On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:12:42AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > So is blocking 224.0.0.0/4. What's that got to do with blocking Alan's > 61.0.0.0/4 netblock? By even *joking* about such a thing, you're putting > yourself into the luser subcategory, tantamount to those advocating > blocking all European domains because "they get so much spam from > Europe." Purely an admission that they shouldn't be administering > anything that has to do with the Internet.
But blacklisting is a good thing. It would be great if, say, China and Korea would block all mail from the U.S, the real source of the spam. I'd say this would almost completely eliminate the problem of spam from this region. --- Lars Hansson ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
