Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know this was supposedly well-tested, but it generates warnings if the
> message body is empty:
>
> Use of uninitialized value in division (/) at
> lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm line 1331.
> Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt (>) at
> li
I know this was supposedly well-tested, but it generates warnings if the
message body is empty:
Use of uninitialized value in division (/) at
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm line 1331.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt (>) at
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm line 1331.
__
In SpamAssassin.pm I see:
# Let's not make this required -- Marc
#eval { require Time::HiRes };
#Time::HiRes->import( qw(time) ) unless $@;
# Unfortunately, the above doesn't work, please FIXME
use Time::HiRes qw ( time );
I just wanted to report that the "eval ... unless $@;" stuff works fine
>From my (limited) experience, it seems that the Asian language spam I get
isn't listed in Razor or DCC when I get it. Is this just chance, or could
there be a reason for it? I don't think that I'd be among the first to get
every copy of Asian spam. Maybe most of the people who are first-repo
Hi,
If you are interested in seeing some statistics about CPU, processing
time, message size and spam level, you can get a look at:
http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/laboratory/monitor/mail/
Machine is a P166, with some 64MB ram and SCSI disks.
Disregard virus and client connection that may not be givin
>Ummm... yeah... I just couldn't figure out how to add in the
>accents. And my shift button got stuck when I hit L!
^q 3 4 0 in emacs :)
Olivier
___
Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory
Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 - http://
A few people asked for this so I thoughI would just post it to the list
since it is so small.
Anyone that needs more info, or any help with the configs, there is a
README in the tar file. If you need help beyond that, don't hesitate to
ask!
You will need to edit the config.inc.php for your serve
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 05:03:07PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
| On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:36:06PM -0400, Weidong Wang wrote:
| > Linux 6.2.
There is no Linux 6.2. Linus is still working on 2.5. Oh, you meant
*RedHat* Linux 6.2. (the distinction may seem subtle, but really it
isn't)
| >
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 08:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > or famous martial aritists
> > Bruce Lee, Chuck Norris, Jackie Chan, etc.
> How about famous "real" martial artists as against media hyped ones?
Or even fictional ones.
* Grasshopper (Kung Fu)
* Samurai
> I'm new to perl. New to spamassassin.
Been there ;)
> I do have perl running ok on the server. In the spamassassin docs
> it gives me
> the following commands to install.
Sadly SA has never realy been ported to the Win32 platform. If your realy
intrested in getting the main SpamAssassin script
I'm new to perl. New to spamassassin.
I do have perl running ok on the server. In the spamassassin docs it gives me
the following commands to install.
perl -MCPAN -e shell
o conf prerequisites_policy ask
install Mail::SpamAssassin
This works well but nmake gives me errors.
> > 1. is 1 min normal? Of all the tests, is there a subset that takes most
of
> > the time?
>
> It depends ... Can you define "low end server"? What CPU, how much RAM,
> what's the normal load on the box ...? On my P200, RH 7.2, 256MB RAM,
> low load, messages typically take 2-5 seconds.
>
I w
Not sure how either in my home dir, I've got a link to the spamassasin binary
If I go to the directory that it's in, and run tests it works
If I run tests from my home directory, I get this in the output:
SPAM: (no report template found)
I'm sure it's something simple that I broke.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:36:06PM -0400, Weidong Wang wrote:
> Also, it seems that using spamd only have very marginal gain. I am using a
> dell server (low end server) machine with Linux 6.2.
>
> 1. is 1 min normal? Of all the tests, is there a subset that takes most of
> the time?
It depends
Hi, I just installed spamassassin, as it looks very promising.
One thing I noticed is that checking a mail (the sample-spam.txt one, 4K)
one takes over 1 minute. At first I thought it is razor, as I noticed during
"make test" that razor test took a long time. But after disabling razor
(setting RA
On 11 Jun 2002 the voices made Daniel Quinlan write:
> Nigel Metheringham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How about:-
> > John Wilkes Booth
> > [...]
>
> I'd rather not name our work after literal murderers.
Swedish pornstars? ;-)
/Tony
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Thro
Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, if anyone is about to submit a patch, it's time to do it. I'd
> like to get 2.30 out by wednesday, which is pretty aggressive, but
> things are pretty stable right now. Please don't anyone check
> anything in (those of you with commit privs).
Oo
Nigel Metheringham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about:-
> John Wilkes Booth
> [...]
I'd rather not name our work after literal murderers.
Dan
___
Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory
Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 -
Greetings. This is my first time posting to this list.
Apologies if this isn't the right forum for this; in that case,
could you direct me to the right place?
Does anyone else think there should be a rule for "International
Driver's Licenses"? That's a frequent subject and/or body phrase
that p
I installed the RPM instead and everything seems to work. I tested it real
quick, and SA was able to pick up on SPAM. Thanks for the help, but it
still bothers me that I wasn't able to install it from CPAN.
--
Emery Guévremont,
Systems administrator and Customer Support
Administrateur des systè
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:17:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having problems installing SA on my RH 7.2, kernel 2.4.7-10 on my
> computer. I tried installing SA from CPAN and manually with make, but I
> stop at the same place. What am I missing? I installed every required
> modules wit
> Any chance someone is willing to share some code to put together
> a nice web
> inteface for end users to configure personal settings for SpamAssassin on
> Redhat 7.x with MySQL and PHP or perhaps even just a perl script?
I've made a basic Perl module that can load, save and edit user config
fil
Jim Scott wrote:
> Any chance someone is willing to share some code to put together a
> nice web inteface for end users to configure personal settings for
> SpamAssassin on Redhat 7.x with MySQL and PHP or perhaps even just a
> perl script?
The lovely chaps at Horde (www.horde.org) are working on
Hi Jim,
We are using Postfix, IMAP (for webmail), QPopper for POP3, SA 2.20,
PHP4 and MySQL with a web interface for our test customers.
I would be more than happy to send you the PHP code for this if you like.
Each customer's white_list & black_list as well as their point setting
are the only
I'm having problems installing SA on my RH 7.2, kernel 2.4.7-10 on my
computer. I tried installing SA from CPAN and manually with make, but I
stop at the same place. What am I missing? I installed every required
modules with CPAN. Here's the output of make test:
Running make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 09:02:51AM -0700, Jim Scott wrote:
> So if RAZOR_CHECK is set to 0 spamd will not even go out and check Razor? Or
> by setting it to zero even if it matches RAZOR as spam it is given a score
> of zero?
If a test has a score of 0 it doesn't get run.
> needed. I am guessing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Derrick Hudson stated:
>| I have currently got the mail box at 3.5 with a queue delivery of 10
>| minutes, this I am increasing to 20 minutes as it hits inbounds
>| anyway. Sometimes it can take me upto 30 minutes just to bring t
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:27:40AM -0800, Pete Hanson wrote:
| Hi Derrick,
|
| At 06/10/2002 13:04, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| >On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:51:07AM -0800, Pete Hanson wrote:
| >| Not true. We're starting to see spam mail with huge attachments.
| >
| >What sort of attachments?
Any chance someone is willing to share some code to put together a nice web
inteface for end users to configure personal settings for SpamAssassin on
Redhat 7.x with MySQL and PHP or perhaps even just a perl script?
I know there is some stuff included with SpamAssassin but they dont seem to
meet
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 08:31:17AM -0500, Saul Guttman wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I have Exim with SA running at SMTP time.
If you mean the same thing the rest of us do, then you're using exim 4
with Marc's local_scan() function, right?
| I am testing this to see if I can reduce spam sent to my Exchange
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 08:28:55AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| > or famous martial aritists
| > Bruce Lee, Chuck Norris, Jackie Chan, etc.
|
| How about famous "real" martial artists as against media hyped ones?
Chuck Norris had the world title for several ye
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:19:20AM +0200, A. Schirmacher wrote:
| II think any email containing an executable is spam.
It's certainly junk, unless you asked for it (in which case a smart
sender will (g)zip it first).
| Windows executables can have extensions other than
| *.exe, for example *.bat
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 12:32:53PM -0600, Jake Edge wrote:
>
> It looks like this has been reported a couple of times, but I could find
> no resolution in the archives ... version 2.20 of SA, version 2.1 of
> Mail::Audit. When I call rewrite_mail(), I get the following error message
> (some of t
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:29:50PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > Spamassassin 2.30 (a L'orange) would be a pretty good name.
>
> If I may... that hould be Spamassassin 2.30 (à l'orange)
>
> Lets be orthographically correct :)
>
Ummm... yeah... I just couldn't figure out how to add in the
ac
We have added the following local.cf rules to cover spam that has slipped
through the v2.20 ruleset
body SPONSORED1 /brought to you by/i
describe SPONSORED1 spam with embedded commercials, SHEESH
body REMOVE1/REMOVE/
describe SPECIAL1 REMOVE in caps
body SPECIAL1
OSX startup stuff happens by running scripts called
/Library/StartupItems/ProductName/ProductName -- sniff around in
/Library/StartupItems/ and you'll see what I mean.
If I get bored I might try making an OSX SpamAssassin package.
C
Ian Vännman wrote:
IV> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:29:22 +020
Excellent, thank Olivier! Great work on keeping up with the translations.
C
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:39:47 +0700 (ICT)
ON> From: Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ON> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ON> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ON> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Freeze for 2.30, call for
So if RAZOR_CHECK is set to 0 spamd will not even go out and check Razor? Or
by setting it to zero even if it matches RAZOR as spam it is given a score
of zero?
It seems in some cases it is taking a long time to check RAZOR and so I
would like to know what the best way is to disable RAZOR complet
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 08:39:53AM -0700, Jim Scott wrote:
> Does DCC work with version 2.20?
Not directly (you'd have to patch 2.20 to add the support). It should
be available in 2.30 as I understand it.
> Also what would need to be done if I ever wanted to disable one or the
> other? Is there
I am using versin 2.20 and installed Razor and I see spamassassin is now
using it. I would like to also use DCC however after installing it per
Readme I do not see any indication that it spamassassin is using it as well?
Does DCC work with version 2.20?
Also what would need to be done if I ever w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> or famous martial aritists
> Bruce Lee, Chuck Norris, Jackie Chan, etc.
How about famous "real" martial artists as against media hyped ones?
Mas Oyama
Gichin Funikoshi
Chojun Miyagi
Sensei Oneisi
Claude Von Damme ... <= Wait, how'd he get on this list... hehe.
_
When I run mailstat, I almost always see a few of these:
0 1 ## /bin/sh: /usr/local/bin/spamassassin: not found
0 1 ## procmail: Program failure (127) of "/usr/local/bin/spamassassin"
0 1 ## procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded
Although SA is cle
How about:-
John Wilkes Booth
Charles J. Guiteau
Leon Czolgosz
Lee Harvey Oswald
Lynette Alice (Squeaky) Fromme
Sara Jane Moore
John W. Hinckley, Jr.
as a start...
Hint - http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0194022.html
[This particular sick scheme is all down to me currently backsta
I'm attempting to install SpamAssassin using the instructions on
www.communigatefaq.com. The instructions are for Redhat systems and I'm
running Mac OS X. So when I get to point 5 I get stuck:
Copy the spamd init.d startup script to /etc/init.d, make it executable, and
make it start when the syst
Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
>Craig R Hughes wrote:
>> Anyone have any thoughts for a cool release name for 2.30?
>
>Soylent Green.
I don't think we need to start eating our own, yet. I think we are
missing the key part of SA, not the Spam part but the assassin part.
Since Ninjas are the mascot, us
Hi,
I have Exim with SA running at SMTP time. I am testing this to see if I can reduce
spam sent to my Exchange server (I know, I know, but some people have to make a
living). So I have setup .forward files so that messages get forwarded to the Exchange
server for the time being. It seems to b
> -Original Message-
> From: A. Schirmacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 11 June 2002 05:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] executable attachments should be filtered
>
>
> II think any email containing an executable is spam.
> Windows executables can have extensions o
On 11 Jun 2002 at 6:19, A. Schirmacher wrote:
> II think any email containing an executable is spam.
> Windows executables can have extensions other than
> *.exe, for example *.bat, *.scr, and whatnot. Those
> executables are very dangerous because the reader
> might not recognize them as an ex
Craig,
I rsync a mass-check and posted bug #421 that has the rule description
in French corresponding to the 2.30 coming tomorrow.
Olivier
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas
Hi Derrick,
At 06/10/2002 13:04, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:51:07AM -0800, Pete Hanson wrote:
>| Not true. We're starting to see spam mail with huge attachments.
>
>What sort of attachments? What are the main identifying marks on the
>messages?
Here's a nice examp
Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Anyone have any thoughts for a cool release name for 2.30?
Soylent Green.
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/inde
> Spamassassin 2.30 (a L'orange) would be a pretty good name.
If I may... that hould be Spamassassin 2.30 (à l'orange)
Lets be orthographically correct :)
Olivier
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
52 matches
Mail list logo