Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Spamassassin logging with scanner

Jason Haar wrote: > 0.003 secs to fail means spamd ain't running at a guess... > E - yucky English. Let's try that again "At a guess, I'd say spamd isn't even running." There - that's better ;-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Spamassassin logging with scanner

Craig Sparks wrote: > Anyone ran into this problem before and could give me a shove in the > right direction. > > Sun, 10 May 2009 17:48:28 CDT:1948: SA: finished scan in 0.00344 secs - > hits=? > Sun, 10 May 2009 17:48:49 CDT:2211: SA: REPORT hits = ?/? > Sun, 10 May 2009 17:48:49 CDT:2211: SA:

[Qmail-scanner-general] Spamassassin logging with scanner

Anyone ran into this problem before and could give me a shove in the right direction. Sun, 10 May 2009 17:48:28 CDT:1948: SA: finished scan in 0.00344 secs - hits=? Sun, 10 May 2009 17:48:49 CDT:2211: SA: REPORT hits = ?/? Sun, 10 May 2009 17:48:49 CDT:2211: SA: finished scan in 0.003359 secs -

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin matches rules inconsistently

> Apologies if this gets double-posted; my earlier response didn't make > it through. That's okay. Don't worry. > 2. I don't recall ever setting any minimal size of messages to be > scanned. Where is this set, in Q-S? In spamd invocation? No, ~qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl. Based on 2.01

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin matches rules inconsistently

On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Jason Haar wrote: > Hi J B Hey Jason -- Mr. Q-S! > > Well you're using Qmail-Scanner-st not Qmail-Scanner itself, but I > think > what I'm about to say is true for the both of them. > > Your original email states that SA is scoring some email as 0.0 points > when it

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin matches rules inconsistently

Hi J B Well you're using Qmail-Scanner-st not Qmail-Scanner itself, but I think what I'm about to say is true for the both of them. Your original email states that SA is scoring some email as 0.0 points when it's patently obvious it shouldn't be? If you search through /usr/bin/qmail-scanner-queu

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin matches rules inconsistently

On Jan 13, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Jarbas Celante - CTE Internet wrote: >> I am seeing this inconsistency all across the board: HTML and text >> messages, long and short, forged addresses vs. real ones, etc. It >> looks like something related to a timeout or resource limit, but our >> mail server isn't

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin matches rules inconsistently

On Jan 13, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Jarbas Celante - CTE Internet wrote: >> I am seeing this inconsistency all across the board: HTML and text >> messages, long and short, forged addresses vs. real ones, etc. It >> looks like something related to a timeout or resource limit, but our >> mail server isn't

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin matches rules inconsistently

> I am seeing this inconsistency all across the board: HTML and text > messages, long and short, forged addresses vs. real ones, etc. It > looks like something related to a timeout or resource limit, but our > mail server isn't under particularly heavy load (averages around > 0.1), lots of

[Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin matches rules inconsistently

Hi, I have a qmailrocks-style installation, patched qmail with validrcptto + Spamassassin + ClamAV + qmail-scanner2.05st etc. running under daemontools on a FreeBSD 7.0 box. Problem: a good number of emails, close to half at times, are making it through without matching ANY SpamAssassin rul

[Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin matches rules inconsistently

Hi, I have a qmailrocks-style installation, patched qmail with validrcptto + Spamassassin + ClamAV + qmail-scanner2.05st etc. running under daemontools on a FreeBSD 7.0 box. Problem: a good number of emails, close to half at times, are making it through without matching ANY SpamAssassin rul

[Qmail-scanner-general] spamassassin not dropping emails

Anyone uses qmail here. I just recently setup qmail with qmail-scanner and clamav and spamassin as scanner array. I just noticed in my spamassassin log that even though the required hits in spamassassin is 5, it still allow those email which has greater value of 5. Below is the logs of my spamassas

[Qmail-scanner-general] spamassassin doesn't drop email though exceed required score

I have qmail running and using qmail-scanner to check spams. I have noticed that even though the emails has reached over than the required score, its still continue to send the email instead of dropping. Could it be in the qmail-scanner of in the spamassassin? My other config in my mail server

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin identifying spam, yet being flagged as Clear messages

Hello, I read the FAQ section and there is something similar to you problem: MESSAGES MARKED AS SPAM ARE NOT QUARANTINED!. Feature - not a bug. Spam detection is not 100% accurate - there is a fair number of false-positives. As Qmail-Scanner affects all mail entering your system, i

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin identifying spam, yet being flagged as Clear messages

Do you use an SPF in your domain? (http://www.openspf.org). Its possible that someone is just sending email representing your domain. As for why SA isn't identifying SPAM, it would be helpful to post the full headers on an email message. Also, I'm assuming you have open relay turned off which c

[Qmail-scanner-general] SpamAssassin identifying spam, yet being flagged as Clear messages

Hi all. Been watching the list via websites a lot, my first post here. I'm running Qmail, Qmail Scanner and SpamAssassin, and have the rules going how I want them now, and even a nice little log parser that feeds off mailstats.csv. However, I am getting complaints from some users about the lev

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin header lines gone

Hi, some mistakes are just too obvious to be spotted easily. The problem wasn't that the header lines weren't added but that qmail-scanner was not run at all! ;-) Sorry for bothering everybody with my stupidity! :-( Cheers, Christian On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:32:50 +1000 Christian Lerrahn <[EMAIL P

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin header lines gone

Hi, I'm running qmail-scanner on 2 different hosts. Both us spamassassin, bitdefender and clamav. On one host the whole thing runs fine but on the other box, the header lines that spamassassin writes never show up in the emails. The configs of the qmail-scanners are essentially the saem and I can't

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin spam NOT detected.

Samir Noshy wrote: Do anyone know why that spam not marked as spam ? Yes I do. The mutant pygmies that live inside your hard drive have decided that you don't get enough spam. You obviously haven't been feeding them enough lettuce. Try pushing a few leaves through the floppy drive slot. I know

[Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin spam NOT detected.

Hi Everybody, Do anyone know why that spam not marked as spam ? I know that the score less than the required score that I specified, how can I make the autolearn of this type of messages to be yes not no i.e. (autolearn= "ham", or "spam") ? The Message spam headers: .. .. .. X-Spam-Checker-Ve

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin hanging

Matt wrote: Hello, I am running SpamAssassin version 2.64... yes I know it's a little old but it serves well and I've been a bit scared to upgrade to 3.0... will be doing that soon now that things seem to be running well for people... Someone here may be able to help - but you should post this t

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin hanging

Hello, I am running SpamAssassin version 2.64... yes I know it's a little old but it serves well and I've been a bit scared to upgrade to 3.0... will be doing that soon now that things seem to be running well for people... My issue is that spamd seems to be hanging on me.. I can't quite tell where

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin setup - ClamAv - PHP?

Are you using my rpms for this, or did you roll your own? My squirrelmail rpm ties directly into qmail-scanner, sets up the sql tables (in the horde db), and adds in learning mode support using Imap folders on a per-user basis. If you don't use sql, it will create a global AWL, and Bayes DB in /var

[Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin setup - ClamAv - PHP?

Hi guys. I finally got qmail-scanner running with clamd and spamassassin3 on my plesk server. I was wondering if anyone could advise me on setup. I notice somehow my plesk system is generating lots of junk mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] . These can't find their destination of course and seem to get

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin options

Hi, I just wondering where to find some spamassassin options for the qmail-scanner configure script. Included in some emails on this list I've read something like this: --sa-delta 0 --sa-subject "" Where I could find some documentation about it? Greets Christoph --

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and plesk

At 8:04 -0600 1-09-2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by secure.myfasthost.net by uid 2020 with qmail-scanner-1.22st (clamdscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. perlscan: ???. Clear:RC:0(66.98.168.58):SA:1(3.9/3.0):. Processed in 2.960293 secs); 31 Aug 2004 13:47:31 -

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and plesk

The wierd part is that when i send the same email from my yahoo id it goes through the spam filter. Here is the Message source: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 24393 invoked by uid 2520); 1 Sep 2004 12:37:28 - Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin not used

At 10:58 + 17-08-2004, Payal Rathod wrote: Hi, I download mails from remote host onto my linux machine using fetchmail. I have in my /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl Version: 1.23 --scanners "clamscan,verbose_spamassassin" But I am not believing spamassassin is invovked. I see nothing in t

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin not used

register around 100+ for SPAM. You could also turn on DEBUG in the qmail-scanner-queue.pl file. Steve -Original Message- From: Payal Rathod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:59 AM To: qmail Scanner Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin not used Hi, I down

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin not used

Hi, I download mails from remote host onto my linux machine using fetchmail. I have in my /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl Version: 1.23 --scanners "clamscan,verbose_spamassassin" But I am not believing spamassassin is invovked. I see nothing in the logs for spamassassin. My local.cf for SA i

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin and URI

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:29:59 +0300 (EEST) Nerijus Baliunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why don't I see any matched URI rules in qmail-queue.log? > It was with SA 2.63 and SpamCopURI patch, the same problem > with latest 3.0.0 pre The problem was that I ran spamd -L -x -d (-L means "Use local tes

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin and URI

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:06:46 +0200 Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What version of qmail-scanner (st) are you using? Your latest st (q-s-1.22st-20040606). > But these are the standard 2.63 URI rules. I also have these, but I want to use SpamCopURI, it is very effective. See http:

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin and URI

At 13:29 +0300 26-07-2004, Nerijus Baliunas wrote: Hello, Why don't I see any matched URI rules in qmail-queue.log? It was with SA 2.63 and SpamCopURI patch, the same problem with latest 3.0.0 pre (which includes this functionality, and there is loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL in /e

[Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin and URI

Hello, Why don't I see any matched URI rules in qmail-queue.log? It was with SA 2.63 and SpamCopURI patch, the same problem with latest 3.0.0 pre (which includes this functionality, and there is loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL in /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre). On another system,

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin 3.0

Works like a charm using: SpamAssassin version 3.0.0-r10668 I'm also using the rules_du_jour stuff with it. Charles -Original Message- From: Patrik Nilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Qmail-scanner-ge

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin 3.0

Hi, Anyone who has experiences of running qmail-scanner with SA 3.0 (using spamd)? As it's getting close to a final release, I'm considering installing the pre-release 1 version of 3.0 on a test system and wonder if anyone has run into any gotchas or configuration specifics one might want to be a

RE: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header

: Saturday, June 19, 2004 9:51 AM >> To: Jason Staudenmayer >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header >> >> >> Thanks, is there any disadvantage of using non-fast_spamassassin mode? >> >> > F

RE: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header

>> Thanks for the quick reply. > >> > >> > Yes they are. > >> > > >> >> -Original Message- > >> >> From: Andrew Cranson > >> >> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 8:53 AM > >> >> To: [EMAIL PR

Re: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header

the only thing I needed to do. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrew Cranson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 9:11 AM >> To: Jason Staudenmayer >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin rep

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header

ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 9:11 AM > To: Jason Staudenmayer > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header > > > Any clues how? I can't see an option anywhere. > > Thanks for the quick reply

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header

Any clues how? I can't see an option anywhere. Thanks for the quick reply. > Yes they are. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrew Cranson >> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 8:53 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]S

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header

Yes they are. > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Cranson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 8:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header > > > Hi, > > Would it be possible to i

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin reports in header

Hi, Would it be possible to include a detailed breakdown of the score of a particular email in the message headers? e.g.1: X-Spam-Report: * 0.1 EXCUSE_14 BODY: Tells you how to stop further spam * 0.1 HTML_70_80 BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN BODY: H

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin doesn't parse the message when sent from another host

At 1:20 -0700 13-05-2004, Stand H wrote: Dear all, I just setup qmail-scanner. I'm curious why my message doesn't get through spamassassin when I send the message from another machine via smtp(no spassassin header added to the message), but if I inject the mail locally(something like #echo to: [EM

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin doesn't parse the message when sent from another host

--- Stand H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I just setup qmail-scanner. I'm curious why my > message > doesn't get through spamassassin when I send the > message from another machine via smtp(no spassassin > header added to the message), but if I inject the > mail > locally(something l

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin doesn't parse the message when sent from another host

Dear all, I just setup qmail-scanner. I'm curious why my message doesn't get through spamassassin when I send the message from another machine via smtp(no spassassin header added to the message), but if I inject the mail locally(something like #echo to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inj

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin + F-Secure + qmail-scanner

Hello, I am running qmail 1.03 with qmail-scanner-1.22 with spamassassin 2.63 and F-Secure virus scanner. I have noticed that after I upgraded to 1.22 from 1.21 the load on the server has increased significantly, I also have the ST patch with does a CHECK USER so I am not accepting email for non

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin don't work with qmail-scanner but work alone

Hi!   I have qmail-scanner and spamassassin installed.   When I moved qmail-queue to qmail-queue.orig and edit the qmail-queue as: #!/bin/sh/usr/bin/spamc | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig   The spamassassin works just fine.   When I removed the qmail-queue.orig to qmail-queue it didn't filt

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and qmail-scanner not playing well together

> My two cents: > > - Are you calling "spamc" in the right way like "spamc" is called via > the system? Have you looked in "/var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-queue.log" > for the system call? > > - Maybe your servers are to busy and spamc falls back to pass through > the mails? Thanks for the reply. We a

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and qmail-scanner not playing well together

On Wednesday 28 January 2004 22:15, Jeremy S Lowery wrote: > We've got spam assassin setup to scan via qmail scanner > > $ spamc -f -c -d adblocker < 1075244831.1972.4zSQ\:2\,S > 25.2/5.0 > > It's tagging as spam, however this email didn't get marked as spam by > the system. A lot of email gets

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin not working properly

We've got spam assassin setup to scan via qmail scanner $ spamc -f -c -d adblocker < 1075244831.1972.4zSQ\:2\,S 25.2/5.0 It's tagging as spam, however this email didn't get marked as spam by the system. A lot of email gets marked as spam and a lot of it doesn't. When using spamc manually it

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and qmail-scanner not playing well together

For some reason my first submission did'nt go through so I"m resending. We've got spam assassin setup to scan via qmail scanner $ spamc -f -c -d adblocker < 1075244831.1972.4zSQ\:2\,S 25.2/5.0 It's tagging as spam, however this email didn't get marked as spam by the system. A lot of email ge

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin oddness

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mr. David wrote: > Sean Kennedy wrote: > First, I am running qmail with qmail-scanner ( 1.20 ) + clamAV ( .65 ) + spamassassin ( 2.61 ). I noticed when a large message comes in, spamassassin fails to return a result. I get the ??/?? stuff in the hea

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin oddness

Sean Kennedy wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 First, I am running qmail with qmail-scanner ( 1.20 ) + clamAV ( .65 ) + spamassassin ( 2.61 ). I noticed when a large message comes in, spamassassin fails to return a result. I get the ??/?? stuff in the header. After some rese

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin oddness

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 First, I am running qmail with qmail-scanner ( 1.20 ) + clamAV ( .65 ) + spamassassin ( 2.61 ). I noticed when a large message comes in, spamassassin fails to return a result. I get the ??/?? stuff in the header. After some research, I found that s

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin and bayes filtering

>This isn't a Q-S question. You should search the SpamAssassin mailing-list (or post to it) for such things as "how do I do bayes filtering >on a mail relay server?". It is pretty hard - so hard that I don't do it :-( >[Bayes is really an end-user tool - how does an automated process like a mail r

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin and bayes filtering

On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:58:54PM -0500, Jennifer Fountain wrote: > I am currently using qmail/qmailscanner and SA on a redhat 8 box for my > mail. Everything works great except bayes filtering. I either get > errors or nothing at all. If anyone could share information on how to > get bayes wor

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin and bayes filtering

I am currently using qmail/qmailscanner and SA on a redhat 8 box for my mail. Everything works great except bayes filtering. I either get errors or nothing at all. If anyone could share information on how to get bayes working correctly with qmailscanner, I would greatly appreciate it.

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin issue?

I ran into a problem with qmail-scanner-1.20 recently. Everything seems to be working flawlessly except for the spamassassin integration. I ended up making it work by pipelining SA before QS.   I have all the current sources as of yesterday 11/6/2003. I followed all directions, and everythi

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:27:46AM -0400, Cedric Fontaine wrote: > debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: > auto_report_threshold 30 > debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: report_header 1 > debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin co

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin report

am sorry i know its not meant for here but have read that documentation but its not very clear to me would apreciate if some one gave me some rough ideas how to go about it Ed Henderson wrote: I have configured spamassassin 2.60 and qmail-scanner and they working ok my problem is i need to co

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin report

I have configured spamassassin 2.60 and qmail-scanner and they working ok my problem is i need to configure spamassassin to send a message tagged as spam with extra messages giving the person reason the e-mail has been tagged and the number of hits and the person to get intouch to incase they

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin

Hello, I've just upgraded to qmail-scanner 1.2rc3 and also installed spamassassin. I think there are sme mistakes in the qmail-scanner FAQ. First, if I configure Spamassassin using the recommended settings : skip_rbl_checks 1 required_hits 5 auto_report_threshold 30 rewrite_subject 0 report_hea

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin ... configuration by domain (Virtualhost?)

I exlpain the situation, I have 2 linux server. On the first one, I have web sites, dbase, qmail 1.03, vpopmail. On the second one, qmail 1.03, qmail-queue, qmail-scanner, clamav and spamassassin On the first server, for one domaine (for the moment) I changed the Bind configuration (MX) to send

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin header-modification/removal

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:59:15PM +0200, Thomas Dahl Pedersen wrote: > I use qmail-scanner 1.15. From the changelog I can't see that the newest > stable version (1.16) should alter the behavior in this particular > situation. > > Have I discovered a bug in qmail-scanner or in the configuration

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin header-modification/removal

It seems that qmailscanner deletes any existing X-Spam-Status and X-Spam-Flag-headers from the scanned email, so that these are ignored in case a spammer has put them there to fool useres of spamassassin. This is the expected behaviour, I guess. However I've noticed that if an already spamassas

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin issues all should read.

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238&mode=nocomment&tid=111&tid=126 I know it has been out for a couple of days but didn't see any mention of this. So I thought I would post it. Brad --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkG

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin 2.60 problem

Hine,Chris wrote: Just tried out the release candidate of SpamAssassin 2.60. They have change the format of the X-Spam-Status line, so the tests used are listed on this line rather than a new line. This causes the sa_max score to look like: Clear:RC:0:SA:1(7.3/5.5 tests=BAYES_90,HTML_MESSAGE,):. T

[Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin 2.60 problem

Just tried out the release candidate of SpamAssassin 2.60. They have change the format of the X-Spam-Status line, so the tests used are listed on this line rather than a new line. This causes the sa_max score to look like: Clear:RC:0:SA:1(7.3/5.5 tests=BAYES_90,HTML_MESSAGE,):. The following patch

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin and quarantine

Hi folks, Could you send me in attach the Chris Heine patch for qmail-scanner-1.16? I've seen the message on http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=5204178, but there isn't the attach. Could you help me? Thanks for all Best Regards Andrea Riela --

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin

> I want "fast_spamassassin" for performance - but I want the Subject: header > tagged as "SPAM" too! Boy - you don't want much do you! :-) Anyway - you > can. Simply change the "--scanner" option to "fast_spamassassin=STRING" and > "STRING" ("SPAM:" is a good value) will be prepended to the Subjec

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin

I want "fast_spamassassin" for performance - but I want the Subject: header tagged as "SPAM" too! Boy - you don't want much do you! :-) Anyway - you can. Simply change the "--scanner" option to "fast_spamassassin=STRING" and "STRING" ("SPAM:" is a good value) will be prepended to the Subject line o

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin

On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 05:50:45PM +0200, Martin Sarajervi wrote: > Could anyone explain this ? > I dont understand where I should do > "Simply change the "--scanner" option to "fast_spamassassin=STRING" and > "STRING" ("SPAM:" is a good value)" > > I want to have SPAM: in the subject of messages

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and quarantine

This is exactly what I was seeking, Thanks to all who responded. > > Salvatore Toribio wrote: > > > >> This exactly what I'm doing with the patch posted by Chis Heine, you can > >> configure a threshold in qmail-scanner (for ex. 10; 12 is too much) to > >> quarantine a message, and spamassassin

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and quarantine

Here is the message from Chris with the instructions, there is an error message when you apply the patch, but don't mind it works anyway. ST --- I wrote a patch to qmail-scanner that you may find useful. It doesn't send the spam to /dev/null, what it does is give you a second thres

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and quarantine

--On Saturday, June 7, 2003 1:22 PM -0600 "Sancho2k.net Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumoured to have written: Salvatore Toribio wrote: This exactly what I'm doing with the patch posted by Chis Heine, you can configure a threshold in qmail-scanner (for ex. 10; 12 is too much) to quarantine a me

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and quarantine

--On Saturday, June 7, 2003 5:28 PM +0200 Salvatore Toribio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumoured to have written: What I want to do is the following: quarantine spam over say 12 (or preferred configurable limit) and never deliver it to a user mailbox tag spam over 7 and then let the individual make a

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and quarantine

Salvatore Toribio wrote: This exactly what I'm doing with the patch posted by Chis Heine, you can configure a threshold in qmail-scanner (for ex. 10; 12 is too much) to quarantine a message, and spamassassin will tag a message over 7. Look the message posted by chris.

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and quarantine

What I want to do is the following: quarantine spam over say 12 (or preferred configurable limit) and never deliver it to a user mailbox tag spam over 7 and then let the individual make a decision on how to deal with it via appropriate filters in mailclient etc. I can deal with the fact that a VER

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and quarantine

Jason Parsons wrote: On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 12:36 PM, Bob wrote: I am sure that someone else may have come up with the appropriate logic in place of the simple 2 lines in the example above to deal with this. I deal with this in a .qmail file. Just send the message through awk, and take s

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and quarantine

On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 12:36 PM, Bob wrote: I am sure that someone else may have come up with the appropriate logic in place of the simple 2 lines in the example above to deal with this. I deal with this in a .qmail file. Just send the message through awk, and take some action (like droppi

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin and quarantine

I have read thru the archives, and not quire found an answer to the question that has been asked a couple of times - so here goes. Setup is qmail-scanner (of course) spamassassin and f-prot virus scanner All works fine, virii get quarantined, qmail-scanner quarantines the obvious stuff as well.

[Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin buffer overflow

hi, I know it's slightly offtopic, but there are many users (most ?), that use SpamAssassin with qmail-scanner. There has been found a security problem with spamc, so patch or update it. reference: http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2003/01/msg00254.html greets, Thomas ---

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin

- Original Message - From: "Jason Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 11:28 Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin > try these: > > http://www.xenos.net/software/qmail-scanner/ > > succ

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin

> hey guys, > I'm wondering if there's a way to alter the way qmail-scanner filter spam > mails with certain score (mostly above 10) to be discarded immediately or > fwded to certain mailbox instead of being delivered. a patch or something > would do :) > > thanks in advance! > silencer. > try

[Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin

hey guys, I'm wondering if there's a way to alter the way qmail-scanner filter spam mails with certain score (mostly above 10) to be discarded immediately or fwded to certain mailbox instead of being delivered. a patch or something would do :) thanks in advance! silencer. ---

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin/rbls

Jan de Groot wrote: > > I'm using rblsmtpd to receive my mail, it looks in ORDB to check if the > server is blacklisted, and then handles the mail to qmail-smtpd > > /service/qmail-smtpd/run: > > #!/bin/sh > export QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl > ulimit -v 8192 > exec /usr/bin

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin/rbls

I'm using rblsmtpd to receive my mail, it looks in ORDB to check if the server is blacklisted, and then handles the mail to qmail-smtpd /service/qmail-smtpd/run: #!/bin/sh export QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl ulimit -v 8192 exec /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -u `id -u qmaild` -g

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin/rbls

Spammassassin is supposed to do rbls checking right..? I haven't seen this as one of the headers in my qmail-scanner checked mail. I have verbose headers on Did I misunderstand SA's rbls checking..? Should I implement a good antirbls in qmail, before SA even has to scan the message? Anyone

[Qmail-scanner-general]spamassassin problem

I'm using qmail-scanner-1.15 together with spamassassin 2.43 in the spamassassin_verbose module. But it seems the mails don't get realy scanned by spamassassin. Testspam doesn't get marked as spam, and the spamassassin headers don't show up and despite setting debug to 100, no .spamc files stay i

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration.

nday, December 08, 2002 8:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration. > > > Just wondering if anyone is capable of updating this patch for 1.15?? > I'm not much of a coder unfortunately, shell scripts are > about my limit &

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration.

002 5:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration. > Hi > > Do you mean the patch for 1.12 at: > > http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/4041/2002/7/50/9109381/ > > Please can you confirm. > > Thanks

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration.

essage- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Jason S > Sent: 07 December 2002 14:22 > To: Daniel Oakes; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration. > > > > > I didn't quite find anything

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration.

Sent: 07 December 2002 14:22 To: Daniel Oakes; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration. > I didn't quite find anything that fitted what I wanted to do, so I > thought I'd post here. Sorry if it's been posted before. > > My spamass

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration.

> I didn't quite find anything that fitted what I wanted to do, so I > thought I'd post here. Sorry if it's been posted before. > > My spamassassin works absolutely fine, that's not at issue here. I was > reading through the docs for qmail-scanner, and thought wahoo, I've just > thought of a goo

[Qmail-scanner-general]Spamassassin integration.

I didn't quite find anything that fitted what I wanted to do, so I thought I'd post here. Sorry if it's been posted before. My spamassassin works absolutely fine, that's not at issue here. I was reading through the docs for qmail-scanner, and thought wahoo, I've just thought of a good way to qua

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin

> Hello > > I'm not sure if I'm writing to the right place but I'm going try my luck > here anyway:) > Yeah, there's so a lot overlap between all the mail lists > What I need is for SpamAssassin to put all mail that SA thinks that is > SPAM to another Maildir other then INBOX. > I have written

[Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin

Hello I'm not sure if I'm writing to the right place but I'm going try my luck here anyway:) What I need is for SpamAssassin to put all mail that SA thinks that is SPAM to another Maildir other then INBOX. and I'm not quite sure what to do... I have installed qmail-scanner for qmail to work agai

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin not altering subject on spam messages

o: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:59 PM Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin not altering subject on spam messages > > I am having trouble getting spamassassin to work properly [...] > I have a SuSE 7.3 box running qmail-1.03 and qmail-scanner 1.14

[Qmail-scanner-general]SpamAssassin not altering subject on spam messages

I am having trouble getting spamassassin to work properly with my qmail-scanner installation, and am not finding anything in the list archives or documentation. I have a SuSE 7.3 box running qmail-1.03 and qmail-scanner 1.14 with spamassassin 2.4.1. Messages are being processes correctly, and sp

  1   2   >