Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that: >> mutt -f '{imap.server}folder-name' > >I thought that just the 1.2 version got the imap part. What's abaut >the performance, does it work fine? > I was checking imap folders on a .95.4i - it was pretty ok ... except that m$ sexchange has a badly broken version of what it calls "imap" ;) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com Green light in a.m. for new projects. Red light in P.M. for traffic tickets.
- Re: Mutt and IMAP Brendan Cully
- Re: Mutt and IMAP Chris Green
- mutt and imap Manuel Hendel
- Re: mutt and imap Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt and imap Chris Green
- Re: mutt and imap Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt and imap Chris Green
- Re: mutt and imap Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt and imap Thomas Roessler
- Re: mutt and imap Manuel Hendel
- mutt and IMAP Suresh Ramasubramanian
- mutt and IMAP Dan Boger
- Re: mutt and IMAP Kai Blin
- Re: mutt and IMAP Dan Boger
- Re: mutt and IMAP Kai Blin
- Mutt and IMAP Raphaël HALIMI
- Re: Mutt and IMAP Brendan Cully
- Re: Mutt and IMAP Raphaël HALIMI