Maybe I didn't understand well, but if you want your Perl program to get and
store the data submitted by the form, then the action of the form should point
to the Perl script something like:
So your "form" object in Python should set the action as the path to the Perl
program.
--Octavian
--
From: "Chris Angelico"
Subject: Re: [newbie] Equivalent to PHP?
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Gilles wrote:
>> Since web scripts are usually very short anyway (user sends query,
>> server handles request, sends response, and closes the port) because
>> the user is waiting and browsers usua
From: "Devin Jeanpierre"
Subject: Re: Regular expression : non capturing groups are faster ?
>> You meant Perl Documentation, didn't you ?
>
> I guess that works too. I did mean Python, though -- its intent is to
> say "you shouldn't worry about this", but in the process it says "this
> does no
From: "candide"
Subject: Regular expression : non capturing groups are faster ?
Excerpt from the Regular Expression HOWTO
(http://docs.python.org/howto/regex.html#non-capturing-and-named-groups) :
---
It should be mentioned that there’s no performan
It is not so hard to decide whether using RE is a good thing or not.
When the speed is important and every millisecond counts, RE should be used
only when there is no other faster way, because usually RE is less faster
than using other core Perl/Python functions that can do matching and
replac
From: "John Bokma"
"Octavian Rasnita" writes:
From: "Daniel Kluev"
a = [1,2]
dict([a])
Yes, but
d = dict([a])
is not so nice as
$d = @a;
That will give you the number of elements in @a. What you (probably)
mean is %hash = @array;
Of course. Thank
Subject: Re: Why did Quora choose Python for its development?
> I've been programming for about seven years, and am basically
> self-taught. I got my first taste of writing code when trying do to some
> basic hacking on my (then) shiny new G3 iBook. (Even though it was a
> Mac, I was enthralled
From: "Kevin Walzer"
> On 5/22/11 3:44 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>> Somebody told that C# and Objective C are good languages. They might be
>> good, but they are proprietary, and not only that they are proprietary, but
>> they need to be ran under platforms
From: "Daniel Kluev"
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>> And you are telling that in Perl should be used an even more complicated and
>> ugly syntax just for beeing the same as in Python just for showing that I am
>> wrong, but I was c
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain"
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 00:17:55 -0500
> John Bokma wrote:
>> > $d = @a;
>>
>> That will give you the number of elements in @a. What you (probably)
>> mean is %hash = @array;
>
> If I was even considering using Perl, this one exchange would send me
> screaming in the opp
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain"
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 09:00:14 +0300
> "Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
>> So, again, in Perl is just:
>>
>> %d = @l;
>>
>> Please tell me if Python has a syntax which is more clear than this for
>> doing thi
From: "Stefan Behnel"
Beliavsky, 20.05.2011 18:39:
I thought this essay on why one startup chose Python was interesting.
Since everyone seems to be hot flaming at their pet languages in this
thread, let me quickly say this:
Thanks for sharing the link.
Maybe I have missed a message, but
From: "Daniel Kluev"
Moreover, you are comparing apples to oranges here, and then
complaining that apples somehow turned out to be not oranges.
If we take python way of defining dicts and check it in perl, we find
that it is not supported, so obviously perl is non-intuitive and does
not support
From: "Daniel Kluev"
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Octavian Rasnita
wrote:
From: "Daniel Kluev"
Aha, so with other words that ORM doesn't have that feature.
DBIX::Class also use the DateTime module, but it can use it directly,
without needing to write more code
From: "Ulrich Eckhardt"
Ahem, is this Java the language that a certain, well-known service
provider
is getting screwed over hard currently, because they forgot to read the
fineprint in the declaration of freedom? And this Objective C, isn't this
the language that GCC had support for since befor
From: "Daniel Kluev"
a = [1,2]
dict([a])
Yes, but
d = dict([a])
is not so nice as
$d = @a;
because it has exactly those numerous number of params and brackets which is
used as a reason for bashing Perl and an aditional "dict" word.
Octavian
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyth
From: "Terry Reedy"
> On 5/23/2011 4:49 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
>> But let's remember from what this discussion started. This is not a
>> Python critique, because each language has its own ways.
>> I just wanted to show that the fact that "the
From: "Daniel Kluev"
...
Can it also set the current locale, for example romanian, and print the
name of the current month?
...something like t1.date.set_locale('ro').month_name?
There is separate module for date localization. You can pass datetime
object to it and it will give you needed val
From: "Daniel Kluev"
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Octavian Rasnita
wrote:
There are more, but a single eloquent feature is the possibility of
interpreting variables in strings which cannot be done so nice in Python.
I've should probably mentioned it earlier, but I&#x
From: "Chris Angelico"
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Octavian Rasnita
wrote:
From: "Dennis Lee Bieber"
Since indentation seems so crucial to easy comprehension of the logical
structure of a program,
making it a mandatory syntactical structure becomes a desirable f
From: "Terry Reedy"
On 5/23/2011 1:31 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
I am talking about a simple way of creating a hash/dict from an array,
which is so simple that there should be really a single way to do it, or
very few.
Again, Python has such:
>>> dict([['one&#x
From: "Daniel Kluev"
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Octavian Rasnita
wrote:
From: "Daniel Kluev"
I am talking about that flexibility which was criticized in the previous
messages telling that this flexibility allows any programmer to use his
own way.
Perl doesn'
From: "Dennis Lee Bieber"
Since indentation seems so crucial to easy comprehension of the logical
structure of a program,
making it a mandatory syntactical structure becomes a desirable feature
for code that must be maintained (by others, in many cases).
Why "in many cases"? I wrote hundread
From: "Daniel Kluev"
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>> Because of its flexibility, Perl offers more advanced modules and libraries
>> which are not available for Python.
>
> What 'flexibility' are you talking about? This see
From: "Hansmeet Singh"
>i think we should end our butchering of perl on a light note (you may have
> already read this):
> EXTERIOR: DAGOBAH -- DAY
> With Yoda strapped to his back, Luke climbs up one of
> the many thick vines that grow in the swamp until he
> reaches the Dagobah statistics lab.
From: "Steven D'Aprano"
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
> On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 01:32:17 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:21 AM, km wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> How does python 3.2 fare compared to Java 1.6 in terms of performance ?
>>> any pointers or observations ?
>>
>> H
From: "OKB (not okblacke)"
> Robert wrote:
>
>> Is there a push to one toolkit or the other?
>
>I use Dabo, which wraps wxPython.
>
> --
What's the advantage of using Dabo instead of wxPython directly?
Thanks.
Octavian
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
>Yes but his silence speaks louder than words. He is saying " While i
>won't defend Tkinter publicly, i won't promote any others as well".
That's the best translation I've ever heard: taking silence and diverting
it into your own meaning for what you want it to mean.
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
>* Disclaimer: You are stupid if you think this is true. But seriously,
>Octavian makes it REALLY hard to continue caring about something that I
>actually cared about before and thought was important.
When I told about what the community of the blind from my country
From: "Stephen Hansen"
Seriously. Octavian's attitude in this thread makes me want to go use
Tkinter just to spite him.
Oh yes? And this would probably mean that your atitude is a very good and
normal one, right?
Octavian
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
From: "rusi"
Its quite clear to everyone here that
-- Octavian has no interest in a 21st century snazzy-looking toolkit
Oh well I am interested, but with the condition that toolkit to be
accessible, however Tkinter is not.
Is it too much to expect from a "21st century snazzy-looking toolkit" to
From: Vaduvoiu Tiberiu
> Well, to quote firefox: this is embarrassing. I've realized the dictionary
initialization is wrong, as [] means its a tuple, I should use {}. That's why I
> don't like working nights..it's only in the morning when you start seeing
things better. I apologize for the ma
From: "alex23"
"Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
Ok, in this case I understand why WxPython can't be included in stdlib.
I think there was a communication problem because the oldest list members
start with the idea that all the list members know who is who and they
may
be t
From: "Grant Edwards"
I think there are a lot of people who think that including a GUI in
the standard library was a mistake and the best solution would be to
get rid of Tkinter and replace it with nothing. If I were Guido and
thought that, I'd probably keep mum about it as well. :)
[I'm not c
From: "Terry Reedy"
wxPython is the best and most mature cross-platform GUI toolkit, given a
number of constraints. The only reason wxPython isn't the standard
Python GUI toolkit is that Tkinter was there first.
-- Guido van Rossum
(from http://www.wxpython.org/quotes.php)
Of course, that is
From: "Corey Richardson"
wxPython is the best and most mature cross-platform GUI toolkit, given a
number of constraints. The only reason wxPython isn't the standard
Python GUI toolkit is that Tkinter was there first.
-- Guido van Rossum
Oh, how can Guido say this about that bad WxPython that
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
>Because healthy Linux users ARE NOT equal to handicapped people!
O? I bet I could run circles around RR in the shell, any day. Why are you
trying to promote accessibility for a group of people you consider not
equal to a group of "healthy" people?
What do you mean
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
what >JAWS
Tyler, did I used bad words in my posts as you do now?
I didn't, but the other list members told me that my atitude is not good,
that I am not civilized, because I have a different opinion than them.
I am sure *nobody* will tell you that thing even though
From: "Grant Edwards"
A very important way to help would be to test accessibility features
and post accurate, detailed, bug-reports.
I am willing to do that. I have tested that program made with WxPython and I
have posted here what I found, hoping that there will appear a Tkinter-based
app t
From: "Giampaolo Rodolà"
...
py2exe offers the following installation kits, depending on the Python
version. If you know, please tell me why there are different packages for
different versions of Python?
py2exe-0.6.9.win32-py2.5.exe
py2exe-0.6.9.win32-py2.4.exe
py2exe-0.6.9.win32-py2.3.exe
py2e
From: "Terry Reedy"
For example: pygui pretty much uses native widgets on Windows and OX and
gtk (I believe) on *nix. How is the accessibility of those widget sets *as
accessed through pygui*? Is it different from the 'native' accessibility
of each of those set?
Thank you for telling about th
From: "Grant Edwards"
You said that you don't care about convincing anybody either that
accessibility is import or about convincing anybody to do anything
about it. To me that means you don't care about accessiblity.
And you are wrong. If you don't try to convince someone that Python is a
go
From: "Grant Edwards"
So you're saying that you don't see any value in easing communication,
nor presumably in communication itself?
No, I don't want to say that, but I want to say that if it is obviously that
the others don't care about the main issue discussed, then the communication
just fo
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >We are talking about accessibility here. Are you saying that Tkinter
> can be >recommended from the perspective of accessibility?
> See my comment about shoving words in people's mouths; I did not hint,
> nor did I come near saying that in that message.
But you as
From: "Emile van Sebille"
> On 1/26/2011 11:02 PM Octavian Rasnita said...
>
>> As we all know, Python doesn't care too much about maintaining a
>> backward compatibility
>
> Where'd you get this idea? Between v2 and v3 yes, that was the i
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >It doesn't support a good voice synthesizer like Eloquence or IBM Via
> voice
> Eloq is an add-on, but it does support it.
If you are saying this, it means that you haven't used it for a long time, or
you just heard about it by searching on the web. Eloq is support
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >but what's wrong is that Python promotes a GUI which is not accessible
> by including it as a default GUI.
> You seem to have overlooked this multiple times and instead decided to
> shove words in my mouth and continue on your line of selfishness which
> is justifi
From:
Octavian,
If I understand your message, you are frustrated with Tkinter because it
doesn't support accessability.
In several messages on this thread I pointed out that Tkinter can easily
be made accessable under Linux and Mac OS X.
Rather than throw out Tkinter entirely, why not work wi
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
>I don't want to convince anyone, but I just want to inform the others
and let >them know if they are doing something not recommended.
not recommended by -you-, which is different than by a community or the
subset of people you are attempting to represent. furthermore
From: "Grant Edwards"
And, based on your behavior, you apparently don't like convincing
others or advancing the cause of accessibility. It seems you prefer to
annoy and alienate others.
From what I said, what was annoying?
I don't want to convince anyone, but I just want to inform the oth
From: "Brendan Simon (eTRIX)"
Since it seems the python motto is "Batteries included", then it would
seem to me that wxPython is the natural fit as it also has "Batteries
included" (e.g. accessibility, native look-n-feel, mature and evolving,
can produce simple or complex gui programs, etc, et
From: "geremy condra"
The bottom line is that, yes, you do still have to convince people
that accessibility is important if you want them to do anything about
it. I have to do almost exactly the same thing in my field- everybody
knows that security is important, but every time I go to disclose a
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
It doesn't support a good voice synthesizer like Eloquence or IBM Via
voice, but only eSpeak which sounds horrible, it doesn't have a scripting
language
ready to use as JAWS and Window Eyes do, it doesn't offer the possibility
of reading with the mouse cursor as JAWS
From: "Alexander Kapps"
Please don't use the lower Linux user percentage as an argument here. If
you follow that path further, you would need to agree that it's only an
"insignificant" percent of people who need a screen reader, so why bother?
I didn't say that the Linux users or Mac users ar
From: "Robert Kern"
in? Robin Dunn is the wxPython project lead.
Ok, in this case I understand why WxPython can't be included in stdlib.
I think there was a communication problem because the oldest list members
start with the idea that all the list members know who is who and they may
be th
From: "geremy condra"
> At least 40% of my coworkers do not speak English as their native
> language. Your problem is not the language. Your problem is your
> attitude.
The atitude considered nice is just duplicity for convincing others, and I
don't like duplicity. I like to know exactly what th
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >with JAWS because it is the most used screen reader.
> Get off your me soapbox. Jaws is not the most used. NVDA is taking over,
> quite fast, and lots of people have totally switched to mac or Vinux
Lots of people means an insignifiant percent of users compared wit
From: "Tommy Grav"
>> You didn't say that WxPython can't be used with Python 3. Have you said that?
>
> Some besides Peter pointed this out a few days ago.
I don't remember to have read that. But who knows, maybe I have missed it. Does
anyone have that message?
> Python 2 is in bug-fix mode a
From: "Emile van Sebille"
...
>> Well, I didn't know this, and it is a valid reason.
>> This means that it is true that there is no enough maintainance force to
>> keep WxPython updated.
>> Did I understand correctly?
>
> Not at all -- wxPython is an active funded ongoing project. Review the
> r
From: "Robert Kern"
> That's not Terry's point. The reasons he's referring to (and stated
> previously)
> are as follows:
>
> 1. The license of wxWidgets and wxPython is not as permissive as Python's.
> The
> Python developers, as a matter of policy, do not want to include code into
> the
>
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >I don't know why you didn't say this before.
> Comprehention, Octavian. I've made that point multiple times, but your
> to stuck on talking about how selfish people are.
You didn't say that WxPython doesn't work on Python 3, so I don't know what you
are talking abo
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >I don't know why you didn't say this before.
> Comprehention, Octavian. I've made that point multiple times, but your
> to stuck on talking about how selfish people are.
You didn't say that WxPython can't be used with Python 3. Have you said that?
> >The other part
From: "rusi"
On Jan 26, 11:18 am, "Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
From: "rantingrick"
On Jan 25, 3:41 pm, Corey Richardson wrote:
> Do you honestly think he was talking about the accessibility problem?
> IMO that should move to another thread, because this o
From: "Steven D'Aprano"
Quality code is a good thing, but there are people who write good code
but are so obnoxious that you wouldn't listen to a word they have to say,
and people who are only mediocre or average coders, but are otherwise
helpful and friendly.
I'm amazed that Rick actually aske
From: "Nicholas Devenish"
Octavian, we get it - you are on the warpath about accessibility. And this
is, in a way, a good thing, because, yes, programmers should in general
think more about accessibility when designing their programs. But nobody
was ever persuaded to consider a complicated and
From: "geremy condra"
There's a difference between what you say and how you say it. If a
friend came up to you and said "give me $100 right now!", you probably
wouldn't do it. If the same friend came up to you and said "I know
this is a big thing to ask, but I really need $100 and I can't
guaran
From: "Emile van Sebille"
Are third party installations nonsense? Or should python come with all
libraries for all potential applications? And then always keep up with
best of breed?
Python should not include all the libraries for all the potential
applications, but it should promote the to
From: "Emile van Sebille"
On 1/25/2011 3:33 PM rantingrick said...
Tkinter is old and in many ways insufficient for 21st century GUIs. We
need to decide what should come next. I believe wxPython is our best
hope. Wx may not be the best it can be, but it is the best we have at
this time.
Then
From: "rantingrick"
On Jan 25, 3:41 pm, Corey Richardson wrote:
Do you honestly think he was talking about the accessibility problem?
IMO that should move to another thread, because this one is simply
about, as the subject suggests, "WxPython versus Tkinter".
Corey again (like many) you lack
From: "Emile van Sebille"
Why is WxPython ineligible?
I think Terry's point was compatibility with python3 -- which wx
apparently isn't yet.
Emile
Well, I didn't know this, and it is a valid reason.
This means that it is true that there is no enough maintainance force to
keep WxPython u
From: "geremy condra"
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
>> Yes, I know, that's life, which is not right, that's faith, bla bla, but it
>> doesn't mean that my atitude need to be changed.
>
> There's a diffe
> this thread was a "psy-ops" (psychological
operations) trick to turn off wxPython adopters by associating it with
juvenile nonsense
Do you think the need for accessibility is a nonsense?
Or do you think it is something juvenile?
Octavian
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
From: "Terry Reedy"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: WxPython versus Tkinter.
> On 1/25/2011 7:03 AM, Bob Martin wrote:
>
>> "I bet not much" - there you go again ;-)
>> You'll find that nearly all software used in Europe (and most other parts)
>> is internationalized o
From: "Bob Martin"
...
>>Do non-US-based developers focus a lot on accessibility too, since
>>that's what really started this whole sub-thread?
>
> I don't think so; it was never a requirement for the software I wrote,
> though I know I had some blind users. But NLS was a must and it has
> to be
From: "Terry Reedy"
> Good as far as it goes, but this list leaves out several requirements
> (already posted by me, Steve Hansen, and others) for a Python 3 new
> stdlib module. It does not matter for the stdlib if wxpython is 3 times
> as good as tkinter, by some measure, as long as it is ine
From: "rantingrick"
> Availability of gui builder
+0 both
I thought that there are a few GUI builders for Wx. Isn't this true?
Octavian
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
From: "Bryan"
Do non-US-based developers focus a lot on accessibility too, since
that's what really started this whole sub-thread?
Almost nobody focuses on accessibility, and nobody should focus on
accessibility.
If you target a program for your national population and your national
population
From: "Nicholas Devenish"
> I can't speak for everyone (I don't have that presumption), but to me,
> given the two data points, you are certainly coming across as more
> level-headed, and thus representative. Octavians posts sound more and
> more like rantingricks as time goes on, which is not
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >Wow! I, I, I, I... is there a sentence that doesn't talk about your
> self interests?
> It is clear you have been taking lessons from RR; the word I does not
> convey self interest, in fact, it is the best word suited to speaking of
> oppinions (which is all that t
From: "rantingrick"
Tyler's argument, which lacked greatly in compassion for people with
disabilities brought out my accusation. It was not an accusation meant
to merely insult just to invoke a flame war; which is the definition
of Godwins Law.
It is a fact that Tyler displayed despicable intoler
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
And we already do. I haven't campaigned for changes with TKInter or spoken
to anyone about them, because I haven't downloaded a program to find out
it was
written to use TKInter, and thus unacccessible. I'm not saying that there
aren't any, just saying it's not some
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
>Because of this, many blind people try to show that they are like the
sighted, that they can do everything, that they are >independent, so they
like to
>talk about the movies they watch, they like to have touch-pad mobile
phones and so on, even though the accessibil
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
>It would be great if the Tk/Tkinter developers would be interested in
making >this GUI lib accessible.
They're not going to do it without knowing what makes accessible
accessible, and why it needs to be so. So, rather than tell the world
about how -some- blind peopl
From: "Infinity77"
As a general rule, a GUI-newbie should try all the GUI
toolkits out there and settle with the one which looks easier/nicer/
Yes it would be nice, but... does it happen that way usually? :-)
Octavian
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
From: "Mark Roseman"
> "Littlefield, Tyler" wrote:
>> Rather, I believe
>> those pushing accessibility should concentrate on the root cause; that
>> of fixing TKInter, and not forcing everyone else to use a different library.
>
>
> Here, here. From my queries to some of the Tcl/Tk folks, it
From: "rantingrick"
> Obviously it
> would be awesome, but I think Octavian is just focusing on himself, and
> not the actual big picture here.
Yes Octavian is the only disabled person in the world. What
a selfish, selfish person he is. Shame on you Octavian, Shame on You!
You just showed your
From: "MRAB"
> On 24/01/2011 18:05, rantingrick wrote:
>> On Jan 24, 12:00 pm, Bryan wrote:
>>
>>> Accessibility, like internationalization, is something few programmers
>>> spend much time thinking about.
>>
>> Thats another uninformed statement by you we can add to the mountains
>> of useless c
From: "Bryan"
I wish I could respond to that, but I have no experience with screen
readers. Are there any free ones, or ones with free trials, that I
could try out? I'm not yet convinced it's any better or worse than
wxPython since you're only a single datapoint, but of course it's
possible. If y
From: "Mark Roseman"
> Octavian, thank you for very clearly making and repeating your point
> about screen readers. It is very obvious that at this point in time Tk
> (and hence Tkinter) is not a suitable candidate if screen readers are an
> important concern.
The screen readers are always a
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> Hello,
>
> I have been on another list with Octavian, and he takes his
> accessibility a bit to seriously. If things went his way, he wants laws
> where -everything- has to be accessible, and it is illegal not to do so.
Is the discrimination legal in your country
From: "Ethan Furman"
> Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>> From: "rantingrick"
>>> WxPython versus Tkinter (A code battle to the death!)
>>>
>>> by Rick Johnson.
> [...]
>
> Octavian,
>
> Please do not repost rr's crap in its
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >Or you have started to use Linux and now you don't care about the
> majority of >users that need to use a screen reader?
> I said nothing the like. TkInter does have problemns with Jaws, but I'm
> not going to sit here and say the same thing over and over as you are
From: "Bryan"
It would be hard (but not impossible, by any
stretch) for me to duplicate your code. Certainly, it would take more
lines of code but that's about it. OTOH, it would be very difficult
indeed to create a tkinter program that works on windows but segfaults
on linux. That's also quite
From: "Kevin Walzer"
The ttk::treeview widget can also function as a multi-column listbox, and
can include both tree and multi-column listbox features in a single
window. It's a very flexible widget.
But unfortunately it is not accessible for screen readers and it
discriminates many potenti
From: "rantingrick"
On Jan 23, 5:44 pm, "Martin v. Loewis" wrote:
> For something as common as displaying a file browser, it should be as
> simple as this:
> import gui_toolkit # whichever
> path = gui_toolkit.select_file()
> Something like zenity:
> [steve@sylar ~]$ zenity --file-selection
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
>PS: Be sure not to cause any segfaults because these linux folks can't
>debug for shite!
Or maybe it is that the person fighting and throwing insults around like
candy at a parade can't code for shite. Or *gasp* the library that is
supposedly cross-platform has issu
From: "Kevin Walzer"
I found this code in the Demo/tkinter/ttk directory of the Python 2.7.1
source distribution. I'm NOT the author (credit should probably go to
Guilherme Polo, developer of the Tkinter wrapper for the ttk themed widgets
that is now in the stdlib). But, using a tree/listview
From: "rantingrick"
>
> WxPython versus Tkinter (A code battle to the death!)
>
> by Rick Johnson.
>
> I have in many threads declared that Tkinter (and TclTk) is currently
> --and has been for a decade-- the wrong choice for Python's stdlib
> GUI. Throughout the 90's Tkinter was fine. However
From: "Adam Skutt" > Yet, for some unfathomable reason,
you keep promoting
I would be glad if you could tell me about a portable solution which is
accessible with JAWS and Window Eyes, the most used screen readers under
Windows (real glad).
I did, Qt. I'm not yournanny and I'm not going to go
From: "Adam Skutt"
> Yet, for some unfathomable reason, you keep promoting
wxWidgets even though it is plainly the inferior solution.
Inferior to what?
I would be glad if you could tell me about a portable solution which is
accessible with JAWS and Window Eyes, the most used screen readers und
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
