by words

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:51:11AM -0500, Edward Shornock wrote: > >Can SA block messages that contain certain words in the > >/header/body/subject ? > > > >Thank you. > > > >Zlatko. > > Yes =P Slight correction -- SA won't block any messages, but it can have a rule to match header/body/subjec

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60-1 installation

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:15:10AM -0500, Gorm Jensen wrote: > Doesn't the perl-Mail-SpamAssassin package contain all of the > dependencies required by spamassassin? No, it contains the Mail::SpamAssassin perl module. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Blame San Andreas - its all his fault. pgp000

RE: [SAtalk] scoring system and values...

Thanks Chris! Good to know someone else has a similar experience and thinks this way too! I am experimenting with Bayes and so far, it does seem to help. I have been able to get rid of some custom rules that were creating FPs. BTW, does Columbia University have any incentive to reduce spam more

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn via email

on 11/6/03 10:50 AM, Upwood, Jim at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We are set up the same way. This is what I do: > > Have a folder called "ham" in my outlook > I periodically drag ham to that folder > I then have an outlook rule that I only run on demand > This rule is set to "redirect" all message

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60-1 installation

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Gorm Jensen wrote: [...] > Doesn't the perl-Mail-SpamAssassin package contain all of the > dependencies required by spamassassin? > > I wish to add DNS capability, but perl-Net-DNS requires > perl-Digest-HMAC-MD5. I found a package called perl-Digest and > installed it, but i

RE: [SAtalk] Exchange 2000 + SpamAssassin + Postfix

I have a thought that might work but is high maintenance. First, dump the POP3 connector. Second, setup your Postfix server as a relay using relay_recipient_maps. Using Procmail, or similar, you could forward tagged messages to a Public Folder setup for each user. Public Folders -Possible Spa

[SAtalk] Upgrade from source to CPAN?

Anything that needs to be watched out for when upgrading from source install to CPAN? I usually do source, but figured I would try CPAN for SA, as it has worked great for other packages. Any files I need to make sure are deleted? Any little ones hiding in the shadows to bite me in the bum? :) Als

[SAtalk] Productivity...long...

Hi all, SA and this list is great, here is some reading material... I must be lucky, and don't have the problem of 2 mailboxes, we re-route the spam to a single spam box on the exchange server, only accessible by 2 users, the IT director and myself. If someone "complains" about not gettin

[SAtalk] Run spamd as root ?

I have found that spamd will not use razor on my system because of permissions. Is it safe to run spamd as root? ++ Mike Yrabedra (President) 323 Incorporated Home of MacDock.com, MacAgent.com and MacShirt.com +--

[SAtalk] FROM_OFFERS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Had my first serious FP in a while yesterday -- promotional email from United Air Lines' Mileage Plus program to a registered member. Email was sent from > United News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and therefore matched a very high-scoring FROM_OFFERS rule in

RE: [SAtalk] scoring system and values...

I have to agree even without Bayes! I have spammy legit mail that isn't business related get flagged a lot. It is a real PITA because it effects my evilrules. Same thing, users don't uncheck the "send me all sorts of junk from your network partners" when they sign up for something. I've had conve

[SAtalk] instalation problems

i dont know where is the problem , but i install the spam assassing , instal the razor , the config file , but is like is was not there i think my problem resides on the link with procmail      any one can help me   regards ???

RE: [SAtalk] OT: Administrivia: List mom, please disable the boun cing thewizard.net subscriber.

I've only received one of these. I find that VERY interesting! openrbl.org shows no hits on that IP. I found some more interesting info! Stay with me! The bounce is from thewizard.net which looks like: IP address: 199.85.4.55 Host name: thewizard.net Alias: acquired.pool.com Registrant: Dav

[SAtalk] Bad domain list

Does someone have a bad domain list they would like to share? Or better yet what are the opinions on using a bad domain list? I have a bad spammer (email address) list, and it seems to be working well. Over time it will take some tuning, but im blocking only about 60% of my spam. (what would you s

RE: [SAtalk] Bad domain list

Check the link in my sig for both access lists, and evilrules file. > -Original Message- > From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:11 PM > To: SATalk list > Subject: [SAtalk] Bad domain list > > > Does someone have a bad domain list they would like to

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

--On Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:36 AM -0600 maximo lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i dont know where is the problem , but i install the spam assassing , > instal the razor , the config file , but is like is was not there i think > my problem resides on the link with procmail > > an

Re: [SAtalk] Resolving and hat-checking spamvertised URLs...

Florian, I just wanted to share my success using your hosted_in rbl rules. So far, it's hit about 2 spam per day on my primary email account. One of those would have been a false negative, had it not been for your mod :) Thanks! -- Chris Thielen Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfus

[SAtalk] A new way to circumvent local RBLs?

I received 4 of the emails like the one addressed in the log file below. I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] blocked via sendmail's virtusers file. Notice the To: is to=<00-ALLBouncesOnly0603-0-4999.txt:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Somehow this is circumventing my local virtusers, then the first part is be

Re: [SAtalk] help

--On Wednesday, November 12, 2003 10:27 PM -0500 "Mueller, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please remove me from the mailing list... > Thanks in advance. In the headers of every message... List-Unsubscribe: ,

[SAtalk] Re: FROM_AND_TO_SAME Rule does not seem to work

On 12 Nov 2003, at 13:09, Gerhardt, Scott wrote:   ## Forged CAMI Header   header   __CLAIMS_FROM_CAMI    From  =~   /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i   header   __NOT_CAMI_IP Received  !~   /\[206\.252\.197\.\d+\]/   meta FORGED_CAMI_RCVD  (__CLAIMS_FROM_CAMI && __NOT_CAMI_IP)   describe F

[SAtalk] Added Rules to local.cf, are they working?

I have SA running under freebsd: $ ls -ls /usr/local/etc/mail total 0 0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 22 Nov 11 09:53 spamassassin -> /etc/mail/spamassassin $ ls -ls /etc/mail/spamassassin/ total 24 22 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 21544 Nov 13 10:00 local.cf I've recently added a bunch of rules to SA

Re: [SAtalk] Run spamd as root ?

At 09:43 AM 11/13/2003, MIKE YRABEDRA wrote: I have found that spamd will not use razor on my system because of permissions. Is it safe to run spamd as root? It's not entirely safe to leave it running as root... if you try, spamd will setuid itself to nobody. You can however start spamd as root a

Re: [SAtalk] Is punctuation really needed? (fwd)

> >I was thinking today wouldn't it be better to just ignore all the periods, > >commas, and what have you in the text? Inside SA we could just drop those > >and then search the message from that. > > > >I've had one spammer who just puts a random period in the message and it > >doesn't get tagged

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

I don't know how to do that , that is why I can't please help me - Original Message - From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SpamAssassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:22 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems > --On Thursday, November 13, 2003 9

[SAtalk] [RD] Backhair Update

Backhair set modification similar to the last popcorn update. (a waxing??) More flexible in the hidden tag to include more garbage. http://spamhammers.nxtek.net Jennifer --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in L

Re: [SAtalk] timed out

OK... I disabled RAZOR AND DCC and have not experienced the timeout again. is there anything I can do to find out what is causing these delays and solve the problem? CT - Original Message - From: "Chris Trudeau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12,

[SAtalk] problem with mail

Hi folks. I have exim4, exiscan and spamassassin 2.60 It works great, but not always. Normaly SA does not report any errors, warings etc. I use debian version (testing). As I say it work ok, but when remote server send to me from mail-daemon (zmailer) (mail with HTML and attachment), then spamd

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

its ok =)   I already find the file on /usr/local/etc/procmailrc   how can I include this on the post   best regards     - Original Message - From: spamassassin To: maximo lopez ; SpamAssassin Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:59 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] i

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

--On Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:16 AM -0600 maximo lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know how to do that , that is why I can't > > please help me Not to be rude, but unless I'm misunderstanding you.. if you don't know how to copy and paste your procmail to a e-mail, installing SpamA

[SAtalk] Re: scoring system and values...

On 12 Nov 2003, at 10:09, Covington, Chris wrote: And it doesn't help that Razor, DCC and Pyzor have a lot of users that report legitimate solicited commercial email as spam (the people that forget to uncheck "send me great offers" when they order a product from a vendor, and then report those vend

[SAtalk] Re: Productivity...long...

On 13 Nov 2003, at 07:40, Upwood, Jim wrote: 60.12% of our Incoming Internet E-mail is Spam! According to pflogsumm we are rejecting about 2.2 mails for everyone we accept. That's BEFORE SA even gets a crack at the messages. Mostly that is based on the cbl blacklist and attachment rejection of

[SAtalk] Spamc options and documentation

I'm confused by the documentation on spamc and the results of different spamc options. I'm using SA 2.60 and qmail-scanner 1.20rc3 When I use qmail-scanner calling spamc with the -c option, only qmail-scanner tags the email, and all site-wide settings in local.cf seem to be ignored by spamd. For

RE: [SAtalk] Bad domain list

Nope, I just plum forgot to put it :-) Sorry. Chris Santerre System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy Wonka > -Original Message- > From: Micha

RE: [SAtalk] problem with mail

> Hi folks. > > I have exim4, exiscan and spamassassin 2.60 > It works great, but not always. > > Normaly SA does not report any errors, warings etc. > I use debian version (testing). > > As I say it work ok, but when remote server send to me from > mail-daemon > (zmailer) (mail with HTML and a

Re: [SAtalk] scoring system and values...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Santerre writes: >I've had conversations with legit mass emailers that have to fight getting >there legit opt-in only email to customers, because of antispam software. >I've been wanting to write a guide to legit emailers on how to make there >e

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

1) Is procmail really installed? If you type "procmail" in the shell, does it execute? 2) Is procmail hooked up properly to your MTA? -- Chris Thielen Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam phrases: http://www.sandgnat.com/cmos/ maximo lopez said: > > in my last email I sen

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

in my last email I sent my procmail file , I am sending again I follow the install file step by step, the only think I can't install was the pyzor , all the other steps for system wide was successfully install then I finish the installation and I re-start the freebsd, and I am still receiving Sp

Re: [SAtalk] Re: FROM_AND_TO_SAME Rule does not seem to work

--On Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:57 AM -0500 Lukreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that __NOT_CAMI_IP contains a negative operator and contains a > regex matching all of my "legit" IP networks (pared down here for > readability). "legit" meaning "yours"? Yes, meaning all IP networks that m

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

--On Thursday, November 13, 2003 1:34 PM -0600 maximo lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > in my last email I sent my procmail file , I am sending again > > I follow the install file step by step, the only think I can't install was > the pyzor , all the other steps for system wide was successf

[SAtalk] RE: upgrade source install to CPAN install

(sorry, my Email client got all funky on me this morning, yay Microsoft...) > Anything that needs to be watched out for when upgrading from > source install > to CPAN? I usually do source, but figured I would try CPAN for > SA, as it has > worked great for other packages. I upgraded from a CPAN

[SAtalk] Razor does not work with spamd?

I have been trying to get razor to work with spamd. I know it works with ./spamassassin --lint -D It also works with CGPSA (calls SA directly). But it does not want to work with spamd? Where are some places I can look , things I can try, to narrow down the problem? +--

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

if i execute procmail on the shell command nor found is not instaled rigth ??? where can i get it ??? - Original Message - From: "Chris Thielen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 1:52 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems > 1) Is proc

RE: [SAtalk] more spam since installing 2.60

At 09:51 12/11/2003 -0500, Frank Pineau wrote: On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 09:26, Chris Santerre wrote: > > > > Is anyone else experiencing more junk mail getting through > > since installing > > 2.60? > This seems to be a common theme for any new version of SA. I've been seeing a lot more spam *period*

[SAtalk] Headers stopping too early?

I have noticed that on some emails marked as spam, the headers are not completely written, they stop half way through??? Any idea what would cause this? ++ Mike Yrabedra (President) 323 Incorporated Home of MacDock.com, MacAgent.com and MacShirt.c

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

First hit on google.com/search?q=procmail is http://www.procmail.org/ Note: procmail isn't the only way to integrate SpamAssassin, but it is a common way. Also note: (Once procmail is installed) some people integrate procmail via ~/.forward files (in individual users' home directories). Consult

[SAtalk] How do I catch obfuscated characters?

Hi all. I'm new to the list, and I'm trying to figure out a way of detecting words with obfuscated characters (i.e. "@pp!3", "app13" = "apple"). I set up a test something like this: /(?:a|4|@)pp(?:l|1|!)(?:e|3)/i This will catch "@pp!3" and "app13", but it also catches "apple". Can anyone

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

that is the problem that i finish the instalation , and there no message marked as spam , i even use the tool to make the config file regards - Original Message - From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "spamAssassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 2:13 PM Subjec

Re: [SAtalk] How do I catch obfuscated characters?

Michael, The key is a negative lookahead: /(?!apple)(?:a|4|@)pp(?:l|1|!)(?:e|3)/i I've written a script that will help you create obfuscated phrase rules. Check it out -- link in sig. -- Chris Thielen Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam phrases: http://www.sandgnat.com/c

Re: [SAtalk] How do I catch obfuscated characters?

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:33:28PM -0600, Michael Howell wrote: > /(?:a|4|@)pp(?:l|1|!)(?:e|3)/i ewww... at least do: /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i > This will catch "@pp!3" and "app13", but it also catches "apple". Can > anyone help me work the regex so it skips the word if it's spelled > normally?

RE: [SAtalk] How do I catch obfuscated characters?

You'll want to look at http://www.exit0.us/index.php/MaskedWordList Take a gander at the link to Chris' Mediocre ObfuScript, which is soon (I hear) to be upgraded to Chris' Somewhat Adequate ObfuScript. -tom > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [SAtalk] How do I catch obfuscated characters?

Theo, I'm more or less a newbie to Perl, so can you explain why your form is better? All I see is 2 distinct ways of selecting from a set. Thanks, Mike Computer Support Specialist Oklahoma State University Physical Plant CIS 109 PPA Building Stillwater, OK 74078 (405) 744-6993 > On Thu, Nov 1

Re: [SAtalk] Razor does not work with spamd?

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, MIKE YRABEDRA wrote: > > > I have been trying to get razor to work with spamd. > > I know it works with ./spamassassin --lint -D > > It also works with CGPSA (calls SA directly). > > But it does not want to work with spamd? > > Where are some places I can look , things I can t

[SAtalk] dnsbl and fake helo functions

Hi, I'm trying to optimize my MIMEDefang milter and reject the whole message even before it is received and scanned with SpamAssassin. My question is: Is there a function in Mail::Spamassassin perl module which I can use to determine if specific host or IP address listed in any (of particular)

Re: [SAtalk] Razor does not work with spamd?

on 11/13/03 4:49 PM, David B Funk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Other thing to try, run spamd with the '-D' flag to turn on > debugging output. (But don't run it that way for too long unless > you have a -large- disk to hold the output ;). I did this and it says nothing about razor??? -

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

i download it , i instaled following the instructions y write procmail on the command shell and the is triying to do something , bus its takin too long - Original Message - From: "Chris Thielen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Spamassassin-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

I only suggested typing procmail in the shell as a simple/easy way to test if it was indeed installed. You would almost never call procmail directly from the command line. Instead, you now need to hook procmail up to your MTA. The easy version: Try executing this command from bash (I don't know

Re: [SAtalk] How do I catch obfuscated characters?

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:11:25PM -0600, Michael Howell wrote: > I'm more or less a newbie to Perl, so can you explain why your form is > better? All I see is 2 distinct ways of selecting from a set. Well, it's kind of a long discussion about backtracking and state machines ... ;) I'd recommen

Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems

you know what is next , one that i have procmail, spamassasin to make spamassasin work - Original Message - From: "Chris Thielen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 4:14 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] instalation problems > I only suggested ty

Re: [SAtalk] Razor does not work with spamd?

Have you gotten razor working by itself? On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:20:44PM -0500, MIKE YRABEDRA wrote: > on 11/13/03 4:49 PM, David B Funk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Other thing to try, run spamd with the '-D' flag to turn on > > debugging output. (But don't run it that way for too long u

Re: [SAtalk] Razor does not work with spamd?

on 11/13/03 6:07 PM, Chip Paswater at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Have you gotten razor working by itself? Yes, it works fine. I have just never been able to use it with spamd?? ++ Mike Yrabedra (President) 323 Incorporated Home of MacDock.com, Mac

[SAtalk] qscand no such user

Hello-- I'm using qmail 1.03 with qmailqueue patch, vpopmail, qmail-scanner 1.20, spamassassin 2.60, clamav 0.65, on redhat linux 9. qmail-scanners are clamuko (clamscand) and spamassassin_verbose. I'm seeing this in maillog : Nov 14 01:20:36 yoruban spamd[2861]: connection from localhost.loca

[SAtalk] sendmail+procmal+spamassassin

maybe I am doing the questions wrong ,   but I am trying to find out where the problem resides    I already install the Spam then I install the procmail   but the Spamassassin is not seems to work , the Spam still gets to me without the Spam subject   does any one can help me find

Re: [SAtalk] Bad domain list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dan, Thursday, November 13, 2003, 9:11:21 AM, you wrote: D> Does someone have a bad domain list they would like to share? Check out William Stearns' at http://www.stearns.org/sa-blacklist/sa-blacklist.current D> Or better yet what are the op

Re: [SAtalk] sendmail+procmal+spamassassin

have you ever install spamassasin on your system ??? if you do you can help me find out where my problem is - Original Message - From: "Tyler Montbriand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "maximo lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:37 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sendmai

Re: [SAtalk] sendmail+procmal+spamassassin

if you don't then leave the question to someone else - Original Message - From: "maximo lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tyler Montbriand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "SpamAssassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sendmail+procmal+spamassass

[SAtalk] does "spamassassin -r" REALLY strip SA headers?

Hi all, I use the following command periodically to report and learn spam: formail -s spamassassin -r < ~/mail/junk/confirmed but when I do: sa-learn --dump data | sort -n I find suspicious entries like these: 1.000323 0 1068746359 HX-Spam-Pyzor:Reported 1.000323

RE: [SAtalk] how to 'redirect' messages for autolearn with various MUAs?

See the bottom of http://www.stearns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html. Unfortunately, it doesn't include kmail. - dan -- Dan Kohn -Original Message- From: Michael V. Sokolov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday

[SAtalk] auto learn is ALWAYS no

Hi List. I am getting alot more junk mail since upgrading to 2.60, but thats not the point. Why does autolearn always reflect no? autolearn=no version=2.60 I am a little confused as to what triggers the autolearn function. Many thanks Regards, Tom Kinghorn -