This was a hoot...!
___
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ** SPAM (06.70/06.00) ** Rcs, sick of spam?<
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block simil
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:43:00PM +0300, Johnny L. Wales wrote:
> mail(Interscan Sendmail) -> ? Spamassassin on goon ->
> regular sendmail on mail -> delivered.
Compile the regular sendmail with milter support. Use a milter
that can send the mails to another host for checking (e.g.
spamass-milte
At 10:24 PM 6/12/03 -0400, Jose M.Herrera wrote:
What is the difference to put in procmailrc, "| spamassassin", "| spamd"
or "|spamc"
Well you never first off you absolutely never | spamd in procmailrc...
That's just not a valid option. spamd and spamc are a pair and are used
together not s
I'm not exactly worried about it but i'd certainly call it a misfeature,
just dont know if it's even worth putting in bugzilla.
playing with a piece of spam earlier
spamassassin -D -t < leak_1
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: entering helper-app run mode
debug: Pyzor: got res
At 21:34 12/06/03 -0400, Dan O'Brien wrote:
Here's an update.
For the record, I am using spamd/spamc -- this server relays mail to
another server for delivery there.
Per another suggestion, I started spamd with the -L option to do local
checks only, which skips the Razor check (among others). Mes
> -Original Message-
> From: Kloosterman, Henk Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:12 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [SAtalk] Need some tips on setup of a "medium" network
>
> 1. I have a lot of email -adresses from users that are long
> gone, but th
What is the difference to put in procmailrc, "| spamassassin", "| spamd"
or "|spamc"
I know spamassassin is a whole program (spamd + spamc),
spamd is a demonized version and spamc is a client who read for STDIN, and
then taked by spamd... but what the difference???.. performance??...
In m
Here's an update.
For the record, I am using spamd/spamc -- this server relays mail to
another server for delivery there.
Per another suggestion, I started spamd with the -L option to do local
checks only, which skips the Razor check (among others). Messages are now
being processed in 2.5-6 s
At 01:11 13/06/03 +0200, Kloosterman, Henk Jan wrote:
I am running a network with about 40 exchange servers.
We have a linux server in front with SA, and Razor2.
I now want to activate the whole thing but I came across some pratical
issues. Here they are:
1. I have a lot of email -adresses from use
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 21:18, Stuart Gall wrote:
> >
> > if you want something site specific AND effective, try searching the
> > bodies for mycompany.com ROT13'd or backwards like moc.ynapmocym
> >
> > I have a few more if anybody really wants them :)
> >
>
> Are you saying that spammers use RO
I am running a network with about 40 exchange servers.
We have a linux server in front with SA, and Razor2.
I now want to activate the whole thing but I came across some pratical
issues. Here they are:
1. I have a lot of email -adresses from users that are long gone, but they
recive (a lot) of sp
Following on from a discussion with Ben Johansen who has helped to clarify in my mind
how more advanced tests might work. I have a few questions.
Is
Mail::SpamAssassin::EvalTests
Documented? perldoc did not produce any info and I cant find anything on the site.
Is there a way to incorporate cu
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:02:54PM -0700, Steve Thomas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Shayne Lebrun is rumored to have said:
> >
> > and watching the fur fly. Linksys is the current target; supposedly they
> > have Linux cores in some of their products. But, guess what, it mi
Haha. I love how these threads evolve. SCO dropped out of this
conversation like after the first post.
Now, QED, SCO violated GNU!
Excellent.
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Stuart Gall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12
>
> if you want something site specific AND effective, try searching the
> bodies for mycompany.com ROT13'd or backwards like moc.ynapmocym
>
> I have a few more if anybody really wants them :)
>
Are you saying that spammers use ROT13 to "encode" the target company name?
That is realy sad.
St
- Original Message -
From: "Greg A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: SA in Mailshield by Lyris / (was) Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU
> The way I read the license was that you can not sell SA software. You can only
>
- Original Message -
From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Non English Email
> Stuart Gall wrote on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:11:14 +0300:
>
> > So I always though ok_languages was not a way to prevent fals
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 5:33 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Bugzilla and New Function Request
> It might be if I was trying block just that one.
> This is not what I am asking for.
>
> If there was a f
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestions so far. I do indeed already use the
bayes_ignore_header config option to filter out various X-* headers that
we add for internal use.
> One major problem I found with bayes_ignore_header is with regard to
> lotus notes. Most of my users are notes users.
> What can I do to ensure that spamassassin is being
> used by qmail-scanner - my mind is a little boggled
> with the testing and installing and I'm not really sure
> what to do next.
Do you have spamd running? Do you have qmail setup to use tcpserver? If
you're using tcpserver, you need to setu
I will be out of the office starting 06/12/2003 and will not return until
06/16/2003.
I will respond to your message when I return. If you need anything that
is of an urgent nature, please contact Leslie Branch x 2826 or Carl
Carpenter at x 2343.
-
Use spamc/spamd. The actual spam filter (spamd) can reside on any host
that the spam client (spamc) can access on port 783.
spamc -d machine-with-spamd-running.domain.com
-Michael
>>> "Johnny L. Wales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/12/03 01:43PM >>>
Hi folks!
I was wondering if anyone could tell me
look into replacing exim with sendmail, and use spamd instead of
spamassassin, thats my idea.
you're saving some overhead on machine 1 by moving spamassassin off it
-- but then you're creating more processes for future deliveries. i
dont know if you'd be saving enough overhead to warrant that.
Hi,
I have installed a new box with qmail/vpopmail/spamassasin/qmail-scanner/maildrop/ all
the latest qmail patches including the qmailqueue patch. Eeverything mail wise works
ie I can receive emails but nothing seems to get scanned by spamassassin. I think I
installed qmail-scanner properly
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Shayne Lebrun is rumored to have said:
>
> and watching the fur fly. Linksys is the current target; supposedly they
> have Linux cores in some of their products. But, guess what, it might be
I thought that this has been common knowledge for years. I'd h
Hi folks!
I was wondering if anyone could tell me a reasonably easy way to have
SpamAssassin on a different machine than sendmail/procmail? That is, I
have a machine named 'mail', and it's got lots of stuff going on. We'd
like to move spamassassin off to another machine (goon). On mail, however,
w
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:08, Mike Scheidler wrote:
> "Yorkshire" == Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yorkshire>
> >> # Long-gone user listed in the To: or Cc: line
> >> headerANCIENT_RCPT ToCc =~ /(joeuser1|joeuser2|joeuser3)/i
> >> describe ANCIENT_RCPT LOCAL: Long-departed
> Actually, you should leave checking into this sort of thing to the
> copyright holders in general, since they may have made separate
> arrangements with the company. (I haven't done so, but it's possible.)
Actually, and rather interestingly, in some countries, Germany most notably,
random third
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/latest_news/spamassassin.xml
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
__
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:47:27AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> Do you guys recommend batch learning bayes or piping thru sa-learn for
> each mail that comes through. Right now if mail gets tagged as
> X-Spam-Status in procmcail we pipe it to sa-learn --single --spam
> otherwise we pipe it throu
Greg A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about this one?
>
> http://www.mailshield.com/products/mailshield/server/whats_new.html
>
> Mailshield now incorporates SpamAssassin and charges heaps of money
> for their product.
>
> Anyone know if that is legal?
Charging heaps of money is allowed.
Hi there,
My spamassassin +MIMEDefang working fine, but I have a problem, it is the
probably-spam mail was deleted automatically,
It is any way I can configure it do not automatic delete when the message
tagged spam, because I want check it before omit it.
Thanks
David
---
HI,
Is there a way I can tell SA not to use
OPENSSL?
I get this error when I test SA.
Apparently its in DNS/RR/SIG.pm line
12
thanks
And was it trademarked for the current version that we run, or something
that deersoft was working on?
Who was first?
-Mark
Peter Campion-Bye wrote:
The way some on the list have responded would suppose that anyone can copy
SpamAssassin, modify it or integrate it, change the name of it and the
At 05:51 PM 6/12/2003 +0100, Peter Campion-Bye wrote:
> http://www.mailshield.com/products/mailshield/server/whats_new.html
At the bottom of the page in the above link is the line:
Note: SpamAssassin is a trademark of Deersoft, Inc
Putting www.deersoft.com into a browser takes you to the McAfee
Hey all,
I've seen several ways to feed Bayes so far and I was wondering if
there was any way that I could improve my method. I'm using
Postfix/Courier with maildir boxes, no user accounts on the mail server.
Everything is handled with mysql. "/home/vmail/$domain/$user/.maildir"
is where mail
One major problem I found with bayes_ignore_header is with regard to
lotus notes. Most of my users are notes users. My mail gateway is unix
(of course) running SA. When users receive mail that is incorrectly
marked they used to send it to a dummy user on the gateway to be learned
by sa-learn. H
Hey
all,
I currently use spam
assassin and it works great except for sometimes it likes to filter orders from
our shopping cart that the clients get. (yes they all requested the spam
filtering ^_~) The filtering we do is log the spam to the spam.log file and then
send it to a mailbox called
Hi,
Just heard from a client of mine and apparently MDaemon is using it as well.
Regards,
Rick
Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:59:36AM -0700, Greg A wrote:
The way I read the license was that you can not sell SA software.
You can only charge for duplication fees, installati
Adam Denenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right now if mail gets tagged as
X-Spam-Status in procmcail we pipe it to sa-learn --single --spam
otherwise we pipe it through sa-learn --single --ham. So every message
goes thru sa-learn before delivery.
Assuming you do this on all mail, this is a Bad Id
Hi Folks,
Can anyone give me a sense of how much spam is seen in languages other than
English (statistics are always good)?
Also, does anyone have examples of rules created in a language other than
English?
Thanks in advance!
Chuck
---
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:54:35AM -0400, Charles wrote:
> From: "Pamela lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 11, Jun 2003 22:11:37 +
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Assistance
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain
> X-Spam-Index: 1055362464
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.9 required=
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:31:44PM -0400, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> good portion of my checks are taking 30+ seconds.
> I'd welcome anybody's $0.02.
Here's mine!
On my 133MHz laptop (they don't come much slower) SA checking, including
Razor takes under 5 secs per message. I'm using spamd+spamc bec
Or set his per-user preferences to not change his subject line.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adam
> Denenberg
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Server wide SA setup question
>
>
>
> The way some on the list have responded would suppose that anyone can copy
> SpamAssassin, modify it or integrate it, change the name of it and then
> resell it for thousands. (ie, Mailshield). This does not make sense to me.
> (Here is the link again.)
>
> http://www.mailshield.com/products/ma
Title: RE: [SAtalk] Server wide SA setup question
Set them up as a "spamlover" Check http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
-Original Message-
From: Sean Patronis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I h
try all_spam_to in the local.cf file
adam
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 12:12, Sean Patronis wrote:
> I have a server wide SA setup working correctly, and am currently just
> "tagging" the subject of the detected spam. I also have one user who
> demands that none of his email's subjects be altered in a
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:59:36AM -0700, Greg A wrote:
> The way I read the license was that you can not sell SA software.
> You can only charge for duplication fees, installation or
> maintenance but not for the software or customized versions derived
> from it. I could be wrong, I am not a law
I have a server wide SA setup working correctly, and am currently just
"tagging" the subject of the detected spam. I also have one user who
demands that none of his email's subjects be altered in any way. Is there
a way to "omit" one user from the server-wide set up?
thanks,
Sean Patronis
Aaron wrote:
> When I reply, it goes to the "from" address, which is the person who
> sent it. I have to type in the list address by hand (I know... How
> sad is that?) I use Outlook 2003 beta ...
Since Outlook is missing list reply functionality you might find it
easier to do a group followup t
"Yorkshire" == Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yorkshire>
>> # Long-gone user listed in the To: or Cc: line
>> headerANCIENT_RCPT ToCc =~ /(joeuser1|joeuser2|joeuser3)/i
>> describe ANCIENT_RCPT LOCAL: Long-departed user ID in addressee list
>> score ANCIENT_RCPT 4.0
Y
> Sorry, what's the purpose of that?
>
>
> Kai
Probably to let us all know that SpamAssasin works just fine :-)
Other than that, I'm not sure *grins*
Benjamin
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology --
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:37:01PM +0100, Adam T. Bowen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a mail box for users to bounce spam, that has
> slipped through SpamAssassins net, to. I want to manually sort through
> this box and feed the proper spam to the Bayes classifier. The problem is
> that
The way I read the license was that you can not sell SA software. You can only charge for duplication fees, installation or maintenance but not for the software or customized versions derived from it. I could be wrong, I am not a lawyer...
The way some on the list have responded would suppose th
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 05:28:00PM +0300, Mark Jenks wrote:
> How can I move the bayes database from computer to
> computer without corrupting it?
Copy the bayes_ files from the old computer to the new one
and place them so SA finds them again. Use check_bayes_db
to see how they're working and if
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 15:50, Mike Scheidler wrote:
> There was some discussion last week about custom site-wide rules that are
> based on knowledge of the local mail domain. Here are two custom rules I
> have been using recently that have been very successful. The first rule is
> based on the ass
Sorry, what's the purpose of that?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
G
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:50:38AM -0500, Mike Scheidler wrote:
> (gone for over 4 years) is most likely spam. The second rule assumes that
> mail addressed to people who have been gone from the company for years is
> spam. Even though their accounts no longer exist, this rule flags those
> multi
There was some discussion last week about custom site-wide rules that are
based on knowledge of the local mail domain. Here are two custom rules I
have been using recently that have been very successful. The first rule is
based on the assumption that mail sent to anybody at our old mail server
(g
Hello,
I would like to configure spamassassin whit my email server
IPlanet ?
Some body can help me ?
Thanks
/Olivier
I built a Postfix (2.0.9)/Spamassassin(2.55) mail relay setup and it's
working great.
Now I'm going to build a new box to receive smtp right from the
internet, so that I can start
blacklisting domains using postfix.
How can I move the bayes database from computer to computer without
corrupting
I have SA setup site wide and a couple people are testing the system. A
couple really obvious spam messages got through on one user but the other
reported 100% success rate. I would an easy way to teach the Bayesian
filter. I'm looking for example setups to see which works the best.
Example: Have
Hi,
I have created a mail box for users to bounce spam, that has
slipped through SpamAssassins net, to. I want to manually sort through
this box and feed the proper spam to the Bayes classifier. The problem is
that when the mail is bounced (and forwarded because sometimes people just
don
Anyone got a good scheme for resending the attachment from a false
positive when using report_safe=1?
Currently I put false positives into a mailbox called 'resend', and I then
want to resubmit them to procmail after maybe adding the sender to my
whitleist, or changing my spam threshold.
I need to
> "JS" == Justin Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JS> I don't have any information about this either, only a thought. If I
JS> contributed code to an open source project like SA, I'm contributing it
JS> under the conditions of whatever licensing scheme(s) the project already
JS> utilizes. B
- Original Message -
From: "Dr. Ongo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spam Assassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:08 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd per user config files
> Hello
>
> I'm using the spamc/spamd combo with postfix as an inbound relay.
> Postfix runs spamc
IF you truly want to BL them and save overhead, and you have permission to
change the file, add them to your access file as reject. That way the email
won't even get in to be processed.
HTH
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday,
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate0.sover.net (mailgate0.sover.net [209.198.87.43])
by mailhub0.sover.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5BKE8v22907
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:14:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hermes.vtweb.com (hermes.vtweb.COM [216.66.111.4
Do you guys recommend batch learning bayes or piping thru sa-learn for
each mail that comes through. Right now if mail gets tagged as
X-Spam-Status in procmcail we pipe it to sa-learn --single --spam
otherwise we pipe it through sa-learn --single --ham. So every message
goes thru sa-learn before
Stuart Gall wrote on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:11:14 +0300:
> So I always though ok_languages was not a way to prevent false
> positives, only to prevent false negatives.
>
A definition problem? false positive = wrongly tagged spam. With
ok_languages it you avoid tagging Italian mail as spam just beca
Hello
I'm using the spamc/spamd combo with postfix as an inbound relay.
Postfix runs spamc as user 'filter' and messages that spamd is changing to
that user can be seen in the log
My reading of "man spamd" that .. "spamd will check per-user config files
for every message"
has lead me to make ent
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:46:13AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> If you compile your own (release >= 2.1.10, say) Openldap
> stuff, the opportunity is there to compile in an SQL/LDAP
> interface module that can be addressed using ODBC or other SQL
> drivers. It's generally reckoned to be horrible b
Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
Does LDAP interface with DBI?
http://search.cpan.org/modlist/Database_Interfaces does not list
a DBI interface to LDAP. Also, in my personal experience, you
cannot interface LDAP as a relational database without paying
huge performance penalities (LDAP is not even in fi
73 matches
Mail list logo
