On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:36:06PM -0400, Weidong Wang wrote:
> Also, it seems that using spamd only have very marginal gain. I am using a
> dell server (low end server) machine with Linux 6.2.
>
> 1. is 1 min normal? Of all the tests, is there a subset that takes most of
> the time?
It depends ... Can you define "low end server"? What CPU, how much RAM,
what's the normal load on the box ...? On my P200, RH 7.2, 256MB RAM,
low load, messages typically take 2-5 seconds.
Can you try running the message through "spamassassin -D -P -L -t"
and see what happens. That should disable all network checks (razor,
DNS lookups, etc) and only do the local tests. It will also show you
debugging information, so you can notice if the body tests are the ones
taking the longest amount of time, etc.
> 2. While running with spamd has a marginal gain, it seems that the system
> resource usage is not any less. Is this normal?
No, it should take less time using spamd than using spamassassin directly.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Relationships are hard. It's like a full-time job, and we should treat
it like one. If your boyfriend or girlfriend wants to leave you, they
should give you two weeks' notice. There should be severance pay, and
before they leave you, they should have to find you a temp."
- Bob Ettinger
_______________________________________________________________
Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory
Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 - http://www.cowanalexander.com/calendar
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
