>
>
> no, that shouldn't matter. There is nothing special with how it calls spamd.
Yes there is, qmail-scanner uses it's own X-Spam-Status header, it's not
the same as the one that spamc can put into the headers.
To be exact,
t; bounce may end up with multiple recipients.
No. A message can only have *one* envelope sender and bounces goes
to the envelope sender. Thus, messages with an empty envelope-sender
and with multiple recipients cant possibly be valid bounces.
valid
bounce never have more than one recipient.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an
block all mail from the U.S, the real source of the spam.
I'd say this would almost completely eliminate the problem of spam
from this region.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites includ
is? Would
> you SA buffs suggest using qmail-scanner along with SA, or just use SA
> alone?
Depends what you're setup is like and what you need.
qwmail-scanner is one option and writing a script for qmail-qfilter
another. If all your users are local you could run spamc from the
laming"?
I mean, really, if they dont want discussions, and facts, about other products
they should just say so.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 Se
y bad addresses
> or have a 0 ham to X spam ratio.
This is sort of like teer-grubbing/tar-pitting and is also supported in one way
or the other by most MTA's.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: A Thawte Code Signi
ontinue the product? What if they get bought by a bigger company?
The issues are the same.
You can't really know the roadmap and future development for commercial software
either.
You have to take their word for it.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This
or the remainder of eternity.
I was tempted to respond to the "always starting something" thing but in order
to save us from yet another flamewar I'll refrain.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Ent
sponse back.
You haven't told anyone what your operating environment is. What MTA are you using?
Sendmail? qmail? postfix? How do you call SA? exisan? sendmail-milter? amavis?
Without such essential infomation there is nothing anyone her
spamd problem.
procmail should under such circumstances return a temporary failure
so that the remote MTA will queue the message for later delivery (or
put it back in the local queue, whatever works).
---
Lars Hansson
---
This SF.NET email is
e you lose mail? It sure doesnt for me.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Spamassas
ke money on, especially if NAI wont contribute back much?
It costs a lot do do what MessageLab's are doing and actively helping
the competition isn't a good way to stay in business.
--
Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This S
3 developers lost. Shame.
Shame indeed but that's way it's gotta be, I suppose.
--
Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + I
competitor?
They sell a consumer product, you sell a service. Does that
make them a direct competitor?
--
Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Som
efore they appear on black lists,
supplementing that with the ability for customers to filter internal
content with very tight control."
Wow, that's pretty much what, uh, it does already
I love reading press announcements. It's the fairy tales of the new a
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 10:32, Diffenderfer, Randy wrote:
> McAfee SpamKiller(TM) Enterprise
>
It even has the mandatory "Enterprise" so they can hike the price way,
way up there ;)
Argh, now my head hurts from all the empty phrases and buzzwords.
--
Lars Hansson &
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 09:28:17 -0600
"Mark M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to round robin, using spamc/spamd
>
> to have it use more then 1 spamd server
You could hack spamc to support SRV records and load-balance
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 01:51:17 -0600
"Jay Hodges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing at all.
His point was that you started a new thread by replying to an existing one.
Messes up archives, MUA threading and is generally frowned upon
asy enough.
In fact, I've done it (using python and postgresql) but it's hardly of use to
anyone since we use a custom scanner system with log entries that in no way
resembles the ones from spamd.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is
r provider is using to call
spamassassin.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing l
ith "mangling" however, is not.
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
I think I've seen this question every day lately. Maybe it has earned a place in
the FAQ?
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungste
ROTECTED] by web.ifka.dk by uid 503 with qmail-scanner-1.15
> (spamassassin: 2.20. Clear:SA:1(0/0):.
> Processed in 4.976303 secs); 06 Nov 2002 09:22:13 -
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=0 required=0
Since both the X-Spam-status header and the qmail-scanner trace header says
the score was 0
Both of these questions pertains to amavisd-new. Ask on the amavis lists
and I'm sure lots of people will be able to help you.
I dont use amavis so, well, I cant help you.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See th
uestion. Ended up with a system written in python that I am at this time
not able, or even willing, to release upon the public ;)
Anyway, qmail-scanner does work and is probably worth your time.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
eing
> problems when only 20 of us are using spamassassin?
Obvious question: are you using spamc/spamd or spamassassin?
What exact "problems" are you seeing?
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:23:23PM -0800, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> I have seen other posts mentioning really slow times. Any thoughts?
>
Network timeouts, ie your internet connection is flaky in some way.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 02:38:21 -0800
Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm puzzled as to what this spam is hoping to do. Gain the user's trust
> by posing as a clueless newbie, then use that trust to scam them?
Possibly, or it could be to verify the addr
Just create a subdomain, say blacklist.your-domain, and delegate it to your
rbldns server. That's what you'll have to do to use rbldns anyway.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsore
this.
Message: http://www.unet.net.ph/~lars/coredump.msg
spamassassin: 2.43
razor: 2.20
os: openbsd 2.9
---
Lars Hansson
dpe1:lars # spamassassin -D < coredump.msg > /dev/null
debug: using "/usr/local/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir
debug: using "/etc/mail/spam
caching or content. BIND does both in one program wich is not the best
design decision the world has ever seen but that's a discussion for some
other list.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of J
emented my own whitelist approach
was to be able to whitelist servers. I also needed to be able to
whitelist addresses from one or more specific IP's. Yes, I know SA can
do it now but it couldnt backwhen I needed it.
It's a manual whitelist though, I dont use the automagic
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 04:31, John McCoy, Jr. wrote:
> Full message was 400K in size, don't know about you but I'm sure not
> everybody on this list has a broadband connection, so I figure it is
> better to be kind then blindly spam the list.
>
> So I used spamassassin -tD < email-message
> Now I g
eue.pl -z" to update the scanner versions.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
know if there's anyway to modify this behaviour.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:36:57 +0759
Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> razor and rbl are local checks and as such are not executed when the -L switch
> is used.
Err, are /not/ local checks. ;)
---
Lars Hansson
---
This
cal checks and as such are not executed when the -L switch
is used.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-ta
l in an attempt
> to get them marked as spam or otherwise ignored by the receiver.
Huh?? What the? Did I read that right?
They're /actively/ trying to get their own mails tagged as spam or ignored?
That must be a new low.
---
Lars Hansson
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 08:48:46 +0200
Pawel Wojnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does SpamAssassin tag my spam messages about 22 times in the message's
> body?
hmm..mail loop?
Check the headers and see if it is indeed looping.
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 20:47, zenn wrote:
> Is it possible to setup SA to act as a sitewide Spam filter ?
Yes.
> Is there any documentation on setting this up ?
Not much as far as I know.
> Suggestions would be appreciated.
qmail-scanner can do it.
---
Lar
econds and that's with
RBL's checks and Razor.
Actually, that's the average including virus scanning so the average spamd
check should be even less.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome
-
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.2 required=5.0
> X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.12 (Clear:SA:1(14.2/5.0):. Processed in 0.683329 secs)
I beleive qmail-scanner 1.12 doesn't add the Subject stuff unless you
configure it to do so.
---
Lars Hansson
---
course, then you'd have to handle the mime stuff but that's the only simple way
I can think of with Outlook/Express.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Two,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 19:13:32 -0400
"rODbegbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should also be pointed out that Razor2 doesn't work yet. Vipul & co are
> taking the somewhat amateurish approach of releasing barely-tested code (and
> shouting down people on their mailing list who are making constr
he cup.
>
> That case isn't as simple as you might think...
>
> Have a look at http://lawandhelp.com/q298-2.htm
Still. it's coffee. it's served in a plastic cup.
How on gods green earth can you NOT notice that it is hot?
It's comm
ttachments as they really
> slow down the processing.
Hmmm...would it be safe to assume that any attachment type of text/
should be scanned while anything else should not?
---
Lars Hansson
Bringing y
oing to be good at it. On the
contrary, most arent and they software they create should never have been
exposed to the general public.
---
Lars Hansson
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
A
level. You're trying to specify the facility AND level.
---
Lars Hansson
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devco
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 00:20, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> Looks like IT-news in swedish qualifies as part porn whenever something in
> the news ends (end in swedish == slut). =D
Heh, I suspect the number 6 (sex in swedish) will have the same effect ;)
---
Lars H
ile. This is simply solved by creating
something like /var/spool/spamd and give spamd write access to that directory
then just put "listfile = /var/spool/spamd/razor.list" in the razor.conf
file.
---
Lars Hansson
___
Don
conf:
local6.*/var/log/spamdlog
Works fine for me on OpenBSD 2.9. spamd entries goes into
spamdlog and nothing to messages.
---
Lars Hansson
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
Aug
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 09:25, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> Ususally, I would imagine, you know the gender of your correspondant.
Not necessarily. With names like June, Chicken and Flower (I kid you not,
they're all male) gender is not always obvious ;)
--
Lars
Dear Duncan" is not.
No. "Dear Sir/Madam" is a courtesy phrase used in large parts of the world,
especially Asia, and very common in formal communications, such as business
inqueries..
---
Lars Hansson
___
Don
never has to parse adresses from the header in an SMTP conversation.
A MUA always sends all To, Cc, and Bcc addresses as rcpt to:. It's the MUA's
responsability to format the headers properly.
---
Lars Hansson
___
Don'
to, and From addresses are valid). Or am I
> missing something here...?
I beleive you can make qmail-smtpd to return an error from qfilter.
At least that's what happens if you screw up in qfilter...
Lars Hansson
___
Have big pipes
Jon Myers wrote:
> This may be a big task, but has anyone thought about incorporating
> SpamAssassin into qmail-smtpd.
Why not use qfilter instead of a qmail patch?
http://www.untroubled.org/qmail-qfilter/
Lars Hansson
___
Ha
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:44:31 +0100
"Matt Sergeant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I cannot stress enough: Use a caching nameserver!
I presume you mean use a caching nameserver on the machine running spamd.
Most setups will already have a caching nameserver on another
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 02:34:22 -0400 (EDT)
"Doug Crompton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to just select a type to not score - like dialup?
If you're not interested in doing rbl lookups at all you can just
disable them in local.cf.
local.cf:
skip_rbl_che
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:43:36 -0400
"Duncan Findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simply put, it's not free software.
Uh, says who?
Lets see, you dont have to pay for it, you get the source, you can modify the source
and you can distribute your modifications/patches.
Sound
t vouch for any other MTA's but I'm sure they work
fine too.
I'd be sure to use a daemon-based approach to the scanning processes (spamd/sophie)
since, IMHO, this considerably increases performance.
--
Lars Hansson
Universal Joint Network Technologies, Inc
16/F Equitable Bank Tower,
st a bit broad anyway? I wouldnt say that's a phrase that is unlikely
to be used in valid mails.
--
Lars Hansson
Universal Joint Network Technologies, Inc
16/F Equitable Bank Tower, 8751 Paseo de Roxas, Makati City, Philippines
PGP Key http://www
hey dont know how to do it,
but hey, at least they bought some expensive (and overkill) Cisco and Dell gear.
And they're "pretty sure we want to use MS SQL Server". I love it when
non-technical people decide to make technical decisions.
--
Lars Hansson
Universal Joint Network Tec
.se is.
There's "evidence" but no reason or explanation of the evidence.
--
Lars Hansson
Universal Joint Network Technologies, Inc
16/F Equitable Bank Tower, 8751 Paseo de Roxas, Makati City, Philippines
PGP Key http://www.unet.net.ph/~lars/pubkey.asc
e of them), but if an ISP, for example, is going to
> use SA, lots of people are going to get legitmate mail filtered and will
> have to go hunting for it in their caught mail folder.
It's only a problem if the ISP does filtering instead of just tagging.
If the filtering is done in th
> Would being enabled by default with -d be a bad thing?
Doesnt matter really as long as I can turn it off somehow.
--
Lars Hansson
Universal Joint Network Technologies, Inc
16/F Equitable Bank Tower, 8751 Paseo de Roxas, Makati City, Philippines
PGP Key http://www.unet.net.ph/~l
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 17:20:12 -0500
"Duncan Findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sweet!
> Craig, include this please :-)
And if it does get included, make it possible to not
use it. I'm running spamd with daemontools and having pid files
just causes unnecessary grief
in the western hemisphere).
--
Lars Hansson
Universal Joint Network Technologies, Inc
16/F Equitable Bank Tower, 8751 Paseo de Roxas, Makati City, Philippines
PGP Key http://www.unet.net.ph/~lars/pubkey.asc
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
I"m running spamd on OpenBSD 2.9 without any problems for about 3 weeks now.
Lars Hansson
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
y in China. In fact,
our Beijing node is /not/ on it while Philippines and Taiwan are. I wouldnt take
lightly on our clients being blocked just because some ISP thinks a certain
addressspace is only used in China. And no, restructuring the network wi
hose that, well, might be depending
on where you are.
Lars Hansson
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
70 matches
Mail list logo
