--On Friday, April 5, 2002 6:49 PM +0200 "Tony L. Svanstrom"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumoured to have written:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Chris MacLeod write:
>
>> I want to do something along the lines of dropping everything over a
>> certain score (ex >20) then anything less than that
Craig Hughes wrote:
>I disagree that Paul is an ass. He makes some semi-valid points about
>people's fears, and about how sometimes ISPs misuse or misinstall tools
>on their systems, and thereby negatively impact their users. What I
>mostly disagree with him about is that SpamAssassin goes out
Well, I don't know about despicable, but certainly it would have been
polite for him to contact me before publically badmouthing me and
encouraging wide distribution of his misrepresentations about my
character and my work.
C
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 22:29, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> Furthermore, his
I disagree that Paul is an ass. He makes some semi-valid points about
people's fears, and about how sometimes ISPs misuse or misinstall tools
on their systems, and thereby negatively impact their users. What I
mostly disagree with him about is that SpamAssassin goes out of its way
to make it har
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Wandrer wrote:
> FYI:
>
> The Mail Killer
> In this case the culprit was an alleged spam filter system called "Spam
> Assassin."
> Any person that recommends this software should be required to re-take
> their IQ test, to see if they still have one.
> A
Craig R Hughes wrote:
>Hi there Paul.
>
[...]
>
>
>Yours,
>
>Craig Hughes
>
Danged polite. I would have been sorely tempted to trail off with a,
"and the horse you rode in on!" (or far worse) but I decline the
invitation and leave it for others to attend to. What an ass this guy is.
--
h
* Chris Beggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020405 19:33]:
> From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > FAQ. It's the Razor 1.20 client. Downgrade razor to 1.19, or upgrade
> > SA to 2.20.
>
> Thanks. That did the trick immediately.
Just went through this myself. Looked through the archives..
The FAQ contains a clue about this problem.
C
Chris Beggy wrote:
> Why can't it find Razor::Client? I'm using S-A-2.11 and
> razor-agent-1.20.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamass
Hi there Paul. I'm currently maintaining the SpamAssassin project for Justin
Mason while he's off on vacation. He's the guy, by the way, who jokingly put
the "profit is dirty" message on his webpage.
I got pointed to your webpage http://www.talkbiz.com/assassin.html and went
there to read it
From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> FAQ. It's the Razor 1.20 client. Downgrade razor to 1.19, or upgrade
> SA to 2.20.
Thanks. That did the trick immediately.
Chris
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourcef
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:25:20PM -0800, Andrew Salamon wrote:
>I've installed SpamAssassin on my company's mail server and started using
> it for a few addresses. Unfortunately, that leaves me with several
> megabytes of existing email that I would like to retroactively scan. I
> tried th
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 15:25, Andrew Salamon wrote:
> I tried the simplistic approach of simply piping a Unix mbox file through
> SpamAssassin but it only seems to have looked at the first email.
Yes, SpamAssassin expects that its input is a single mail message.
formail is designed to do what yo
I've installed SpamAssassin on my company's mail server and started using
it for a few addresses. Unfortunately, that leaves me with several
megabytes of existing email that I would like to retroactively scan. I
tried the simplistic approach of simply piping a Unix mbox file through
SpamAss
On Friday 05 April 2002 01:10 pm, Chris Beggy wrote:
> First I built and installed spamassassin without razor. Now
> despite installing razor, I get the following errors in the s-a
> test suite:
>
> t/db_based_whitelist.ok
> t/forged_rcvd...razor check skipped: No such file or directory
> und
Hi Folks,
Maybe somebody can help me with the following:
- I've just installed spamassassin 2.11 on my machine (Sun, Solaris)
- it works from the command line
- it works as a filter when I pipe from within Pine
- but, when I stick the recommended rule into .procmailrc, things break
-- procmail
I'm probably one of those email admins he hates.
A couple months ago, our company's execs decided they were tired of getting offers for
"vi*gra" and "h*t ho*ny te*ns". I set up spam-assassin to mark and deliver emails. I
told the users what we were doing and told them to tell me when email was
FAQ. It's the Razor 1.20 client. Downgrade razor to 1.19, or upgrade
SA to 2.20.
LER
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 15:10, Chris Beggy wrote:
> First I built and installed spamassassin without razor. Now
> despite installing razor, I get the following errors in the s-a
> test suite:
>
> t/db_based_w
Here is a solution to people against spam assassin - rename it to:
Mail
Analysis
Protection
Scanner for
Kids email
Contaminated with
Unsolicited
Filth
People cannot argue against protecting kids from porn and unsolicited mail.
(And have lots of fun with the initials)
Tongue in Cheekily,
Jay Hod
First I built and installed spamassassin without razor. Now
despite installing razor, I get the following errors in the s-a
test suite:
t/db_based_whitelist.ok
t/forged_rcvd...razor check skipped: No such file or directory undefined
Razo
Same here.
SA RULES.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tyler Hardison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:13 PM
> To: Nick Fisher; Rose, Bobby; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin
>
>
> On 4/5/02 12:00 PM, "Nick Fisher" <[EMA
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig R Hughes write:
> NB it is possible to have scores >100, in theory. Quite likely in fact if you
> use blacklists.
>
> In theory, communism works, in theory.
In theory, anyone using my "code" should be able to copy&paste his way into a
solutions if he fi
> This is actually scary.
I agree, our company has spent a good deal of time changing the formats of
our mails and learning how spam blockers work so that our Newsletters don't
get blocked. They are a major source of $$$ for us. If no one could get them
we would be in deep do do.
> I don¹t block
On 4/5/02 12:00 PM, "Nick Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think his rant is realy directed at people who setup SA to automatically
> reject/delete mail that hits the threshold score. He doesn't seem to realise
> that's not the way your supposed to do it. I might point out that I am the
> p
I think his rant is realy directed at people who setup SA to automatically
reject/delete mail that hits the threshold score. He doesn't seem to realise
that's not the way your supposed to do it. I might point out that I am the
postmaster for a domain that sends out 100s of thousands of emails a we
Oh dear.
Annother so called expert blaming the tools rather than the workmen. If
someone has installed SA without propper whitelists and consideration real
mail does get blocked. Duh! Don't blame SA for something that an admin did.
When I first installed SA all sorts of things were incorrectly tag
One work... Uninformed. Based on the content of the e-rag, he has
issues far beyond SA. My impression is that the various spam software
being used by systems is either outright refusing his e-rag or in SA's
case tagging it. Maybe his email address should become a spamtroll
address ;-)
-O
FYI:
The Mail Killer
In this case the culprit was an alleged spam filter system called "Spam
Assassin."
Any person that recommends this software should be required to re-take
their IQ test, to see if they still have one.
Any service denier who actually uses it should be promptly sued into obliv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes spake thusly:
> ls -ld /etc/mail/spamassassin? And what uid is spamd running as?
>
sean@bsod:~ > ls -ld /etc/mail/spamassassin
drwxr-xr-x 2 exim exim 84 Apr 5 10:28
/etc/mail/spamassassin
sean@bs
ls -ld /etc/mail/spamassassin? And what uid is spamd running as?
C
Sean Rima wrote:
> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 18:51:08 +0100
> From: Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] local.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin not being checked
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESS
NB it is possible to have scores >100, in theory. Quite likely in fact if you
use blacklists.
In theory, communism works, in theory.
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:49:44 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Tony L. Svanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Chris M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes outgrape:
> ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin ?
>
sean@bsod:~ > ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin/
total 8
- -rwx-- 1 exim exim 848 Apr 5 10:28 local.cf
- -rwx-- 1 root root 631 Apr 5 10:24
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Chris MacLeod write:
> I want to do something along the lines of dropping everything over a
> certain score (ex >20) then anything less than that but still over my spam
> threshold putting it into a separate folder to go through later.
(Consider this pseudo-co
Interesting wrinkle on CASHCASHCASH: while I don't know for sure, it
appears that this legitimate spam (I have the score for CASHCASHCASH
overridden to 2.0) points out that three dollar signs in a row might be
a bad test if the text body is encoded in iso-2022-jp, which seems to
like dollar
ls -l /etc/mail/spamassassin ?
C
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 01:56, Sean Rima wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this:
>
> > What does spamassassin -D say?
> >
>
>
> debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir
> debug: u
I just started using spam assassin and after about 2 hours I moved it over
for my whole mail server (instead of a per user basis) It'll probably get
rolled out at work in a few weeks. Thanks to all!
Does anyone have some good procmail recipies for filtered spamassassin
mail?
I want to do s
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
> Craig Hughes wrote:
> > I think the problem is you need to escape the <.
>
> < isn't anything special in a regexp - this is just a misunderstanding
> propogated thoughout the SA rules.
[tony@localhost] /Users/tony/ {155} man egrep | grep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this:
> What does spamassassin -D say?
>
debug: using "/usr/share/spamassassin" for default rules dir
debug: using "/etc/mail/spamassassin" for site rules dir
debug: using "/home/sean/.spamassassin" for user state
Must be a holdover from some other regex system -- I think it means
"beginning of word" in some regex syntax or other, like:
\b(?=\w)
in perl
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 00:45, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Craig Hughes wrote:
> > I think the problem is you need to escape the <.
>
> < isn't anything specia
Craig Hughes wrote:
> I think the problem is you need to escape the <.
< isn't anything special in a regexp - this is just a misunderstanding
propogated thoughout the SA rules.
Matt.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://list
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 12:50, Ryan Hammond wrote:
> Any suggestions out there? Am I barking up the completely incorrect tree?
> Is there an easy way to verify that we are actually using procmail? etc.
Your recipe looks plausible, spamassassin seems to be working. Have you
thought of the "ask
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 21:55, Justin Wilson wrote:
> 4.Recommended procedure for taking the redhat-rc-script.sh and making it a
> startup script?
# mv redhat-rc-script.sh /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd
# chkconfig --add spamd
# service spamd start
C
___
Spamas
It's a known issue. In fact, it's in the FAQ at
http://www.spamassassin.org/faq.html
C
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 20:29, Aly Dharshi wrote:
> Hello Gurus,
>
> I hope that you are well, is there a known issue with Vipul's razor 1.20 and
>spam assassin latest released version ? I installed vipul
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 19:46, Paul Rushing wrote:
> This message pertains to using AWL and SQL options.
>
> if you will look at the spamd and Conf.pm code, you will see that
> per-user AWL files are by default defined as ~/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
>
> This depends on the setuid code in spamd
43 matches
Mail list logo
