Hi,
The local university magazine has a store about Sage at
http://uwnews.org/uweek/uweekarticle.asp?articleID=38415
-- William
I didn't write the article, but I've created a digg link to it:
http://digg.com/software/Free_Open_Source_Mathematics_Software
I think the only way this will
On Dec 5, 10:06 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> And with
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/Sage-2.9.alpha1-fix-cremona-upgrade-doctest-failout.patch
>
> all doctests on a new install finally pass for me. This was much more
> painful than I thought.
Unfortunat
Thursday 06 December 2007 08:03:48 Carl Witty yazmıştı:
> On Dec 5, 9:15 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> > * Carl reported a clisp build failure with gcc version 4.2.3
> > 20071014 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3), but I guess he will post
> > details later.
>
> Details!
On Dec 6, 6:15 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> Arrg, this isn't going to well so far.
>
> * the cremona.spkg in alpha0 is the old version, you need
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/cremona-20071124.p3.spkg
>
And with
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/
On Dec 5, 9:15 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> * Carl reported a clisp build failure with gcc version 4.2.3
> 20071014 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3), but I guess he will post
> details later.
Details!
On my Debian testing 32-bit x86 Linux laptop, the clisp build failed.
T
Arrg, this isn't going to well so far.
* the cremona.spkg in alpha0 is the old version, you need
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/cremona-20071124.p3.spkg
* Carl reported a clisp build failure with gcc version 4.2.3
20071014 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-3), but I guess he will pos
On Dec 5, 2007 4:17 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me
> this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the
> internals here. Is this just something that is too big?
>
> {{{id=14|
> P = QQ[2^(1/
On Dec 5, 2007, at 7:07 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> Tickets with negative review:
> #1189 [with patch, with negative review] SymPy <-> SAGE automatic
> conversion
I will look into this one.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@g
On Dec 5, 2007 7:07 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the release cycle has started and so far only 5 tickets were closed.
> Since we update clisp (which is tricky) and also updated cremona.spkg
> to take over the functionality of mwrank this might be a little
> rough to get r
Hello,
the release cycle has started and so far only 5 tickets were closed.
Since we update clisp (which is tricky) and also updated cremona.spkg
to take over the functionality of mwrank this might be a little
rough to get right on the first try. The tarball is available at
http://sage.math.wash
On Dec 6, 3:04 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 4:17 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me
> > this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the
> > internals here. Is thi
On Dec 5, 4:17 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me
> this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the
> internals here. Is this just something that is too big?
Just for fun, I took a look at wha
On Dec 5, 2007 5:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>I currently have a bit of a problem. I just 1. installed
> imagemagick and then 2. upgraded my sage. Also, I am on vmware. The
> problem I'm having is that I type in 'notebook' at the prompt and the
> vmware no
Hello,
I currently have a bit of a problem. I just 1. installed
imagemagick and then 2. upgraded my sage. Also, I am on vmware. The
problem I'm having is that I type in 'notebook' at the prompt and the
vmware notebook screen appears for 2-3 seconds and then returns me to
the prompt and it do
Any chance of getting that to work on OS X? Or more details on what
needs to be done? I've been using wxPython quite a bit lately and it
would be nice to have it integrated into sage. I don't see how it
could be used from the notebook easily but it might be complementary -
an easy way to make s
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made an experimental wxPython-2.8.7.1.spkg.
>
> It works for me on Fedora 7 and 8.
>
On this I could build an experimental spkg for the Enthought Tool Suite
I have a working mayavi2 in sage-2.8.14!
Tomorrow I'll post a link.
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~-
Does anyone have any thoughts on the following? Luke Wolcott showed me
this example- the traceback looks suspect, but I don't know about the
internals here. Is this just something that is too big?
{{{id=14|
P = QQ[2^(1/2), 2^(1/3), 2^(1/5)]
}}}
{{{id=11|
P.gens()
///
(sqrt2, a, b)
}}}
{{{id=10|
On Dec 6, 12:18 am, "M. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying install the Macaulay2 package to Sage 2.8.14. I am using
> a PowerPC with Mac OSX 10.5.1. In doing so I get an error as shown
> below. I am pretty new to this. Does anyone know if there is a
> reasonably stra
Hello,
I am trying install the Macaulay2 package to Sage 2.8.14. I am using
a PowerPC with Mac OSX 10.5.1. In doing so I get an error as shown
below. I am pretty new to this. Does anyone know if there is a
reasonably straightforward way to remedy this error?
Thank you,
Matt Miller
On Dec 5, 8:58 pm, "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/5/07, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > The build fails on OSX without that option. Interestingly enough we do
> > not run makemake with the recommended options. I "fixed" that once a
> > couple months ago, but we reverted the changes because
Hi,
I made an experimental wxPython-2.8.7.1.spkg.
It works for me on Fedora 7 and 8.
Dependencies include:
glib and gtk+
OpenGL or the Mesa3D library
This will not work on OSX (slightly different configuration options, etc).
Any testers?
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/wxPython-2.8
I have fixed the smallest of the mwrank/g0n issues in trac # 1403;
patch attached to the trac. This could be applied to either
qrank/getcurve.cc in the new cremona package, or to getcurve.cc in the
old mwrank package.
On to the next one!
John
On 05/12/2007, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 5, 8:58 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello John,
> Actually there are two different errors we are hunting here --- when
> you sent me two backtraces about 12 hours ago there was one for each.
The one without symbols was mwrank from mwrank.spkg, the second one
with [som
On 12/5/07, mabshoff wrote:
>
> The build fails on OSX without that option. Interestingly enough we do
> not run makemake with the recommended options. I "fixed" that once a
> couple months ago, but we reverted the changes because of the above
> mentioned breakage on OSX.
>
> clisp 2.43 is out and
Actually there are two different errors we are hunting here --- when
you sent me two backtraces about 12 hours ago there was one for each.
One is the apparent referenceing of uninitialized memory, somwhere
around line 900 of qcurves/sieve_search.cc (I'm being imprecise since
I have been adding do
Ok, I compiled NTL as well as mwrank with "-O0 -g" and the problem
persists. But at least I got a better backtrace from gdb:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x003105830015 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x003105831980 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x2b09f1db in ghalt (c=0x2b1609a8
On Dec 5, 7:46 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > mwrank compiles with gcc 4.2, so that has never been a problem. I am
> > > not sure who fixed it, but the changes should have certainly flown
>
> If you mean, who fixed my source to compile ok under 4.2 then that was me.
Ok, I w
On Dec 5, 2007, at 10:46 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>> #1058 the mwrank interface barfs on bad input
>
> This is a triviality. mwrank_elliptic curves need to be initialized
> with 5 integers, period. Currently Sage just tried to coerce the 5
> things to integers, whcih some stupid results (e.g.
> >
> > mwrank compiles with gcc 4.2, so that has never been a problem. I am
> > not sure who fixed it, but the changes should have certainly flown
If you mean, who fixed my source to compile ok under 4.2 then that was me.
> > back into your tree. With the removal of mwrank.spkg that issue will
On Dec 5, 7:20 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007 10:15 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 05/12/2007, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 5, 2007 7:51 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I'm sure that c
On Dec 5, 2007 10:21 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 5, 4:55 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since it seems that most of the problems everyone now has are caused
> > by the mwrank.spkg -> cremona.spkg switchover, and given that 99.9% of
> > the extra functi
On Dec 5, 4:55 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since it seems that most of the problems everyone now has are caused
> by the mwrank.spkg -> cremona.spkg switchover, and given that 99.9% of
> the extra functionality has not yet been wrapped into Sage and is
> hence unavailable fro
On Dec 5, 2007 10:15 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 05/12/2007, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 5, 2007 7:51 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm sure that can be done, and in fact I have suggested it myself.
> > > The cremona.sp
On 05/12/2007, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2007 7:51 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure that can be done, and in fact I have suggested it myself.
> > The cremona.spkg contains everything that mwrank.spkg did. So whoever
> > put mwrank into Sage
Thanks! I've made this trac #1404:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1404
so it will get in Sage soon.
On Dec 5, 2007 2:01 AM, fwc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A problem with latex processing in a notebook (otherwise a brilliant
> feature):
>
>
> Evaluating the input cell:
>
> %latex
>
Hi (I'm sending this to sage-devel as well -- there's a bunch of interest there
to get our multivariate stuff up to speed),
I've put some examples of things that are slow up at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jbmohler/singular/
These are things that I ran into just this morning in my compu
On Dec 5, 2007 7:51 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm sure that can be done, and in fact I have suggested it myself.
> The cremona.spkg contains everything that mwrank.spkg did. So whoever
> put mwrank into Sage
That would be me when I visited you for a day in Nottingham > 2 y
On Dec 5, 2007 1:36 AM, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But anyway, I think we can put the issue about PolyBoRi taking too
> long to build at rest. :)
OK, put to rest.
And off-list Michael Brickenstein sent me some applications of PolyBoRi to
a paper I wrote in grad school 11
It seems like email are getting lost on the way to sage-devel:
Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
> However, what we do in Aldor-Combinat cannot be done so elegantly in any
> > other language I know off. We learned a lot from MuPAD-combinat, but our
> > design is completely different from MC, since Aldor
On Dec 5, 6:06 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007 8:54 AM, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > William,
>
> > Do you recall why you explicity set the following option:
>
> > ./makemake --without-dynamic-ffi ...
>
> > in clisp-2.41.p11/spkg-install ? Is it re
On Dec 5, 2007 8:54 AM, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William,
>
> Do you recall why you explicity set the following option:
>
> ./makemake --without-dynamic-ffi ...
>
> in clisp-2.41.p11/spkg-install ? Is it required for some other parts of Sage?
>
> For the purposes of building the fu
William,
Do you recall why you explicity set the following option:
./makemake --without-dynamic-ffi ...
in clisp-2.41.p11/spkg-install ? Is it required for some other parts of Sage?
For the purposes of building the full version of Axiom using clisp it
is necessary to allow '--with-dynamic-ff
>> Is there a problem with the license of the aldor compiler
>> (aldor-combinat itself is GPL2).
>
> Yep, I believe so. From the website; Version 1.1 of Aldor has been
> released in source form under the Aldor Public License 2.0. This allows
> free non-commercial use, modification and re-distribu
Since it seems that most of the problems everyone now has are caused
by the mwrank.spkg -> cremona.spkg switchover, and given that 99.9% of
the extra functionality has not yet been wrapped into Sage and is
hence unavailable from Sage anyway, why don't we just chuck out the
cremona.spkg into an opt
I'm sure that can be done, and in fact I have suggested it myself.
The cremona.spkg contains everything that mwrank.spkg did. So whoever
put mwrank into Sage could make some small changes and get mwrank to
do the same. The executables files (e.g. the mwrank stand-alone
program) should still be b
On Dec 5, 2007, at 02:01 , Michael Brickenstein wrote:
>
> There is no policy. Fee free to do so :-).
Please, no! Don't cross-post.
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
---
I'm beginning to like the cut of his jibberish.
--
I'm writing with some delay too, I just wanted to congratulate you on the
Trophees du Libre. ABSOLUTELY GREAT!
Cheers, Fabio
On Dec 5, 2007 2:56 PM, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2007, at 20:07 , Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> > ... we won!
>
> Just catching up wit
On Nov 29, 2007, at 20:07 , Martin Albrecht wrote:
... we won!
Just catching up with sage-devel, that's why I'm late:
Congratulations Awesome!
Cheers,
Ralf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
I was too busy for the last couple of weeks to help seriously with
this, but I did try to install it on my PPC apple laptop and my Intel
OS X 10.4 desktop. It failed on both; the PPC problem is probably the
same as you mentioned. I will post the errors from the intel machine
when I get a chance.
Martin Rubey wrote:
> "Michael Abshoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
[somehow Martin's reply didn't make it onto sage-devel (yet)]
>
>> > * licensing issues need to be sorted out since the APL2 is not
>> > GPL-compatible. I don't know if it'd even be possible to distribute
>> Aldor
>> > as par
On Dec 5, 12:53 pm, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wednesday 05 December 2007 13:48:19 mabshoff yazmıştı:
>
> > I just love it when I wake up and somebody has come up with a cleaner
> > patch than I did. Do you mind if I forward this to gmp-bugs in your
> > Name?
>
> The patch is fro
Wednesday 05 December 2007 13:53:15 Ismail Dönmez yazmıştı:
> GMP 4.2.2 which is GPLv3
This should say LGPLv3 of course.
--
Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-
Wednesday 05 December 2007 13:48:19 mabshoff yazmıştı:
> I just love it when I wake up and somebody has come up with a cleaner
> patch than I did. Do you mind if I forward this to gmp-bugs in your
> Name?
The patch is from OpenSuse and should be already fixed in GMP 4.2.2 which is
GPLv3 now so c
On Dec 5, 7:39 am, Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wednesday 05 December 2007 06:07:03 mabshoff yazmıştı:
>
> > gmp:
> [...]
> > * uncomment std::FILE -> causes trouble - need clean fix
>
Hello Ismail
> See attached patch.
>
I just love it when I wake up and somebody has come up w
On Dec 5, 6:34 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 20:07 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Those are all cause by mwrank. The issue seems to be the same issue as
> > Justin Walker reported in the 2.8.15 thread in sage-support.
> > Interestingly no
On Dec 5, 10:17 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can explain Robert's error.
>
> When I adapted the code so as to compile with gcc4,2, one function
> whose signature changed is initprimes() since gcc4,2 complained about
> char* parameters. This was changed in the (new) cremona*
There is no policy. Fee free to do so :-).
On 5 Dez., 10:59, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
darmstadt.de> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 19:57 , Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
>
>
> > Note that this is for comments and testing only, and is not at all
> > complete. I know one way of crashing it, tr
A problem with latex processing in a notebook (otherwise a brilliant
feature):
Evaluating the input cell:
%latex
$y=\sin x$
% end of input
tries to process the TeX file:
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{fullpage}\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{gr
On Dec 4, 2007, at 19:57 , Burcin Erocal wrote:
Note that this is for comments and testing only, and is not at all
complete. I know one way of crashing it, try to use BooleSet
iterators.
I just built it and will do some preliminary testing today! Thanks for
your work!
Comments, suggest
On Dec 4, 2007, at 20:11 , William Stein wrote:
>
>>> Hey, it failed for me :-) on ubuntu 32-bit linux:
>>
>> I removed the pushd and popd, apparently they are bashisms.
>>
>> Here is the new package:
>>
>> http://www.risc.uni-linz.ac.at/people/berocal/sage/polybori-0.1-r4.spkg
>
> I've update
I can explain Robert's error.
When I adapted the code so as to compile with gcc4,2, one function
whose signature changed is initprimes() since gcc4,2 complained about
char* parameters. This was changed in the (new) cremona* package, but
has not been changed in the (old) mwrank* package, which sh
61 matches
Mail list logo
