----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:59 PM Subject: SA in Mailshield by Lyris / (was) Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU
> The way I read the license was that you can not sell SA software. You can only > charge for duplication fees, installation or maintenance but not for the software or > customized versions derived from it. I could be wrong, I am not a lawyer... > There are a number of open source licenses GNU definitely would not allow the above scineario, but GPL (the now lesser GNU) does. SA is licensed under the perl artistic license. or GNU It is a bit of a paradox because the GNU is quite strict on what can be done commercially, but perl artistic is very lax. I conclude that SCO definitely violated GNU but not perl artistic and hence not the licence of SA. Stuart Gall Systems Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Critical Error: REALITY.SYS Corrupted! Reboot universe? (y/n) [y]: ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
