On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, David T-G wrote:
[snip!]
> What version of mutt are you running?
Now that is some serious help. Thank you and Bruno, both.
I did, indeed, find that an old version of mutt was being launched.
Don't ya love path conflicts?
So, while I was sorting that out, I downloaded the _ve
ion of this design decision :-)
%
% Can someone straighten me out here? The documentation talks about
% "initialization files". These are somehow different than RC files?
No, that's the same thing.
%
% The Mutt and IMAP document tends to gloss over these details.
REMEMBE
On Sat 02-Feb-2002 at 11:53:55AM -0600, William Guynes wrote:
> The only thing that worked was spoolfile in "{}INBOX" format,
> but not in "imap:///INBOX format".
The URL style syntax is new to mutt-1.3.*. If you are using 1.2.5, then
try upgrading to a recent development version like 1.3.27 - i
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, MuttER wrote:
> > IMAP implementation has me a bit confused. I have 3 IMAP mailboxes,
> > on 3 diferent servers. If I understand the docs correctly, I can
> > switch between them using the 'c' command inside Mutt. Typing out
> > the "imap:///INBOX" isn't working though.
>
>
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 11:53:55AM -0600, William Guynes wrote:
> I'm trying to get moved over to mutt. I've had it with Pine roles,
> it's driving me nuts.
>
> IMAP implementation has me a bit confused. I have 3 IMAP mailboxes,
> on 3 diferent servers. If I understand the docs correctly, I ca
c file)
I've tried both "mailboxes" and "account-hook". The only thing that
worked was spoolfile in "{}INBOX" format, but not in
"imap:///INBOX format". However, that assumes only one IMAP
box.
Can someone straighten me out here? The documentation talks
Quoting Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [05/09/01 11:28 -0400]:
> > On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
> > > I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt.
> What
> > > I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [05/09/01 11:28 -0400]:
> On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
> > I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt. What
> > I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's SMTP server as well, instead of
> > using sendmail on localhos
On Wednesday, 05 September 2001 at 17:04, Matteo Vaccari wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have no problems accessing my provider's IMAP server through Mutt. What
> I'd like is for Mutt to use my provider's SMTP server as well, instead of
> using sendmail on localhost. Is there something I have overlooked?
Cyrus _is_ the IMAP server, so the filtering via procmail has to take place
on the server.
-Justin
Thus spake Jack McKinney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Big Brother tells me that Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail,
> > you don't necessarily
On Wednesday, 14 February 2001 at 09:56, Jack McKinney wrote:
> Big Brother tells me that Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail,
> > you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
> > been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for ab
Big Brother tells me that Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail,
> you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
> been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
> to run fetchmail as root so that it can ca
Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail
(and I'm going by the archive since I just subscribed to this list),
you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
to run fetchmail as root so that it
Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail
(and I'm going by the archive since I just subscribed to this list),
you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
to run fetchmail as root so that it
Regarding what Waldemar said before about fetchmail and procmail,
you don't necessarily have to lose the features of IMAP. I have
been doing this with Cyrus IMAPd for about two years. You have
to run fetchmail as root so that it can call Cyrus' deliver
program (or otherwise set up the right
Big Brother tells me that Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>
> Another solution is to use a imap filter, called sieve.
> I've seen it only by Cyrus IMAP-Server in a newer version than
> 2.0.x.
> http://www.cyrusoft.com/sieve/
OK, I'll check it out. I was think that since mutt had all kinds of
hooks
Hello Jack,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:05:09PM -0600, Jack McKinney wrote:
> I am using mutt to connect to an IMAP server. I'd like to have mutt
> automatically grab new mail and put it into separate IMAP boxes, somewhat
> the way that procmail can sort your incoming mail into separate boxes.
I am using mutt to connect to an IMAP server. I'd like to have mutt
automatically grab new mail and put it into separate IMAP boxes, somewhat
the way that procmail can sort your incoming mail into separate boxes.
How do I go about doing this? Currently, I just use the limit command
to li
On Thu Feb 1 12:52:35 2001, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > 1) How do I browse an IMAP folder if I don't want to specify it as my
> > default mail directory ? If I try to open {user@server}INBOX or simply
> > {user@server}, I see the messages, but I can't browse the folders. I can
> > browse the folder
On Tuesday, 30 January 2001 at 18:21, Rapha?l HALIMI wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I need to access an IMAP box and its subfolders. But I have some
> problems with it. So I have some questions :
>
> 1) How do I browse an IMAP folder if I don't want to specify it as my
> default mail directory ? If I try to o
Hi.
I need to access an IMAP box and its subfolders. But I have some
problems with it. So I have some questions :
1) How do I browse an IMAP folder if I don't want to specify it as my
default mail directory ? If I try to open {user@server}INBOX or simply
{user@server}, I see the messages, but I
Sitting at the campfire, Dan Boger told:
> ok, how do I get it to [mail notifying] work? I put the IMAP folders I want
> in my $mailboxes, but I never get notified still?
I have a line like this in my .muttrc
mailboxes ! {[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ssl}inbox
note the ! (exclamation mark, is it?). Now i
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 03:00:27PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> > Does the new mail notify work for imap folders?
>
> Yes, it works nicely
ok, how do I get it to work? I put the IMAP folders I want in my $mailboxes,
but I never get notified still?
> > Is there a way (without macros) to teach
> >
Sitting at the campfire, Dan Boger told:
> just started playing with IMAP a little (mostly to read postmaster mail)
> and I was wondering about mutt's IMAP support... Is anyone using it?
Yes, I am. It works fine.
> Here's some of my questions... Is there a way to browse the server folders,
> w
just started playing with IMAP a little (mostly to read postmaster mail)
and I was wondering about mutt's IMAP support... Is anyone using it?
Here's some of my questions... Is there a way to browse the server folders,
without knowing in advance which folders are available? Does the new mail
no
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Is there anyway to expunge the messages from the IMAP server? With a setting of some
>sort?
I recommend using fetchmail instead of mutt's imap checking.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
Any clod can have the facts, but
> You are reading your mail off an IMAP server right? And you have it set
> _not_ to expunge messages from the imap server. So, even if a copy is
> fetched locally to mailbox, it may stay on the imap server.
>
Is there anyway to expunge the messages from the IMAP server? With a setting of some
Manuel Arriaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
> mbox is there for people who use "real" *nix systems with many users and
> therefore restrictions on the harddrive space they may use, which has
> nothing to do with my case.
Well, not only for them... It's also for users like you wh
Mikko Hänninen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>I personally prefer to set just move=no and as a result deal with the
>700 mail inbox with all sorts of old junk in it possibly from year(s?)
>back. :-)
I prefer to use procmail and over 50 folders to refile my mails :) If
there are too many mails
Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 23 May 2000:
> >Sorry to interfer in this tread too, but what is the purpose of mbox?
>
> All read mails will be moved to this folder if you say set move=yes in
> your muttrc (it will ask you politely first, of course) :)
Actually, to be
Hi Suresh,
> On a standalone linux box connected over a dialup this is trivial - not
> when you are telneted into your mailbox which gives you just an 1 mb quota
> ...
>
> got it? :)
Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me; now I understand what mbox is
for.:-)
Now I see, as I
Suresh,
But you must admit that the two Mail-(User/Admin)-HOWTOS are very poor: I actually
read them, but the Admin one only teaches you how to setup qmail (I went for postfix,
which has great- and thourough :-) - docs and works flawlessly for me) and the
User-HOWTO only teaches you basic nagi
Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>But you must admit that the two Mail-(User/Admin)-HOWTOS are very poor: I actually
>read them, but the Admin one only teaches you how to setup qmail (I went for postfix,
>which has great- and thourough :-) - docs and works flawlessly for me) and t
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Actually I didn't see any option to expunge the messages from the imap server.
try using fetchmail to pull your mails from the imap server.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
Green light in a.m. for new projects. Red ligh
Actually I didn't see any option to expunge the messages from the imap server.
Dave
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a
> >long time. Then when I op
Dave (Grizz) Glaser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a
>long time. Then when I open mutt again all my mail is duplicated (two
>copies of everything).
You are reading your mail off an IMAP server right? And you have it set
_no
Well I tried this, but now when I exit it says "Fetching message" for a long time.
Then when I open mutt again all my mail is duplicated (two copies of everything).
Dave
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >
> >Sorry to inter
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Chris Green wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 09:12:12PM -0400, Dave (Grizz) Glaser wrote:
> >
> > c. Remove the use of the mbox entirely and just keep their mail on the IMAP
>server, again negating most of the use of IMAP.
> >
> I would have though the idea of the I
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 09:12:12PM -0400, Dave (Grizz) Glaser wrote:
>
> c. Remove the use of the mbox entirely and just keep their mail on the IMAP server,
>again negating most of the use of IMAP.
>
I would have though the idea of the IMAP server *is* that you
keep all your mail on the
Manuel Arriaga proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
>Sorry to interfer in this tread too, but what is the purpose of mbox?
>
All read mails will be moved to this folder if you say set move=yes in
your muttrc (it will ask you politely first, of course) :)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at st
Hi,
> Whenever I exit mutt I get the question: Do you want to move messages into
>/mbox?
> I know what the purpose of mbox is, (...)
Sorry to interfer in this tread too, but what is the purpose of mbox?
Bye,
Manuel
Dave (Grizz) Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 22 May 2000:
> Whenever I exit mutt I get the question: Do you want to move messages
> into /mbox?
...
> a. Default to using a mbox and always move their mail for them? So they
> don't have to answer.
set move=yes
(You want to set that in
Whenever I exit mutt I get the question: Do you want to move messages into /mbox?
I know what the purpose of mbox is, but I have a large number of students who are
becomming confused on what it is and what to do about it. Because removing features is
much easier with users rather than trying t
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>So, no, you don't get IMAP support by default on 1.1.13 at least, and
>I think 1.1.13 is actually identical to 1.2.
my bad ... thanks
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
Walk softly and carry a megawatt laser.
On 2000-05-18 13:48:02 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> I use mutt 1.3 (and have been building the devel
> versions as and when they came out ). AFAICT,
> --with-imap is enabled by default.
That would be a bug.
> Mutt is small enough that I can afford to do a
> ./configure and make ins
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 01:48:02PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >> mutt -f '{imap.server}folder-name'
>
> >Version 1.2 has a whole raft of IMAP enhancements and bug fixes though
> >so I would recommend doenloading and building that if you
Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>> mutt -f '{imap.server}folder-name'
>
>I thought that just the 1.2 version got the imap part. What's abaut
>the performance, does it work fine?
>
I was checking imap folders on a .95.4i - it was pretty ok ... except that
m$ sexchange has a badly b
Chris Green proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>> mutt -f '{imap.server}folder-name'
>Version 1.2 has a whole raft of IMAP enhancements and bug fixes though
>so I would recommend doenloading and building that if you can. When
>you build it you need to give the '--with-imap' option to ./configure
>
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 01:08:39PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >What do I have to do, to get mutt running with imap? Which version of
> >mutt shell I take? How do I have to compile it?
>
> Any version of mutt you want - your 1.01i will
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 01:08:39PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >What do I have to do, to get mutt running with imap? Which version of
> >mutt shell I take? How do I have to compile it?
>
> Any version of mutt you want - your 1.01i will
Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>What do I have to do, to get mutt running with imap? Which version of
>mutt shell I take? How do I have to compile it?
Any version of mutt you want - your 1.01i will do fine. See the mutt/imap
howto at http://www.mutt.org for more. Just read the i
What do I have to do, to get mutt running with imap? Which version of
mutt shell I take? How do I have to compile it?
Thanks Manuel
--
Registrierter Linux-User #130261
** **
* MAXIMUM Internet Services AG | Fon +49 8152 918600
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 07:43:58AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Monday, 13 September 1999 at 11:55, Chris Green wrote:
> > If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
> >
> > I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
> > with mutt? Is there a simple
On Monday, 13 September 1999 at 11:55, Chris Green wrote:
> If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
>
> I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
> with mutt? Is there a simple way to give them names/aliases so they
> can be accessed like local folde
If it isn't a silly question how does mutt work with IMAP4?
I have some folders set up on an IMAP4 server, how do I access them
with mutt? Is there a simple way to give them names/aliases so they
can be accessed like local folders? Having to enter the full address
of the folder every time one w
55 matches
Mail list logo
