We're running SpamAssassin 2.53 on a FreeBSD server in conjunction with omail-admin-1.0 and qmail-scanner-1.15. One of our customers is having a problem whitelisting a sender's address, i.e., mail is tagged as spam in spite of a whitelist entry for the sender, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mysql> select * from userpref where username like '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
+-------------------------------+----------------+------------------+------+
| username | preference | value | id |
+-------------------------------+----------------+------------------+------+
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | whitelist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 5629 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | whitelist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 5630 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | whitelist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 5631 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | required_hits | 3 | 5628 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | spam_trash | 0 | 5627 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | spam_enabled | 1 | 5626 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | spam_fwd | | 5625 |
+-------------------------------+----------------+------------------+------+
7 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Here's the spamassassin portion of the qmail-queue.log entry for a test message:
24/06/2003 15:33:52:24245: checking if spamcheck is enabled...
24/06/2003 15:33:52:24245: looks fine so far!
24/06/2003 15:33:52:24245: spam_enabled is set! spam_trash = '0', spam_fwd = ''
24/06/2003 15:33:52:24245: SA: run /usr/bin/spamc -c -f -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rgery.com < /var/spool/qmailscan/working/new/apache.willamette.net10564940324342
4245
24/06/2003 15:33:52:24245: SA: yup, this smells like SPAM
24/06/2003 15:33:52:24245: spamassassin: finished scan of dir "/var/spool/qmails
can/apache.willamette.net105649403243424245" in 0.009849 secs
Now, here's the test message's header:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 24406 invoked by uid 85); 24 Jun 2003 22:34:18 -0000
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by apache.willamette.net by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.15
(sophie: 2.10/3.66. spamassassin: 2.53. Clear:SA:1(0/0):.
Processed in 26.027755 secs); 24 Jun 2003 22:34:18 -0000
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=0 required=0
Received: from 12-225-173-139.client.attbi.com (HELO gsdnt2k.gsdllc.com) (12.225
.173.139)
by apache.willamette.net with SMTP; 24 Jun 2003 22:33:52 -0000
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C33AA0.D6F37250"
Subject: FW: test
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:34:57 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: test
Thread-Index: AcM3bXv6zpDIHrZDSDeFZYt3WU74DADM1Ctw
From: "Chris Hirst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Several things seem odd. First, if required_hits is set to 3, why does the tag indicate "required=0?" Second, if "hits=0," as the tag indicates, why is the message tagged as spam? Third, why isn't a minus value being added to the score as it should?
I searched through previous postings but couldn't come up with this particular problem. Anyone observed this type of behavior before?
Best, .\\ichelle
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
