Re: Viewing sent mail

2019-05-13 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:55:46PM -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: which doesn't work. Does fcc-hook work only for local mail folders? Should I be using a different hook? (If I use ~/file it does record outgoing mail locally, not on the server.) Not sure if it's your problem, but Fcc to an IMAP

Re: Viewing sent mail

2019-05-13 Thread Paul Gilmartin
ough Gmail, it should > automatically record your sent mail in the "[Gmail]/Sent Mail" mailbox for > you. > That works fine for me with GMail. Apparently AOL doesn't "automatically record". So, I try in my .muttrc: # Automatically log in to this mailbo

Re: Viewing sent mail

2019-05-13 Thread Edgy Hacker
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:21:43AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 05:09:27PM -, Grant Edwards wrote: > > Note that mutt won't allow you to enter that mailbox path directly > > because it has a space in it. However, you can use tab-completion. > > Great point! Ctrl-

Re: Viewing sent mail

2019-05-13 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 05:09:27PM -, Grant Edwards wrote: Note that mutt won't allow you to enter that mailbox path directly because it has a space in it. However, you can use tab-completion. Great point! Ctrl-v is useful to know too, though your example is the most efficient. -- Kev

Re: Viewing sent mail

2019-05-13 Thread Vegard Svanberg
n to the [Gmail]/ selection and hit enter. Then scroll down to > the "Sent Mail" folder and hit enter. Just wanted to chip in here to say I run multiple instances of Mutt in a screen/tmux session; one window per mailbox. That way I can keep multiple mailboxes open without having to open, wait, etc. -- Vegard Svanberg [*Takapa@IRC (EFnet)]

Re: Viewing sent mail

2019-05-13 Thread Grant Edwards
gt; should automatically record your sent mail in the "[Gmail]/Sent Mail" > mailbox for you. Note that mutt won't allow you to enter that mailbox path directly because it has a space in it. However, you can use tab-completion. Aassuming you have no other Gmail tags starting with

Re: Viewing sent mail

2019-05-13 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 07:08:07PM +0300, Edgy Hacker wrote: I routinely want to view the email that I sent but I am yet to figure out a way around this. Your muttrc looks fine to me. When you send email through Gmail, it should automatically record your sent mail in the "[Gmail]/Sent

Re: Viewing sent mail

2019-05-13 Thread Edgy Hacker
For instance, left out the muttrc attachment and had to log into Gmail to attach it simply because I have trouble viewing the sent email from mutt. On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 7:09 PM Edgy Hacker wrote: > hello,

Viewing sent mail

2019-05-13 Thread Edgy Hacker
hello, This is probably a silly question but I am having quite a bit of trouble figuring this out. I am mostly writing just in case someone is able to offer help regarding this right away. I routinely want to view the email that I sent but I am yet to figure out a way around this. >From my pre

Re: Question about saving sent mail to current mailbox

2018-04-25 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
* David J. Weller-Fahy [2018-04-25 21:38 -0400]: I've been dealing with an error whenever mutt starts for a few years now, and finally decided to ask how others have fixed the issue. #v+ folder-hook . "set record=^" #v- Sigh... apparently inspiration required that I send an email to a mailing

Question about saving sent mail to current mailbox

2018-04-25 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
I've been dealing with an error whenever mutt starts for a few years now, and finally decided to ask how others have fixed the issue. I have all my sent email saved in the current mailbox. I do this using the following setting in my muttrc (per https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/wikis/MuttFaq/Folde

Re: easier searching in my sent-mail folder

2015-12-04 Thread jurriaan_mutt
From: Cameron Simpson Date: Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 07:52:42AM +1100 > On 04Dec2015 20:45, Jurriaan wrote: > >Is there any way to have the 'l' command (limit) default to include > >searching the recipients email addresses in the sent mail folder? > > > W

Re: easier searching in my sent-mail folder

2015-12-04 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 04Dec2015 20:45, Jurriaan wrote: Is there any way to have the 'l' command (limit) default to include searching the recipients email addresses in the sent mail folder? Normally, when I press 'l' and enter a word, that word is searched for in the email-address of the sende

easier searching in my sent-mail folder

2015-12-04 Thread Jurriaan
Is there any way to have the 'l' command (limit) default to include searching the recipients email addresses in the sent mail folder? Normally, when I press 'l' and enter a word, that word is searched for in the email-address of the sender and in the subject, I think. In t

Re: Searching To:-Headers in Sent Mail

2013-06-05 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 03Jun2013 15:18, christian ebert wrote: | * Erik Christiansen on Monday, June 03, 2013 at 23:41:59 +1000 | > On 03.06.13 14:30, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: | >> I'd like to search messages by recipient in my Sent-Folder, but at least my | >> mutt install won't do it out of the box. | > | > To d

Re: Searching To:-Headers in Sent Mail

2013-06-03 Thread Christian Ebert
* Erik Christiansen on Monday, June 03, 2013 at 23:41:59 +1000 > On 03.06.13 14:30, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: >> I'd like to search messages by recipient in my Sent-Folder, but at least my >> mutt install won't do it out of the box. > > To do that, I just use: > > / ~h some_recipient_name > > O

Re: Searching To:-Headers in Sent Mail

2013-06-03 Thread Erik Christiansen
On 03.06.13 14:30, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > I'd like to search messages by recipient in my Sent-Folder, but at least my > mutt install won't do it out of the box. To do that, I just use: / ~h some_recipient_name OK, that looks in all the headers, but you probably want to check Cc: as well, a

Searching To:-Headers in Sent Mail

2013-06-03 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
I'd like to search messages by recipient in my Sent-Folder, but at least my mutt install won't do it out of the box. Is the scope mutt searches for limited by context (e.g. Sent-Folder) or do I have to use a special search keyword? THX p@rick -- Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de

Save sent mail in local folder even when using native IMAP

2012-03-11 Thread Francesco de Virgilio
On 11.03.12, 09:09, nb wrote: > Le 2012-03-11 01:13, Francesco de Virgilio a écrit : > > Hi guys, > > I've two muttrc, one for online use (IMAP) and one for offline use > > (using local folders synced with offlineimap). > > > > --- > > set folder = $HOME/.mail/inventati > > set mbox="$HOME/.mail/i

Re: Save sent mail in local folder even when using native IMAP

2012-03-11 Thread nb
Le 2012-03-11 01:13, Francesco de Virgilio a écrit : > Hi guys, > I've two muttrc, one for online use (IMAP) and one for offline use > (using local folders synced with offlineimap). > > --- > set folder = $HOME/.mail/inventati > set mbox="$HOME/.mail/inventati/INBOX" > set trash=+Trash > set postp

Save sent mail in local folder even when using native IMAP

2012-03-10 Thread Francesco de Virgilio
t; set trash=+Trash set postponed=+Drafts set record=+Sent set smtp_url='smtps://frad...@inventati.org@smtp.autistici.org' set smtp_pass=$my_pass2 --- Now, for a bunch of reasons, in both configs I need to save sent mail _only_ in the local folder ($HOME/.mail/accountname/Sent). -->>

Re: Gmail "Sent Mail" folder and folder-hook

2010-11-23 Thread Francesco de Virgilio
On 23.11.10, 18:27, Christian Brabandt wrote: > You should probably also escape '[' and ']' or use a dot instead, > otherwise this would match either G.Sent.Mail or m.Sent.Mail, etc... Yeah, this is definitely the kind of tip that made my day :D Now, with folder-hook fradeve11/.Gmail..Sent.Mail '

Re: Gmail "Sent Mail" folder and folder-hook

2010-11-23 Thread Christian Brabandt
On Tue, November 23, 2010 5:48 pm, Francesco de Virgilio wrote: > On 23.11.10, 11:17, Ed Blackman wrote: >> According to the muttrc man page, the folder argument to folder-hook >> is a regexp. A test with a local mbox named 'space test' works for >> me with this folder hook: >> >> folder-hook =spa

Re: Gmail "Sent Mail" folder and folder-hook

2010-11-23 Thread Francesco de Virgilio
be a good > workaround as long as you didn't do that. Interesting, but it doesn't work for me. However, thanks for the time spent on my issue. I'll wait a bit, than I'll be proud and I'll mod my offlineimaprc to rename Sent Mail local folder. Cheers, -- Francesco de V

Re: Gmail "Sent Mail" folder and folder-hook

2010-11-23 Thread Ed Blackman
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 02:24:43PM +0100, Francesco de Virgilio wrote: I "simply" want to modify the "Sent Mail" folder index to show the the "To:" column. I'm using local mail folders generated by OfflineIMAP, so each folder has the name of the respective tag

Re: Gmail "Sent Mail" folder and folder-hook

2010-11-23 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2010-11-23, Francesco de Virgilio wrote: > Hi list, > I've googled and searched on the net about this, tried lots of > different approaches, but the question is still unsolved. > > I "simply" want to modify the "Sent Mail" folder index to show the

Gmail "Sent Mail" folder and folder-hook

2010-11-23 Thread Francesco de Virgilio
Hi list, I've googled and searched on the net about this, tried lots of different approaches, but the question is still unsolved. I "simply" want to modify the "Sent Mail" folder index to show the the "To:" column. I'm using local mail folders generated by

Re: filter sent mail

2009-10-06 Thread James Michael Fultz
* Javier Rojas [2009-10-06 23:57 -0500]: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 10:39:08PM -0400, James Michael Fultz wrote: > > As a solution within Mutt, have you tried fcc-hooks? > > > > > > No, but if I read that correctly, I would have to duplicate al

Re: filter sent mail

2009-10-06 Thread Javier Rojas
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 10:39:08PM -0400, James Michael Fultz wrote: > As a solution within Mutt, have you tried fcc-hooks? > > No, but if I read that correctly, I would have to duplicate all of my procmail filters into mutt. -- Javier Rojas

Re: filter sent mail

2009-10-06 Thread James Michael Fultz
* Javier Rojas [2009-10-06 19:43 -0500]: > I have a problem with the mail I send: I'd like it to be filtered > by procmail, just like it is done with the mail I receive, mostly to get > it in the proper mailbox, to get threaded mail. [...] > Any ideas on how to solve this? I feel this is a pretty

filter sent mail

2009-10-06 Thread Javier Rojas
Hi all, I have a problem with the mail I send: I'd like it to be filtered by procmail, just like it is done with the mail I receive, mostly to get it in the proper mailbox, to get threaded mail. I've tried two approaches to get a solution to this: - Configure mutt to keep a copy o

sent-mail & alternatives

2008-08-14 Thread gurubonz
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:57:01AM +0100, Marianne Promberger wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is what you're experiencing, but you could try > putting your different "from" addresses into your .muttrc: > > alternates "[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]" Works great on this

Re: sent-mail

2008-08-12 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, August 12 at 09:44 AM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > My problem is my sentmail is denoted by from rather then recipient > if I set the realname and from hook to something other then my true > username. Denoted? Denoted where, in the index?

Re: sent-mail

2008-08-12 Thread Marianne Promberger
Hi, On Tuesday, 12 August 2008, 09:44 (UTC+), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My problem is my sentmail is denoted by from rather then recipient if > I set the realname and from hook to something other then my true > username. I'm not sure if this is what you're experiencing, but you could try

sent-mail

2008-08-12 Thread gurubonz
I apologise if this is something previously covered. My problem is my sentmail is denoted by from rather then recipient if I set the realname and from hook to something other then my true username. Hence all my sentmail messages except those messages sent before I changed my from hook are liste

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-03-31 Thread Kyle Wheeler
folder prompt, you can first call >the function (bound to ^V by default), then press . > >| macro index,pager S "=[Gmail]/Sent Mail" Ah! Beautiful; I had no idea existed. Dang, I should read functions.h more closely. Thanks very much, Alain. >Well, as the key is boun

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-03-30 Thread Alain Bench
st call the function (bound to ^V by default), then press . | macro index,pager S "=[Gmail]/Sent Mail" > mutt should only do that if space is the *first* character that you > type Well, as the key is bound to , it would be quite difficult to call a function when first at prompt

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-03-02 Thread Chris Sussmann
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 04:19:08PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Friday, February 29 at 02:53 PM, quoth Chris Sussmann: > > Mutt then replies that Mail is not a folder. Now the macro works > > with Spam or Drafts because they don't have a space in the name of > > the folder. > > It's a bug. O

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-02-29 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, February 29 at 10:55 PM, quoth Michael Kjorling: >On 29 Feb 2008 16:19 -0600, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kyle Wheeler): >> The space there triggers mutt to replace everything you've typed thus >> far with the name of whatever mailboxes contain n

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-02-29 Thread Michael Kjorling
On 29 Feb 2008 16:19 -0600, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kyle Wheeler): > The space there triggers mutt to replace everything you've typed thus > far with the name of whatever mailboxes contain new email. There's no > way to turn this behavior off. How about a "bind editor ' ' noop" in the macro, and r

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-02-29 Thread Chris Sussmann
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 04:26:37PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Friday, February 29 at 04:19 PM, quoth Kyle Wheeler: > >The only workaround I've found is to use tab-completion to make mutt > >insert the space for you. Assuming none of your other mailboxes begin > >with "Sent", something like t

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-02-29 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, February 29 at 04:19 PM, quoth Kyle Wheeler: >The only workaround I've found is to use tab-completion to make mutt >insert the space for you. Assuming none of your other mailboxes begin >with "Sent", something like this would work: > >

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-02-29 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, February 29 at 02:53 PM, quoth Chris Sussmann: > Mutt then replies that Mail is not a folder. Now the macro works > with Spam or Drafts because they don't have a space in the name of > the folder. It's a bug. One I've been pretty annoyed

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-02-29 Thread Chris Sussmann
er? > > I tried the \ with no luck. > > Try a double \, like so: > > macro index S "c=[Gmail]/Sent\\ Mail\n" > Sorry to say No Dice. Two \ and still I get Mail is not a mailbox Thanks though, Chris

Re: Google Sent Mail

2008-02-29 Thread Michael Kjorling
"c=[Gmail]/Sent\\ Mail\n" -- Michael Kjörling .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. http://michael.kjorling.se * . No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings . * * ENCRYPTED email preferred -- OpenPGP key ID: 0x(758F8749)BDE9ADA6 * * ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML mail, prop

Google Sent Mail

2008-02-29 Thread Chris Sussmann
Hello all, I am trying to set up a macro for gmail's sent mail folder. I connect via IMAP and presently I have to navigate to the folder. Here is what I have in my .muttrc macro index S "c=[Gmail]/Sent Mail\n" macro pager S "c=[Gmail]/Sent Mail\n" Mutt then replies

Re: Sent mail

2008-01-08 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, January 5 at 09:42 AM, quoth Rem P Roberti: > "Sent," as defined by $record, is indeed my dedicated "sent" > mailbox. But it is itself a file to which all of the copies of > outgoing mail are appended. All of my other mailboxes, inclu

Re: Sent mail

2008-01-05 Thread Michael Kjorling
On 5 Jan 2008 09:42 -0800, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rem P Roberti): > You're right...I'm confusing the issue. "Sent," as defined by $record, > is indeed my dedicated "sent" mailbox. But it is itself a file to which > all of the copies of outgoing mail are appended. All of my other > mailboxes, incl

Re: Sent mail

2008-01-05 Thread Rem P Roberti
> > > Thanks for responding, Kyle. I found the problem. Somewhere along > > the line, while I was messing around with my .muttrc file, I changed > > the set force_name= variable to yes instead of no. And, as you > > know, that overode my set record=~/Mail/sent. For the time being I > > am

Re: Sent mail

2008-01-05 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, January 4 at 09:49 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti: > Thanks for responding, Kyle. I found the problem. Somewhere along > the line, while I was messing around with my .muttrc file, I changed > the set force_name= variable to yes instead of no.

Re: Sent mail

2008-01-05 Thread Patrick Shanahan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Rem P Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-05-08 00:50]: > I am curious about one thing, however. It seems that having a > dedicated "sent" mailbox is verboten. Why is that? It is not. Look up "record" in "man muttrc". - -- Patrick Shanahan

Re: Sent mail

2008-01-04 Thread Rem P Roberti
> > On Friday, January 4 at 04:02 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti: > > I don't know how this happened, but Mutt is now creating individual > > folders for mail that I have sent, in which it places copies of sent > > mail. Before this time Mutt always put copies of ou

Re: Sent mail

2008-01-04 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, January 4 at 04:02 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti: > I don't know how this happened, but Mutt is now creating individual > folders for mail that I have sent, in which it places copies of sent > mail. Before this time Mutt always

Sent mail

2008-01-04 Thread Rem P Roberti
I don't know how this happened, but Mutt is now creating individual folders for mail that I have sent, in which it places copies of sent mail. Before this time Mutt always put copies of outgoing mail in a central "sent" folder. I did do some "tweaking" of the .muttr

How to mark all new mesgs in sent mail as read?

2007-09-06 Thread senator galt
Hello, I started using mutt few weeks ago and I'm loving it. I use "set record=filename" in .muttrc to save a copy of my sent email. But the emails in this mbox are NEW. How do I configure mutt so that all the emails in the 'record' file are not marked as new. I don't want to open the record file

Re: new mail in sent-mail

2002-09-10 Thread Erik Simon
not tagged as new in the destination (I think). What you would do to store in sent-mail is fcc-hook "." "=sent-mail" But why does it annoy you to have messages marked as new in sent-mail? Do you have mutt to check sent-mail for new messages (sent-mail in mailboxes)? Enjoy! Erik

Re: new mail in sent-mail

2002-09-10 Thread darren chamberlain
* Keith Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 08:40]: > Every time I send an email, my sent-mail box gets tagged with a > new-mail N. This is good for *all* of my other mail directorys, but > not not for sent-mail. Do you have send-mail in $mailboxes? (darren) -- Maybe

new mail in sent-mail

2002-09-10 Thread Keith Robinson
Hi, Every time I send an email, my sent-mail box gets tagged with a new-mail N. This is good for *all* of my other mail directorys, but not not for sent-mail. I've tried various things in my .muttrc but to no avail. Is there any way of getting it so that this does not happen? Any he

Re: mutt not saving sent mail

2002-02-15 Thread Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri.
Hi Christoph! On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Christoph Maurer wrote: > Hi! > On 2002-02-14 Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri. wrote: > > I am using 1.3.27 with a .muttrc that I got from Roland Rosenfeld's page > > with, by now, quite a few modifications. I had previously got the sample > > muttrc file for 1.2.x and

Re: mutt not saving sent mail

2002-02-15 Thread Christoph Maurer
Hi! On 2002-02-14 Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri. wrote: > I am using 1.3.27 with a .muttrc that I got from Roland Rosenfeld's page > with, by now, quite a few modifications. I had previously got the sample > muttrc file for 1.2.x and now I am using the sample file for 1.3.x. > > I used my 1.3.27 for a

mutt not saving sent mail

2002-02-15 Thread Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri.
Hi !! I am using 1.3.27 with a .muttrc that I got from Roland Rosenfeld's page with, by now, quite a few modifications. I had previously got the sample muttrc file for 1.2.x and now I am using the sample file for 1.3.x. I used my 1.3.27 for a few days w/ the old muttrc (for 1.2.5) till I was sa

Re: sent-mail

2001-05-08 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Pradeep Sangunni proclaimed on mutt-users that: [set your date - today is not may 7, 1999] > When I send a mail from mutt it gets copied into > the sent-mail folder but when i open the sent-mail > folder i get to see the name of the person who has > sent the mail(From:my name)inste

sent-mail

2001-05-08 Thread Pradeep Sangunni
Hi, When I send a mail from mutt it gets copied into the sent-mail folder but when i open the sent-mail folder i get to see the name of the person who has sent the mail(From:my name)instead of to the person i have sent the mail to. Any solutions. Thanx Reg, - Pradeep. -- Pradeep Sangunni

Re: how to only save certain sent mail

2001-04-26 Thread Mr. Wade
Joss Winn wrote: > Anyway, I have renamed my mutt sent mail file now and it has got me > wondering how I can just save certain mail with a key command prior to > sending, while not saving all other sent mail by default. > > Basically, I want to slimline my sent mail file to cont

how to only save certain sent mail

2001-04-26 Thread Joss Winn
Hello, You may have received several old messages from me in the last 24hrs for which I apologise. Yesterday, I opened up KMail for the first time, it found my mutt 'outbox' (sent mail - I realise now it was poorly labeled) and assumed that the last four months of mail in that fi

Re: Maildir box, sent mail

2001-02-14 Thread Michael Tatge
Jason Helfman muttered: > What is the setting for having just a standard mbox sent mail file. > > Mine keeps finding itself to mbox. > > I have this option set. > > set record=sent > > I have also tried > > set record=+sent set record="~/Mail/sent-

Maildir box, sent mail

2001-02-14 Thread Jason Helfman
What is the setting for having just a standard mbox sent mail file. Mine keeps finding itself to mbox. I have this option set. set record=sent I have also tried set record=+sent -- /Jason G Helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in

Re: creating Mutt folder for sent mail

2001-02-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
sam rosenfeld proclaimed on mutt-users that: > set editor="/usr/bin/mcedit" > set smart_wrap=yes > BTW, my smart_wrap does not result in line wrapping, perhaps because the set >configuration to > smart_wrap=yes is a mutt instruction and I am using an external editor. > :wq This is because sm

Re: creating Mutt folder for sent mail

2001-02-10 Thread Michael Tatge
Hi Sam! sam rosenfeld muttered: > set folder=/home/sam/Mail/outbox You seem to have mixed put your pathes a bit, or it this really what you intended? > but still cannot store sent mail in my /home/sam/Mail/outbox. (All > cases correct) Of cause you can't do that. You set $fo

Re: creating Mutt folder for sent mail

2001-02-10 Thread Viktor Lakics
Hi Sam, Here is what you should include in your muttrc: # This is for mutt to copy your sent mail: set copy=yes set record=+outbox # Have you actually created this? # And this is for your editor to wrwp lines at 68 # (I saw from the end of your message# that you # use vi or vim - the

Re: creating Mutt folder for sent mail

2001-02-10 Thread sam rosenfeld
In response to an earlier rerquest for advice on enabling me to save copies of outgoing mail, Suresh Ramasubrahamian and Frank Naumann suggested a couple of lines to be added to .muttrc. I've incorporated them into my .muttrc but still cannot store sent mail in my /home/sam/Mail/outbox.

Re: creating Mutt folder for sent mail

2001-02-06 Thread Frank Naumann
Hello Sam, On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:51:13AM -0500, sam rosenfeld wrote: > I must have overlooked some line in either the mutt manual or > .muttrc (or both) that tells me how to create a folder for sent > mail. Ideally all my sent mail would automatically be saved in > that fol

Re: creating Mutt folder for sent mail

2001-02-06 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
sam rosenfeld proclaimed on mutt-users that: > I must have overlooked some line in either the mutt manual or .muttrc (or > both) that tells me how to create a folder for sent mail. Ideally all my > sent mail would automatically be saved in that folder. > Could someone provide a ref

creating Mutt folder for sent mail

2001-02-06 Thread sam rosenfeld
I must have overlooked some line in either the mutt manual or .muttrc (or both) that tells me how to create a folder for sent mail. Ideally all my sent mail would automatically be saved in that folder. Could someone provide a reference? thanks, sam

Re: sending mail and a copy saved to sent-mail...

2000-11-15 Thread Luke Ravitch
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 03:40:43PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:28:06PM -0800, Luke Ravitch wrote: > > Cool. I like to compress my archived sent mail, though. I just have: > > nod, I do that too, only gpg it in the proccess. do you use the > +COMPRE

Re: sending mail and a copy saved to sent-mail...

2000-11-15 Thread Conor Daly
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:08:30PM - or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Dan Boger thought: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:28:06PM -0800, Luke Ravitch wrote: > > Cool. I like to compress my archived sent mail, though. I just have: > > nod, I do that too, only gpg it in the pr

Re: sending mail and a copy saved to sent-mail...

2000-11-15 Thread Dan Boger
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:28:06PM -0800, Luke Ravitch wrote: > Cool. I like to compress my archived sent mail, though. I just have: nod, I do that too, only gpg it in the proccess. do you use the +COMPRESSED patch to mutt, so it could read the compressed folders on the fly? :) -- Dan Bo

Re: sending mail and a copy saved to sent-mail...

2000-11-15 Thread Luke Ravitch
ach month) Cool. I like to compress my archived sent mail, though. I just have: set record="=sent/current" in my .muttrc and this crontab entry: 1 0 1 * * -D mv /home/luke/Mail/sent/current \ /home/luke/Mail/sent/`date -I`; bzip2 \ /home/luke/Mail/sent/`d

Re: sending mail and a copy saved to sent-mail...

2000-11-15 Thread Nollaig MacKenzie
On 2000.11.15 11:28:01, you, the extraordinary Luke Ravitch, opined: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:08:40PM -0800, Robert Sweet wrote: > > Does anyone know how to have a copy of mail sent saved to a > > mailbox i.e., sent-mail? > > set record = sent-mail > After

Re: sending mail and a copy saved to sent-mail...

2000-11-15 Thread Juergen Salk
* Robert Sweet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 20:12]: > Does anyone know how to have a copy of mail sent saved to a > mailbox i.e., sent-mail? set record="=sent-mail" in your ~/.muttrc. For further details read the section about "record" in the mutt manual 6.1. Best regards - Juergen.

Re: sending mail and a copy saved to sent-mail...

2000-11-15 Thread Luke Ravitch
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:08:40PM -0800, Robert Sweet wrote: > Does anyone know how to have a copy of mail sent saved to a > mailbox i.e., sent-mail? set record = sent-mail -- Luke

sending mail and a copy saved to sent-mail...

2000-11-15 Thread Robert Sweet
Does anyone know how to have a copy of mail sent saved to a mailbox i.e., sent-mail? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Under a government which -o) | imprisons any unjustly, the Linux, the Choice /\ | true place for a just man is of a GNU generation _\_v | also in

Re: copies of sent mail

2000-09-06 Thread Juergen Salk
* Jeff Coppock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000906 23:35]: > I'm a new user of mutt and sendmail. I've got everything working, but I can't >figure out whether mutt of sendmail is responsible for keeping copies of sent mail, >and where they would be. > > Can anyon

Re: copies of sent mail

2000-09-06 Thread Michael Sanders
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 11:55:33AM +, Jeff Coppock wrote: > I'm a new user of mutt and sendmail. I've got everything working, but I can't >figure out whether mutt of sendmail is responsible for keeping copies of sent mail, >and where they would be. > >Fr

copies of sent mail

2000-09-06 Thread Jeff Coppock
I'm a new user of mutt and sendmail. I've got everything working, but I can't figure out whether mutt of sendmail is responsible for keeping copies of sent mail, and where they would be. Can anyone help me? thanks, jc --

Re: tracking sent mail with outstanding reply

2000-08-24 Thread Jason Helfman
This is done through the DAEMON. I can't recall the feature in Mutt that uses it, dsn? Either way, it needs to be supported by the DAEMON. It is essentially a return-receipt. On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 01:41:03PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson muttered: | [Please cc: me replies as I'm not subscribed to th

tracking sent mail with outstanding reply

2000-08-24 Thread Stefan Alfredsson
[Please cc: me replies as I'm not subscribed to the list.] Hello, I often find myself in a situation where I send off a mail to which I expect a reply, however sometimes there is no reply and I forget about the whole issue altogether. What I'm wondering is, is there some "mail-tracking" mechani

Re: No Lines: tag in sent mail folder

2000-06-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 15 Jun 2000: > % can be done with a little hacking. And this need is probably so > % specialized that a little hacking is justified for it. :-) > > Oh, so now you think I should have to work for it, eh? :-) Well, either that, or you can submit a patch

Re: No Lines: tag in sent mail folder

2000-06-15 Thread David T-G
Mikko -- ...and then Mikko Hänninen said... % David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 14 Jun 2000: % > Walt, I can't help you with adding a Lines: header to your sent mail, % > but I would like to second the very interesting idea of being able to fcc % > to a program

Re: No Lines: tag in sent mail folder

2000-06-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 14 Jun 2000: > Walt, I can't help you with adding a Lines: header to your sent mail, > but I would like to second the very interesting idea of being able to fcc > to a program instead of just to a single file/folder/maildir. You k

Re: No Lines: tag in sent mail folder

2000-06-14 Thread Walt Mankowski
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 12:22:34AM +0200, clemensF wrote: > the lines disappear in a maildir, but the size in bytes holds. I've tried %c instead of %L in my index_format and I don't like it. A 1 byte message will have its size listed as 0.1K (4 chars) while a 99,999 byte message appears as 99K (

Re: No Lines: tag in sent mail folder

2000-06-14 Thread clemensF
> Walt Mankowski: > in my .muttrc file. I recently converted this folder to a Maildir. > Since then none of the new messages have a Lines: tag, so to mutt they > all appear to have 0 lines. the lines disappear in a maildir, but the size in bytes holds. clemens

Re: No Lines: tag in sent mail folder

2000-06-14 Thread David T-G
Hi, folks -- Walt, I can't help you with adding a Lines: header to your sent mail, but I would like to second the very interesting idea of being able to fcc to a program instead of just to a single file/folder/maildir. There are times when I'd really like to be able to save mail to

No Lines: tag in sent mail folder

2000-06-14 Thread Walt Mankowski
I keep a copy of all my sent mail with the command set record=~/Mail/sent in my .muttrc file. I recently converted this folder to a Maildir. Since then none of the new messages have a Lines: tag, so to mutt they all appear to have 0 lines. I've actually written a little perl script t

no saved 'sent-mail' after upgrade to 1.1.11i

2000-04-21 Thread Steffan Hoeke
Hi all, Maybe it's a stupid question but: i upgraded to 1.1.11i and 'all of a sudden' my sent mail is no longer saved in the sent-mail folder :-( i see the fcc-hook active as ~/Maildir/sent-mail but : no new mail appears I also set the record variable to ~/Maildir/sent-mail,

Small hack / save_name folder - [was: sorting sent mail into subdirectory]

1999-11-14 Thread Josh Rodman
* Josh Rodman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991114 07:50]: > * Ronny Haryanto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991114 05:12]: > > On 13-Nov-1999, Josh Rodman wrote: > > > Thus i created ~/Mail/sent. I want two main things: > > > > > A) all automatically saved mail should drop into this directory > > However, I woul

Re: sorting sent mail into subdirectory

1999-11-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Josh Rodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 13 Nov 1999: > This will work, and is the best idea probabaly. "S" is unused, and it > seems reasonable. I had imagined I could control what the '=suggestion' > would be on the line, which would require the least training... You can do that too, wit

Re: sorting sent mail into subdirectory

1999-11-13 Thread Josh Rodman
* Ronny Haryanto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991114 05:12]: > On 13-Nov-1999, Josh Rodman wrote: > > Thus i created ~/Mail/sent. I want two main things: > > > A) all automatically saved mail should drop into this directory Ahh, I now understand things quite a bit better. This is easily achievable give

Re: sorting sent mail into subdirectory

1999-11-13 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On 13-Nov-1999, Josh Rodman wrote: > B) I hope to additionally cause mindless use of 's [return]' from the > index to drop main into this directory as well named as per default by the > sender. Of course I want to be able to ovveride this on a case-by-case > basis. I would create a macro for thi

sorting sent mail into subdirectory

1999-11-13 Thread Josh Rodman
Sanity check: I'm rather new to fancy mutt configs. I like the concept of 'save_name' and have enabled it, but I don't want it cluttering up my main $folder. Thus i created ~/Mail/sent. I want two main things: A) all automatically saved mail should drop into this directory B) I hope to addit

  1   2   >