Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
For example whitelisting.
Any examples on whitelisting messages that are marked as spam when
they are not ?
From what I understand from
http://au.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
if you get legit messages as spam, you can configure in
/etc/mail/spamassas
HolyMoly...69.27 seconds?!
How'd you port SpamAssassin to run on a Commodore Vic-20?
-JR
BAHAHA... that ALMOST got me to spew coffee out my nose.
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Developm
Whew... thought I maybe I offended or something
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.ecli
did I get booted off the list, no list traffic or is sourceforge down?
I haven't gotten anything really since friday
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 04:56 PM 1/21/2004, you wrote:
Hi
SA offers the possibility of having a "smarter" whitelist which
whitelists only if the sending relay is "related" to the sending email,
like
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] example.com
is there a possibility to somehow do the oppos
Jennifer Wheeler wrote:
Hello spam peeps
Adam Lopresto and I have recently begun working together on Chickenpox,
and while working on that set, it occurred to him how to fix the
limitations in Backhair, using similar ideas we're using in pox. This
change in essence "combines" Backhair & Popcorn.
Chris Thielen wrote:
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 18:23, Erik Slooff wrote:
Hi Chris,
Small change for RulesDuJour: when sa is not in path lint will not succeed
(line 313). Maybe you could add a variable that contains the path to sa in
the settings?
Erik
Will do. Should have it up tomorrow, al
and you can add these to your rules_du_jour by adding this
Here are settings for evilnumber
EVILNUMBERS=7; # Index of evilnumbers data into the arrays is 7
CF_URLS[7]="http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/evilnumbers.cf";;
CF_FILES[7]="evilnumbers.c
humm.. didn't think of ^ thanks
ack just shoot my copy and past cleanup.
uri MY_EMAILINURL_1/https?:([EMAIL PROTECTED])/i
This an be subject to a mild denial of service attack.
You probably mean to use '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and '[^.]' instead of '.' in a couple
of places.
Scott
-
ack just shoot my copy and past cleanup.
uri MY_EMAILINURL_1/https?:([EMAIL PROTECTED])/i
Tim B wrote:
because a lot of spam contains some email address in an embedded uri
that I'm seeing. I threw together this rule:
uri MY_EMAILINURL_1 /https?:([EMAIL PROTECTED])/i
des
because a lot of spam contains some email address in an embedded uri
that I'm seeing. I threw together this rule:
uri MY_EMAILINURL_1 /https?:([EMAIL PROTECTED])/i
describe MY_EMAILINURL_1Contains what appears to be an Email
Address in URL
score MY_EMAILINURL_1 1.5
If you change the version number lines to all be the same number of
digits, the script given earlier today will report the update correctly
for example
# Version 1.00 Initial release
# Version 1.01 Avoid FPs with Forwards, Embedded images and PGP.
# Version 1.02 Avoid FPs with Yahoo Groups
#
ronoyms in the FAQ?
They are quite well known acronyms, in the Open Source World. Try the Hacker's
Dictionary when you encounter more.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Tim Stoop
Random quote/fortune:
The most common form of marriage proposal: "YOU'RE WHAT!?"
-
Hey does anyone know if there are any spamassassin books comming out?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic
This is why I beleive ISPs who have a restriction should publish their
address blocks which are NOT supposed to be sending mail directly out.
It then becomes the recipient mail domain's responsibility if they
choose to block on the information published.
In your small ISP case, you would not pu
It's well known that filtering is *only* useful for keeping one's inbox
uncluttered; it does nothing to interdict the flow of crap from
upstream. You want to put a serious dent in spam? IDP broadband
providers that give their customers direct access to port 25 on remote
systems by default. Spam fro
Excellent News!
Chris Santerre wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Not since eating popcorn covered in backhair in the weeds have I
been so excited about a ruleset. Fred, along with the rule writers
consortium, has developed a new ruleset called Tripwire. Much testing has
gone into this set. I
rules than searching for something that may set off false
postitives, based on the information that was presented at the time.
Tim Donahue
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configura
that's exactly what I started doing a few weeks agao.
I want to send enough habeas to enforce their copyrights :)
jenni baier wrote:
I guess we can all start putting together a "habeas corpus"
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Jack Gostl wrote:
I must have gotten 20 of these in the last three hours! I'm
How many do think would end up with an overly outgoing well blessed
healthy abit thin gorilla with a huge desire to descramble tv while
becoming financially secure and well insured
Chris Santerre wrote:
Ok, this one is out in left field but I think it would make spam fun. The
idea jumped i
Op vrijdag 9 januari 2004 23:34, schreef Chris Santerre:
> Tamogachi Gorilla Spam!!!
> (Watch someone market this and make millions.)
> Tamogachi Gorilla Spam (tm.) Patent pending...blah blah lol..
Hey! That was my idea :P~
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Tim Stoop
Random quot
Kris Deugau wrote:
With your method of making sure mail gets scanned, mail will slowly
build up in the queue until the server runs out of disk space, the MTA
can't process the queue because it's too big, or SA's memory usage
triggers the Linux kernel OOM process killer. (Exactly which happens
fir
ution that could be used in
an "email-farm", where only virtual accounts exist?
Thanks in advance for your reply and status-update ;-)
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Tim Stoop
Random quote/fortune:
War is an equal opportunity destroyer.
-
I think we all have our favorite ways of calling spamc/spamassassin, and
one of my biggest concerns is that spamd will die for some obscure
reason and mail will stop getting scanned, or I'll be restarting spamd
and a flood mail suddendly comes in. Well this is how I finally settled
into my co
thanks! that's exactly what I needed to know!
Robert Lacroix wrote:
from the spamd documentation:
"-m number, --max-children=number
Specify a maximum number of children to spawn. Spamd will wait until
another child finishes before forking again. Meanwhile, incoming connections
will be queue
the spamd -m commandline option for max child processes... is that per
spamc call?
for instance if I use:
spamd -d -m10 -x -u filter
and I run 50 instances of spamc, does that mean that all 50 call of the
spamc process get 10 spamd child processes for a total of up to 500
spamd child processes?
Evans Martin wrote:
I recently split out my CF file into multiple files.
Ex. whitelist.cf, blacklist.cf, bigevil.cf, evilrules.cf, etc.
Will this noticably degrade system performance?
Thanks,
Evans Martin
I've not notice any performance decrease due to having multiple cf
files, and afaik, spamd
schafer wrote:
To Spamassassin:
My publication is double-opted in by 15,000 families with children with
autism. We are routinely victimized by incompetent software like
spamassassin because of false positives. This is just as intolerable as
> spam. It is worse than spam because it victimizes t
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 07:52 AM 12/23/2003, Tim B wrote:
I want to feed ham into sa-learn every night. However when I get the
ham i'm going to have a bunch more received headers and extra
Microsoft SMTP headers because of the way it's going to be send to
me. What's the downs
Howdy All,
I want to feed ham into sa-learn every night. However when I get the
ham i'm going to have a bunch more received headers and extra Microsoft
SMTP headers because of the way it's going to be send to me. What's the
downside to learning ham with these extra headers?
I know I can use
Tim B wrote:
Bill Larson wrote:
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/36402
http://www.enterpriseitplanet.com/security/news/article.php/3288771
http://www.secunia.com/advisories/10395/
Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 833786:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=833786
In this exploit using:
http
Bill Larson wrote:
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/36402
http://www.enterpriseitplanet.com/security/news/article.php/3288771
http://www.secunia.com/advisories/10395/
Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 833786:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=833786
In this exploit using:
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:01:22PM -0500, Tim B wrote:
I don't think I've seen this covered ever. can required_hits = 5.5?
yes. the documentation (and code) specifies 5.0 as the default.
integers are used just for simplicity, but floats are allowed.
Ok g
I don't think I've seen this covered ever. can required_hits = 5.5?
everywhere points to a whole number, like 5, or 6 ect ect.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.
Jens, Thanks for this handy piece of code.
Jens Madsen wrote:
Hack away,
--
cat Report_spam.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
#-***
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:06 AM 12/16/03 -0500, Tim B wrote:
this should work. may need a little tweeking.
header RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL eval:check_rbl('SECSAGE',
'blackhole.securitysage.com.')
describe RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL SECSAGE: listed in Security Sage's RBL
score RCVD
Mark Lowes wrote:
Afternoon all,
I've had a dig through the archives and wiki for a definitive answer
with no success. Is it currently possible to use DNS based domain
blacklists at the moment in SA? (such as
http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_rhsbl.html)
thanks
Mark
Yes
th
Fred wrote:
Tim B wrote:
Hey I stumbled over this little gem of a marketeer, looks like they
claim they can bypass any spamfilter. Anyone familiar with this group?
onlinemarketingpros.net
That's funny, their website says in business since 1997, but their whois
shows different (10 day
Hey I stumbled over this little gem of a marketeer, looks like they
claim they can bypass any spamfilter. Anyone familiar with this group?
onlinemarketingpros.net
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert
Rachel E. Hewitt wrote:
New to SA and unix. I am using SA 2.6 with Guinevere and GW 6. It is
helping a lot. I have spent about 3 hours looking through the archives
of this list and have not found the answer yeta couple questions:
1. if using the spamassassin --lint at the command prompt and it
Daniel Kaliel wrote:
Hey
At least once a week our server hangs. I can't figure this out. It seems
to be hanging when spamassassin is working on large emails. Here is how I
have it setup and where I am confused.
My confusion lies in this. If I use the mailbox_command field in postfix do
I need
<--- snip >
My Question/Concerns
Does anybody have any ideas about how this would affect the bayesian
learning system? If i suddenly changed my mind about liking porn one day
and decided to block all porn, would I need to clear out my bayesian
learning database so that it would begin t
Thanks, is amavisd-new linked from the Spamassassin homepage?
Tim
- Original Message -
From: "Alain Fauconnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tim Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 10:11 PM
Subject: Re
%
of the users will not have accounts anyway).Tim Johnson
it in with the way you want it to.
tm
Tim Merkel wrote:
> I have a client who wishes to only allow mail into his inbox that is
> explicitly allowed via his white list. Yahoo currently allows you to do
> this (which is where they got the idea).
>
> I currently host multiple domains u
'postfixfilter' to check the
userpref table in MySQL before calling spamc. Has anybody has success with
this. Can anyone think of a better solution for this?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Tim Merkel
#/etc/postfix/main.cf (a
'postfixfilter' to check the
userpref table in MySQL before calling spamc. Has anybody has success with
this. Can anyone think of a better solution for this?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Tim Merkel
#/etc/postfix/main.cf (a
Hello
I think I figured something out, and I just want to confirm:
Am I correct in understanding now that the SQL user preferences system only
works when you run Spam Assassin through Procmail? Can it be set up to run
from the Spamass-Milter?
Thanks.
Tim
I think this is because Sendmail checks the current peer's IP address
against the RBL, and SA scans all the Received: headers in the e-mail for
matches.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Bill Polhemus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 10:39 AM
To: 'Gustafso
Hello
I am new to Spam Assassin. I see that it checks e-mail against the MAPS
databases, but that it does not appear to check the RBL+ database. Is there
some way for me to add this check to the list?
Thanks.
Tim
---
This SF.net email is
rver' as the README file in the
SQL folder says it should.
Am I doing something wrong? Can someone please clue me in as to what I
might be missing?
Thanks.
Tim
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.n
Jeffrey Schilperoord wrote:
What is the easyest way to change the 5.0 spampoints to a higher level ?
greetings Jeffrey Schilperoord
in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file add/change the line
required_hits 5 to whatever you want it to be.
--
David B Funk wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Tim B wrote:
Yes I have.. that was the first thing I tried... it still thinks when
there's just one other host that the host is trusted.
Havn't seen that one, sounds like a true bug.
I guess I will open a bugzilla request then.
Problem in spamassassin 2.60 -- trusted relay
There seems there might be a glitch in the detection of trusted relays
which is causing RBL checks to be bypassed.
Is there a way to bypass the autodetection of trusted relays and use
only ones specified in a .cf file? I searched bugzilla and didn'
So since I really don't know anything about the iptables firewall on my
mail server do you more details so I can check to make sure that this is
set correctly?
Dave Lugo wrote:
Howdy all,
It's been noticed that more mid-sized sites are using the DCC
with SA. This is potentially very cool, a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, fine, you have persuaded me.
So I have one question: how can I delete the message, when we use qmail and for local
delivery we use the qmail-local? We run the SA after the AMAVIS + antivirus (both
written in the .qmail file, because these programs must be turn off/o
_before_ the one that
does spamchecking then the message will be sa-checked for each user
separately, each time with their own prefs. If you have the directors in
reversed order, it's checked only once with the global prefs.
grts Tim
---
nt to SA.
Hope that helps!
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain't broke, then you're not trying hard enough!" --Red Green
-
Has anyone devised a plan to chuck all the email with attachments
matching a list of known viral names? Like thank_you/pif ...etc..
Using procmail/SA2.55
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://think
Mark C wrote:
Hi,
I have spamassassin installed on my
debian woody e-mail server, out of the box it works generally ok, except
for a few false alerts, which is why this mail comes in, I wish to allow
each use to setup their own user_prefs file, I have sucsessfully
implimented this, but I'm having
atic: I have to go into a folder,
set a label on messages for rejection and then apply a filter. The rate
of false positives has been so slow (ie zero so far as I know, until
now) that I'd got sloppy in scanning them. I'll consider this a wake-up
call.
Tim
---
Here is how I do it - these lines are in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf on my system
# Whether to change the subject of suspected spam
rewrite_subject 1
# Text to prepend to subject if rewrite_subject is used
subject_tag [SPAM-Score-_HITS_]
jpf wrote:
Is there someway tha
Hi,
Thought you all might be interested in this artical on freshmeat.net:
http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/964/
Later--
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain't broke, then
#x27;t
see anything out of the ordinary.
I even had one user switch back to running spamassassin (the
standalone version) instead of spamc (the client-daemon version),
but it made no difference.
So I've reverted back to SA 2.55. Anyone else see this behavior?
Tim Buck * Information Tec
Another got through:
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43606A711
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 19 Au
Hi Guys,
Real creativity here. . .
Later--
Tim
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9B56A72B
I am
on several lists.
Good Luck,
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain't broke, then you're not trying hard enough!" --Red Green
---
Hi Guys,
Here is another one that sneaked past SpamAssassin.
Tim
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ES
Hi Guys,
Thought you might enjoy this article on Wired:
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,59859,00.html
I enjoy wading through each morning's batch of spam looking for high
scores too.
Later--
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROT
ould do it:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Later--
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain't broke, then you're not trying hard enough!" --Red Green
---
OTECTED]
I have not tried using more than one wildcard per line.
Good Luck!
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain't broke, then you
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Bonny wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> In my ./spamassassin/user_prefs I put:
>
> whitelist_from@tuttinudi.com
Try:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Later--
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo:
owing format:
whitelist_from
Later--
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain't broke, then you're not trying hard enough!" --Red Green
-
Hi Henry,
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Henry Van Styn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I want to increase the value of the test VIAGRA from 0.0 to 5.0 site
> wide. How do I do this?
Try adding this line to user_prefs:
score VIAGRA5.0
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Guys,
(B
(BHere is another sneaky one. It is entirely in Japanese, so I have set the
(Bfollowing in my user_prefs:
(B
(B# Languages--rejects non-English spam
(Bok_languages en
(Bok_locales en
(B
(BLater--
(BTim
(B
(B-- Forwarded message --
(BReturn-Path: <[EMAIL PRO
here is a version that only needs the spamd logs
http://mailhost.bccwebhosting.com/mrtg/sstats.tar.gz
it creates part of the stats on this page
http://mailhost.bccwebhosting.com/mrtg/
Jim Ford wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying spamstats, but there seems to be insufficient logging for it to
return meaningfu
Hi Guys,
These Nigerian scammers are really getting creative. This one scored 1.1!
Tim
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (P
this sounds exactly like what I need - what version of linux are you
running it on?
can you give me more details on the setup and configuration
Thanks!
alan premselaar wrote:
>On 7/17/03 10:46 PM, "Tim Litwiller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I h
I have been running mail servers for several of our clients with
spamassassin for several months. Now a client that has an exchange
server want to clean up thier email but pass the mail thru to the
exchange server. I have seen several discussions the lead me to believe
that this is not an un
6K dialup connection, and network
checks can be very time-consuming. I would rather have a large whitelist.
Actually, I get very few 'false positives'--haven't had one since
upgrading to 2.60
Thanks,
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like we have some competition.
;-)
Tim
-- Forwarded message --
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by localhost.localdomain
with SpamAssassin (2.60-cvs 1.193-2003-06-13-exp);
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:44:32 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kc8hr <[EM
Hi Guys,
Here's one that came in under the radar. I have no idea how I got on this
list as I live in the U.S.
Tim
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
is in your .procmailrc:
SHELL=/bin/sh
PATH=$PATH
PMDIR=$HOME/Procmail
LOGFILE=$PMDIR/log
MAILDIR=$HOME/mail
VERBOSE=yes
The "VERBOSE=yes" should give you just about everything you want to know.
Just watch out that the log doesn't get too big--it will, real quick!
Later--
Tim
--
Timot
Hi Again
I figured out why the spam made it through. It was addressed to one of
my alternative e-mail addresses, which was white_listed, but isn't
anymore.
Sorry to add to the noise level!
Tim
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Tim wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here's another one that sneaked b
Hi Guys,
Here's another one that sneaked by SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs.
Question: The header mentions "autolearn=no". . .I thought autolearn was
"on" by default?
Thanks,
Tim
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [
http://mailhost.bccwebhosting.com/mrtg/
the mrtg part is some perl scripts parsing the spamassassin and amavis logs
then since I was pasring thru those files anyways I decided to grab the
users names and make
make some more interesting items for the page.
I'm still adjusting the scripts etc. i
:)
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commis
It is best to be politically correct nowadays.
this attitude is a big part of what is wrong with the world these days!
It is infinately better to say it how it is or how you see it than to
attempt to be politically correct.
That doesn't mean you can't be nice when you say what you really thi
Hi,
SpamAssassin 2.60 works fine here.
Thanks,
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain't broke, then you're not trying hard enoug
=~/etc && \
> make install INST_PREFIX=~/usr INST_SYSCONFDIR=~/etc
>
> please somebody tell me how to make install in $HOME!?
>
> You are trying to write to /usr/local/lib/perl ... but I want to write
> to my home dir, am I "SOL"?!
Make sure you give the
Hi Tony,
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>
> > This guy sneaked past SpamAssassin 2.55. I only use the address for
> > Yahoogroups subscriptions, so that must have been where the spammer got
> > it. I did [not] "opt in" for anything.
e ...
Try setting:
required_hits 2
It works for me, and I get very few errors.
Good Luck!
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain't broke, then you're
Hi,
This guy sneaked past SpamAssassin 2.55. I only use the address for
Yahoogroups subscriptions, so that must have been where the spammer got
it. I did [not] "opt in" for anything.
Later--
Tim
-- Forwarded message --
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Deli
installed it in my home directory, following the directions
in the INSTALL file. I wanted to see how the program works and be able to
play with it without having to su to root to edit config files. I have
learned a great deal about how everything works this way.
Thanks,
Tim
--
Timothy J. S
r me.
No, but I do have a rather extensive white_list. :-)
I would rather white-list an address than let a creative spam get through.
Later--
Tim
--
Timothy J. Schutte | AIM: TimSchutte | ICQ: 57061028
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo: kc8hr| http://www.wwnet.net/~kc8hr
"If it ain'
Thanks, I've been looking for something like that on and off for a long
time.
Justin Mason wrote:
for UNIX and windows. very cool:
http://weitz.de/regex-coach/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The be
I am looking at the saproxy I donwloaded from the bloomba site.
Open the configuration , click on host mape
look / read thru the information that is there,
then make a new line at the bottom
818 = mail.myisp.com:110
where mail.myisp.com is the mail server you are trying to connect to
then in y
Hi all
I'm currently adding a header field which contains the enevelope from
email address. I was wondering if there was a way to write a rule where
I could check this header against the from header field?
Spamassassin 2.55
Postfix 1.11
Procmail/formail in use.
I add the header:
X-Enve-sender
Yes, this would be a major pain on a large rollout.
Tyler Hardison wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:41 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Maybe Spam?
If you are using outlook as your mail client you might
If you are using outlook as your mail client you might want to look at
spambayes
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/spambayes
I have been using it along with SA for several weeks and am very happy
with it.
Tyler Hardison wrote:
I just wanted to throw an idea out there in case there might
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
