Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > >now user steve has an entry in the userpref database that asks his
> default
> > >score to be 5.0. However SA doesn't seem to be listening:
> >
> > Are you running spamd with the -q option?
>
> Yes. As I'd said entries for GLOBAL (including whitelist entries) are
>
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 11:54:58PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
| On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 10:52:53PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| > Why do these "prebuilt" systems all use sendmail? I've heard enough
|
| sendmail is the godfather of email on the Internet? ;)
The PDP-7 is the godfather
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 10:52:53PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> Why do these "prebuilt" systems all use sendmail? I've heard enough
sendmail is the godfather of email on the Internet? ;) it's scalable,
reliable, and currently handles the majority of all Internet email
traffic?
> horro
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 03:10:51AM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
| > At 06/30/2002 14:25, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
| >
| > > Sorry for the noice, but even something as simple as finding the
| > > local version of sendmail.mc nearly drow me nuts, so I thought
| > > I'd ask if anyone's had the dis
> >now user steve has an entry in the userpref database that asks his default
> >score to be 5.0. However SA doesn't seem to be listening:
>
> Are you running spamd with the -q option?
Yes. As I'd said entries for GLOBAL (including whitelist entries) are working
fine. It seems to me that the
Matthew Cline wrote:
> > Scelson, who designed the software, says it will penetrate virtually
>
> > any system designed to stop ads from reaching the intended mailbox.
>
> > "If it accepts e-mail, there's a way in," he says. "And this is
> > designed to get around anything."
Yeah, right. Looks
http://www.ctnow.com/technology/hc-sp1scelsonjun30.story?coll=hc-headlines-home
> The program allows him to control every aspect of the outgoing
> e-mail - including masking the sender, randomly changing the subject
> line or disguising the point of origin.
A legitamit business which needs
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 the voices made Pete Hanson write:
> At 06/30/2002 14:25, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the noice, but even something as simple as finding the local version
> >of sendmail.mc nearly drow me nuts, so I thought I'd ask if anyone's had the
> >displeasure of setting up
At 06/30/2002 14:25, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> Sorry for the noice, but even something as simple as finding the local version
>of sendmail.mc nearly drow me nuts, so I thought I'd ask if anyone's had the
>displeasure of setting up SA on a RaQ3 so that forwarded (as set up with the
>webUI) e-mail
Figured it out! My spamd doesn't seem to like the "-a" option. If I use
it, spamc/spamd don't tag anything. If I leave that option out (using
only "-c -L -d"), it tags fine.
workhorse:/var/spool/spamassassin# ps ax | grep spamd
28134 ?S 0:05 perl /usr/sbin/spamd -c -L -d --pidfile=/v
At 06/30/2002 05:32, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
>I'm storing user preferences in a database. The default hit is 8.0 currently
>(will shortly be back to 5.0) and spamc is getting called from procmail
>(which is getting called from qmail/vpopmail) thusly:
>
>
>now user steve has an entry in the user
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 07:09:04PM -0400, sysadmin wrote:
> I've got SA 2.31 , and recently installed razor 2.09 , but when
> I run spamassassin -r to report spam I have caught, it reports
> version 1.19. Why is that, and how can I get it to use the latest
> (as Razor2 in the perl lib dir ...), as
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 16:34, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 03:04:05PM -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
> | On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 13:04, Michael Agbaglo wrote:
>
> | > I suppose Net-DNS looks for test::more and doesn't find it
> | > therefore things are stopped here...
> |
> |
Greetings,
I've got SA 2.31 , and recently installed razor 2.09 , but when
I run spamassassin -r to report spam I have caught, it reports
version 1.19. Why is that, and how can I get it to use the latest
(as Razor2 in the perl lib dir ...), assuming that this wont break
things like 1.20 seemed t
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 16:34, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 03:04:05PM -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
> | On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 13:04, Michael Agbaglo wrote:
>
> | > I suppose Net-DNS looks for test::more and doesn't find it
> | > therefore things are stopped here...
> |
> |
Sorry for the noice, but even something as simple as finding the local version
of sendmail.mc nearly drow me nuts, so I thought I'd ask if anyone's had the
displeasure of setting up SA on a RaQ3 so that forwarded (as set up with the
webUI) e-mails are scanned too.
Right now the setup is your b
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 03:04:05PM -0400, Michael Leone wrote:
| On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 13:04, Michael Agbaglo wrote:
| > I suppose Net-DNS looks for test::more and doesn't find it
| > therefore things are stopped here...
|
| So are you saying I should find and download Net::DNS::Resolver? If so,
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 13:04, Michael Agbaglo wrote:
>
>
> Michael Leone wrote:
>
> > -Forwarded Message-
> > Sorry; I hit SEND before the mail log got posted.
> >
> > NOTE: running "spamassassin -P" *does* tag as spam.Running "spamc" I get
> > no headers - no "X-Spam-Status", no "X-S
From: Yaniv Fine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [SAtalk] SPm will not had to subject
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:37:20 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Yanif,
I *think* (which means: I am a toital newbie to this great program, but...)
that you can switch this feature on in the file locate
Michael Leone wrote:
> -Forwarded Message-
> Sorry; I hit SEND before the mail log got posted.
>
> NOTE: running "spamassassin -P" *does* tag as spam.Running "spamc" I get
> no headers - no "X-Spam-Status", no "X-Spam-Level", none of the normal
> output of a SA check. Mail log does s
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 09:01:59AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Get the 3.23pre snapshot of procmail:
>
> ftp://ftp.procmail.org/pub/procmail/testing/snapshot.tar.gz
and/or add the following kluge rule to your procmailrc:
:0 fhw
| sed '1s/^rom /From /'
--
Randomly Generated Tagline
Hi list
I am trying to figure out why I don't get in Spam messages **SPAM*
I only get in the header X-Spam-Status: YES
I am running qmail 1.03 + qmail scanner with spamassassin
My /etc/default/spamassassin is configured
With OPTIONS="-F 0"
I am not using vpop to retrieve all @my
Hello!
...just want to say hello to the community.
Just I installed spamassassin with a modified version of exim
(sa-exim 4.05) and I am very happy of the result.
One think I hadn't find out until now is how I can make
this combo make _bouncing_ spam instead of sending back
and explanation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 June 2002 08:29 am, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> From what I saw in your message, you're missing the
> Time::HighRes module. Blame Theo's RPM for that, not
> SpamAssassin. The RPM should have caught that dependency.
Time::HiRes is not requ
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Mike Diehl wrote:
> I am having trouble with SA. It looks like it is stripping off the
> first 'F' in 'From" in every message I receive.
Get the 3.23pre snapshot of procmail:
ftp://ftp.procmail.org/pub/procmail/testing/snapshot.tar.gz
---
Hi,
I tried to install SA using CPAN:
cpan> install Mail::SpamAssassin
but I get lots of failed tests:
- - - Schnipp - - -
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t/forged_rcvd.t
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> When you use CPAN, it's smart enough to see what's on your current Perl
> installation and suggest what should be. Then when you go to install a
> module it will ask you if you want it to automatically get and install
> dependencies too. *very*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Bill Omer on Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 11:19:59AM -0500:
> I'm using SA on my mail gateway, and I'm trying to figure out a way to
> make all spam with a score of 12 or higher sent to /dev/null
> automatically.
Here's what I have in my .procmailrc:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 01:10:39PM -0700, Kevin Gagel wrote:
| I need to ask for some support for the windows platform. Is there
| anyone that can help me or point me in the right direction?
|
| What is happening is that a message gets the headers added to it
| from SA but then the mail readers c
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:27:20AM -0500, Brian wrote:
| Any ideas on how we can blacklist a server or user when a predetermined
| number of "User unknown" errors are encountered.
This is a job for your MTA. SA doesn't know about SMTP-level
operations. You need to configure your MTA to track in
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 01:46:03AM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote:
| I am having trouble with SA. It looks like it is stripping off the first 'F'
| in 'From" in every message I receive.
Procmail bug. (well-known too)
| My /etc/procmailrc file looks like:
|
| :0fw
| | spamassassin -P -F1
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 10:37:49PM -0600, Randy Cassingham wrote:
| At 08:30 PM 6/29/2002 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson said:
|
| >| >That is surely a PATH problem. If you use an absolute path to SA in
| >| >the procmailrc does it work then?
| >|
| >| Yes,
| >
| >Yes it works? If it works, th
By the way, this is working properly. I'm thinking something was odd
with the "return" at the end of the file, so SA wasn't reading the last
line properly (the only line that had a whitelist_to entry). I added an
all_spam_to entry for the same domain at the end of the file, and
suddenly not only
I'm storing user preferences in a database. The default hit is 8.0 currently
(will shortly be back to 5.0) and spamc is getting called from procmail
(which is getting called from qmail/vpopmail) thusly:
:0fw
| /usr/local/bin/spamc -u $EXT -f
$EXT is the username and any extension they have.
> -- I just don't have time to fuss with this kind of stuff, which takes a
> LONG time for me as a newbie to deal with, so I just ripped SA out and am
> going with what I know works: my own procmail recipes. They only get
> 70-75% of the spam (which means a dozen or two get through), but it's
> b
I am having trouble with SA. It looks like it is stripping off the first 'F'
in 'From" in every message I receive.
I'm using procmail and postfix.
My /etc/procmailrc file looks like:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P -F1
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/var/spool/mail/caughtspam
My mail command in postfi
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > > # $head is a Mail::Header object, fyi.
> > > my $SAstatus = $head->get("X-Spam-Status") || "No, tests=\n";
...
> I could do $head->unfold('X-Spam-Status'), but not $SAstatus->unfold()
> ($SAsta
37 matches
Mail list logo
