On 7/29/03 11:29 AM, "Lars Hansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:12:42AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>> So is blocking 224.0.0.0/4. What's that got to do with blocking Alan's
>> 61.0.0.0/4 netblock? By even *joking* about such a thing, you're putting
>> yourself into the luser subcategory, tantamount to those advocating
>> blocking all European domains because "they get so much spam from
>> Europe." Purely an admission that they shouldn't be administering
>> anything that has to do with the Internet.
>
> But blacklisting is a good thing. It would be great if, say, China
> and Korea would block all mail from the U.S, the real source of the spam.
> I'd say this would almost completely eliminate the problem of spam
> from this region.
>
it would be nice if they just configured their mail servers properly to not
be open relays.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
