On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Erik B. Berry wrote:
> I have noticed that the rules SPAM_PHRASES_020 and SPAM_PHRASES_040
> don't seem to work anymore in 2.31. FREQ_SPAM_PHRASE works fine. For
> example, this message will score over 20 but not get the corresponding
> SPAM_PHRASES_020 rule marked in the
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:35:50PM -0400, David B. Bitton wrote:
> This got a 35.7. What's your record?
My four highest scores so far are 51.5, 52.3, 53.6 and 54.7. Strange
thing is that the three highest ones are all versions of 'Adv: Parents
of 15 year old find $71,000 cash hidden in his close
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Works for me (output from spamc):
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.0 required=5.0
> tests=SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK,SUBJ_REMOVE,KIFF,CLICK_BELOW,
> FREQ_SPAM_PHRASE,SPAM_PHRASES_020,SPAM_PHRASES_100
> version=2.31 ^^^
David B. Bitton wrote:
> This got a 35.7. What's your record?
Not mine, but it's higher:
http://use.perl.org/~davorg/journal/5859
Matt.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com
Rose, Bobby wrote:
> Is there a rule that anyone uses for reducing the score for listservs?
> I know you can whitelist but I was wondering if there was an easier way
> to avoid all the maintenance.
CVS has a KNOWN_MAILING_LIST rule. Please also see the following
bugzilla bug: http://bugzilla.spa
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
>
>>Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
>>be release ready?
>
>
> Good question. I haven't seen anything on the list about a planned 2.40
> release date yet. Hopefully
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
> Which resources does SA need in order to scan (15.000 accounts) - 50.000
>emails/day (Hardware/Software)?
> And 1.000.000 emails/day (50.000 accounts)?
> I have these two email conf to put to work. Are they possible? I
Jason Baker wrote:
> Before I start wandering down this path, I thought I'd check to see if it's
> already been done (and a quick google came up emptyhanded).
>
> Has anyone added spamassassin into EZMLM mailing lists? I'm essentially
> thinking to bounce to moderator if the score is above the
These are probably FAQs, but I couldn't find the answers easily:
Q: How do I create my own Spam Rule in Spam Assasin?
Q: Whats the best way to update the rules? (I'm using SA 2.11)
Should I take the latest rules from CVS or the 2.31 package?
Thanks
Paul
-
I'm sure we could live with that, too.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:03:57PM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> >
> >>Aaahhh...well, then. Is there any idication of when the current CVS will
> >>be release ready?
> >
> >
> > Good
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:44:07AM +0100, Paul Reilly wrote:
>
> These are probably FAQs, but I couldn't find the answers easily:
>
> Q: How do I create my own Spam Rule in Spam Assasin?
Just add a file inside the "rules" directory with a number (28_body.cf)
and put the rules inside.
If you ar
> -Original Message-
> From: Harold Hallikainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 July 2002 03:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Use of mail bounce to deliver spam?
>
>
> Over the past few days I've been receiving bounces of
> mail I did not send.
> The content of
Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
"upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versions are buggy". In the 2
weeks I was gone, have things settled down
Hi,
lets fix a mean email size of 50k. So we can do calculations.
We want to know if SA is a feasible solution to implement in these two
situations or not?
Any hints?
TIA,Paulo Henrique.
On Tue, 09 Jul 2002 09:33:45 +0100
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi,
> lets fix a mean email size of 50k. So we can do calculations.
> We want to know if SA is a feasible solution to implement in these two
>situations or not?
> Any hints?
If that's your mean email size, you'll probably need
After having SA mark an issue of a Lyris-hosted newsletter I subscribe
to as spam, I started a discussion of SA here:
http://www.escribe.com/computing/neatnettricks/bb/index.html?bID=29470
Feel free to jump in and correct my errors. ;-)
---
> >
> > This is something that Postini offers. It allows the customer to select
> > different categories and could be a great way for business users to make
> > sure less legit business email doesn't get tagged as Spam while allowing
> > residential/personal email to block $$ type emails since th
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:26:35PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> | Has anyone added spamassassin into EZMLM mailing lists? I'm essentially
> | thinking to bounce to moderator if the score is above the limit, rather than
> | message-mangle.
I added SA scanning to my majordomo lists usin
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write:
> And there's also the computation time involved in checking a rule --
> particularly when said rule might be poorly written and have unpleasant regex
> characteristics. Could easily lead to deliberate of accidental DoS attacks
> against the
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 04:58:27AM -0700, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release
> it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2
> support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is
> "upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versi
Hello,
I have setup and configured a spamassassin server on our network and so
far everything looks great. There is one thing I cannot figure out though.
It appears that when I put in the configuration rule
all_spam_to *@example.com
users at example.com are still getting their mail
Howard,
I am having a similar problem - my local.cf is being read, but
sometimes various items in the local.cf seem to be ignored. For
example, I changed my required_hits to 5.9, and that seems to be read
consistently. However, I have some all_spam_to entries that get ignored
"occasionally". T
Robert L Mathews said:
> Perhaps someone has already tried this, but it occurs to me that a sort
> of RBL for spammer phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and URLs would be
> useful.
Yes, myself and Mark Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> swapped a few mails
on this in January -- I think it was Mark's
> >> This got a 35.7. What's your record?
I got a "Temple Kiff" spam that scored 60.9 the other day. My Razor and DCC
scores are higher than normal since I use a threshold of 7, so it really
should have only been 58.something. I think everything else is standard.
X-Spam-Report: 60.9 hits, 7 r
I'm sure this has been done and is probably documented somewhere...
I would like my Linux machine running Spam Assassin to simply filter the
messages and pass them on to my Exchange server. I don't want to create
individual user accounts on the Linux machine. How can I have it filter all
messag
Craig Hughes said:
> And there's also the computation time involved in checking a
> rule -- particularly when said rule might be poorly written and
> have unpleasant regex characteristics. Could easily lead to
> deliberate of accidental DoS attacks against the machine hosting
> the CGI. I
What mail server software are you planning to use on the Linux server?
sendmail, qmail, etc..? Once you decide then that will determine how to
implement SA in the manner that you want.
Ed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hess,
>
I have it working in a test mode using sendmail/procmail.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Hess, Mtodd, /mth; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Pass through to smart host?
What mail
Theo Van Dinter said:
> Originally the statement was "Razor2 support is a big change, we
> should wait for 2.4", and now it's "2.4 will take a while, we should
> release 2.32." The semi-software engineer in me says we should leave
> 2.3[1-9] as maintenance releases and wait for 2.40 for R2 supp
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> although I seem to recall some questions on the razor list about Razor
> matching anything, and I haven't seen many hits in the past few days,
> but I haven't had any time to investigate, myself :(
Well:
mysql> select COUNT(*) from
> mysql> select COUNT(*) from reported where date > '2002-06-26
> 00:00:00' and rules like
> '%RAZOR_CHECK%';
Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
share the script that's doing that?
--
michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/
"
Trey Keifer wrote:
> I have setup and configured a spamassassin server on our network and so
> far everything looks great. There is one thing I cannot figure out though.
> It appears that when I put in the configuration rule
>
> all_spam_to *@example.com
>
> users at example.com are s
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 08:34:40PM -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> What are you using to record this? I was going to do something very similar
> but if you've already got public code I'd like to use it.
It's a few bits of perl I threw together. I didn't make it public mostly
because I just di
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:16:47PM -0600, Michael Moncur wrote:
> Hey, cool. How did your reported spam end up in MySQL? Any chance you can
> share the script that's doing that?
;) I just posted a message about it (under the "high spam score"
thread...) It's just some perl I threw together.
--
Hello,
I am setting up spamd to connect to a remote mysql database to read/set
user preferences. If the remote database is down, spamd resolves to read
the 10_misc.cf and apply the rules therein to every inbound e-mail .
Since I have about 45000 users, this might become a burden for the
machine
Hello list,
I have spamc/spamd setup (for a few test users via procmail) and (very)
occasionally get messages with their subjects tagged, but the messages
do not have enough points to get tagged. This isn't an issue for me as
X-Spam-Status is still No, but for those users filtering by subject it
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 05:15:12PM +0200, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
> Michael Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > Aha... you need to modify your logrotate scripts to restart spamd. On
> > linux, there is a /etc/logrotate.d directory which contains rulesets
> > for each service & how to rest
Crist J. Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> It sounds like you have spamd writing _directly_ to the log file
> rather than actually using the syslog service?
I don't think so. Spamd is using the syslog-ng service with the mail
facility (the default). Spamd stops logging when syslog-ng is stop
nothing like anti-spam spam!
--
David B. Bitton[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.codenoevil.com
Code Made Fresh Daily
- Original Message -
From: MyHitMovie
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:46 PM
Subject: *SPAM* Finally. Eliminate Annoying
Spam!
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:16:00PM -0500, Hess, Mtodd, /mth wrote:
| I'm sure this has been done and is probably documented somewhere...
|
| I would like my Linux machine running Spam Assassin to simply filter the
| messages and pass them on to my Exchange server. I don't want to create
| individ
Hi Robert and Justin,
I've documented the original idea (well, saved some emails :-)
at http://bl.reynolds.net.au/ksi/
I've been focusing on learning who to run a dnsbl service,
scanning, and integrating it all together. Current system
was spread over 4 servers, so I'm also merging it all onto
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:43:15PM -0700, Jason Baker wrote:
> | Before I start wandering down this path, I thought I'd check to see if it's
> | already been done (and a quick google came up emptyhanded).
> |
> | Has anyone added spamassassin into EZMLM mailing lis
42 matches
Mail list logo
