# break up blocks of separator chars so they become their own tokens
$boundary =~ s/([-_\.=]+)/ $1 /gs;
$val .= $boundary;
}
# stop-list words for Content-Type header: these wind up totally gray
$val =~ s/\b(?:text|charset)\b//;
$val;
}
Best regards,
Jack L.
At 05:36 PM 1.22.2004 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:05:49PM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> >From what I have read, we don't meed to move up on perl (perl5.8x) until
>> SA-2.70 is released.
>
>2.70 (which is actually going to be 3.0.0) o
At 09:44 AM 1.22.2004 -0800, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Thursday 22 January 2004 07:53, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> Perhaps this question needs to be directed to Theo Van Dinter who most
>> likely knows the answer I need.
At 05:17 PM 1.22.2004 +0100, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:53:23AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> Theo and/or anyone -- please help if you know the answer. I would like to
>> keep using this function now disabled.
>>
>> BTW: here are a few of the
rican /kernel: pid 1884 (perl5.00503), uid 2:
exited on signal 10
Jan 22 07:13:31 sage-american /kernel: pid 1968 (perl5.00503), uid 2:
exited on signal 10
Jan 22 07:23:59 sage-american /kernel: pid 2101 (perl5.00503), uid 2:
exited on signal 10
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage A
outs like that. I have tweaked everything I can think of, but they keep on
coming. More spam is getting through too, maybe as a result of the above.
Anyone have any suggestions how to fix this??
Thanks!
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL
ki.org/PieterB
>
>
>---
>The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
>Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
>See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
>http://www.eclipsecon.
f Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
>http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
>___
>Spamassassin-talk mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
>
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Admini
> 10970 6083 48870.555 0.000.00 (all messages)
>> 2201.000 1.00 1.00 JAVASCRIPT_ENCODING_2
>> 18 1620.865 0.60 1.00 JAVASCRIPT_ENCODING_1
>> 0000.500 0.00 1.00 JAVA
laiming to be
>from my own domain)??
>
>Regards
>
>/Brian
>
This works for me:
## Catch SPAMs with name in From and To
:0:
* $^From:.*\<$\LOGNAME\>
* $^To:.*\<$\LOGNAME\>
$REVIEW
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
h
in on
running --LINT Otherwise, maybe I need those extra files because SA sure
does a good job as is...
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsor
stian
>
Research has led me to believe that the "envelope from" is the most
reliable source of the actual sender. I am prepared to be corrected
though and would like to be.
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
block at a certain
spam threshhold. So, doesn't it get that score weight from SA.??? I'm
blocking a huge amount of spams with spamass-milter this way. That stops
them just a little sooner I would think
Best regards,
J
At 03:18 PM 9.2.2003 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>FWIW, Sendmail 8.12.9 (and possibly prior versions) supports a limit:
>
>define(`confMAX_DAEMON_CHILDREN', `24')dnl
>
>
>Tony Nelson
Tony, how does one arrive at the limit '24'.?
Best regards,
Ja
iler: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
>Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 14:45:50 -0500
>To: Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Jack L. Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [SAtalk] OT: Weird logs from the mailing list
>In
r=prog, pri=232254, dsn=2.0.0,
stat=Sent
>
>
>
>---
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>___
>Spamassassin-talk mailing l
rded to the user -- still NO losses! I
always divert the marginals to a "review" mail folder. And, as more
insurance, ALL SPAMs are placed in an archive which can be searched later
if a user realizes one may be lost
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://ww
TopPost: Correction to my list below. "spamd" should be "spamass-milter"
for the threshold blocking. Sorry.
>Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:32:21 -0500
>To: Abigail Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel
Kaliel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: "
, this is probably the single most efficient way to shoot
>yourself in the foot with any spam filter.
>
Yes, if you just limit your system to this point-blank method
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
e. This has diverted many MBs of bandwidth consumption and dropped the quantity of spam from entering the user accounts to less than 1%.
This is a custom system involving several programs to filter and identify the spam. I may be contacted offlist about the method if you like.
he users are ecstatic -- most are shocked to see that they are not nearly
as "popular" as they had thought once they only download real good emails.
Common sense must apply in implementing a deletion program(s)
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sa
At 03:15 PM 8.18.2003 +0200, Luca Benassi wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>[K]
>> Here is how I do mine for all spams, but you could easily modify to run
>for
>> each user. Also, my script does more than just count spams, so I carved out
>> the coun
;X-Spam-Status:" $SPAMSH > totalspams
#
/bin/date >> qtyspams
/usr/bin/wc -l totalspams >> qtyspams
mail -s "Qty of Spams Today" < qtyspams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
/usr/bin/grep "X-Spam-Status:" $SPAMARCHIVE >> $COUNTMONTH
/usr/bin/wc -l $COUNTMONTH >> $
n the case of a correct spelling.
>
>Scott
>
Scott: This rule looked useful & I just tried it but SA says it can't parse
either line...??
What did I miss... thanks!
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...and will the -m switch work for spamd without losing any filtering...??
Appreciate any feedback thanks!
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email sponsor
ough.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 11:55 AM
Is your threshold set at 5.0 also? If so, either lower the thresold or
raise the score while testing.
Sorry if a dumb sugge
d like to teach SA about the spam missed, but if I am to wait to
accumulate an equal quantity of ham, I'll never feed it any spam for a long
time.
What would y'all suggest I do.??
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage Amer
ther information that may be needed
>to help solve this issue.
>
>Thank You,
>
>Mike
>
First, suggest you look for sure as to status of spamd:
# ps -auxw | grep spamd
If you see spamd loaded, that's the problem. Kill it with this:
kill `ps -auxw | grep spamd | awk '{print
At 06:30 PM 1.14.2003 +, Justin Mason wrote:
>
>Jack L. Stone said:
>> Ed, your info about Formmail is not correct and is very stale. In fact
>> there are more than 2 Million users and the security hole was patched. That
>> doesn't mean that some have not kept up
likely the ones you are receiving. The newer versions of formmails
cannot be sent from any other domain but the authorized host nor to any
other recipients but the one designated by the authorized host.
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Adminis
At 11:49 AM 1.12.2003 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:09:21AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> Jan 12 10:01:21 sage-american spamd[91734]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file
>> descriptor IO::Socket::INET: Interrupted system call ...propagated at
>>
At 11:49 AM 1.12.2003 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 10:09:21AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
>> Jan 12 10:01:21 sage-american spamd[91734]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file
>> descriptor IO::Socket::INET: Interrupted system call ...propagated at
>>
0+ seconds delay on every email.
Would appreciate any tips maybe disable razor2 completely if need
be.
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.NET email is sp
embarrassing to some subscribers.
Help appreciated.
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
mal to see the above message every time??? ...or what do I
need to tweak..??
Tips appreciated
Thanks!
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is
>That's all. I'm not seeing anything about Razor and the message headers
>don't seem to mention Razor at all.
>
>
Have you tried grep?: # grep razor maillog
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
seen
this?
The error on the console:
"sageame@sage-american$ sh: turning off NDELAY mode"
Thanks for any tips & Happy Holidays!
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
elcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______
>Spamassassin-talk mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
>
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-ameri
uot; file is used
for blocking:
For an IP:
200.000.000.000 550 Access denied
A network might be:
200.000.000.0/24550 Access denied
...or by domain:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Access denied
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http
39 matches
Mail list logo
