> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On Behalf Of David B Funk
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:48 AM
> To: Joe Julian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist ignored for auto-learn?
> 
> 
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Joe Julian wrote:
> 
> > I have a list of specific trusted addresses in my whitelist, but it 
> > still won't autolearn from them. Why not? Their scores are quite 
> > negative, way below -2, but it still won't autolearn from them. It 
> > looks like it's ignoring the whitelist when checking 
> whether or not it 
> > should autolearn. What can I do to change that?
> 
> Um, you probably -don't- want to change that, there's a good 
> reason for that logic.

I see what you're saying. I actually whitelisted these specific
addresses due to the fact that all they produce is ham. Nothing that
comes from them looks remotely spammish and I wanted bayes to learn from
them (esp. to get over that 200 message hurdle). 

I suppose what I am looking for then is a new feature ie: "learn-from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Or I suppose I can just make a rule that looks for
the From that I want to learn from and set my own negative score for
those.

Thanks,
Joe



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to