Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > Right, his rule would only trigger if SA had already decided it was > SPAM. So it's not *that* bad. I wonder how often you'd see PORN > rules triggered in non-porn spam. That's the only problem, right?
Quite often, I'm afraid. PORN_* matches 753/4129 of my nonspam corpus. But maybe I just have dirty friends :) rOD. -- Before Stonehenge, there was Woodhenge and Strawhenge. >> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ << _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
