Re: [SAtalk] mysql user-prefs script?

rOD. - -- :: rODbegbie :: http://www.groovymother.com/ :: "Sorry, son! I didn't know you, Jay Leno and a monkey were bathing a clown." -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP) iD8DBQE/akIvN/YdXIyAw18RAp6tAJ9pOQCPdyk24niFSk5M55JNML5kYQCfZZC0 plyiBcXNdR

Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names

Personally, I think BANG_OPRAH is the most disturbing test name. What a horrible thought. rOD. -- :: rODbegbie :: http://www.groovymother.com/ :: So what do you do? Oh yeah, I wait tables too. No, I haven't heard your band, cause you guys are prett

Re: [SAtalk] I hate Mandatory Mail Filtering!!!! - speakeasy.net bites the dust. (was "I hate SpamAsssassin")

end them without a second thought. rOD. -- :: rODbegbie :: http://www.groovymother.com/ :: I think I'm in love. Probably just hungry. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the

Re: [SAtalk] Why is this lists Reply-To: Header set to the wrong address?

Ben Johansen wrote: > So Why is the reply-to set to this > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It isn't. HTH. HAND. rOD. -- :: rODbegbie :: http://www.groovymother.com/ :: So what do you do? Oh yeah, I wait tables too. No, I haven't heard your band, cause you guy

Re: [SAtalk] Which version of Red Hat?

scanner and SA fine. rOD. -- :: rODbegbie :: http://www.groovymother.com/ :: "A computer is a stupid machine with the ability to do incredibly smart things, while computer programmers are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a dangerously perfec

Re: [SAtalk] spamd frozen?

rODbegbie wrote: > Something similarly wacky happened here today. My mailserver was freaking > out: load at about 30 and suchlike. Oh, and the base of my machine is RedHat 7.3 (although there's not a great deal still on it that came from those RPMs!) rOD. -- He gave his life

Re: [SAtalk] spamd frozen?

Rob Bos wrote: > This morning I woke up with a system load around thirty Something similarly wacky happened here today. My mailserver was freaking out: load at about 30 and suchlike. Very interesting. (qmail -> maildrop -> spamc -> spamd, running 2.43 release) rOD. -- "Fast! Fast! Faster!

Re: [SAtalk] white and blacklist .cf files

Matthew Boeckman wrote: > I am running spamassassin sitewide for my company, using spamd/spamc > and sendmail. I think I have misunderstood something from the > documentation: spamd compiles and stores the system-wide rules on start-up to speed up processing. If you edit the local.cf file, you sh

Re: [SAtalk] GENUINE_EBAY_RCVD

Adam Henry wrote: > I have received the following headers from a message from an Ebay > purchaser, and am not sure why the GENUINE_EBAY_RCVD trigger wasn't > Hit. Here they are: > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The "From:" header doesn't end with @ebay.com, therefore the eBay checks weren't performed

Re: [SAtalk] Interesting Nigerian scam article

Matthew Cline wrote: > Not in my inbox. And 1% of > recipients reply? How sad. Yet another blow to my faith in > humanity... Have you tried replying to them? It's *fun*! Try asking them complex questions, and watch them answer in incredibly tortured English which must take them hours to write

Re: [SAtalk] RedHat 8.0 - Sendmail

Greg Jamison wrote: > The spamassassin service is running, but spam of all kinds is still > pouring through. Any ideas on what I need to do to get it working? Any > input is greatly appreciated. Thanks!! >From the RPM notes: To enable spamassassin, if you are receiving mail locally, simply add th

[SAtalk] cloudmark to start charging for razor lookups?

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1166564&forum_id=4258 Looks like Razor2 should be given a 0 score in the same manner as the SpamCop blacklist. rOD. -- "I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!" >> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymothe

Re: [SAtalk] spamd error messages

Odhiambo Washington wrote: > After being bitten by bugs in 2.41, I've downgraded to 2.31 but now spamd > spews errors like I've never seen before: Delete the contents of /usr/local/share/spamassassin and reinstall. There are some files that were new to v2.4x, so they won't be overwritten when yo

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelisting SpamCop messages?

Per Goetterup wrote: > I've tried whitelisting the sender address '###@reports.spamcop.net' but > it still tags all the reports with a pretty hefty hit-score. you should whitelist_to ###@reports.spamcop.net, not whitelist_from. rOD. -- "It's a feeling that I can't get through, I'll just bing

Re: [SAtalk] URL blacklist

Daniel Rogers wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:25:59PM -0400, Kerry Nice wrote: >> So, you haven't heard about drive-by spamming? You find an open wireless >> lan connection and sit in somebody's front drive and spam away for a >> while. > > No, but I can't hardly say as I'm surprised. It's s

[SAtalk] Why isn't CPAN mentioned on SA website? (was: Newbie help-RH7.2+Postfix)

Steve Thomas wrote: > The easiest way to install SA would be to run: > > perl -MCPAN -e 'install Mail::SpamAssassin' > > and answer yes to any questions about following dependencies. In my experience, CPAN certainly is the easiest way to install and/or upgrade SA. SHouldn't we recommend its usag

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] Scoring Yahoo Ads

Justin Mason wrote: > As a result I'm now collecting a corpus of nonspam SCEs, using a few > common FP'ing SCE sources. BTW if anyone knows of more FP'ing SCE > sources, I'd appreciate if they posted them; the more the better. The e-mail club at www.newbury.com is a good one -- It's a weekly lis

Re: [SAtalk] Graphics-only spam?

Hess, Mtodd, /mth wrote: > I hate to bring this up, but I see more and more spams that contain > very little, if any, text. Instead, most of the spam text is in a > graphic image. How will we be able to detect those as spam? OCR? There are still ways to analyse it. 1) Analyse the headers. Ar

Re: [SAtalk] Rules Question

Kevin Gagel wrote: > Based on the following header info, is my rule built correctly? > > Received: from (127.0.0.1) by MAIL3041.flowgo.com (PowerMTA(TM) > v1.5); Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:19:56 -0700 > (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > I want to make a rule that will tag it bassed on t

[SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] Scoring Yahoo Ads

Matt Kettler wrote: > Hmm, I think that Marc, being one of the most active and prolific > posters to this list Prolific != Useful. > certainly understands SA much better than most. > Certainly better than I do, and I suspect better than you do "rOD". Yeah. What do I know? Only been contributi

Re: [SAtalk] the non spam sample gets 8.5 hits

John Covici wrote: > I am using spamassassin 2.40 and I am getting 8.6 hits for the non > spam sample -- should I change the threshold or what? Teehee. First up, if you're new to SA, you really should use a release version, since the code is tested and the scores settled upon by the GA engine.

Re: [SAtalk] Microsoft developer newsletter tagged as spam

Bart Schaefer wrote: > Just to demonstrate that even a score of 10 or more doesn't guarantee > that something is spam, Oh, absolutely. Have a look at the attached email, which scores over 15 points with recent CVS. SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results SPAM: 15.9 hits, 5 required; SPAM: * 1.5

Re: [SAtalk] Is this an attempt to throw off SA?

Darian Rafie wrote: > I've noticed two recent spam emails, both from mortgage lenders, with > some nonsense like this attached at the end. Is this an attempt to > throw SA off the trail? Could be -- Decrease the chance of hitting a spam phrase score by padding out the message? Could also be ran

[SAtalk] "DCC is not available"

DCC was working fine on my system. I installed the latest CVS, and now I see this in my maillog: Jul 11 12:02:49 blazing spamd[5952]: debug: DCC is not available: system failed Did the "fix" to stop the DCC not found messages cause SA to stop finding DCC? Anyone else? rOD. -- Sell to them th

Re: [SAtalk] Web Front End To Alter Individual Settings?

Jim Hale wrote: > I know that SquirrelMail has something that will do it, but I'm using > the Horde Suite. Horde are working on just such a package, called "sam". It's not released, but it is in their CVS repository. I grabbed a copy last week and had a wee bit of a poke, but didn't have much l

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin on OS X Server

Hans Vallden wrote: > I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to > Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so. > Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions. http://rhumba.pair.com/ben/docs/sa.html Shall I presume the check is in the

[SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] spamassassin for windows

Matt Sergeant wrote: > Alternatively, yes, I'd use sourceforge. They're crap, but probably > the best crap we have ;-) Or as the old Your Sinclair t-shirts used to say: "It's CRAP! But in a funky, skillo sort of way" rOD. -- "Everybody's screwed up in their own special way! I'm Mr. Punchy!"

Re: [SAtalk] Razor

Lars Hansson wrote: > Eh, shouting down? Matt Perry's message is anything but constructive. > I'd be pretty pissed off too if someone tried to tell me how to do my > job and basicly accused me of being incompetent. *Releasing* a version of razor which fails to actually check spam (http://www.geoc

Re: [SAtalk] Razor

Theo Van Dinter wrote: > As someone else stated, 2.3x doesn't support Razor2 yet (although > patches are available via Bugzilla). SA doesn't look for the razor-* > programs, it calls the modules directly. When you installed Razor2 > it didn't get rid of the Razor1 modules, and they're named > di

Re: [SAtalk] dcc_add_header and spamd.

Deanna Phillips wrote: > dcc_add_header 1 > > to my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and restart spamd, I'm not > seeing the header. This setting does work when I put it into my > ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file and run spamassassin -t. It's working fine here when in my local.cf file. Try deleti

Re: [SAtalk] Fw: [Razor-users] Announce: Vipul's Razor v2

rODbegbie wrote: > Off to do a build now. I'll report back on how it does with SA later. Initial signs are promising. Nothing seems "broken" in the SA integration. Coolio! rOD. -- You have the right to remain *fabulous* >> Doing the blogging thang again at htt

[SAtalk] Fw: [Razor-users] Announce: Vipul's Razor v2

Off to do a build now. I'll report back on how it does with SA later. rOD. -- I think I'm in love. Probably just hungry. >> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ << - Original Message - From: "Vipul Ved Prakash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc:

Re: [SAtalk] RE: Broken Bugzilla links? - RE: [SAdev] [Bug 436]

Michael Moncur wrote: >> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=5.0 >> tests=FROM_MISSING,DATE_MISSING,MISSING >> _HEADERS,SUBJ_MISSING version=2.20 > > I should mention that this only started happening (to me) sometime > yesterday when I installed the latest CVS, so if this is a > spamassassin prob

Re: [SAtalk] MySQL/PHP Interface to SpamAssassin

Jim Scott wrote: > Any chance someone is willing to share some code to put together a > nice web inteface for end users to configure personal settings for > SpamAssassin on Redhat 7.x with MySQL and PHP or perhaps even just a > perl script? The lovely chaps at Horde (www.horde.org) are working on

[SAtalk] "Still running as root"

Just tried upgrading my system to SA 2.30pre, but spamd isn't behaving well. All of a sudden, I'm getting the following message in my maillog during startup: Jun 10 14:23:50 blazing spamd[981]: Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm

Re: [SAtalk] Freeze for 2.30, call for nonspam.log submissions

> On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Craig R. Hughes said: > >> Anyone have any thoughts for a cool release name for 2.30? "Chinese Dentist"? You know... the old joke: Q. What time does a chinaman go to the dentist? A. Tooth-hurty. rOD. (non-PC) -- Before Stonehenge, there was Woodhenge and Strawhenge.

Re: [SAtalk] Re: scoring question

Vivek Khera wrote: >> "r" == rOD writes: > > r> Vivek Khera wrote: >>> But how many of those were scoring 5 or more to be flagged as spam >>> as well? > > r> [rod@blazing masses]$ cat nonspam-rODbegbie.log | grep ^Y | grep > PORN | wc r> 197 788 40835 > > r> So, about 4% of my non-

Re: [SAtalk] Re: scoring question

Vivek Khera wrote: > But how many of those were scoring 5 or more to be flagged as spam as > well? [rod@blazing masses]$ cat nonspam-rODbegbie.log | grep ^Y | grep PORN | wc 197 788 40835 So, about 4% of my non-spam matches a PRON rule. rOD. -- Before Stonehenge, there was Woodhenge

Re: [SAtalk] Re: scoring question

Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > Right, his rule would only trigger if SA had already decided it was > SPAM. So it's not *that* bad. I wonder how often you'd see PORN > rules triggered in non-porn spam. That's the only problem, right? Quite often, I'm afraid.PORN_* matches 753/4129 of my nonspam co

Re: [SAtalk] Updating Rules

Craig R Hughes wrote: > It's now > been quite a while since our last release, and so I'm going to do the > 2.30 release imminently. I will post a separate thread message with > the usual freeze request plus requests for nonspam.log submissions. Just a thought, but should we wait for the also-rep

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin-talk digest, Vol 1 #456 - 14 msgs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >= WECS.COM AUTOMATIC NOTICE = Teehee. Yet another example of why bouncing/devnulling mail tagged as spam is a bad idea :) bhoover -- you might want to consider whitelist_toing spamassassin-talk. rOD. -- "I'll hide somewhere, and you'll wear bi

Re: [SAtalk] OutLook Express 3.14159

Patrice Fournier wrote: > Has anyone ever seen a legitimate email with an X-Mailer: header of > OutLook Express 3.14159? I'm also seeing this here. I'd agree with the rule being added. rOD. -- "I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night" >> Doing the blogging thang again at ht

Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC and razor doc (Was: Why aren't ALL scores geneticallyevolved?)

Dan Kohn wrote: > Craig, DCC isn't mentioned on > . > > I added the following lines in my .spamassassinrc/user_prefs, but didn't > see how to turn on DCC. DCC support isn't in SA2.20 -- Only in CVS. Grab a nightly release if you're fee

Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM!

Rob Winters wrote: > How about a "bonus" for cumulative effect? Why not do a second-level > analysis after scoring; something like: > > 3 positive score matches - add 1.0 > 4 positive score matches - add 2.0 > 5 positive score matches - add 4.0 > 6 positive score matches - add 8.0 This reminds me

Re: [SAtalk] Searchable archive

Matt Thoene wrote: > Is there a searchable spamassassin mail list archive somewhere? I'd > search the archive for the answer but... There's a search box on the left-hand-side of https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=1981 rOD. -- "Sorry, son! I didn't know you, Jay Leno and a

Re: [SAtalk] I viewed your web site-http://www.resuba.com/bucks/index.html (fwd)

Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is this nonsense? They added headers to track abuse? This is abuse! > > X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, > please include it with any abuse report > X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - crompton.com Nah. My guess is that since Spa

Re: [SAtalk] Exchanger^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HSpamAssassin

Jose Celestino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the idea behind spam assassin is indeed great, the problem is that after > about 3 minutes the server load goes to: > > mail:/var/log/qmail# uptime > 18:15:06 up 6 days, 21:40, 3 users, load average: 15.22, 8.96, 7.77 How are you running it? spamc/

[SAtalk] Fw: User has been terminated

Title: User has been terminated Thought some of you might be happy to see this...   rOD.   --I think I'm in love.Probably just hungry.   >> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ << - Original Message - From: abuse Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: U

Re: [SAtalk] Viewing auto-whitelist database

Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Probably what's happening is you're not using the AWL file you think > you're using. Is spamd running as root and not dropping privs? Try > checking out the contents of /root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.db > instead... Yeah, my (site-wide) AWL file i

[SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] Re: CVS: spamassassin/lib/Mail/SpamAssassinPerMsgStatus.pm,1.99,1.100

Sidney Markowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So for the purpose of stripping out comments in HTML you would want to > match from a leading '' and you would > specifically not want to match other legal SGML comment syntax that > would not be recognized by most browsers. But, if Outlook/OutlookEx

Re: [SAtalk] Add NJABL DNSBL to SA

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I currently use SpamCop, OsiruSoft, and NJABL for RBL on my Postfix > implementation. How can I add NJABL to SA? I have the following lines in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file: header RCVD_IN_NJABLeval:check_rbl('relay', 'dnsbl.njabl.org') describe

Re: [SAtalk] What's an easy way to report the spam I get?

Brian Kendig wrote: > I have a free reporting account on SpamCop. I suppose I could put > a line into my procmailrc which forwards all my spam to my SpamCop > reporting address; then SpamCop will send me back a confirmation > email for each spam thus reported. That's a little messy, though, > si

Re: [SAtalk] Porn mail deleting for school

Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 99.9% of companies have the fact that they can read and monitor your > email and web browsing and just about everything you do with your > computer as part of your contract of employment. Which is why all my emailing, web-browsing and IMing goes through

Re: [SAtalk] best platform?

> If I remember correctly, DJB won't allow it to be distributed as a binary, > unless it contains his *exact* specifications -- Not "adjusted" to fit the > packager's hierarchy. So most packagers don't bother. In fact, here's his rant on the subject: http://cr.yp.to/compatibility.html and http:/

Re: [SAtalk] best platform?

If I remember correctly, DJB won't allow it to be distributed as a binary, unless it contains his *exact* specifications -- Not "adjusted" to fit the packager's hierarchy. So most packagers don't bother. rOD. -- "Three prawns are hardly a galaxy!" ___

Re: [SAtalk] site-wide AWL and user_prefs

> If I use sitewide AWL (as defined in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf) but > still allow individual users to create their own user_prefs where they could > create whitelist_from entries would this skew the sitewide AWL db for other > users? Bart Schaefer mentioned this, and I entered this int

[SAtalk] the ironing is delicious

Spotted at the bottom of a recent spam:    TIRED OF HITTING THE DELETE KEY? New technology STOPS SPAMand harmful email viruses BEFORE they reach your computer...FACT: Now you CAN take back 100% control of your email!   rOD.     -- "Sorry,

[SAtalk] Re: DSBL.org

Looks like some of the issues raised here are being addressed by DSBL: http://dsbl.org/faq-help.html Note that now it mentions a "cookie" featuring in the test mail, so they can have some kind of "trust" of who's sending the message to listme, and two blacklists -- One for "confirmed" sources, on

Re: [SAtalk] Stupid Outlook (procmail) tricks revisited

> According to a discussion on the procmail list, using the X-message-flag > header in this way depends on something that the server does, not just on > using Outlook. E.g., there was mention of the message being marked as > flagged by an IMAP server. > > Can you verify that X-message-flag should

Re: [SAtalk] hi sa-talk, my name is ben, and I get spam

Occassionally, people sign up for things as fran(k|cis|co)@begbie.com -- So I usually take the time to log-on to whatever service it is, change their password, then mess with their settings a bit. Especially fun on bulletin boards which dynamically add your signature to all your posts. rOD. --

Re: [SAtalk] false positives since upgrading to 2.11 (2/7)

The problem is not SA -- It's that the relay for the mailing list is currently in a blacklist. Either switch off blacklist checking for OSIRUSOFT or whitelist the mailing list. rOD. -- "Fast! Fast! Faster! Bring the beef, you bastard," cries Paula Abdul, "and don't forget the pasta!" -

Re: [SAtalk] A Front Page rule?

Quoting Kerry Nice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Just out of curiousity, I looked quickly though my > mail.2002FebSpam has about 1000 messages in it, it > tagged like 6% of them. In the rest of my email, > which covers a number of years, out of those 8 extra, > 5 of them were webpages I mailed to m

Re: [SAtalk] blacklist_to; reporting spam

Quoting William R Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There are "whitelist_from" and "whitelist_to" but "blacklist_from" is > the only form for blacklist. I'd like to propose that "blacklist_to" > would be a good idea. Is there a reason why this is not there? There is a sneaky work-around... If you a

[SAtalk] Re: [Razor-users] Agent Terminated

I have found that this issue only happens when Razor *does not* need to run a server discovery. If I remove .razor.lst, spamassassin starts up fine. As a temporary hack, I've added 'force_discovery' => 1 to the %options in the razor_lookup method in Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm, because I'm only run

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

> Yes, a header will contain a line that says: > > X-eGroups-Return: ... > > But where do I add such rule? In head_test? I see some Perl regex in there, > but also several eval functions. Put it in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Something like: header YAHOOGROUPSX-eGroups-Return =~ /

Re: [SAtalk] rule suggestion

That would fail for all those annoying effing mailing lists who set the Reply-To address to be the list. rOD. -- "Marie Curie was Polish-born, but French-bred. FRENCH BREAD!" - Original Message - From: "Michael Geier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SpamAssassin List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sen

Re: [SAtalk] Port 81 (contains pr0n spam)

> Yeah, I'm not sure why, but the PORN_3 rule wants 3 naughty words on a > single line before it'll trigger. Can anyone think of a reason why it > shouldn't be just one occurrence? The problem is that some of the words in the list can be used in quite innocent contexts (Amateur, Teen and Webcam

[SAtalk] Port 81 (contains pr0n spam)

I'm receiving an increasing number of Spams for porn sites hosted by splitrock.net which are operating on port 81 (see URLs below). 1) Anyone else getting them? 2) Is anyone adverse to adding a rule to catch http://.*:81/ into SpamAssassin? 3) Shouldn't these be getting points for being fully

Re: [SAtalk] USER_IN_WHITELIST problem

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Yahoo Delivers is an opt-in mailing list. Since that isn't technically Spam (it fails on the U of UBE), there should be no reason for SpamAssassin to stop it. I've had to add a whitelist entry for "mypoints.com" mail on my server, as it was also opt-in. Perhaps somet

Re: [SAtalk] USER_IN_WHITELIST problem

rules/60_whitelist.cf in CVS includes the line: whitelist_from *@yahoo-inc.com It's a site-wide default. rOD. -- I think I'm in love. Probably just hungry. - Original Message - From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "satalk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday,

[SAtalk] 5 < 5?

Two questions: 1) Why did this mail not get marked as spam, despite getting 5.0 hits? 2) Why did it not register as HTML text with no plaintext? rOD. -- "That's what you get for not hailing to the chimp" >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 27 23:43:52 2002 Received: (qmail 16600 invoked from

Re: [SAtalk] HTTP/URL rules

Perhaps something that looks for a "%" symbol between "http://"; and the next "/" (or whitespace). I'm no regex wiz, but would http://[\w\.-]*%[\w\.-]*/? do the job? rOD. -- "To me, clowns aren't funny. In fact, they're kind of scary. I've wondered where this started and I think it goes back

Re: [SAtalk] SA with FetchMail? help!

> Does anybody know where I can find a tutorial (or would care to post one) > for setting up SA with FetchMail. > > This is the configuration that I want to use SA with. > > My mail is held on my ISPs pop3 server - I retrieve this with FetchMail to > my RedHat 7 box > SA filters my mail > I use Ou