Good morning,
I have just upgraded my mail server from Solaris 8 to Solaris 9, and am
using spamd/spamc v2.63 with default compile (only PREFIX=/usr/local).
spamd is set to communicate over a socket, /var/run/spamd.socket.
Since my upgrade this morning, ALL mail sent to spamd from spamc re
Hi.
I started using SA a year ago. I use it in a site-wide confuguration-
spamd + milter + sendmail.
Now I noticed that the amount of spam written in russian increased, and
from this time I need to filter it.
Since 90% of the mail on my relay is in russian (cp1251/koi8-r) I can't
simply say in
en if
trusting the IP of the relaying server works I'd still have to track all of
them down - yes?
Or am I missing something?
m/
Please don't top post.
No, you're not missing anything. This is a known bug in SA 2.6X.
People saying to add your IP to trusted_networks are not
I ussuaky will download the file to another file name in the SA config
directory, than cat them all together and run lint on them *just in
case*. If lint fails I do not switch to the new file.
Steve
Chris Petersen wrote:
MAN, that's a lot of code for such a simple task. mine is just:
#!/bin
Chris,
Could you add a |MESSAGE to the PGP signature lines in tripwire so that
it does not trigger on PGP encrypted messages? I believe someone else
has suggested this earlier in the thread but it wasn't in version 1.13.
I made this change after receiving multiple false positives on PGP
encrypted
Chris Maher wrote:
Hello all,
Here's my scenario:
I've got a RH9 server with SA2.61-1 installed. The server is a gateway for a number of different email domains. company1.com, company2.net, company3.org. I've got the three companies in /etc/mail/access and the forwarding/relaying is working fi
Michael Smith wrote:
Hey all, I recently started experiencing a weird issue.
Upon upgrading to SA 2.61 and amavisd-new-20030616-p7,
SA is no longer checking my mail. I am using a
sendmail-milter setup. My log files simple shows:
Jan 6 13:44:35 gozer amavis[4809]: (XXWs89uW)
spam_scan: h
ent: Monday, December 29, 2003 5:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question
>
> At 02:08 PM 12/28/03 -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
> >whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], root,
> >Super-User
> >
&g
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] new razor issue
>
> At Wed Dec 31 20:48:12 2003, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
>
> > debug: Razor2 is available
> > debug: entering helper-app run mode
> > razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Insecure dependency
in
> >
/sun4-solaris/Razor2/Client/Config.p
m line 414, line 1.
In my procmail.log
Anyone else noticed this? Is it a real problem??
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign u
>
> No. You *do* need a minimum of 200 hams. The reason behind this is
> that for Bayes to work, it needs to know *both* what spam looks like
> *and* what ham looks like so it can tell the difference.
>
> But yes, it is best to have a vaguely equal number of both ham and
> spam (but you can ea
Hi,
Another question on SA, sorry for bombarding you all..
I have the following in my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], root,
Super-User
but unix system messages like the one below still get trapped as spam. I
thought that the whitelist_from
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to use the --remove-markup command in SA? I have
a whole folder of spam and I'd like to remove the SA markups so that I
can use this with sa-learn (next time my bayes DB goes awol..)
Also, I've got passed the 200 spams breakpoint for bayes but now it
seems that I need
ld check the temp file to see if it
has X-Spam in the header and if not dump it. Testing for a proper To:
header might also work. What's your test?
Frank M. CookAssociation Computer Services, Inc.http://www.acsplus.com
h message to be scanned. spamd is actually on a separate linux box. if a
second message came in before the first was totally processed, a second
scanning request could be made. would that cause a problem?
Frank M. Cook
Association Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.ac
that is tagged X-Spam: Yes before calling spamassassin?
I don't suppose it's safe to skip testing anything
tagged X-Spam: No as the spammers could just put that in their messages.
Is there something some header line to look for to skip SA testing?
Frank M. CookAssociati
>> Can anyone give me a clue as to how to resolve this?
> Looks like you need to Install BerkeleyDB first... DB::File requires
it.
> Once you get those two loaded, bayes should work for ya.
Yep, the problem was that SA was looking for /usr/local/BerkeleyDB and
the sun "addpkg" was creating it
Hi,
I get the following message when amavisd-new try to scan a spam mail for
spam with SA:
Dec 22 10:04:50 socrates amavis[12387]: (12387-04) SA TIMED OUT,
backtrace: at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
1489\n\teval {...} called at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_per
Peter SJF Bance wrote:
All,
[Hoping this gets through, and isn't blocked by SpamAssassin on another
server!!]
I've been trying to work this one out for a few days now - I run various
mailman lists, and recently all my mail has been rejected when I've
attempted to post to them. I use Sendmail, Am
to resolve this?
Rgds, Simon.
___
For mp3's, gigs, transcriptions, photos and more check out
www.SiButler.com
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 1
age-
> From: S. M. C. Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thx for the info larry. Can I place a blacklists.cf file in
> /etc/mail/spamassassin and will it be read in conjunction to
> any blacklist information I place in my ~/.spamassassin/local.cf
> file?
Yes, SA
make sense. The rules will not be seen in
~/.spamassassin/.
Review the "Priveleged Settings" section of
http://useast.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
--Larry
-Original Message-
From: S. M. C. Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003
Hi all, I have downloaded the latest versions from http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
and placed them
in ~/.spamassassin/*.cf
Can someone confirm that SA will find all the *.cf files in this dir and run them?
Rgds, Simon
Alexei Moulton wrote:
I am running exim 4.12 with exiscan and spamassassin 6.1
The list of TESTS in X-Spam-Report header never includes BAYES and also
the bayes score from _BAYES_ is always 0.5000. From this i gather that the
bayes database is not being used?
not sure exactly what spamassassin
Hello, I am running SA 2.55 with the bigevil and backhair rules. I have
been getting hit with seom spam lately by this one guy and he is
relentless.
The spam has an image that won't load, and the image is in an tag,
but the interesting thing is it is FULL of bad html tags:
Banned CD Governmen
set its score to in your local.cf 0:
score X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY 0
score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 0
Steve
James Van Sickle wrote:
Hey everyone
I installed SpamAssassin on my Linux box a few months ago, and I am now
getting all my incoming emails tagged as coming from an Open Relay Mail server
accord
I have some php scripts that are almost ready to release. I will notify
the list whne it's done.
Steve
David Hooton wrote:
Hi All,
I have a rather large list of domains that I've collected that I am wanting
to block. Does anyone have a "bulk admin tool" of sorts that I could use to
make SA ru
essage
rules. I've read the documentation for local.cf and don't see anything
other than report_safe to change. What am I missing?
Frank M. CookAssociation Computer Services,
Inc.http://www.acsplus.com
/mail/mbox so that i can process.
thanks and regards
M H Raju
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything fro
ame has expired. This however isn't as accurate in some ways, because
the domain wouldn't get removed for a year. However if the domain is
expired it defiantly doesn't belong as a rule.
Steve
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:09 AM 12/10/03 -0500, Stephen M. Przepiora wrote:
Hello, I h
Hello, I have constructed a huge list of rules and wish to detect how
good they are. Is there a way to log the count of rule matches somewhere?
Steve
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just
Obantec Support wrote:
Hi All
RH8.0 with SA2.60 installed as sitewide.
Procmailrc is handling spam for all users and creates
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs ok.
Now 1 customer has decided he does not like spam filtered emails (cannot
please all).
tried |/usr/bin/spamassasin -x in procmailrc since i r
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 7:27 PM
To: S. M. C. Butler
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn question
Hello S.,
Thursday, November 27, 2003, 3:49:46 PM, you wrote:
SMCB> * sa-learn --show
Hi, I ran the following
Ø
sa-learn --showdots --spam ./Mail/spam_new
and got
.
Learned from 0 message(s) (37
message(s) examined).
Did this work? Seems like it didn’t..
FYI. This spam_new dir is an MH folder of spam tha
A custom rule, or a builtin rule?
built-in.
I looked back through one of the archives (the other seemed to be a
little broken), but didn't see any messages from you around Nov 14.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=106883816809749&w=2
The error was:
Nov 14 11:0
At 05:55 PM 11/25/2003 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why ?? I installed SA on RH 7.3 without any problem at all..
With (almost) just two commands :
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install /Mail:SpamAssassin/
My guess is that the problems arise from some package being missing that is
required, and the CPA
At 06:39 AM 11/25/2003 -0800, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 05:18 am, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
> Yesterday I again tried to install 2.60 on RedHat Linux 7.3.
This is your problem^^
I undersntad that that is the only thing that s
At 06:13 AM 11/25/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
Is SA hard to install? Not harder than any other program based on Perl. Perl
is the underlying engine, which, in and by itself, has nothing to do with
SA. It is good to keep that in mind;
Perhaps this is *my* problem. November 14 I mentioned having problems
Trying to build SA on a RedHat Linux system via CPAN. In the install I get
this:
t/spamd_allow_user_rulesok
t/spamd_hup.NOK 5 Not found: flag = X-Spam-Flag: YES
t/spamd_hup.FAILED tests 3-5, 8
Failed 4/8 tests, 50.00% okay
t/spamd_maxchildren
Folks:
Has anybody created rule to "score"
the obscuration technique that is "tunneling" through bayes? What were your
results (more false positives for SPAM)?
Mark M.
At 08:19 AM 11/15/2003 -0500, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
... X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
tests=none
version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Should have mentioned when
At 01:31 PM 11/14/2003 -0800, ian douglas wrote:
> Anyway, I downloaded the sources, built it, and installed it with no
> problems. I rebuilt the Bayes db. When I started it (in debug mode) it
> logged this and then exited:
My first install (2.55) was via CPAN, and upgraded (also via CPAN) to 2.60
I decided to upgrade SA from 2.55 to 2.60. Some things I read lead me to
believe that there are additional tools to deal with obfuscated HTML tags
hiding text.
Anyway, I downloaded the sources, built it, and installed it with no
problems. I rebuilt the Bayes db. When I started it (in debug mode
I use dialups.visi.com and dynablock.easynet.nl.
- Original Message -
From: "Marcio Merlone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SA List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:30 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] What Dynamic IPs rbl list?
> Hello!
>
> I was wondering what rbl lists you guys
We have spam
assassin running, some users didnt get spam before hand and I wanted to know if
there is a ignore_usr option to completely ignore specified email addresses?
Thanks
(with 2.60)
Occasionally (about 1 in 5000) SA recognizes a spam (according to all
the other headers), but fails to add the *SPAM* header.
As this is so rare, I'm willing to write it off as "just weird", but
I'm wondering if anyone else has had this problem.
I can reproduce this by sendin
Microsoft Windows XP's "Remote Assistance" invitations trigger a false
positive for me.
Relevant headers:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: YOU HAVE RECEIVED A REMOTE ASSISTANCE INVITATION FROM: Nikki
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_000
Title: Message
What is the format
of the files of ham/spam fed to sa-learn? Can I use Outlook .pst
files?
Thanks
Alan
Stanier
Essex University
Computing Service
to
occasionally intervene (something as simple as a hot-key in their MUA)
to move and relearn anything SA got wrong.
Any info on the behavior I'm seeing would be appreciated.
--
Jeremy M. Dolan <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://jmd.us/>
PGP: 1024D/3C
> Have you tried starting spamd with the "-m" flag to limit
> the number of copies?
Yes, I have -m 10. It doesn't seem to have any effect.
> How much RAM are you using?
Unfortunately, I wasn't keeping track. Now I am: http://3e.org/perf/
I'm hoping this'
(Running 2.60)
I'm having a problem where sometimes I end up with dozens of spamds
taking 100% CPU, driving my load average up to 50 or so.
Anyone else see this?
--
Daniel Drucker / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enter
>> I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as I
can
>> tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
>> I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this problem...
> Out of curiosity, what method do you use to feed your email into
> SpamAssassin? D
> Yes, the situation I'm talking about is lots of spamd processes running at
> once using lots of memory. (Not to mention the local delivery processes
> running at the same time as well)
>
> Spamd using 800MB of ram is a bug, and one which I've never encountered
> yet in months of using spamd, so i
> On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
> > -notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
> > SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As
a
>
> I wasn't even
> At 03:10 PM 10/16/2003, Daniel M. Drucker wrote:
> >I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as
> >I can tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect.
> >I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this proble
On 2003-10-16, Brian Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you check the rule itself in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf you'll notice the
> -notfirsthop part of the argument to check_rbl_txt(). This tells
> SpamAssassin to check all hops except the first one for this match. As a
I wasn't even aware that thi
All the documentation for version 2.60 says that autowhitelist is turned on
by default and that by default the autowhitelist is stored in each users
config directory (e.g. ~/.spamassassin/autowhitelist)
When I installed spamassissin, it installed with no problem and is doing a
great job of filt
el Quinlan wrote:
> David M. Carney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I installed Spamassassin version 2.60 a few days ago. I don't get a lot of
> > spam, but I do get some.
> >
> > So far, Spamassassin has only caught half the spam hitting my mailbox. I
When spamassissin gets invoked by procmail, I get the following in the
procmail log file:
.
.
procmail: Locking "/home/footoo/spamassassin.lock"
procmail: Error while writing to "/usr/local/perl/bin/spamassassin"
procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data failed
procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data faile
Hi Scott --
When going through the SpamAssassin installation instructions here:
http://au.spamassassin.org/full/2.6x/dist/INSTALL
Are you absolutely sure you installed all the necessary CPAN packages
mentioned?
AMA
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Scott Kennedy wrote:
:For some reason razo
I installed Spamassassin version 2.60 a few days ago. I don't get a lot of
spam, but I do get some.
So far, Spamassassin has only caught half the spam hitting my mailbox. I have
saved the spam that has gotten through and did a "sa-learn --spam "
on the saved spam.
Is 50% normal, or is there somet
I've only had spamassassin installed and operating for about 2 days.
I don't normally get a lot of spam, but it only seems to be stopping about
half of all the spams that hit my mailbox.
My ~/.procmailrc file is pretty much the sample that comes with the docs.
I am doing sa-learn on all the spam
Hello all.
I'm a real spamassassin newbie. I'm using spamassassin version 2.60. My mail
is stored in /var/mail/david.
I recently received three non-spams. So I thought I give sa-learn a tryout.
This is what I did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sa-learn --ham --mbox /var/mail/david
Learned from 0 message
Ooops. I got interrupted and forgot the script in my last post. Here it is:
# SpamAssassin sample procmailrc
#
# Pipe the mail through spamassassin (replace 'spamassassin' with 'spamc'
# if you use the spamc/spamd combination)
#
# The condition line ensures that only messages smaller than 250 kB
#
Hello all.
I just installed spamassassin. I used the sample ~/.procmailrc file.
I see the lines spamassassin adds to each received email header. Si I thought
I'd give it a little test and turn off the spam filters on one of the pop3 servers I
use to get my email.
This server usually gets a medio
> At 12:42 AM 10/3/03 -0400, Christopher M. Iarocci wrote:
> >Hi, I'm using SpamAssassin 2.60 being called through Amavisd-new.
Dynablock
> >(along with a few others) is scoring on lots of messages that it
shouldn't
> >because the first hop is a dial up. I put t
need to use the "eval:check_rbl_txt" option instead for this
particular RBL? I'm a little confused, any help would be appreciated,
thanks.
Christopher M. Iarocci
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.5
I know this is probably more of a procmail issue but I'll ask anyway as
it involves Spamassassin.
This is how I call it from my main server for system wide use
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0
* ! ? test -f $HOME/.sabypass
{
:0fw
* < 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc -f -U /var/spool/spamassassin/spamd.sock
:0:
* ^X-S
test ideas: Presently the uppercase and HTML-tag percentage
of a message is checked, but has anyone tried a rule to detect the HTML
comment percentage? And how about an HTML_FONT_COLOR_WHITE? I've seen a
lot of spams hiding non-spammy words in a block.
Please be so kind as to Cc me on any r
I tried to check time timelog to look at performance and check hit rates
for dcc, pyzor, razor, etc.
Only to find it has disappeared on me since I last used it.
It is still in the man page though
And the config options page was broken at SA.org
debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin confi
First post, tried to find the answer
I had a rich text document come thru and was flagged with
"HTML has images with 600-800 bytes of words"
The document had no images.
What is being picked up?
Thanks
Tory
<|[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This
> > If performance is an issue, how about an option like...
> >
> > HIT_AND_RUN 1
> >
> > ...that would cause spamd to stop processing once your threshhold
had
> > been met? IOW why keep scanning text once the message has been
> > identified as spam? I'm sure that I'm missing something here but I'
>
> Martin Radford schrieb:
> [...]
> >>4) I am new to spamassassin. What parameter should I use in my
> >>configuration to cause spamassassin to stop using osirusoft open
relay?
> >
> > See the news article at http://news.spamassassin.org/
>
> The instructions given there can't work, IMHO, be
I use expire_mail.pl
I sort spam into users spam folders so they don't have to download via
pop
They can access with a web interface (or imap) to see the spam folder
and then every week I run a cron job to expire mail from every users
spam folders
It gives a summary of what was erased, showing t
> >>this latest server I'm building
> >>requires blocking of email, not just filtering
> >
> >I used [1] for exim3 but there is also a help for exim4 [2].
> >
> >[1] http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim3_spamassassin.html
> >[2] http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim4_spamassassin.htm
think that it would only attach the above text only if it was
likely that the email was spam.
Thanks for listening,
Dick
--
Richard M. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com.
Did you know that Dice
Chris,
Will Postfix block email at the SMTP level if the email reaches a score I
specify, or at least block it from being delivered to the POP server that
sits behind it?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Covington, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christophe
Will Postfix block email at the SMTP level if the email reaches a score I
specify, or at least block it from being delivered to the POP server that
sits behind it?
Chris
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.507 / Viru
Anybody have Exim and SA running as a SPAM filtering/blocking gateway that
would want to share their configs with me, and knowledge for that matter?
I'm a qmail person myself, but this latest server I'm building requires
blocking of email, not just filtering, and I was advised that EXIM was the
rig
You can also look at the module at www.horde.org
I use the horde project progs to supply webmail to my customers..
They have a nice sa module
> >
> > Does anyone know of a good web based front-end for spamassassin?
> ... and does anybody know if there's some sort of "WebMin module"
> to config
I prefer fairly easy method of turning on timelog and then I grep for
DCC from those files.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Sanjay K. Patel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] dcc
At 07:28 AM 7/31/03 -0400, Sa
,
the MTA needs to be able to block totally email that scores above a certain
amount in SpamAssassin. Thanks for your suggestions.
Christopher M. Iarocci
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database
Is there any simple config option to shut off all the assorted SA filtering
options, except Bayes and whitelisting by collecting 'outgoing' e-mail
addresses?
Something along the lines of "OptionsToTurnOn" rather than shutting down
each filtering option I don't want?
These are the two features
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:37:38PM -0400, Greg Cirino wrote:
> bayes is only system wide when using a database
you mean it would be possible already now, if I use
a DB instead of the bayes_ files ?
Sounds good, would also be fine... I'll have a look and
try to find some more docs about that, th
hello,
I'm using SA with a mysql database for a few months, and I
wanted to test the bayes system.
Unfortunately, the spamd is reporting that:
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
SQL server
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: Failed to
> I have a Red Hat Linux 9 machine that has Perl 5.8 installed on it, and
Perl
> 5.8 on this machine looks deeply embedded to the core of the OS, based on
> the ton of dependencies when I do "rpm -e perl". I need to run
SpamAssassin
> on this machine, but the SpamAssassin docs highly recommends
'bonjour,
I'm using SA with a mysql database for a few months, and I
wanted to test the bayes system.
Unfortunately, the spamd is reporting that:
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
SQL server
Jul 3 01:24:30 omega spamd[21676]: debug: Failed
Perl
5.6.1, it varies a bit by platform and Perl version) every time I try to
get rid of the old Mail::SpamAssassin and create a new one.
Anybody have any suggestions?
-Dan
--
Daniel M. Zimmerman
I sent myself a
number of innocuous test messages, each containing just the
text
1 2 3 4 5 7
8
Ones from my hotmail
account were marked as SPAM. The full header set of one such is
below.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version
2.0Received: from serlinux14.essex.ac.uk ([155.245.48
>
> In my work, we have a lot of mail servers. My idea is put a spamassassin
> server where any mail server in my domain can connect to the server to
> analize spams.
>
> It is posible??
>
> Bye!
Yes.
Chris
---
This SF.Net email is spon
>
> > This method proposes to delay EVERY SINGLE MESSAGE until a
> database match
> > is found for sending IP, FROM, and TO.
> >
> > So...we punish everyone in the world, and hope that a delay
> of one or more
> > hours is considered "acceptable"?
>
> I have to agree. I know for a fact tha
> Hi,
> I am using the sam module in Horde/IMP CVS version for spamassasin
> to work with the webinterface.
>
> It works great
>
> I just wanted to ask , can I blacklist an entire domain for a particular
> user in his spam settings (Web iterface)
>
blacklist_f
I'm running a Mandrake 9.0 machine, with qmail (as installed by LWQ.org) and
SA 2.55 site wide, using Bayes with auto learning enabled. The server is
just a gateway server, which then routes it's filtered email (Thank you VERY
much SpamAssassin!) to a POP server sitting behind it. The server behi
> I need help figuring something out.
>
> I'm managing email on a server in an inhouse, company
> environment. Many users on system, but all are using the
> system for company business, so basically we will have very
> similar spam vs. ham issues.
>
> I was frustrated because the autolearn Bayes
> I've been using Bayes and auto whitelisting for several weeks
> only, but on a site wide basis (i.e. spamc/spamd triggered from
> procmail from sendmail).
>
> I've been very happy with the bayes learner, but today got a
> pretty bad spam into one of the mailing lists I manage, here are
> some
I'm running a Mandrake 9.0 machine, with qmail (as installed by LWQ.org) and
SA 2.55 site wide, using Bayes with auto learning enabled. The server is
just a gateway server, which then routes it's filtered email (Thank you VERY
much SpamAssassin!) to a POP server sitting behind it. The server behi
> Jack,
>
> based on what you wrote, I added a "-m 2" option to my call of spamd, to
> limit the number of children to 2.
> This should solve at least my problem, since the default obviously was
> "unlimited". If that's wrong, could one of the devel
Hi ML,
I always read about AWL and auto_learn. But will
SA auto_learn from the manual blacklist settings
in local.cf ?
THX
- Michael
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hostin
>It is completely automatic, you may want to change the threshholds, spam is ok but
>you dont get much ham by default.
>An easier way to seed the bayes is to whitelist some of your clients.
sounds good ... and where is all information stored ?
in "bayes_path" ? when i don't use the sa-learn
comm
y not to get rid of the headers for the
specific user ?
TIA
karthik
--- "Christopher M. Iarocci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am a newbie to spamassassin but managed to
> install
> > it and am successfully runni
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
