On 6/5/03 11:45 PM, "Mark Emerle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I am running a server using Solaris 2.8 and Sendmail-8.12.9. I was
> wondering if someone could recommend what milter would work best in my
> current setup. If there are a couple of different options, maybe the
> pros/cons of each.
>
I've heard of 2 milter options for spamassassin. MIMEDefang (which i use)
and spamass-milter (which i've never used, nor know anything about)
either should work on your system provided that you have a working version
of perl installed.
Some of the Pros to MIMEDefang are that it gives you A LOT of control within
the milter api environment to make calls to virus scanners, check for
dangerous file extensions, etc. the Cons include having to know a bit about
perl programming in order to setup your filter in a manner that's going to
work for you. (i'm sure you could just use the sample filter and have it do
the basics out the gate)
again, i know nothing about spamass-milter, so hopefully someone who has
experience with it can provide you with more information.
hope this helps,
alan
> -Mark Emerle
> Vision Data Equipment Corp.
> (518) 434-2193
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
