plement, if (user+pass validates and user has spam to view)
then show spam, else error.
Jeremy
--
**********
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk SupervisorPhone: 405.425.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone: 405.425.1820
Information Te
ts are
> all identical in this instance, I suppose there's no reason that they
> couldn't be random in some future incarnation.
What if a rule based on the number of comments to lines ratio?
--
******
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk
periodically checked.
Jeremy
--
**********
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk SupervisorPhone: 405.425.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone: 405.425.1820
Information Technology Services, Oklahoma Christian University
**
Microsoft Palladium -- Wh
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 08:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2003, Jeremy Turner wrote:
>
> > 2. As discussed previously on this thread (I believe), it might be a
> > bad idea to send an email back to a spam source. At best, the address
> > doesn't exist, cre
o this debate earlier... isn't sending an email to the
recipient saying they might have been spammed just sending an unwanted
email to the recipient, much like spam does?
Jeremy
--
******
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk Supervisor
eally a SpamAssassin thing. I would
point you to your favorite MTA for more info.
> Has anyone done off-server LDAP user validation like this?
No but it sounds like a great concept.
Jeremy
--
******
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk Supervisor
een blocking and tagging. I err on
the side of caution, mainly because I haven't figured out a quarantine
system out.
Jeremy
--
**
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk SupervisorPhone: 405.425.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone: 405.425.1820
Information Technology Services
some sort of processing script.
Jeremy
--
******
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk SupervisorPhone: 405.425.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone: 405.425.1820
Information Technology
You might ask the qmail
folks.
Jeremy
--
******
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk SupervisorPhone: 405.425.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone: 405.425.1820
Information Technology Services, Oklahoma Christian University
**
Lin
readers.
The fact that the email is signed could make a difference. According to
http://spamassassin.org/tests.html, PGP_SIGNATURE and PGP_SIGNATURE_2
are -.5 and -.7 which would give them extra breathing room in case they
turn up positive otherwise.
--
***********
lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zaurus-chatter
==
=== End of Email =
======
--
**
Jerem
ho did it.
One word... blacklist. :)
Jeremy
--
**********
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk SupervisorPhone: 405.425.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone: 405.425.1820
Information Techn
setup, I know).
Jeremy
--
**********
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk SupervisorPhone: 405.425.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone: 405.425.1820
Information Technology Services, Oklahoma Christian University
**
Linux j
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Loiterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I get this error when I run your script:
> Fatal error: Call to undefined function: imagecreate() in
> /usr/home/mike/phplot-4.4.6/phplot.php on line 203
>
> I did some checking and it appears that the problem is be
e?
Jeremy
--
******
Jeremy Turner, Help Desk SupervisorPhone: 405.425.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone: 405.425.1820
Information Technology Services, Oklahoma Christian
}
if (!$found) {
array_push($example_data,array($num,1));
}
}
}
$graph->SetTitle("$which_title");
$graph->SetDataValues($example_data);
$graph->SetIsInline("1");
$graph->SetFile
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 17:49, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:03:18PM -0500, Johnny L. Wales wrote:
> > Anyhoo, I wrote a little perl script that takes the name of a user and
> > automagically installs SpamAssassin for them. It's not quite ready for
> > primetime, but I thought
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 12:33, Stewart, John wrote:
>
> > A few days ago, someone mentioned graphing stats from
> > spamassassin using
> > MRTG and others. Well, I got that working, and it's pretty slick.
>
> Care to share the recipe for this? I didn't see anything in the SAtalk
> archive...
>
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 22:31, Scott Lambert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:59:49PM -0500, Jeremy Turner wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 20:42, Philip Clever wrote:
> > > what graphing have you set up thus far?
> >
> > The current graph is spam vs time, a
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 20:26, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> How'd you get it working? I managed to make a flat line with mine. :-)
I had that problem too. I put on my perl thinking hat, and I traced it
back to a problem with a function call to the line of code that tries to
pull the date off of the s
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 20:42, Philip Clever wrote:
> what graphing have you set up thus far?
The current graph is spam vs time, as in number of spam emails per
minute (or hour, day, year, etc...). What I want to graph now is the
spamassassin point value vs quanity of each.
What I want is a set o
A few days ago, someone mentioned graphing stats from spamassassin using
MRTG and others. Well, I got that working, and it's pretty slick.
I was wondering about other non-time-based graphs? In other words I
don't want to graph how many emails were tagged as spam, but I want a
graph of how many
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 14:03, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> > On 08 Oct 2002 13:01:34 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Would anyone be interested in a script that pipes spamd data
> > into mrtg
> > >to be graphed?
> > Yes. I already graph inbound and outbound mail to MRTG. A
> > spam one would be
> > nice, to
I realized that I hadn't sent this reply back to the group...
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 15:30, Diffenderfer, Randy wrote:
> In testing, I have forwarded various samples of the heap o' spam that I have
> in my AOL mailbox. The "enlarge your..." sample resonates strongly with the
> rules -- clearly ma
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:52, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:40:57AM -0500, Jeremy Turner wrote:
> > I worked through a mini-howto on spamassassin which used the '-F 0'
> > option when invoking spamd, which is supposted to disable rewriting the
> &g
I worked through a mini-howto on spamassassin which used the '-F 0'
option when invoking spamd, which is supposted to disable rewriting the
'From' header. I can't find this option on the manpage though. Is it
not available in the spamd/c option?
Jeremy
-
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 23:48, Mark Roach wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:32:09AM -0500, Jeremy Turner wrote:
> >
> > When email goes through exim to a non-local destination, it is scanned
> > properly, but there is a break in the email header:
> >
> Hi, Jeremy.
27 matches
Mail list logo
