Greg, please don't think that you know everything...
SBC DSL FAQ states:
Question:
Can I run dedicated servers with DSL Internet access service?
Answer: Answer last updated: 05-02-02
Yes, as long as you have a static IP address. The best part of DSL
Internet access service is that the larg
Thought this was a little humorous... Habeas is Misusing their own mark?
-
Content preview: Thank you for your email to Habeas! This message has
been automatically generated in response to your email regarding
"Habeas Misuse", a summary of which appears below. There is no
Gerry,
Habeas is around to make sure email reaches its destination. SA uses
Habeas to push the score down, much like whitelisting. IF spammers use the
Habeas headers, and the message is in fact spam, they will be sued. Habeas
is used, much like white lists. They serve just about the same p
Not the Habeas topic... it all the rave now... all the kids are talking
about it.. :) But yes, sometimes the little topics squeek by... but not
the major ones...
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Chipman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004
Because that would destroy the Habeas idea.. all I did was nuke the URL in
the message.. pharmwhavetersomthing.biz and I have caught every single one
of them.
Disabling the Habeas is not the correct thing to do.. but you can do
whatever you want..
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Raquel
any thing above 4.1 is spam
4.1 to 5 goes to one folder to check for FN
5+ to 12 goes to another folder for checking
12+ to 25 goes to yet another folder...
25+ gets auto reported to razor and like...
after all spam that scored under 25 get s a manual inspection then fed to
razor and bayes..
all
Here is the partial Auto Reply from Habeas.. where they tell you that they
most likely will not reply back to you, but will go after the abuser..
Thank you for your report of spam containing the Habeas headers.
[snip]
With respect to spam containing our headers:
Please know that at Habeas we take
Yea.. I guess if I didn't get email for an hour I would wonder whats
up.. but you gotta wonder about the people who start to wonder after a
few days... heh..
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 20:34, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> > By all means do it! :) ... but it won't help that there are still
> > servers
> > t
By all means do it! :) ... but it won't help that there are still servers
that use the rbl directly from sendmail or postfix and the like.. :(
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECT
I though this was freaking funny... I've been reporting spam to the UCE
address for over 6 months, then today I get this (over 200 of them)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host arcticfox.ftc.gov[164.62.7.14] said: 550 5.7.1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Rejected:< mydlsIP> listed at
dialups.relays.osirusof
I have an older 2.50-CVS build that works pretty well...
Looks like its a 01/12/03 version... if you (Dan Kubilos or anyone) is
interested..
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Earnshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:06 PM
Subject: Re:
Why not just make it an option for the mass-check app?
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:03 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Re: [SAdev] NOTICE: mass-che
One could argue that the whole point of open source it to use the community
to build and test your app.. then sell the product. Deersoft did it..
Cloudmark did it... the only difference, Deersoft sold the company.
I understand that the developers need to eat and what not... but I feel
like I was
Let me be on of many to say, that it's a bad idea. Most spam addresses are
fake, and at best, you send it to an email address that is valid, but didn't
send the spam. And you create more useless net traffic. It's best to
report it to Razor, SpamCop and the like.. or use the trusty Del key...
-
Well.. since the list was spam free... I'd call it spam..
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002
as an enter.net address,
but I've never seen one.. )
Someone is in defense mode..
- Original Message -
From: "Jordan Ritter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, De
No forging there at all.. none of the headers were from cloudmark servers..
it was just some asshat pushing Cloudmarks product.. I'll just keep the
info to myself next time...
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jordan Ritter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EM
Wel.. I'd say wait for SA 2.50 wiht bayes support.. It will kick
snortmonsters butt.. IMHO..
It also seemed like snortmonster may have caught more of the under 7 range..
it it also detected less spam
> However, of those, sniffer said 50 were not spam. Examining them
> reveals that 49 were indee
I thought this was funny... spam pimping anti-spam product by Cloudmark...
Received: from LISTSERV.AOL.COM (tem01.mx.aol.com) by lmailaol2.aol.com
(LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 31 Dec 2002 10:37:15 -0500
Received: from LISTSERV.AOL.COM by LISTSERV.AOL.COM (LI
Perl version or SpamAssassin Pro?
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Dold
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 4:35 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Where is the spam
Actually I've got it on a Win32 platform plugged in to Guinevere. I know
there is an option to archive spam, whi
-- URI: URL of page called "remove"
* 0.3 -- URI: 'remove' URL contains an email address
* 0.2 -- URI: Includes a 'remove' email address
* 0.9 -- 'Message-Id' was added by a relay (3)
* 1.2 -- message body is 25-50% uppercase
----- Original Messa
Did you request the email?
Is the email something that you want?
If you answered No, SPAM.
If you answered Yes, ham.
for me.. SPAM.
- Original Message -
From: "Ross Vandegrift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:59 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Is this
Did you request the email?
Is the email something that you want?
If you answered No, SPAM.
If you answered Yes, ham.
for me.. SPAM.
- Original Message -
From: "Ross Vandegrift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:59 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Is this
I'm very happy with the bayes and other additions for 2.50-cvs.. I've been
running it for the past 2 weeks... and I have had only 3 false positives
(which where spam, but from sources I wanted email from). Can't wait for
the release!
---
This
well, if the message that you posted was complete, there wasn't a BODY tag..
so text would default to the system default. And the whole message seemed
to be made out of images. (well and the html to load the image) You could
always up the score for html only messages.. but then I bet your false
p
SA Had a problem with Razor2 (if you can call it a problem) when Razor2
first came out. Basically, (If I remember correctly) SA's problem was, it
didn;t support Razor2, because the SA-Devel team was testing Razor2 first to
make sure that Razor2 would play nice with SA. The first couple of release
Yes, something addded it, but it wasn't SpamAssassin.
- Original Message -
From: "Drav Sloan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Arne Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, Decembe
So this line doesn;t bother you at all?
>> Diagnostic-Code: 501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender domain must exist
or
>> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
>>
>> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
>> recipients. This is a perma
Fine by me.. they aren't using my baysien databases.. SA-2.50-cvs... I love
you. err umm.. yeah.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 12:42 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Anti-spam-assassination?
Seen thi
With Bayesian enabled.. wouldn't it have a higher hit count? I didn't see
that in your list of test matches...
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:48 AM
Subject: RE
now thats funny! :) You mean someone likes SpamAssassin?
- Original Message -
From: Someone Likes You
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] You have a secret admirer
Guess what... You've got a secret admirer!
Want to find out who? Just click
Is there anyway we can add the version number of the release to the man
pages? I know this seems kind of silly, but I just removed some very old man
pages from /usr/share/man/man1 I think they were dated 6/15/02 or 01, but
it would be MUCH easier to tell if I was looking atthe correct man pages i
I'm sure this can be site specific... :)
- Original Message -
From: "Kip Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bart Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] s/SPAM/spam/ it seems
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
Was there supposed to be a Makefile.PL is the tar.gz file?
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:48 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] [SA-announce] Deersoft Emerges to Combat Spam
Press Release
SOURCE: Deersoft, I
You know.. I make my living writing code in VB.. and I must say it pisses me
off when people say that VB coders are "dumb". For personal use, I write
code in perl, PHP, C and yes VB.
What are your reasons for calling VB coders dumb? Please reply off list.
-Original Message-
From: [EM
Not to nitpick, but that is most languages.. if you don't know how to use
the languange.. its kinda hard to make it do what you want it to do... :)
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bryan
Hoover
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 10:59 P
The person emailing me had what they wanted to say in the subject line,
and I guess the email server added this little ditty on at sendtime...
from bakernet.com
start here and go to the end. ---
This is an email from Baker & McKenzie, solicitors. The contents of this
email are confidential t
Has anyone seen this header before? Google had no matches.
X-Stormpost-To:
It was one of the headers of spam that got through...
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- htt
How would an auto white list db file get created if my only command line to
spamd is -d and spamc has no arguments? I'm kinda stumped on this one...
the only entry in there is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint P
3.14159 is the begining of Pi... I don't think M$ would be that cute about
its version number..
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Patrice Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:10 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] OutLook Express 3.14159
Hi,
Has anyone
Thats why in spam assassin you can set the scores yourself... fit them for
your needs..
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Winters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 8:43 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM!
Maybe it's bec
Maybe for you! heh. someone had to say it..
Congrats Craig...
Brian
---
Groom Killed By Stripper's Boobs
Wednesday January 16, 2002
"Those breasts were lethal weapons," he told reporters.
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Cline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Th
I know something like this was discussed here a few days ago.. but I didn't
see a resolution to the problem.
I've been using spamassassin for a while now.. and I love it.. removed all
of my procmail spam recipes..
Anyway.. as soon as I switched to spamd/spamc my auto-whitelist.db, which
SHOULD
43 matches
Mail list logo
