On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:50:38AM -0500, Mike Scheidler wrote:
> (gone for over 4 years) is most likely spam. The second rule assumes that
> mail addressed to people who have been gone from the company for years is
> spam. Even though their accounts no longer exist, this rule flags those
> multi-recipient spams where their IDs are mixed in with those that are
> still valid and active.
Isn't this the typical way a normal mailinglist gets
spamfiltered worldwide (i.e by razor) ?
Somebody gets an account, subscribes, goes away,
his vanity-forward expires, postmaster finds the bounces,
and makes the account into a spamtrap.
And voila ... all those lists are razored ...
So please make sure you do not kill/spamtrap Lists
subscribed by the 'gone-users' :-)
Stucki (postmaster at math.fu-berlin.de, who found lots of lists
subscribed by 'gone users' / so no spamtrap so far).
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
