On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:57:00PM +0300, Link, Pete wrote:
> My spamassassin still allows quite a few SPAMs to the owner of the
> company...
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to tweak spamassassin without
> writing too many custom rules and without enabling the RBL checks?
Forget about
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 05:55:00PM +0300, DM wrote:
> Jun 24 07:23:57 mx4 spamd[16795]: Cannot write to
> /nonexistent/.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such file or directory
>
> I've checked the paths and perms for sharedstatedir, localstatedir, and of
> course, the home directory for the spam user.
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
You can probably do more efficient blocking at the MTA level...which one
are you using?
No, he can't, this is a body test.
Postfix (my version is 2.0.12) can do body tests, but Postfix UCE rules
are "all or nothing" - one can't allocate points, as SA can. Therefore I
prefer t
hi list,
does anyone has a filter script which will work
with Qmailadmin, and the mail forwarding and vocation functions. Now i am using
a little script which willfilter spam mails, but it has also disable the
forwarding and vocation function. My files as below:-
.qmail-default
| preline
hi all
i try now for a long time to switch off the auto learn / whitelist funktion.
but not settings works well.
here my settings
---
use_pyzor 0
use_razor1 0
use_razor2 0
use_bayes 0
use_dcc 0
subject_tag [SPAM]
skip
Wouldn't it be possible to expand all tests so that they can match all those p0rn,
rem0ve and g1rls and so on,
like the example I created below? Would it decrease performance to much? Or does it
have any other side effects?
It would at least make it harder for spammers to avoid spamassassin by o
Hello all,
I am new to Spamassassin. I installed spamassassin in my server but I do
not know that it is working in my system or not. How could I know that
Spamassassin is working in my system?
Thanks,
Chan Choth
---
This SF.Net email is spons
Are you using "spammassassin" or "spamd/spamc"..
If using "spamd/spamc" dont forget to restart "spamd"..
( I keep forgetting it myself all the time..;-)
/SqM
> i try now for a long time to switch off the auto learn / whitelist
> funktion.
> but not settings works well.
> here my settings
> -
Per Björklund wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to expand all tests so that they can match all those p0rn, rem0ve and g1rls and so on
Perhaps uri references to real live p0rn sites, so that SA could watch
what was going on and learn for itself. Or, better, install a webcam in
your bedroom and wait
> If you fancy testing a pre-release of SpamAssassin 2.60, one is now
> available:
>
I currently have a running SA 2.60-cvs setup (from 220603) with which I
had no probs running "make test". However, with SA 2.60-PR1 I have the
following errors running "make test":
t/spamd_report_ifspam...ok
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Subject: [SAtalk] How could I know that Spamassassin is working in my
> system?
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am new to Spamassassin. I installed spamassassin in my
> server but I do not know that it is working in my system or
> not. How could I know that Spamassassin is wor
Hi
- Original Message -
From: "Puth Chan Choth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:30 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] How could I know that Spamassassin is working in my
system?
> not know that it is working in my system or not. How could I know that
> Sp
Well, for example, I tried the attached porn spam (which uses a lot of 0's and 1's)
with 2.60-CVS,
but it still didn't score more than 0.6.
(I don't have razor, pyzor, bayes etc. on the machine I tried 2.60-CVS on so perhaps
that would have increased the score.)
This is what 2.60-CVS on my mach
I belive this is work for bayes. I just wondering why people turn it off ?
Why they try to use 'manual' bayes filtering ?
> > Wouldn't it be possible to expand all tests so that they can match all
> > those p0rn, rem0ve and g1rls and so on
>
> Perhaps uri references to real live p0rn sites, so tha
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 12:47, SqM wrote:
> Are you using "spammassassin" or "spamd/spamc"..
> If using "spamd/spamc" dont forget to restart "spamd"..
> ( I keep forgetting it myself all the time..;-)
i use spamd/spamc and it is more then one time restarted with this settings.
holger
>
> /SqM
Jose M.Herrera wrote on Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:50:52 -0400:
> The database is ok and the bayes files (tokens, etc).
> But (for example) when I attemp to train bayes... not function!!
>
> sa-lean --spam --showdots --mbox mymail
Again, *what* does not function? What happens if you issue the command
Tony Earnshaw wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:11:23 +0200:
> Postfix (my version is 2.0.12) can do body tests, but Postfix UCE rules
> are "all or nothing"
>
Well, sendmail can do this as well, and with the same caveat. But I think
Matt simply confused that body rule with a one that rejects mail b
Just curious what the preferred spam threshold is for spam these days. In
my user prefs I'm running at a spam threshold of 5.0 and not having many
problems with it save for the occasional 1 or 2 missed spam messages. I
don't believe it's getting any false positives as I haven't seen any
late
A message just slipped through, no text, just an image. It slipped through
with a ridiculously low score, minus .6
When I expanded the headers, I found that the message got through mostly
because of the following.
USER_AGENT_MSN (-2.3 points) Headers indicate valid mail from MSN
PGP_SIGNAT
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Leghart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 7:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SPAM] [SAtalk] spamassassin-talk get you hacker
> toolz here
> cwgh
>
>
> --On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 7:12 PM -0400 Bill
> <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:32:35PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> hmm -- Theo? Sounds OK to me, I thought that was already the default ;)
hmmm. it is, sorta. apparently the subsys locks are still spamd,
but the sysconfig file is spamassassin now (the spec file enforces this too).
I'm opening a
Per Björklund wrote:
Well, for example, I tried the attached porn spam (which uses a lot of 0's and 1's)
with 2.60-CVS,
but it still didn't score more than 0.6.
(I don't have razor, pyzor, bayes etc. on the machine I tried 2.60-CVS on so perhaps
that would have increased the score.)
This is what
We need a prounouncability test of the sender addresses. If it has a bunch
of ixf38jk3 crud in it, it is more likely to be spam.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partn
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:12:11PM +0200, Erik Slooff wrote:
> t/spamd_report_ifspam...ok 1/10 Not found: date = INVALID_DATE
rules/50_scores.cf:score INVALID_DATE 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001
the GA shut the rule off, so it's not running during the "make test" ...
I'll undisable them since
Erik Slooff wrote:
If you fancy testing a pre-release of SpamAssassin 2.60, one is now
available:
I currently have a running SA 2.60-cvs setup (from 220603) with which I
had no probs running "make test". However, with SA 2.60-PR1 I have the
following errors running "make test":
Stick with the CVS
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:12:11PM +0200, Erik Slooff wrote:
> t/spamd_report_ifspam...ok 1/10 Not found: date = INVALID_DATE
ok, this is fixed in cvs now.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Note that if I can get you to \"su and say\" something just by asking,
you have a very serious sec
Jack Gostl wrote:
A message just slipped through, no text, just an image. It slipped through
with a ridiculously low score, minus .6
You know better by now :-) That's what you get for using SA 1.1
Tony
--
Tony Earnshaw
Humor him, and he'll go away again
http://j-walk.com/blog/docs/conference.h
Hi everyone,
I have Qmail1.03 running on a RedHat9 build. I am new to linux and was
very excited when I got it going last week; however, I now want to rid
my inbox of this annoying spam. I have been parusing all the readme
files in the Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55 distribtion to figure out hot to go
How can you suggest incorporating a PGP into the ruleset though?
You can check if its a valid length, but then spammers will use valid
PGP sigs.
You can't pointify all PGP sigs, because lots of valid mail is signed
w/a PGP
So you can either:
Remove the negative points for PGP sigs -- essential
Are there any rules for DNS forgeries in SA 2.53? I had a message pass through whose
forged From: line was from a domain that has a whitelist entry, but the sender
basically set up a PTR record to resolve back to that domain. Is there any way to
prevent this?
--
Hi,
SpamAssassin 2.60 works fine here.
Thanks,
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain't broke, then you're not trying hard enough!" --Red Green
-
... time for new spam types.
What's more, I'm in a vile mood today.
Many spammers follow this list. O.k. I keep on getting Viagra spam,
which Postfix 2.0.12/amavisd-new/SA 2.60-CVS consigns to the cesspit and
sends postmaster e-mail messages, so that he knows.
There seems to be a gap in the ma
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Earnshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] I'm fed up with Viagra spam ...
>
>
> ... time for new spam types.
>
> What's more, I'm in a vile mood today.
>
> Many spammers fo
\w is a word
correct?
Is this
right:?
/(build(ing)?|increase|more) \w?wealth/i
should hit "building real
weatlh" ?
Or is it just easier to
write:
/(build(ing)?|increase|more).{1,10}wealth/i
Chris SanterreSystem Admin"A little nonsense now and
then, is relished by the wisest men."
When I run SA-Learn I get this error message. "Failed to create default user
preference file". I am running spamassassin 2.53 on RedHat 9. Do I just need to
create a user Preference file. I want SA-Learn to be applied to all emails not just a
particular users emails. I am also running spamd
Spammers stick to what they know generally...screwing people, not protecting
them.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Earnshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:06 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] I'm fed up with Viagra spam ...
> ... time for new spam type
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:35:26PM +0100, LBsys wrote:
> would you be so kind as to redirect this mail to whomever it may concern?
> TIA, LB
you should send these types of mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> First: what is PLING_PLING? It cannot be found in the FAQ / Test
> performed list. There is only
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 15:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We need a prounouncability test of the sender addresses. If it has a bunch
> of ixf38jk3 crud in it, it is more likely to be spam.
/me points and laughs at lds0062
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ - Co
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:17:33AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> \w is a word correct?
no. "perldoc perlre" ... \w is an alphanumeric character (includes
underscore too).
> Is this right:?
> /(build(ing)?|increase|more) \w?wealth/i
>
> should hit "building real weatlh" ?
nope.
--
Ran
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003 @ 6:31:39 AM [-0700], Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Well, sendmail can do this as well, and with the same caveat. But I think
> Matt simply confused that body rule with a one that rejects mail by
> sender/sending server which would be an optinmal use for the MTA access
> confi
Hello,
I've been wading through all the information regarding spam fighting and
think I know how I want my configuration to look. I'm hoping someone will
verify it for me, pass along any pointers and most importantly point me in
the right direction for specific tools. What I need is someone to s
No... I'm not suggesting anything about PGP sigs. What (I think) happened
here was that a marginally passable PGP sig was buried in the HTML portion
of the message. I almost didn't see it. So not only do I question the
negative value on a PGP sig, I'm noting that this is a suspicious sig that
slip
Now THIS is a scary thing to see in /var/log/mail:
Jun 25 08:49:49 jezebel spamd[28618]: Attempt to free non-existent
shared string during global destruction.
I half expected a computer named Joshua to ask me if I'd like to play a
game.
What does that error mean, anyway? ;)
> > A message just slipped through, no text, just an image. It slipped through
> > with a ridiculously low score, minus .6
>
> You know better by now :-) That's what you get for using SA 1.1
I'm using 2.55.
--
Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:31 AM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] quick regex question for rules
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:17:33AM -0400, Chris Santerre wr
Hi,
Do we need to subscribe to the RBLs that Net::DNS call?
Regards: Jim Ford
--
Spam poison - don't use! ---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <---
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hostin
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:30:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> As to proving where it comes from, I'm just not sure it's
> worth the effort on an individual basis -- a lot of time &
> expense involved. That's another thing the big ISP's could
Any pointers as to how to trace email from the h
Hi James,
You have to create a user spamd
Run spamd every time at startup in rc.local
spamd -C /etc/mail/spamassassin -d -q -x -a -u spamd
Then in the users .procmailrc file add this
:0wf
| /usr/bin/spamc -f -u $LOGNAME
If you want to redirect spam flagged mails to the Spam folder add this als
Hey Nancy/All,
Thanks for getting back to me - this isn't a huge problem, but it's been
driving me mad. I should better explain my setup:
- accessing pine (and mailboxes) directly - ssh'ing into the server (i.e.
no IMAP)
- server is running QMail
My procmail recipe is as follows:
--
Erik Slooff writes:
>> If you fancy testing a pre-release of SpamAssassin 2.60, one is now
>> available:
>>
>
>I currently have a running SA 2.60-cvs setup (from 220603) with which I
>had no probs running "make test". However, with SA 2.60-PR1 I have the
>following errors running "make test":
>
>t
Another wasy to be sure that it is working in and of itself is to find the sample
files (sample-nonspam.txt and sample-spam.txt) and pipe them through spamassassin like
this:
spamassassin -t < [path to]sample-spam.txt
This will return a response indicating waht it did with the sample on your sc
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Jim Ford wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:30:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
>
> > As to proving where it comes from, I'm just not sure it's
> > worth the effort on an individual basis -- a lot of time &
> > expense involved. That's another thing the big ISP's cou
I got this gem today:
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003, at 10:08 PM, Saphenoscope Oapheresis wrote:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 25 12:00:21 2003
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 11133 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2003 15:41:19 -
Received: from m
I'm coming in on this thread late, so sorry if you've already covered
this, but if you're running qmail with Maildir, the standard pine won't
work; you need the version patched for Maildir.
This has nothing to do with procmail or SA, in either case...
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Brad Marcoux wrote:
>
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY UNLESS YOU CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION.
I have a working SpamAssassin rule which rejects messages based on URLs
within the body of the message. This is used for spammers who forge From
addresses and are otherwise careful not to break rules. I collect the
"click here to order" an
I'm currently running spamd as root (so it does an suid to each user.)
Were I to run this as another user (spamd -u someone), wouldn't that
user still have to suid to whomever is running spamc? Does this other
user need any special privs?
TIA
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=
That worked! Thanks to all who helped.
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:57:45PM -0700, Greg A wrote:> perl-Mail-Spamassassin = 2.53-1 spamassassin> perl-Mail-Spamassassin = 2.53-1 spamassassin-tools> *notice the above error refers to version 2.53? weirdness...>
http://www.spamcop.net does a great job of taking apart headers.
Harold
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:30:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
>
>> As to proving where it comes from, I'm just not sure it's
>> worth the effort on an individual basis -- a lot of time &
>> expense involved. That's ano
> "JF" == Jim Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JF> Surely it would be a trivial thing for them to do. I'm no programmer,
JF> but I think I could write a perl script to examine a bounced message
You greatly underestimate the difficulty of processing bounces from
random remote sources. If eve
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Mount [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] URI rule -- how big?
>
>
>
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY UNLESS YOU CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>
> I have a worki
Hi!
I am calling spamassassin from within my .qmail-default file like this:
| /var/qmail/bin/preline -d /var/qmail/bin/bouncesaying "SPAM Bounce message"
/var/qmail/bin/except /usr/bin/spamc -c
| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
I know this way works and differentiates the
Charles Mount writes:
>
>PLEASE DO NOT REPLY UNLESS YOU CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>
>I have a working SpamAssassin rule which rejects messages based on URLs
>within the body of the message. This is used for spammers who forge From
>addresses and are otherwise careful not to break rules. I collect
Thx, indeed the code runs fine as far as I can tell for now.
> Erik Slooff writes:
> >> If you fancy testing a pre-release of SpamAssassin 2.60, one is now
> >> available:
> >>
> >
> >I currently have a running SA 2.60-cvs setup (from 220603)
> with which I
> >had no probs running "make test". H
--On Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:13 PM +0100 Jim Ford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:30:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
As to proving where it comes from, I'm just not sure it's
worth the effort on an individual basis -- a lot of time &
expense involved. That's another
At 08:51 AM 6/25/2003 -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Now THIS is a scary thing to see in /var/log/mail:
Jun 25 08:49:49 jezebel spamd[28618]: Attempt to free non-existent shared
string during global destruction.
I half expected a computer named Joshua to ask me if I'd like to play a game.
What
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:40:37PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> but that's just an educated guess.
fyi: that's going to be a perl error message, not a SA one.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I'll have to be careful when I walk past that thing ... It'll blow the rest
of my hair off."
From: "Fox Flanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 08:30 am, Fox Flanders wrote:
> We need a prounouncability test of the sender addresses. If it has a bunch
> of ixf38jk3 crud in it, it is more likely to be spam.
>
The irony is astounding.
--
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:13:32PM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:30:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
>
> > As to proving where it comes from, I'm just not sure it's
> > worth the effort on an individual basis -- a lot of time &
> > expense involved. That's another thing t
On 25 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I'm coming in on this thread late, so sorry if you've already
> covered this, but if you're running qmail with Maildir, the
> standard pine won't work; you need the version patched for
> Maildir.
But if you've got procmail delivering
Ok, with recent discussion on the list I've gotten somewhat confused by
this issue.
What I thought happens is that sa-learn can recognize an email message that
contains a message/rfc822 attached message, and learn from that attached
message, hence the reason you should forward a spam message to
Charles Mount wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:47:49 -0500:
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY UNLESS YOU CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION.
>
Please stop shouting. If you don't like well-intended answers to your
question then please stop posting here.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Int
Jim Ford wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:13:14 +0100:
> Do we need to subscribe to the RBLs that Net::DNS call?
>
To the ones that require it: yes. (Those are the ones not enabled by
default.)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:06:24PM -0400, Gary Schrock wrote:
> What I thought happens is that sa-learn can recognize an email message that
> contains a message/rfc822 attached message, and learn from that attached
> message, hence the reason you should forward a spam message to it using
> that
Dragoncrest wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:41:23 -0400:
> So I was curious if 5.0 was a good setting or if I should set it
> higher to like 7.0 or 5.5 or if I should just leave it as is. :)
>
5.0 works very well with 2.60 and also did with 2.55, just that you had
some more false negatives.
Kai
I've just installed SpamAssassin from rpm's to use on our company's
sendmail server.
Everything seems to be installed correctly.
Is there any newbie's guide to setting up and configuring a fresh install
of SpamAssassin?
I am pretty familiar with Redhat and sendmail but never messed around with
Hi,
I have tried searching the archives on this but I apparently can't get
the correct search string...hopefully one of you can assist with what is
probably an easy one.
I have been running SA for a few local users for quite a while. It's
worked so well that I decided to take it global so to spea
Is there an easy way to pipe a message to sa-learn as you can with
bogofilter?
For instance, when using a console based mailer like mutt or Pine, it's a lot
easier to do:
|spamassassin -d | bogofilter -S
(to remove SA markup and mark a message as spam within bogofilter)
than it is to export the m
When I build SA in a user's home directory, stuff seems to go in
~/sauser/local/bin instead of just ~/sauser/bin. Is this the intended
behavior? My recollection in the past was that it put stuff in ~/sauser/bin.
If it matters, I'm using Debian 3.0 on x86 hardware with Perl 5.6.1.
I basically do the same thing, but I use fetchmail called from a shell
script to grab the messages, then rsync over SSH to get the messages to the
SpamAssassin relays. I run fetchmail script from our internal mail hub to
get the messages off of Exchange, and run a cron job on the SA relays to
Note the random words within the tags at the end of the spam. I
think they lowered its Bayes score, which dropped it below my threshold
overall. That, and the lack of any other text aside from the links...
Is this tactic likely to succeed for them, rendering our Bayesian
classifiers ineffect
Gary Schrock wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:06:24 -0400:
> Do I need to be doing something before the message gets piped to
> sa-learn to pull the attachment out so it's seperate?
>
Yes, sa-learn needs the message in the attachment, not the whole thing. That's
why it is in the attachment, so you
Matt Thoene wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:56:01 -0700:
> I have been running SA for a few local users for quite a while. It's
> worked so well that I decided to take it global so to speak. However,
> myself and the existing users have user_prefs with personal scores,
> rules, etc. that we'd like to
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:20:25PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> than it is to export the message to a file, open a subshell, and then do:
>
> sa-learn --spam --single < spamfile
>
> Perhaps sa-learn could accept messages on stdin if you add a '-' to the end,
> like:
>
> sa-learn --spam -
uh ...
> > So I was curious if 5.0 was a good setting or if I should set it
> > higher to like 7.0 or 5.5 or if I should just leave it as is. :)
> >
>
> 5.0 works very well with 2.60 and also did with 2.55, just
> that you had some more false negatives.
Probably depends on your environment. I use 8.0 he
I think custom rules may be a problem. I don't believe (though I could
be wrong) SA allows rules to be defined in user prefs.
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Matt Thoene wrote on Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:56:01 -0700:
I have been running SA for a few local users for quite a while. It's
worked so well that I
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:20:25PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> > than it is to export the message to a file, open a subshell, and then do:
> >
> > sa-learn --spam --single < spamfile
> >
> > Perhaps sa-learn could accept messages on stdin if you add a '-' to the
> > end
I wonder if anyone can help me with the following:
My main machine is at home, but I also read e-mail through a webmail
client at work. I would like to filter out the 'likely spam'
automatically to avoid clogging the webmail client. At present I end
up deleting all the spam that arrives in work
At 12:25 25/06/03 -0500, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
Some caveats: 1) Bogus Received headers are common but always occur
below the last legitimate header (once you find one bogus one the rest
are probably junk too), 2) envelope sender (helo_name) is often forged,
Just being pedantic here, but the helo na
How does one add more points according to message size?
Maybe I must check for a Lines: header, then what?
Anyway, say I want to add 2 points per 100 KB.
i.e. $message_size/5
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Develop
--On Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:20 AM +1200 Simon Byrnand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 12:25 25/06/03 -0500, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
Some caveats: 1) Bogus Received headers are common but always occur
below the last legitimate header (once you find one bogus one the rest
are probably junk too), 2)
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Will Yardley wrote:
> If I do: |sa-learn --spam
> from within mutt or Pine, it seems to just sit there.
It needs --single as well.
In pine what you want to do is
| to get to the pipe prompt
^W (ctrl-w) to select RAW
Colin Bell wrote:
> My main machine is at home, but I also read e-mail through a webmail
> client at work. I would like to filter out the 'likely spam'
> automatically to avoid clogging the webmail client. At present I end
> up deleting all the spam that arrives in work hours by hand...
> I t
On wo, 25 jun 2003, Will Yardley wrote:
> That's exactly what I'd like to do (hence my question) - however i haven't
> had luck doing this in the past. What's the syntax for doing it this way.
> There's no mention of this in the man-page.
> If I do: |sa-learn --spam
> from within mutt or Pine, it
Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I do: |sa-learn --spam
> from within mutt or Pine, it seems to just sit there.
I have the following setup for Gnus and it works just fine:
(global-set-key "\C-cs" 'cdh-sa-learn-spam)
(defun cdh-sa-learn-spam ()
"Pipe a message to sa-learn so that
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Will Yardley wrote:
> > If I do: |sa-learn --spam
> > from within mutt or Pine, it seems to just sit there.
>
> It needs --single as well.
>
> In pine what you want to do is
>
> | to get to the pipe prompt
> ^W
At 04:43 AM 6/26/03 +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
How does one add more points according to message size?
Maybe I must check for a Lines: header, then what?
Anyway, say I want to add 2 points per 100 KB.
i.e. $message_size/5
I don't think you can do this with a simple rule, but if you dig out an o
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Will Yardley wrote:
> > If I do: |sa-learn --spam
> > from within mutt or Pine, it seems to just sit there.
>
> It needs --single as well.
>
> In pine what you want to do is
>
> | to get to the pipe prompt
> ^W
On Wednesday, June 25, 2003 @ 3:55:28 PM [-0700], Patrick Morris wrote:
> I think custom rules may be a problem. I don't believe (though I could
> be wrong) SA allows rules to be defined in user prefs.
Actually, the most important thing for me is to be able to have users
set their own required h
For some reason, I am unable to connect to `calcite.rhyolite.com' via
HTTP. Is there a way to fetch the DCC tarball via FTP? Is there an
alternate site?
Thanks!
Scott
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Con
hi all. I've got a little proof of concept idea I want to do and I was
looking to get some advice from some of the CGI experts on this list to
help me with it. What I want to do is simple. I have like 3 users I want
to track and retrieve the following stats on.
1. Total number of total me
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
