RE: [SAtalk] Spamd & spamassassin - one works one doesn't

Title: Message Hi Kevin,   I think the problem might be with user accounts and their local settings. When you manually run spamassassin for example as a user "kevin" it reads different settings (from /home/kevin/.spamassassin), but when you run spamd it probably reads "root" settings or som

[SAtalk] Bayes filter/spamd troubles

Hello, We are using spamassassin in spamd mode on our mail server. For the users, spamc is invoked via the /etc/procmailrc file. During the month of may, I have received 1361 SA-tagged and 551 spam messages that were not recognized by SA. To improve the statistics, I have used sa-learn, but I can

Re: [SAtalk] FW: [SPAM] Dept of Homeland Security - New SpeakerAdded - Cyber - 5 June - Arl Va.

--On Sunday, June 01, 2003 10:35 PM +0200 Brian Ipsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi! Hmm I wonder why the message below hasn't been caught by my SpamAssassin - maybe tweaking of the score values i my setup needs to be adjusted ?? Some might think the message isn't spam - but I do. Comments

[SAtalk] Razor/DCC Effectiveness?

I'm currently running SA 2.55 on Redhat 8.0 with Postfix. I don't know the numbers as it's dependant on my users providing feedback consistently, but I suspect we detect and flag 95% or more of inbound spam. Am I missing out significantly by not using Razor or DCC? I've looked on the respectiv

RE: [SAtalk] Bayes filter/spamd troubles

Hi, You should probably check which bayes database is used when spamd is invoked (you can set this in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, and which database is updated when you use salearn (maybe you database in /home//.spamassassin/...) Regards, Ivan > > Hello, > > We are using spamassassin in sp

Re: [SAtalk] OT: Randomly picking X addresses from a file

> "JS" == Justin Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JS> What I don't know how to do is randomly pick a line from a file. Like I JS> said I'm doing this from the CLI where it only takes a nominal amount of JS> shell scripting to have a working product in the end. Any tips would be /usr/games/

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin Milter ? [Partially OT]

Hi, Cass, Try Spamass-Milter (http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/), it allows you to reject incoming mail at MTA level as you wish, and you could decide if the rejection will be done at a certain level (say, over 15 of SA scoring), or if ANY mail rejected by spamassassin will be rejec

Re: [SAtalk] What's bad about X_LIST_UNSUBSCRIBE?

At 10:01 AM 6/2/2003 +0100, Paul Hutchings wrote: As subject really, one of my users had something tagged falsely, this alone gave it 4.3 and I'm not sure exactly what it is/does? List-Unsubscribe is a standardized header. Since List-Unsubscribe is a RFC standard, X-List-Unsubscribe isn't really p

Re: [SAtalk] spamass-milter and /etc/aliases

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:38:00AM +0300, wilma wrote: > > There's a patch for spamass-milter that will do something like > > that: dump mails tagged as spam to e.g. local spamd user's > > mailbox. > > > > Take a look at patch IDs 415 and 411 at > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?group=spamass-

Re: [SAtalk] Nigerian scam on this list!

Yep, happens about once or twice a month. There's a "15 bazillion email address CD" one that gets posted here too. I figure it's good corpus fodder, and they aren't all that frequent. At 05:32 PM 6/1/2003 +0100, Jim Ford wrote: Hi, I've just had a 'Nigerian Scam' spam from this list. I 'Razored

Re: [SAtalk] Thanks for all the help

At 11:11 PM 6/1/2003 -0800, Jon Reynolds wrote: Because of SpamAssassin, I have now been enjoying spam for the past week and lovin every piece of it. :) Hmm, I'm not sure if that makes spamassassin sound like a good spamfighting tool, or a good brainwashing tool. "Spam is your friend. Love the

[SAtalk] OT: Nigerian Email Conference

*spits espresso on keyboard* Saw this on craigslist.org a few minutes ago. heh http://j-walk.com/blog/docs/conference.htm --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/7

Re: [SAtalk] keeping local copies of outbound email using SA

No. SA is a message body filter, so it is impossible for SA to alter the delivery envelope. That prevents it from deleting or redirecting mail.. Theoretically it could copy mail if it had some MDA code in it, but it does not. Really having a MDA inside SA would serve no generally useful purpose

[SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

I'm setting up a new box with qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin on a Red Hat box. Does anyone have recommendations about which OS version I should use? Thanks, Russ Ringer ringer at avtcorp dot com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:

RE: [AMaViS-user] Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

Well, so far, so good. I've set the bayes_expiry_scan_count to 50 and set up a nightly sa-learn process to do the --force-expire. It's been 3 days so far without amavisd-new freaking out on me; looking good. thanks! johnS --- This SF.n

[SAtalk] Re: spamass-milter and /etc/aliases

>>> There's a patch for spamass-milter that will do something like >>> that: dump mails tagged as spam to e.g. local spamd user's >>> mailbox. >>> >>> Take a look at patch IDs 415 and 411 at >>> http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?group=spamass-milt >> >> How can I get hold of this 411 patch? >> I lo

[SAtalk] No Razor check in SA header

Hi, I've noticed that whilst my maillog shows that Razor appears to be working (eg. 'Razor2 results: spam? 1 highest cf score: 100'), No information regarding Razor2 checking appears in the message header information SA inserts. Is this OK, please? Regards: Jim Ford

[SAtalk] Life after spam.

Hi, Looks like I've got SA+Razor2 roughly setup OK - next to nothing gets through now, and what does I report to Razor. Now the spam's gone, life at the keyboard has gone a bit flat - there's nothing to hate anymore. Previously I used to get a bit of an adrenelin rush as I muttered 'bastards' whe

[SAtalk] HTML stripping

I get more and more mails which just slip through my patterns because they contain text of the type This is Spam This is not matched by a /This is Spam/ body test. But, shouldn't this actually work when all HTML Tags had been cut out? Or does the stripping not work for this kind of pseudo-tag

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 12:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm setting up a new box with qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin on a Red > Hat box. Does anyone have recommendations about which OS version I should use? > It depends on if this is a production box that you need to get online fast or if

Re: [SAtalk] Razor/DCC Effectiveness?

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:55:01PM +0100, Paul Hutchings wrote: > Am I missing out significantly by not using Razor or DCC? > > I've looked on the respective sites, and I'm still not overly clear how well > they work, and what sort of bandwidth penalty they may impose (the sizes > vary, but we re

RE: [AMaViS-user] Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

> -Original Message- > From: Stewart, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:20 AM > > > Well, so far, so good. > > I've set the bayes_expiry_scan_count to 50 and set up a > nightly sa-learn process to do the --force-expire. > > It's been 3 days so far wi

Re: [SAtalk] Life after spam.

Now the spam's gone, life at the keyboard has gone a bit flat - there's nothing to hate anymore. Previously I used to get a bit of an adrenelin rush as I muttered 'bastards' when I deleted a spam! You, sir... need to invest in Quake II or Quake III Arena. Or may I suggest "Age of Empires II" or "A

[SAtalk] Re: spamass-milter and /etc/aliases

> OK, thanks but I tried that already. However savannah might be > having problems with php since when I try to download via > "View Raw Patch" it only wants me to download the file > "download.php", and not any patch package... You wouldn't > happen to have the files yourself somewhere for me to d

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm setting up a new box with qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin on a > Red Hat box. Does anyone have recommendations about which OS version I > should use? Shouldn't matter too much. My mailserver is based on RedHat 7.1, and runs qmail, qmail-scanner and SA fine. r

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

Personally not really liking rhat very much, I'd suggest another OS, but for stability, so far 6.2 is the most stable of the rhat releases I've played with, though 7.3 is a good runner up. I'd give 9 a while (read minor version or two) before trying it on anything but a test machine. Regards,

RE: [SAtalk] Life after spam.

> > Now the spam's gone, life at the keyboard has gone a bit flat - there's > > nothing to hate anymore. Previously I used to get a bit of an adrenelin > > rush as I muttered 'bastards' when I deleted a spam! > > > > You, sir... need to invest in Quake II or Quake III Arena. > > Or may I suggest "

Re: [SAtalk] OT: Nigerian Email Conference

Damn, that's funny!! I needed a laugh this morning, work's been nuts! Thanks for the laugh! -- Bob -- -- ___ Bob Sully - Malibyte Consulting Simi Valley, California, USA http://www.malibyte.com "Years of dedication, and a natural inclination" - J. Buffett ---

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:42:24AM -0700, Cassandra Lynette Brockett wrote: > Personally not really liking rhat very much, I'd suggest another OS, but for > stability, so far 6.2 is the most stable of the rhat releases I've played 6.2 is ok if you don't mind the fact it's EOLed and you'd want to m

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

Heh, my money bets you get at least 3 replies which say "something that's not RedHat". Quite frankly, after the "gcc-2.96" fiasco, I'm somewhat in agreement with them in having concerns about RedHat's packaging policies, although I'm not entirely averse to RedHat, merely skeptical. That said,

[SAtalk] Mailing list

   Please subscribe me.   Jim O'Leary " If you are the bird get there early; if you are the worm get there late. " All mail scanned by Norton Anti-Virus

[Satalk] Database reports error during sa-learn

Greetings all, The last few days I've been receiving the following error from sa-learn: :/etc/cron.daily# sa-learn --spam --mbox /var/mail/zspam Learned from 1 messages. __db_assert: "0" failed: file "../dist/../common/db_err.c", line 200 Aborted :/etc/cron.daily # sa-lea

Re: [SAtalk] OT: Nigerian Email Conference

On Monday 02 June 2003 09:06, Jonathan Nichols wrote: > *spits espresso on keyboard* > > Saw this on craigslist.org a few minutes ago. heh > > http://j-walk.com/blog/docs/conference.htm > > ROTFLMAO!! -- Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? =

[SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

Hello, Trying to get SA working with LDAP users. I know this can work, but I am running into problems. I create a user local on the box and it filters fine, but when I try to filter a user that is in LDAP it is not working. I changed the shell to a valid shell, and it seems that it is pickin

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:42:24AM -0700, Cassandra Lynette Brockett wrote: > Personally not really liking rhat very much, I'd suggest another OS, but for > stability, so far 6.2 is the most stable of the rhat releases I've played > with, though 7.3 is a good runner up. I'd give 9 a while (read mi

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

- Original Message - From: "Peter McGarvey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 10:46 AM Subject: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system > Hi all. > > I'm currently running SA spamd with Exim and exiscan_acl. Everything is > fine, and I'm more

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm setting up a new box with qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin on a Red Hat box. Does anyone have recommendations about which OS version I should use? I just set up a new box using RH9 and QMAIL. Haven't figured out QMAIL Scanner yet, but I will. The rest works f

Re: [SAtalk] Mailing list

At 11:11 AM 06/02/2003, Jim O'Leary wrote: Please subscribe me. List-Subscribe: , Evan --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office

[SAtalk] 2.60 minimal negative scores

Hi, My appologies if this topic has been covered already. I did do some searching though and didn't come up with anything. I am looking at 2.60 rules/50_scores.cf and am noticing that there are almost no negative local rules. I am actually tweaking my 2.54 rules and was thinking about removing

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

Hi! >>> "Cassandra Lynette Brockett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/02/03 12:42PM >>> > Personally not really liking rhat very much, I'd suggest another OS, but for > stability, so far 6.2 is the most stable of the rhat releases I've played > with, though 7.3 is a good runner up. I'd give 9 a while (read

[SAtalk] Patch #411

All - I applied this patch but I got this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamass-milter-0.1.3a]# patch -p0 < ../patch patching file spamass-milter.cpp Hunk #3 FAILED at 165. Hunk #6 succeeded at 317 with fuzz 1. Hunk #7 FAILED at 447. Hunk #8 FAILED at 463. Hunk #9 FAILED at 742. 4 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- s

[SAtalk] custom content filtering

Can one do body content filtering with custom SA rules? How about custom subject filtering? thanks adam --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 ___

Re: [SAtalk] Mailing list

You can subscribe yourself at the form indicated below (every message posted to the list has this link, and it is also on the spamassassin.org website). Since subscription requires that you choose a password and do a confirmed opt-in nobody else can do it for you. List-Subscribe:

Re: [SAtalk] Patch #411

i usually see this error on solaris. Make sure you are using GNU Patch .. adam On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 15:34, Thomas Cameron wrote: > All - > > I applied this patch but I got this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamass-milter-0.1.3a]# patch -p0 < ../patch > patching file spamass-milter.cpp > Hunk #3 FA

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

I am using RH9 and it is nice. Upside is, you get a long update cycle with RH9, RH8 is only supported through December 31, 2003, where 9.0 is supported through April 30, 2004. Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT Cameron Technical Services, Inc. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [SAtalk] Razor/DCC Effectiveness?

At 02:55 PM 6/2/2003 +0100, Paul Hutchings wrote: Am I missing out significantly by not using Razor or DCC? Really, you're not likely missing out on a whole lot. Razor is a very nice, very accurate tool, but it also consumes considerably more time than the regex based rules of SA. I tend to view

[SAtalk] The Postfix + site-wide SpamAssassin + Procmail doc webpage

Well, actually it's a blog entry, but that works too :) This is a better formatted version of the doc I posted last week. If this can be officially mirrored somewhere on the official site, that would be best, but here it will remain anyhow. http://www.geekly.com/entries/archives/0155.htm Do

DOH! (was Re: [SAtalk] Patch #411)

OK, I'm a dope - I sent this to the wrong list, sorry. - Original Message - From: "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:34 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Patch #411 > All - > > I applied this patch but I got this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamas

Re: [SAtalk] Maillog analysis

Mark wrote: A few weeks ago I thought of an interesting new "statistical" way of fighting spam. Having collected a few weeks worth of maillog data (about 500 MB), I wrote a small Perl script, matching IP addresses by the following simple rule (in words): "Look at SMTP connections, and consider all

[SAtalk] send RAW or SHOWN text from pine to sa-learn?

Under pine, I first turn full headers on, then use '|' to pipe message to sa-learn --(spam or ham) --no-rebuild --single. Until now, I have been using the SHOWN text, but I just noticed that pine can also send RAW text. Which should be used? Britton Kerin __ GNU GPL: "The Source will be with y

Re: [SAtalk] send RAW or SHOWN text from pine to sa-learn?

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Britton wrote: > Under pine, I first turn full headers on, then use '|' to pipe message to > sa-learn --(spam or ham) --no-rebuild --single. Until now, I have been How are you using '|' from within pine? --- This SF.net

Re: [SAtalk] custom content filtering

At 03:31 PM 6/2/2003 -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: Can one do body content filtering with custom SA rules? How about custom subject filtering? Yes.. I've got a guide on doing your own simple body and header rules. http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/SA-rules-howto-draft.txt --

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 minimal negative scores

At 03:20 PM 6/2/2003 -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote: Hi, My appologies if this topic has been covered already. I did do some searching though and didn't come up with anything. I am looking at 2.60 rules/50_scores.cf and am noticing that there are almost no negative local rules. I am actually tweaking

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:42:24AM -0700, Cassandra Lynette Brockett > wrote: >> Personally not really liking rhat very much, I'd suggest another OS, but >> for >> stability, so far 6.2 is the most stable of the rhat releases I've >> played > > 6.2 is ok if you don't mind the fact it's EOLed and

Re: [SAtalk] send RAW or SHOWN text from pine to sa-learn?

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Britton wrote: > Under pine, I first turn full headers on, then use '|' to pipe message to > sa-learn --(spam or ham) --no-rebuild --single. Until now, I have been > using the SHOWN text, but I just noticed that pine can also send RAW text. You should send the RAW text; sa-l

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

All I was mentioning was that 6.2 was the most stable of rhat I've used. I personally moved away from using rhat in production connected machines years ago, however I am only one of two unix admins at my site, and the other has not really had decent use of debian (my preference). Both of us thoug

Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Best way to whitelist mailing list msgs?

- Original Message - From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mike Scheidler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 5:34 AM Subject: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Best way to whitelist mailing list msgs? > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > >

[SAtalk] Ugly spam

I don't understand those spammers... If I have a spamfilter, that probably (certainly!) means I'm not interested in what they offer. Why go through all that trouble to avoid them? ;) Anyway.. I have received a couple (over 20) of spam lately which looks almost exactly like the one pasted belo

[SAtalk] Debug question

Hello I have the following line when I do: spamassasin -D debug: bayes: 1950 tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks My main question is this. When you see the R/O thing does that mean that Bayes does or doesn't work? In addition how can I be sure that mail actually goes through

Re: [SAtalk] Debug question

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:47:38PM -0700, Marek Dohojda wrote: > My main question is this. When you see the R/O thing does that mean that > Bayes does or doesn't work? That means read-only. > In addition how can I be sure that mail actually goes through Bayes? The rest of the -D should show you

Re: [SAtalk] Debug question

Seeing R/O doesn't mean it is or isn't working in itself, really; it just means SA opened the database read-only. Sometimes it does that (well, usually it does -- most accesses to the database only need to read it). If it needs to open it read/write (like during an sa-learn, or when autolearn

RE: [SAtalk] Debug question

LOL, I guess that would probably be the case, but then you never know about assassins and what they are trying to do :P Thanks guys. Just want to confirm my suspicions. Marek over and out :) -Original Message- From: Patrick Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02,

[SAtalk] Messages and Aliases

I've got a strange situation here, I have updated to running spamassassin via spamass-milter with it set to not actually do anything to the message other than check it and bounce it if it is over a certain score (at the moment that is set to 50, which should get about 25% of the spam we get here),

Re: [SAtalk] HTML stripping

On Monday 02 June 2003 09:58 am, Stefan wrote: > I get more and more mails which just slip through my patterns because they > contain text of the type > > This is Spam > > This is not matched by a /This is Spam/ body test. But, shouldn't this > actually work when all HTML Tags had been cut out? O

[SAtalk] Could stripping bad HTML comments be abused by spammers?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello... After having read http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1551 (stripping malformed HTML comments and possibly tags from the mail) I immediately had the following thought: Could this probably be abused by enclosing the complete Ma

[SAtalk] adding more checks?

Is there a way to add more checks on messages or does SA-2.55 come with all of them bundled. -- Jon Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/

Re: [SAtalk] Could stripping bad HTML comments be abused by spammers?

On Monday 02 June 2003 09:10 pm, Patrick Dreker wrote: > Could this probably be abused by enclosing the complete Mail in "<"and ">" > Tags or something similar? So if the whole body ist one big invalid comment > or tag, would the rest of the tests come up empty, because the message body > is emp

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd: Option -F 'removed'? - FIXED

Yup, I figured it out myself, and I can't believe it was that easy. Why, all I had to do was read more of the documentation . The fix was in Exim, not in SpamAssassin. When setting up the "transport", you really need the 'prefix' option set to nothing; the default value is a mbox-style "From

[SAtalk] Hello Spamassassin-talk! My name is Roland Merten. Potsdam, Germany. CREDIT CARDS INFORMATION BELOW!

Title: Hello Hello! My name is Roland Merten. Potsdam, Germany. Future Starts Today… Everybody cares about his future, the future of his family, society but not everyone conceives laying of the basis for this necessary at the moment. It is essential to keep up to date to be a truly successful p

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

Cassandra Lynette Brockett wrote: > All I was mentioning was that 6.2 was the most stable of rhat I've > used. Of the Red Hat releases 6.2 was the best they ever had. > debian, though there has not been setup a method to get spamassassin current > for stable or testing, so it has less accessibili

[SAtalk] Outlook 2003 coming thru as spam

Hi - Since the rule for FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK is 3.5 points, and our threshold is set at 4.0 (we get an ungodly amount of spam) then we're having a lot of trouble with mail wrongly being marked as spam, when the mail is coming from Outlook 2003. (We have the 2003 Beta 2 software from M$.) How do

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook 2003 coming thru as spam

Yeah, I think that outlook 2003 headers may need to get rolled into SA fairly soon. They're really pushing that thing down our throats where I work (Microsoft) and i expect that there will be quite a few people using it even before the RTM version, given that visually it is a massive improvemen

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat? Unicode UTF-8 problems

I have just installed SA 1.55 and Anomy Sanitizer 1.60, both called from a Courier Maildrop .mailfilter file, on Red Hat 9.0. I discovered the hard way that there are all sorts of Perl troubles caused by a setting in RH8.0 and RH9.0 to do with Unicode. Googling "Perl" and "UTF-8" leads to many ot

Re: [SAtalk] spamass-milter and /etc/aliases

>> OK, thanks but I tried that already. However savannah might be >> having problems with php since when I try to download via >> "View Raw Patch" it only wants me to download the file >> "download.php", and not any patch package... You wouldn't >> happen to have the files yourself somewhere for me

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook 2003 coming thru as spam

Catherine Pinatiello wrote on Mon, 02 Jun 2003 22:46:02 -0700: > How do I suggest to the SA people > There's a Bugzilla link an spamassassin.org, there you can bug it. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

Keith Olmstead wrote: Trying to get SA working with LDAP users. I know this can work, but I am running into problems. I create a user local on the box and it filters fine, but when I try to filter a user that is in LDAP it is not working. I changed the shell to a valid shell, and it seems that

[SAtalk] Problems with RBL after migrating to 2.55

Hello, I just can't find the answer in the archives, so I will post it here... I just migrated from 2.44 to 2.55 on a Red Hat box running SA with procmail and postfix. I copied my old config-file local.cf which worked very well with 2.44, and basically everything works as before (I needed to add a

[SAtalk] Spamassassin & sa-learn

I put in my procmail " | spamassassin", what is the difference of put "spamd -f"??? And... the bayes database is global or for each user??? Thanks. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://ad

[SAtalk] Maybe Spam?

I just wanted to throw an idea out there in case there might be interest. Recently, I implemented SA on a site wide basis (SMTP relay from qmail to exchange) with much success. Our users have recently come back and asked me about the possibility of implementing what I call a score range or offset.