I am using pattern parsing to order my index screens, scoring on
a header I write to incoming mails with procmail. I have 125 students
sending me mail from all over and I want the mail to be ordered
in the index screen by their student ID number so it is easy to
transfer grades to the grade book.
I get mixed up sometimes
:)
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 07:52:36PM +0200, Thomas Roessler muttered:
| On 2000-10-27 12:39:44 -0500, Jack McKinney wrote:
|
| >> I have Qmail and am filtering with Procmail to MAILDIR format,
| >> however I would like to backup mail very easily by having all
| >> inc
So this is my current .qmail file:
#./Maildir/
|/usr/bin/procmail
So what would I add here?
I am confused. I thought you can only have one command in there. I want
to have an mbox file that is named $HOME/Mail/backup-inbox
Please help.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:39:44PM -0500, Jack McKinney
As promised in another thread, a report on using type 1 remailers in
mutt as I see it.
I played around with mixmaster support in mutt, but with little success.
I decided to go back to the beginning, partly because of my failure with
mixmaster but also because I am not sure I need mixmaster. Just
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 09:11:20AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wrote:
> > > Anyway, I'd REALLY like to be able to change directories while inside
> > > mutt; that's one of the things I've found wanting in elm that I hoped
[cut]
> There are work-arounds: I can press "s", erase the sugge
Rafael A. Schmitt [Saturday, October 28, 2000 8:12 AM]:
> it 's possible configure mutt to send my e-mail
> through my isp smtp?
> i have a dial-up conection.how can i configure that??
You have to configure your sendmail (or whatever mta you are
running on your desktop) to smarthost through
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 03:59:13AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
> > I always get confused about what the
> > menu are called.
>
> A final usage tip -- I got confused too, until someone pointed out to me
> that the menu's name appe
it 's possible configure mutt to send my e-mail through my isp smtp?
i have a dial-up conection.how can i configure that??
thanks
--
Rafael.
§=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=§
| Rafael Alexandre Schmitt |
| Registered Linux User # 152146 |
| Bl
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:08:23AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> OK, I'll just clean up this lot and then I let people on the list know
> how to use type I remailers with mutt.
Looking forward to it. :)
It would certainly be good if we could get Mixmaster to work, too. Remailers
are essenti
Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
> I always get confused about what the
> menu are called.
A final usage tip -- I got confused too, until someone pointed out to me
that the menu's name appears at the top of the help screen when you
press '?'.
Good to hear things
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 03:28:56AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
> > It prompts for my filter script and then needs a
> > "yes" reply as it warns it is overwriting the mutt-hostname-number file
> > in /tmp.
>
> You can probably get
Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 28 Oct 2000:
> It prompts for my filter script and then needs a
> "yes" reply as it warns it is overwriting the mutt-hostname-number file
> in /tmp.
You can probably get rid of that "yes" reply -- I'm not sure of this,
but I would expect that to
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:13:55AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Brian Salter-Duke muttered:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:47:06AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > > Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
> > > > In the attach menu after saving the message, I
> > > > wan
Mikko Hänninen muttered:
> PS. No need to send emails to me privately, I'm on the list (as the MFT
> header in this email should indicate...).
I'm sorry Mikko. I replied to Brian's message, and _are_ listed in the
MFT-Header of that message. Sorry for any inconvenience. I just didn't
pay attentio
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Juergen Salk wrote:
> I have to apologize if I'm beating this to death, but I have to admit,
> that I don't feel terribly familiar with all these terminfo stuff.
> So, is there a way to use mutt in gnome-terminal with Home and End
> keys working *and* with color support?
* Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001027 07:53]:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:20:44PM +0200, Juergen Salk wrote:
[Home and End keys not working within mutt running in gnome-terminal]
> # this describes the alpha-version of Gnome terminal shipped with Redhat 6.0
> gnome|Gnome terminal,
>
On 2000-10-27 12:39:44 -0500, Jack McKinney wrote:
>> I have Qmail and am filtering with Procmail to MAILDIR format,
>> however I would like to backup mail very easily by having all
>> incoming mail to go a backup-inbox in MBOX format, and use
>> Roessler's compression patch to view it.
^^
Big Brother tells me that Jason Helfman wrote:
> I have Qmail and am filtering with Procmail to MAILDIR format, however I
> would like to backup mail very easily by having all incoming mail to go
> a backup-inbox in MBOX format, and use Roessler's compression patch to
> view it.
>
> Is this possi
I have Qmail and am filtering with Procmail to MAILDIR format, however I
would like to backup mail very easily by having all incoming mail to go
a backup-inbox in MBOX format, and use Roessler's compression patch to
view it.
Is this possible?
How would I define the mailbox format in mutt?
Would
I use pgp-hook to define a key for an email address:
pgp-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ABCD1234
I also tell mutt to always encrypt to this address:
send-hook . set pgp_autoencrypt=no
send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] set pgp_autoencrypt=yes
When I send a message to this email address, mutt i
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 15:42:59 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Well, you can use a complex expression, like
>
> ~C "([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED])"
>
> So that's why it's EXPR, not USER. You're not limited to looking for a
> single user. The same is true for ~t, so I think the ~t sho
Of course just after I sent the message I tried again and found where
the thing is! I added a "fputc ('\n', fp);" after the "fputc ('\f',fp);"
in command.c and now it works perfectly. Still, maybe it's something
that should be done in the next release, it's up to the mantainers...
Thanks.
Hi,
I have a (possibly) weird request for mutt. I am using version 1.2.5i
and my problem is printing several tagged mails. I use this
set print_command="a2ps -b"" -R -q --pretty-print=mail -1 "
and what happens is that all the mail are printed properly, each one in
his page but while the "
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 06:30:16 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > there are differences between various terminal emulators for the
> > codes used for home/end. XFree86 xterm for instance originally
> > supported PC-style codes (\EOH and \EOF), while r
> > > Did you try to change the content-type of these octet-streams to
> > > application/pgp? With the more recent mutt versions, you can
> > > comfortably do this from within mutt.
> >
> > Really? I'm using mutt 1.2i .
> > What version do I need to do this and where do I find information on
> >
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 27 Oct 2000:
>~t USER messages addressed to USER
> It should be
>~t USER messages addressed to: USER
>
> Otherwise, it is really ambiguous, in particular when one has somewhere
> else:
>
>g group-repl
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 06:30:16 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> there are differences between various terminal emulators for the
> codes used for home/end. XFree86 xterm for instance originally
> supported PC-style codes (\EOH and \EOF), while rxvt used
> vt220-style (\E[1~ and \E[4~). At the mom
Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 27 Oct 2000:
> It is not the attachment I want to filter and F is filter-entry for the
> attachment. I want to alter the message itself.
Like Brian Tatge already said, the message body *is* an attachement,
from the MIME point of view (and how th
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:43:10AM +0100, John Wright wrote:
> > > Ah, post-5.1. yes the latest one didn't get past running the c++ compiler.
> >
> > what was the error message? (most of the g++ problems currently are due
> > to things like missing or conflicting libraries - a year or two ago i
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 06:35:45AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:44:46AM +0100, John Wright wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:58:39AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, John Wright wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > I'm told that ncurses (post-5.1
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:44:46AM +0100, John Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:58:39AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, John Wright wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:14:36PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
> > > > Just wondering if anyone has gotten Mutt to wo
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 08:37:33AM +0200, Juergen Salk wrote:
> * Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001027 07:53]:
>
> > which is Pos1?
>
> Ooops, I'm sorry. It's the "Home" key.
there are differences between various terminal emulators for the codes
used for home/end. XFree86 xterm for inst
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 16:39:28 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
> > I've just tried. This doesn't work, so there is really a bug.
>
> What exactly did you try? Can you show us the command, please?
Finally, there is no bug, just a ty
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:58:39AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, John Wright wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:14:36PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
> > > Just wondering if anyone has gotten Mutt to work under the Mac OS X
> > > Public Beta.
> >
> > 1.2.4i didn't compile
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 06:34:36AM +0930 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Brian Salter-Duke thought:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 11:21:59AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
> mv /tmp/new-file /tmp/mutt*
>
> This works. I can now just hit "y" to send the mail. However of course
> it would fail if
Brian Salter-Duke muttered:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:47:06AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
> > > In the attach menu after saving the message, I
> > > want to modify the message considerably by piping it to a script. The
> > >
Markus Fischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Hello,
>
> I've allready read the previous thread about forwarding
> mails with attachments and the final solution was
>
> resending mail with e
> or
> set mime_forward=yes in .muttrc
we have a better solution now, with lastest stable v
Hello,
I've allready read the previous thread about forwarding
mails with attachments and the final solution was
resending mail with e
or
set mime_forward=yes in .muttrc
What the first solution does is, simple resending the message,
but not preformating it (header, body). You h
38 matches
Mail list logo
