On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 04:58:27AM -0700, Craig Hughes wrote: > Is the concensus that Razor2 is stable enough for us to release > it? I'm somewhat wary of releasing a SA version with Razor2 > support and having to answer daily emails where the answer is > "upgrade to version 2.x -- prior versions are buggy". In the 2
Well, 2.12 seems fairly stable at the moment, and the SA code has been working with it on my box for the past few weeks. There is still at least one bug I have to report to the list (Razor calls Socket::INET with bad parameters once in a while.) There will inevitably be some "I installed Razor2 and it's doing _________, so how do I change this" questions, but there's not much we can do about that. (I would point them to the razor-users list, but ...) Originally the statement was "Razor2 support is a big change, we should wait for 2.4", and now it's "2.4 will take a while, we should release 2.32." The semi-software engineer in me says we should leave 2.3[1-9] as maintenance releases and wait for 2.40 for R2 support. The spamassassinator in me says the R2 code is stable, it's the Razor2 code that may have problems, but that's not our project. Attachments 198 and 211 (in order) go against the 2.3x code, which is what I'm currently running with. It'd go well with some of the other fixes that have come through against 2.31. :) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "It's the ego trip of the century to write your own operating system. Highly recommended, two thumbs up!" - Linus Torvalds ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, and much much more. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
