40MHz on 2.4 is note widely supported, and for good reason - it sucks up the
entire unlicensed 2.4GHz band (if you include the 802.12 mask).
On 5GHz, 20/40 are supported, and 80/160 in current and future versions of
802.11ac.
On Jun 14, 2015 7:56 PM, Alexander Maassen wrote:
>
> Shoot me if i
Shoot me if i'm wrong, but doesn't a mac prefer MIMO in order to work
correctly?
On Sun, June 14, 2015 8:42 pm, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> On 6/14/15 12:33 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am running a TP Link TL-WR1043N which (as TP Link says is a) 802.11n
>> router working o
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Rafael Possamai wrote:
> Well, I was wondering the same. I am guessing it depends on the SLA
> contract since they are all very unique and specific.
I'm going to bet that aside from a few one-off cases the SLA in
question talks about maintaining reachability insid
Well, I was wondering the same. I am guessing it depends on the SLA
contract since they are all very unique and specific. I assume they would
have to, granted the issue lasted for a couple hours. Now, it depends on
how they define the outage. A fiber cut that yields a customer's service
unusable wo
Hi Rafael,
I get that much, just wondering if Level3 would have to pay an SLA breach
> to its customers given the mess started with TM (even though it could have
> been avoided). And I am guessing if they do, they wouldn't be able to
> recover anything from TM.
I doubt if L3 has to pay anything
what i have yet to understand (probably my fault) is how L(3) propagated
the disease or, more correctly, what has happened over there that they
did not stop the propagation? the crew that went there from mci ran a
very tight ship and L(3) has always had pretty rigid filters. what
happened? and i
I get that much, just wondering if Level3 would have to pay an SLA breach
to its customers given the mess started with TM (even though it could have
been avoided). And I am guessing if they do, they wouldn't be able to
recover anything from TM.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
Does anyone know if there's an official "ruling" as to who gets to pay for
the SLA breaches?
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> Raymond,
>
> But you said "A simple 'sorry' would have done." Now you're asking for
> lots more detail. Why the change?
>
> -mel beckman
>
> > On Ju
> I know this is slightly off-topic, but since it's still related to the
> list, I thought I'd give it a try. I am wondering what systems are out
> there (open source, preferably) for data collection and processing of
> hardware health data (temperature, CPU clock, fan speeds, etc).
> Ideally brand
In addition to that, losing face in SE Asia is "not done".
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:14:43AM +, ryanL wrote:
> keep in mind their target audience with that message is probably local
> malaysian customers, not the world.
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:09 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
>
> > SLAs are
keep in mind their target audience with that message is probably local
malaysian customers, not the world.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:09 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
> SLAs are part of a contract, and thus only apply to the parties of the
> contract. There are no payments due to other parties. The Inter
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> SLAs are part of a contract, and thus only apply to the parties of the
> contract. There are no payments due to other parties. The Internet is a
> "best effort" network, with zero guarantees.
>
> -mel beckman
>
Ok, I'll bite: my $dayjob is a
SLAs are part of a contract, and thus only apply to the parties of the
contract. There are no payments due to other parties. The Internet is a "best
effort" network, with zero guarantees.
-mel beckman
On Jun 14, 2015, at 4:06 PM, Rafael Possamai
mailto:raf...@gav.ufsc.br>> wrote:
Does anyone
Raymond,
But you said "A simple 'sorry' would have done." Now you're asking for lots
more detail. Why the change?
-mel beckman
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 2:32 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn
> wrote:
>
> Hello Mel,
>
> Must just be me then.
>
> I was most likely expecting a more in depth report. Stran
Hello Mel,
Must just be me then.
I was most likely expecting a more in depth report. Strange things happened.
Perhaps they could post a 'what exactly happened' since this wasnt a average
route leak.
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn
> Op 14 jun. 2015 om 23:27 heeft Mel Beckman het volgende
> ges
Raymond,
They provided a "simple sorry":
"We apologise for any inconvenience caused by the service disruption."
It doesn't get much more simple than that.
-mel beckman
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn
> wrote:
>
> Hai!
>
> Mark, mistakes and oopses happen. No problem
Hai!
Mark, mistakes and oopses happen. No problem at all. I understand that
completely. There is human faillure and this happenes.
A simple 'sorry' would have done. Yet their whole message tells 'they did ok'
In my very limited view they did NOT ok. Did i misread?
I am also very much looking
They should verify the GBLX customer ports as well ...
Jürgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
E-Mail: j...@anexia.at
Web: http://www.anexia.at
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140,
On 14/Jun/15 22:55, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hai!
>
> Wouw! This is what they came up with?!
>
> Hopefully Level3 will take appropriate measures. Its amazing. Really.
>
> 'Some internationally routes'
>
> Have they any idea what they did at all?
>
> Its amazing that with parties like that t
Hai!
Wouw! This is what they came up with?!
Hopefully Level3 will take appropriate measures. Its amazing. Really.
'Some internationally routes'
Have they any idea what they did at all?
Its amazing that with parties like that the internet still works as is ...
Thanks,
Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi Rob
I couldn't get the ports working on SRX with low priority on the cluster.
They always showed as down by protocol and never picked traffic. Can you
put some light on the reason for that?
Thanks
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Rob Greenwood wrote:
> > 3. In case of SRX only one devi
On 6/14/15 12:33 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am running a TP Link TL-WR1043N which (as TP Link says is a) 802.11n
router working on 2.4Ghz (no support for 5Ghz). I am running it with
flashed OpenWRT.
While using option to pick 40Mhz, I see my Mac only gets 20Mhz to use and
sp
Hello everyone,
I am running a TP Link TL-WR1043N which (as TP Link says is a) 802.11n
router working on 2.4Ghz (no support for 5Ghz). I am running it with
flashed OpenWRT.
While using option to pick 40Mhz, I see my Mac only gets 20Mhz to use and
speed is always 130Mbps. There's no other SSID
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 08:25:40PM +, Jürgen Jaritsch wrote:
> This is the official [level3] feedback:
>
> [ ... ]
For completeness sake: here is what Telekom Malaysia published about the
issue:
Telekom Malaysia Berhad (TM) wishes to update on the service related
issue detected yeste
No worries cause your answer wasn't totally wrong :)
>From my POV PRTG is nearly a 100% solution and you do not need much more tools
>to get an good view of your running inventory. Beside PRTG we're only running
>some tools for flow analysis, NetApp storage analysis, etc. In sum we're
>running
Appreciate the amplification.
Cunningham's Law: "The best way to get the right answer on the Internet
is not to ask a question, it's to post the wrong answer."
On 06/14/2015 10:46 AM, Jürgen Jaritsch wrote:
This is a product designed for use on Windows only,
No. The monitoring itself requir
> This is a product designed for use on Windows only,
No. The monitoring itself requires windows as OS but only for the Mgmt service,
DB service, etc. You do not need a client (like for Nagios/etc) to monitor
other systems. You simply monitor devices via http (e.g. APIs, etc) or SNMP,
etc. You
On 06/14/2015 10:23 AM, Jürgen Jaritsch wrote:
We're using PRTG from Paessler (http://www.paessler.com).
This is a product designed for use on Windows only, no mention of ports
to other operating systems. For some people, this is fine. For others,
who don't want to mess with Windows at all,
Hi,
We're using PRTG from Paessler (http://www.paessler.com). We're monitoring >
50k sensors (storage, network, hardware, applications, a/c, generators, door
locks, liquid detection system in datacentres, etc) ... Best decision ever!
Best regards
Jürgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructu
Hi,
>Message: 15
>Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 01:09:44 +0530
>From: Anurag Bhatia
>To: NANOG Mailing List
>Subject: Re: Question about EX - SRX redundancy
>Message-ID:
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 3. In case of SRX only one device runs at a time and ports of other SRX
> (s
Even cheaper, but a little more DYI, you can look into building a small
Linux box, load MRTG (which you should be running anyway), and crafting
small probe scripts that would feed the "traffic" grapher. For switch
closures like on water-sensors, you will need an I/O board, but they are
readily
Just for getting your feet wet and doing so on a (tiny) budget. If you want
to monitor non-SNMP devices such as things like room temp probes, water leak
detection, generator/ats/ups alarm outputs, etc . You could look into something
like the APC AP9340 units
These support APC's own temp/hu
While this is all true, and I'm always willing to forgive honest errors
accompanied by sincere admissions, my recent Level 3 experience (beginning
prior to the 12th) has strongly biased me toward the third option Niels meant:
serious lack of clue. I've had multiple tickets open over several wee
There are lots of options from failure to follow procedure to software defect
amongst others. We are all human, except for my coworker the Troy-bot-3000.
Even well intentioned and motivated people have bad things happen to them.
What I look for in these incidents is what can be learned and impr
On 06/14/2015 07:06 AM, Niels Bakker wrote:
* raf...@gav.ufsc.br (Rafael Possamai) [Sun 14 Jun 2015, 04:54 CEST]:
This was either an isolated incident or they really don't care much.
Have you considered the third option?
Third option?
* raf...@gav.ufsc.br (Rafael Possamai) [Sun 14 Jun 2015, 04:54 CEST]:
A lot of these things are for show only.. Like a big corporation
donating to non-profits and sponsoring "feel good" events.
Donating costs actual money, unlike putting a statement on a webpage
This was either an isolated i
If only it wasn't on sourceforge?
http://ow.ly/OhNcR
(or the original link,
http://www.howtogeek.com/218764/warning-dont-download-software-from-sourceforge-if-you-can-help-it/)
On Sun, June 14, 2015 2:40 pm, Hicks, Byron wrote:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/routerproxy/
>
> Is my looking
librenms, a fork of observium, originally designed to do network monitoring but
over the last years, expanded into servers/devices.
http://www.librenms.org/
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:54:51AM -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I know this is slightly off-topic, but since it's sti
38 matches
Mail list logo
