RE: [SAtalk] whitelist problems

> I have messages I am desperatly trying to whitelist from SA. > I am using SpamAssassin on a Solaris 8 server using sendmail > 8.12.10 and MIMEDefang. > > I have tried various lines in > /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf to no avail: > >whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >whitelis

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist problems

I think this is a bug in the latest release of SA, I just reported it an hour ago. Theo is checking it out for me, we might see a new version released soon! Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. Charles Gagnon wrote: > I have messages I am desperatly trying to whitelist fro

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist problems

On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:24:09PM -0500, Colin A. Bartlett wrote: [...] > Just to point out the obvious, did you restart spamd or mimedefang > after adding the lines to your CF file? Yeah. I have restarted sendmail and MIMEDefang after every config attempt but it didn't work. > BTW, in my experi

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist problems

www.kineticweb.biz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles Gagnon Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] whitelist problems I have messages I am desperatly trying to whitelist from SA. I am using SpamAssassin on

[SAtalk] whitelist problems

I have messages I am desperatly trying to whitelist from SA. I am using SpamAssassin on a Solaris 8 server using sendmail 8.12.10 and MIMEDefang. I have tried various lines in /etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf to no avail: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist by ip and logging issues

Matt Kettler wrote: 99% of the time you're much better off implementing a whitelist in whatever layer you are using to call SA in the first place (ie: procmail them around sa instead of through it).. In my setup the SA is called from postfix (-o content_filter in master.cf). The box does not ha

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist by ip and logging issues

Bob Apthorpe wrote: What about the trusted_networks parameter? From perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf: DNS blacklist checks will never query for hosts on these networks. Exactly as stated, these (dnsbl) are the only tests that are not performed for trusted networks. danb

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist by ip and logging issues

Hi, On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 03:31 AM 1/13/2004, DanB wrote: > >Just installed spamassassin 2.60 - there are two things I haven't > >figured yet: > > > >- can I whitelist somebody by the ip of the mta that gives me that > >mail? > > Within SA, no What about the trusted_n

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist by ip and logging issues

At 03:31 AM 1/13/2004, DanB wrote: Just installed spamassassin 2.60 - there are two things I haven't figured yet: - can I whitelist somebody by the ip of the mta that gives me that mail? Within SA, no Also, you should realize that SA's built in whitelist (ie: whitelist_from) doesn't prevent

[SAtalk] whitelist by ip and logging issues

Just installed spamassassin 2.60 - there are two things I haven't figured yet: - can I whitelist somebody by the ip of the mta that gives me that mail? I have some internal mail servers, say s1 and s2, but the mx is sa. When a mail comes for [EMAIL PROTECTED], and this is and alias to [EMAIL PRO

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist question

ent: Monday, December 29, 2003 5:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question > > At 02:08 PM 12/28/03 -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote: > >whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], root, > >Super-User > > &g

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question

At 02:08 PM 12/28/03 -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], root, Super-User but unix system messages like the one below still get trapped as spam. I thought that the whitelist_from took precedence over everything else, am I missing something? Appreciate

[SAtalk] whitelist question

Hi, Another question on SA, sorry for bombarding you all.. I have the following in my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], root, Super-User but unix system messages like the one below still get trapped as spam. I thought that the whitelist_from

[SAtalk] whitelist and autolearn

Hi everybody: I *think* I want to whitelist an address, but stop SA from autolearning the whitelisted mail as ham. Before I get started explaing why, i realize this topic has been discussed here. This thread is enlightening: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/29088 He

[SAtalk] whitelist seems to be ignored?

Hi spamassassin mailing list. I'm trying to avoid this email getting tagged as spam. at first i just tried to edit the user_prefs file, but after that didnt work i read http://useast.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist

nyone with an @sourceforge.net address globally I would add Whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]   to my local.cf   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julio Cesar Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 9:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Whitelist   H

[SAtalk] Whitelist

How do I to insert many domains in whitelist?? Help me please!! Julio Cesar - ATN Network - Sao Paulo/Brasil

[SAtalk] WhiteList problem

Hello guys, I guess i'm doing something totaly WRONG herebut can't figure out what. I have spamassassin 2.60. I have placed a file whitelist.cf in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/ the file has following: def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] goodwillny.org def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL P

Re: [SAtalk] WhiteList problem

On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 13:39, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 12:13 PM 11/12/2003, Kiryl Hakhovich , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >am I missing something here? > > > >here is a headers for email that should be going through: > > > >--- > > > >Received: from > >mail-gateway.exchan

Re: [SAtalk] WhiteList problem

At 12:13 PM 11/12/2003, Kiryl Hakhovich , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: am I missing something here? here is a headers for email that should be going through: --- Received: from mail-gateway.exchange.goodwillny.org ([10.0.1.27]) by winxchnge2-2kab.exchange.goodwillny.org

[SAtalk] WhiteList problem

Hello guys, I guess i'm doing something totaly WRONG herebut can't figure out what. I have spamassassin 2.60. I have placed a file whitelist.cf in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/ the file has following: def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] goodwillny.org def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL P

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question

Jack Coates wrote: just got a spam that SA 2.55 not only didn't catch, but specifically let through because of whitelisting. I don't have a manual whitelist that matches this message, but I do have auto-whitelist turned on. Is there a way to parse the auto whitelist files and see what's in them? I'

[SAtalk] whitelist question

just got a spam that SA 2.55 not only didn't catch, but specifically let through because of whitelisting. I don't have a manual whitelist that matches this message, but I do have auto-whitelist turned on. Is there a way to parse the auto whitelist files and see what's in them? I'm concerned that s

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not working?

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Ron Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > SA 2.60 > Postfix 2.0.16 [snip..] > So, I added whitelist entries to /etc/spamassassin/local.cf for all > the machines in my home lan, and restarted spamassassin. > def_whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]haggis > def_whitelist_from_rc

[SAtalk] Whitelist not working?

Hi, SA 2.60 Postfix 2.0.16 I've got various local daemons that occasionally send email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Works like a charm. Unfortu- nately, SA flags them as spam: Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 4.9 required) pts rule name description --

[SAtalk] Whitelist / Rule Question...

I am going nuts. I can't resolve this. I have SA 2.55 running with out any other major issues except for a nagging issue of an external user that continues to be identified as spam no matter how I try to white list them. I have marked up the offending header below by adding `000` to the end of a

[SAtalk] Whitelist vs. Blacklist

Greetings, Dumb question or a clarification (you choose): I have a blacklisted domain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]); however, there are one or two users at that domain who actually have legitimate reasons to send users of my mail servers mail (i.e. they belong to this list). If I globally whiteli

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist / Rule Question...

At Sat Oct 25 03:18:30 2003, Larry Gilson wrote: > > I get username in the body also. While trying to personalize a message the > spammer uses an alias/username for an introduction. An example would be a > person with an address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > #--- Begin Example ---# > Hello Dude, Th

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist / Rule Question...

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist / Rule Question... > > > At 01:34 PM 10/24/2003, Dan Tappin wrote: > >rawbody USERNAME

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist / Rule Question...

At 01:34 PM 10/24/2003, Dan Tappin wrote: rawbody USERNAME /username/i describe USERNAME score USERNAME -100.0 ... where the person sending e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Um... does "username" appear in the body part of the message? Note that "rawbody" does not include the headers. You probably want

[SAtalk] Whitelist / Rule Question...

I have posted on this before so forgive me if I am repeating myself. I have several whitelist_from entries in my config files but the odd message continues to get trapped as spam. It seems to be the same sender over and over again. I have created a custom rule for this but I must have made a mis

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist?

At 09:55 PM 10/12/2003, Robert Nicholson wrote: Q. With the SA whitelist, will mail that contains addresses that are on the whitelist ever be checked for spam? Yes. The SA whitelist only performs a score-biasing method, but the messages are still checked. This applies to both the conventional, an

[SAtalk] Whitelist?

My previous setup involved a combination of procmail, spamassassin call from filtmail which is a perlscript that runs from my .procmailrc. I am reimplementing the lot in perl using SpamAssassin and Mail::Audit with qmail. so far everything works quite nicely. However, in the past I used my own

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist not working...

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan > Tappin > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] whitelist not working... > > > Attached is a header of a sender that keeps getti

[SAtalk] whitelist not working...

Attached is a header of a sender that keeps getting flagged as spam. I have whitelisted the sender as follows: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] collicutt.com whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] telus.com Can any one see an

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

the link - I will check it out. Dan > -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue > > > > No, . is the wildcard ch

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

At 09:09 AM 10/2/03 -0600, Dan Tappin wrote: So if I wanted multiple ISP's in the same rule can I do an OR operator or can I just create multiple header rules with the same lable? All rules must have different names.. if two rules have the same name, the first is over-written. There is a regex O

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

tt > Kettler > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue > > > At 09:26 AM 10/1/03 -0600, Dan Tappin wrote: > >How would I whitelist a machine? > > AFAIK there's no normal whitelist s

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

At 09:26 AM 10/1/03 -0600, Dan Tappin wrote: How would I whitelist a machine? AFAIK there's no normal whitelist support for that, but you could get that effect with a custom header rule. For example: header LOCAL_RCVD_PRIV_TELUSPLANET Received =~ /priv-.{0,20}\.telusplanet\.net/i score LO

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

round. Dan > -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue > > > At 08:45 AM 10/1/03 -0600, Dan Tappin wrote: > >

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

At 08:45 AM 10/1/03 -0600, Dan Tappin wrote: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from_rcvd *.tsn.ca tsn.ca whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from_rcvd *.theglobeandmail.comtheglobeandmail.com Am I missing something obvious here? Well that

[SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

Below is the header of a legitimate mailing list message that keeps getting flagged as spam: Here is part of my local.cf file where I tried to whitelist it: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from_rcvd *.tsn.ca tsn.ca whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

RE: [SAtalk] WhiteList

olten > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:48 AM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] WhiteList > > > put the following line into your local.cf -file > > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > or > whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >

RE: [SAtalk] WhiteList

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] WhiteList > > > Hi all, > i need to add an address to spamassassin whitelist. Where ? > > Tnx. Oz > > -- > -- > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsore

RE: [SAtalk] WhiteList

Can you whitelist a IP subnet using the same format? Dan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Cornelius Bolten > Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:48 AM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Whit

Re: [SAtalk] WhiteList

I wrote a short shell script that does the trick for me. It assumes that there is a file, local.cf.top that has all the config info from the normal local.cf file, everything except the white or blacklist info, and a file local.cf.names that contains all the whitelist and blacklist lines. Run w

Re: [SAtalk] WhiteList

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:15:25 + O-Zone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > i need to add an address to spamassassin whitelist. Where ? > Just add a line like whitlist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the file local.cf in mails homefolder -- Regards, Jens Strohschnitter

Re: [SAtalk] WhiteList

put the following line into your local.cf -file whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] or whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "O-Zone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:15 PM Subje

[SAtalk] WhiteList

Hi all, i need to add an address to spamassassin whitelist. Where ? Tnx. Oz -- -- --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassass

[SAtalk] whitelist entire domain

Hi guys! I'm new to SA but I'm have my system wide configuration up & running. Now, I'm trying to whitelist an entire domain... which is the best way to do it? I'm trying this line in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain.com but it is n

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist by IP?

> Having a problem with some users on our local network writing > emails that get marked as spam. I dont want to whitelist by > domain as this is easy to forge is there a way to whitelist > by IP (and mask) that the mail was recieved from, being these > users are all local on rfc1918 network s

[SAtalk] Whitelist by IP?

Having a problem with some users on our local network writing emails that get marked as spam. I dont want to whitelist by domain as this is easy to forge is there a way to whitelist by IP (and mask) that the mail was recieved from, being these users are all local on rfc1918 network seems like the

Re: [SAtalk] WHITELIST QUESTION

At 01:12 PM 7/30/2003 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote: I have a question for someone. What does Whitelist_from actually look at? all headers? or a single one? Is there a way to whitelist this line: From: "Alan Fullmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> any ideas? thanks in advance. w

Re: [SAtalk] WHITELIST QUESTION

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Alan Fullmer wrote: > I have a question for someone. > > What does Whitelist_from actually look at? all headers? or a single one? > > Is there a way to whitelist this line: From: "Alan Fullmer" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Here is how I would do it: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTEC

[SAtalk] WHITELIST QUESTION

I have a question for someone.   What does Whitelist_from actually look at?  all headers? or a single one?   Is there a way to whitelist this line:  From: "Alan Fullmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     any ideas?  thanks in advance. Alan Fullmer Owner / Administrator

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist not working?!?

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Bonny wrote: > Hello all! > > In my ./spamassassin/user_prefs I put: > > whitelist_from@tuttinudi.com Try: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Later-- Tim -- Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http:/

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist not working?!?

At 07:41 PM 7/29/2003 +0200, Bonny wrote: Hello all! In my ./spamassassin/user_prefs I put: whitelist_from @tuttinudi.com BUT e-mails coming in from that domain (I mainly get it from ONE address, which is a mailing list) are still caught as SPAM! What can I do? I already did "sa-learn" on the

[SAtalk] whitelist not working?!?

Hello all! In my ./spamassassin/user_prefs I put: whitelist_from @tuttinudi.com BUT e-mails coming in from that domain (I mainly get it from ONE address, which is a mailing list) are still caught as SPAM! What can I do? I already did "sa-learn" on the folder of that mailing list... Thank you

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Joe, Thursday, July 24, 2003, 7:43:02 AM, you wrote: JJ> I see what you're saying. I actually whitelisted these specific JJ> addresses due to the fact that all they produce is ham. Nothing that JJ> comes from them looks remotely spammish and I

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of David B Funk > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:48 AM > To: Joe Julian > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn? > > > On Wed,

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn?

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Joe Julian wrote: > I have a list of specific trusted addresses in my whitelist, but it > still won't autolearn from them. Why not? Their scores are quite > negative, way below -2, but it still won't autolearn from them. It looks > like it's ignoring the whitelist when checkin

[SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn?

I have a list of specific trusted addresses in my whitelist, but it still won't autolearn from them. Why not? Their scores are quite negative, way below -2, but it still won't autolearn from them. It looks like it's ignoring the whitelist when checking whether or not it should autolearn. What can I

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist Problem

At 01:46 AM 7/16/03 -0400, Gorm Jensen wrote: I run spamassassin 2.55 on a Redhat 7.2 system The attached email is spam, but it was not filtered because of the "USER_IN_WHITELIST" assessment. I studied my whitelist, and neither the originator nor strings containing the originator are listed, so I

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist Problem

Close. I whitelisted myself, and the spam's "Return-Path" points to me. Thanks, Bob. > Even without seeing the missing attachment, I'm guessing the message > matched something in the default whitelists in > /usr/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist.cf > > Amazon? > > -- Bob ---

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist Problem

Hi, On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 01:46:17 -0400 "Gorm Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I run spamassassin 2.55 on a Redhat 7.2 system > > The attached email is spam, but it was not filtered because of the > "USER_IN_WHITELIST" assessment. I studied my whitelist, and neither > the originator nor stri

[SAtalk] Whitelist Problem

I run spamassassin 2.55 on a Redhat 7.2 system The attached email is spam, but it was not filtered because of the "USER_IN_WHITELIST" assessment. I studied my whitelist, and neither the originator nor strings containing the originator are listed, so I don't see how/why the message passed. Can an

[SAtalk] Whitelist scoring aberration

Gentle friends, We're running SpamAssassin 2.53 on a FreeBSD server in conjunction with omail-admin-1.0 and qmail-scanner-1.15. One of our customers is having a problem whitelisting a sender's address, i.e., mail is tagged as spam in spite of a whitelist entry for the sender, [EMAIL PROTECTED

Mystery Solved! [Was: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not whitelisting?}

--- Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:42:31 -0400 Theo Van > Dinter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:26:42AM -0700, James > Nonya wrote: > >> Yet the email is still processed. Anything I'm > >> missing here? > > > > Whi

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not whitelisting?

--On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:42:31 -0400 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:26:42AM -0700, James Nonya wrote: Yet the email is still processed. Anything I'm missing here? Whitelists don't make the message not get processed. They just add a score (negative

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not whitelisting?

On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:26:42AM -0700, James Nonya wrote: > Yet the email is still processed. Anything I'm > missing here? Whitelists don't make the message not get processed. They just add a score (negative in this case). Same as blacklists. The only way to not filter for a set of users is

[SAtalk] Whitelist not whitelisting?

Any reason why the whitelist *may* not be whitelisting? Kind of odd...I've tried both: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from @domain.net Yet the email is still processed. Anything I'm missing here? __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question:

. Pat Masterson cc: Sent by: Subject: [SAtalk

[SAtalk] whitelist question:

What exactly does a "whitelist_from" directive do? Does it add a negative score? Or does it cause Spamassassin to ignore that particular sender? Does "whitelist_from" match against the DNS name that results from the reverse DNS lookup of the IP of the conecting MTA? Thanks. -pat *---

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

John Lederer wrote: > I am extremely interested. > > We use Rolodap, an LDAP contacts directory . Automatically whielisting > email from anyone in tht would let us lower the threshold for spam > generally. > > If you can post your code somewhere where I could link to it, I would > make sure that

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

Simon Byrnand wrote: Huh ? Of course Sendmail can refuse mail for non-existant user accounts. :) This happens automatically for the "primary" domain name the server is configured with, but if you're doing multiple virtual domains using the virtusertable file then you need a wildcard entry per d

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

At 11:30 15/06/03 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote: >Ah. Does this make any difference to putting your MTA in a proxy-forwarding DMZ? Don't know what provision >Sendmail has for defeating dictionary attacks and suchlike, but both Postfix 2.0 and Exim 4.20 can completely >defeat them, so using Fetchmai

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 05:44:40PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > I'll do a trade with you ("swap you this for that"). You tell me how > you'd whitelist a given ldap alias list with Sendmail, and I'll tell you > how I'd do it with SA-Exim 4.20/3.0 and with Postfix 2.0.12 (dunno yet, > cos I never

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

David Luyer wrote: Of course it can. sendmail can do anything. Never believe anyone who tells you there's something sendmail can't do. Well, well, well. It does it by default if it's the final delivery host, Good. So now I know that. I don't know Sendmail at all, but as I said, both SA-Exim 4.

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

> Also, both can be configured to refuse mail for non-existent user > accounts. Which I don't believe Sendmail can. Of course it can. sendmail can do anything. Never believe anyone who tells you there's something sendmail can't do. It does it by default if it's the final delivery host, if it's

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist file?

dGenus Mailing List wrote: /etc/mail/spamassassin/whitelist_from.cf What is teh format of this file... one entry per line??? It's exactly the same as you'd stuff into your user_prefs or local.cf file. In fact, it's simply an extension of both the latter. The only point of having it at all, is to

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

Colin Dean wrote: Sorry, in trying to be brief in my original posting, I probably wasn't clear enough. All you had to do is to explain "why." Before using SA, we'd set up a regular cron job to send the relevant data from MySQL into an OpenLDAP directory so that we could then use this easily as a

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist file?

Jim Ford wrote: I think it's what's known as a "badly kept secret." Unless you count the many and frequent postings on this list, pointing it out. Should be in a FAQ somewhere (and is, perhaps :), it isn't in 'man spamd', 'man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf',though. It's probably in the code in the P

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist file?

Tony Earnshaw wrote: /etc/mail/spamassassin/whitelist_from.cf What is teh format of this file... one entry per line??? --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.media

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

I am extremely interested. We use Rolodap, an LDAP contacts directory . Automatically whielisting email from anyone in tht would let us lower the threshold for spam generally. If you can post your code somewhere where I could link to it, I would make sure that Rolodap users generally knew of

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

Tony Earnshaw wrote: I suppose it might be of interest to others if you told the list what users your ldap director[y|ies] contain(s). As well as your policy. Like I don't want mail from my local users (100% Openldap 2.1.19 based) scanned, so both with my Postfix 2.0.x and SA-Exim 4.20/3.0 MTAs

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist file?

On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 10:07:55AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > I think it's what's known as a "badly kept secret." Unless you count the > many and frequent postings on this list, pointing it out. Should be in a > FAQ somewhere (and is, perhaps :), it isn't in 'man spamd', 'man > Mail::SpamAss

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

Colin Dean wrote: Using SpamAssassin, I want to whitelist every email address in the LDAP directory address book our mail clients (Mozilla and Netscape) use, without having a separate "whitelist_from" hard-wired into the SpamAssassin config file. So I've hacked some changes to SpamAssassin 2.55 so

[SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

Hi, Using SpamAssassin, I want to whitelist every email address in the LDAP directory address book our mail clients (Mozilla and Netscape) use, without having a separate "whitelist_from" hard-wired into the SpamAssassin config file. So I've hacked some changes to SpamAssassin 2.55 so it can query

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist file?

Thomas Cameron wrote: In as much as any .cf file in that directory will be read in whenever whatever it is (spamd, amavisd-new etc) starts up. Given read rights, etc. Where is that documented? I am having a hard time finding things like that... I think it's what's known as a "badly kept secre

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist file?

On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 18:00, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > Jonathan Nichols wrote: > > > Is there a way to have a "whitelist_from" file instead of individual > > entries in local.cf? > > /etc/mail/spamassassin/whitelist_from.cf > > In as much as any .cf file in that directory will be read in whenever

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist file?

Jonathan Nichols wrote: Is there a way to have a "whitelist_from" file instead of individual entries in local.cf? /etc/mail/spamassassin/whitelist_from.cf In as much as any .cf file in that directory will be read in whenever whatever it is (spamd, amavisd-new etc) starts up. Given read rights,

[SAtalk] whitelist file?

Hi everyone! Is there a way to have a "whitelist_from" file instead of individual entries in local.cf? Thanks, -Jonathan --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.me

RE: [SAtalk] whitelist: help please ;'o(

This may not be quite on the mark, but is something I've been looking at, so will pass it along. There's a utility called 'fam', which has been contributed to the open source community by SGI. Fam monitors files for changes, and notifies clients when those files have been chaged: http://oss.sgi.co

[SAtalk] whitelist: help please ;'o(

Hi List. Is there a way to linear search a file with domains that need to be in whitelist_from ? i.e whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED];/usr/exim/whitelist-from/clients OR whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/exim/whitelist-clients/clients}} Regards, Tom Kinghorn

[SAtalk] whitelist/blacklist confusion

Ok, this is ticking me off. I can't seem to find a certain address I am trying to blacklist. Some of you are familiar with this guy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have his relay rejected at my own server, but that doesn't seem to filter out those messages coming in via fetchmail (they have already been ac

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not working as expected.

mAssassin listserve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] whitelist > > I don't suppose someone out there could tell me how to tell procmail to > simply accept the message and stop processing? > Generally, just deliver it to $DEFAULT. Something like this (toward

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not working as expected.

On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:34:53PM +0100, Jim Ford wrote: > What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox, > bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips with!) If you're using procmail, yes. Basically you need to put the logic of "do I want to filte

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not working as expected.

On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jim Ford wrote: > However, I still see SA checking info in the headers of the whitelisted mails. > Is this normal, please? Yes. A white/black-list does not stop SA from running over a message. They simply add a certain value (positive or negative) to the

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not working as expected.

On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:10:15AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > The only way to not have SA check a message is to not call SA under > certain conditions. What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox, bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips w

[SAtalk] Whitelist not working as expected.

Hi, I'm trying to get to grips with eliminating spam on my single user home machine and do my bit for the community by using Vipul's Razor. Spamassassin seems to be working well, but needs tuning. (Ironically, because of the volume of this list, I seem to spend more time reading spamassassin-talk

  1   2   >