On 12/13/03 7:05 AM, "Vivek Khera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "JV" == Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> JV> AOL IM
>
> JV> Maybe its an ichat only thing -- because everyone i know running iChat
> JV> gets 10+ AOL IM spams a day. I'm averaging 15.
>
On 12/2/03 3:20 PM, "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:57 AM +0900 alan premselaar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> vi ~/.procmail (and add appropriate config lines to call spamassassin or
&
On 12/1/03 11:39 PM, "Graham Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Logan Harbaugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I had to locate the RPM on the RedHat disks, install the package,
>> then go back and then install the dependencies that hadn't been
>> installed in the first plac
On 11/28/03 6:32 PM, "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: "maximo lopez"
>> Sent: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:40:50 -0600
>> Subject: [SAtalk] earn money
>
>> does some one what to earn some money helping me
>> to start and configure and m
On 11/28/03 9:19 AM, "Tim Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a smtp gateway running sendmail 8.12.10. How do I setup a site-wide
> filter and still retain the ability to select which users are sent through
> spamassassin? Also, if I can pose two questions in the same message,
On 2003/11/26, at 1:37, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
At 06:39 AM 11/25/2003 -0800, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 05:18 am, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
> Yesterday I again tried to install 2.60 on RedHat Linux 7.3.
This is your problem^^
I unde
On 2003/11/26, at 19:22, David B Funk wrote:
...snip...
Yes, that size seems way out of line. It should be using about 30~50
bytes per token, assuming typical token size.
According to your 'non-token data: ntokens' that bayes_toks file should
be using about 5~6 Mbytes; unless something is whacko, o
On 2003/11/25, at 6:58, Matt Chapman wrote:
Hello,
I have been deleting at a score of 5 via Mimedefang. I notice that
some spam is scoring at 3.5 and 4ish. Is is better to tag at say
3-4.9 and delete if it is any higher?
What are some of the setups out there? What score do you delete at?
-
I've recently noticed something I think is a little strange but I'd
like to confirm it with the list.
My bayes database seems excessively large at 967M:
-rw-rw-rw-1 defang defang61k Nov 26 16:34 bayes_journal
-rw-rw-rw-1 defang defang 624k Nov 26 15:58 bayes_seen
-rw-rw
On 11/12/03 9:06 AM, "Satya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2003 at 13:17, Peter P. Benac wrote:
>
>>Is there a legitimate reason not to blacklist email.com? I just seem to
>> get way too much SPAM from email.com.
>
>
> Go ahead and block it. Collateral dam
On 8/29/03 2:51 AM, "Jon Fraley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to get Spamassassin 2.55, spamass-milter-0.2.0 and
> sendmail-8.11.6-26.72 running with Red Hat AS 2.1. I have installed
> everything and have started all process, however no emails are being
> sent through S
On 8/19/03 1:51 PM, "Bob Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>>> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
>>
>> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mymachine.example.com
>>
>> where "mymachine.example.com" is some inte
On 8/13/03 2:07 PM, "Greg Ennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please help!
>
> I have set up two Red Hat 8.0 systems using sendmail 8.12.9. I am using one
> system as a gateway for internet mail, and the other as a network hub that
> functions as a POP3 server for several PCs.
On 8/5/03 8:59 AM, "Ernest W. Lessenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> ** Append to EvalTests.pm
> sub received_between {
> my ($self, $min, $max) = @_;
here you're using $min as an argument passed to the function.
> local ($_);
> my ($sec,$min,$hour,$mday,$mo
On 8/4/03 3:20 PM, "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>
> The problem is that I saw things like,
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs (1.195-2003-06-30-exp) on
> screamerX-Spam-Level: ***
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 a
Luiz,
On 2003年 July月 31日 Thursday, at 11:01 AM, Luiz L Souza wrote:
> Thanks for the prompt reply.
> Here are two examples of spamassassin info from emails I received:
>
> (1) From: Tail Wagging Offers News Letter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Sp
On 7/29/03 11:29 AM, "Lars Hansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:12:42AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>> So is blocking 224.0.0.0/4. What's that got to do with blocking Alan's
>> 61.0.0.0/4 netblock? By even *joking* about such a thing, you're putting
>> yo
On 7/24/03 9:17 PM, "Kevin Buzzard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I know I can change the point scoring system in spamassassin, but I don't
>>> get the logic of the default set-up here: if an email is listed in Razor2,
>>> then how can it not be spam?
>>
>> It could be a newsle
On 7/24/03 11:00 AM, "Jim Blevins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does one go about blacklisting an entire network, say for example
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not seem to work?
>
you'd want to block it at your MTA or possibly using a firewall setting.
however, bl
verything from source because RPMs really annoy the
hell out of me.
alan
>
>
> alan premselaar wrote:
>
>> On 7/17/03 10:46 PM, "Tim Litwiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I have bee
On 7/17/03 10:46 PM, "Tim Litwiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been running mail servers for several of our clients with
> spamassassin for several months. Now a client that has an exchange
> server want to clean up thier email but pass the mail thru to the
> exchange se
On 7/10/03 11:48 AM, "Mike Vanecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...snip...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]$ whois uchuu.12inch.com
> BW whois 3.4 by Bill Weinman (http://whois.bw.org/)
> Copyright 1999-2003 William E. Weinman
> Request: uchuu.12inch.com
> whois server for *.co
Mike Vanecek,
>I think I am under a DOS attack on port 25. I have received 2172 smtp packets
>from the same location yesterday. Due to this activity I have set my firewall
>to reject all incoming packets from Japan. I notified [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PR
Mike,
this appears to be coming from my mail server, i'm looking into the cause
now. it also appears that earlier I responded to one of your posts and that
the mail wasn't able to be delivered and it's retrying to deliver it.
i tried sending you this message directly, but of co
On 7/8/03 8:11 AM, "Mike Vanecek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running RH 9, SA 2.55 w/spamc/d, Postfix, procmail, ...
>
> Q1.
> Does a configuration exist (mailscanner, or such utilities) that would allow
> one to do a standard reject based on the hit score? Based on my existin
On 7/2/03 4:15 AM, "Mark Emerle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I have a related question. Is there a way to have mimedefang to call
> spamc instead of spamassassin? I have yet to find documentation stating
> that.
If i'm not mistaken, Dirk Muller on the MIMEDefang
On 6/5/03 11:45 PM, "Mark Emerle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I am running a server using Solaris 2.8 and Sendmail-8.12.9. I was
> wondering if someone could recommend what milter would work best in my
> current setup. If there are a couple of different options, maybe t
Daniel,
On 6/5/03 12:41 PM, "Daniel Miles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>
> Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /~sausr/lib/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i686-linux-thread
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.0
> /usr/loca
On 6/4/03 2:07 PM, "Matt Beland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>
> Does anyone else think this is an odd series of coincidences? Or have I
> watched too many conspiracy movies lately?
i've always been suspicious of these emails... which is why i don't reply
(flame or o
On 6/4/03 1:31 AM, "Tyler Hardison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Maybe_Factor 1 (default 0)
>
> Where messages within 5.0 - 6.0 (1 offset from threshold) are marked with
> "maybe". This way, messages scoring higher then 6 (or more) are marked with
> a definite. Then the use
Mike,
I recently experienced the same thing. I receive much less than 120,000
messages a day, so it was taking maybe 4-7 days before i would experience
the problem again after supposedly fixing it.
to make a long story short, what you want to do is setup a cron job that
runs
Ok,
so i'm running SA 2.50 (no bayes yet) site-wide as a gateway to my exchange
server at the office here and it looks like a spam i received triggered my
whitelist by adding:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to the headers. I want to have users in my domain on the whitel
32 matches
Mail list logo
