Oh dear.
Annother so called expert blaming the tools rather than the workmen. If
someone has installed SA without propper whitelists and consideration real
mail does get blocked. Duh! Don't blame SA for something that an admin did.
When I first installed SA all sorts of things were incorrectly tagged,
that's why I added them to my white list. This is like blaming knife makers
bacuase a child cut themselfs.
If your going to rant at someone rant at the stupid postmasters.

        Nick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Wandrer
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin
>
>
> FYI:
>
> The Mail Killer
> In this case the culprit was an alleged spam filter system called "Spam
> Assassin."
> Any person that recommends this software should be required to re-take
> their IQ test, to see if they still have one.
> Any service denier who actually uses it should be promptly sued
> into oblivion.
> It's true that most anti-spam filtering systems are intended simply to
> reduce spam, not to apply judgments to the content of email. They
> fail, as
> any dumb, brute force filtering system will do, but their intentions are
> generally good.
> Not the ... person ... who wrote Spam Assassin.
> He appears to have a political agenda that's nicely summed up in his own
> words in the documentation for the software. He says, and I quote:
> Profit is dirty, not pure
> I wonder how this ... person ... feeds himself, without benefit
> of someone
> making a profit somewhere?
> Or why he bothers.
>
> http://www.talkbiz.com/assassin.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to