Russell Hoover proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>I've just gotten mutt to work on a new (backup) ISP. (And at least until I
>persuade the sysadmin to upgrade, it's mutt 0.95.7i). It took me the
Pity :)
>*longest* time to be able to send any mail. Then I finally realized I had
>to disable "dsn_
i just had an idea for a feature that i think could kick ass.
though maybe it is already in place :)
i have a mailbox with 3000 messages and the problem is that
i keep on leaving stuff there that i think i will need later,
but stays there for years.
the idea is to delay-delete a message. the ide
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 11:46:43AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
>
> 3> I guess I make other files like:
> ~/.qmail-mailbox-mutt
> ./Maildir/new/mutt/
>
> 4> In mutt:set check_new=yes
>set mailbox_type=Maildir
>
Using M
And mention that a 32 line sig on a 3 line message is a bit excessive :)
Shawn
Previously, fman wrote:
% The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list. I suggest someone write a
% book on how to use mutt. Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket
% references. Mutt is popular enought
The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list. I suggest someone write a
book on how to use mutt. Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket
references. Mutt is popular enought to deserve one, no?
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info
On 27-Jun-2000, Hardy Merrill wrote:
> I recently setup mutt to use PGP 6.5.2, [...]
> I can't find "pkspxycwrap" anywhere on my system - anyone
> know what command I should be using to fetch keys?
I'm having a similar problem. I just ditched 5.0i and installed 6.5.2.
However there are no 'pkspxy
> How do I get started using PGP/GPG with mutt?
try http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Mutt-GnuPG-PGP-HOWTO.html
>
> them to a good tutorial, or at least give directions including how to
> generate a key and how to use it.
http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory&sid=2000/5/1/17058/47630
http://www
>
> Any comments?
>
> --
try my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDlYQxYRBACHDSw/JNcmvvZeQQMKq954FHbiyJHyNZ+clwwdFPzIOsxiq3AW
r5T1Xk2mPYqF8cQEqUQME8jHGaBUf2ty+zn+C/2In80LzZ3KslY
I've got
save-hook =customer.in =archived/customer
in my dot-muttrc file. However, when I press 's' while reading a message,
or while in the folder index (in customer.in) it guesses at the save file
name (based on the From: address). What am I missing?
Thanks,
jon
There is something similar at
www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Mutt-GnuPG-PGP-HOWTO.html
It focuses mainly on gpg, pgp and mutt working together but it is an easy read.
> authority, that we as the mutt community need to come up with some Quick
> Start and "mutt for the impatient" docs, perhaps along the
fman [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > 'p' makes perfect sense for 'print', etc. They can't be more than one
>
> I though p was for encryting and/or signing options?
On the compose menu it is. On the index menu it's print by default.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jbloss
I though p was for encryting and/or signing options?
> 'p' makes perfect sense for 'print', etc. They can't be more than one
-juan
John P. Verel [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I can't figure out how to foward a message and edit the original
> message. I'm using emacs -nw as my editor. The forwarded message
> shows up as an attachment, which I can't figure out how to edit.
See the manual regarding mime_forward.
--
Jeremy Bl
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000627 20:09]:
> % > has the [built-in] ability to create in-line signatures and encryption;
> % > check out the pgp6.rc file supplied with the tarball.
> % I saw that there is a pgp_clearsign_command, but how do I activate it...
> That much I don't know; I haven't
I got it working!! Here's what I found that works:
text/html; netscape %s\;exit 1; nametemplate=%s.html; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"
text/html; lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal
(this is courtesy of Roland Rosenfeld on his mutt page)
At 26 June, 2000 Dale Morris wrote:
> When I try to open an email
msg.pgp
Antoine
When I change my .mailcap file as you indicated below, Netscape
doesn't open on the link, it gives me the following:
file:/tmp/muttuNv5SY (In Netscape's url location box) and a blank page
with the following: On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 06:40:31PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> > When I try to op
I can't figure out how to foward a message and edit the original
message. I'm using emacs -nw as my editor. The forwarded message
shows up as an attachment, which I can't figure out how to edit.
Thanks.
John
> Jason Helfman:
> I just installed Qmail last night and broke my Procmail, but I thought I
> had fixed it with setting up where Promail writes to...
had the exact same probs, also procmail complaining about every
write(2). but i needed email badly and dropped procmail until i regain
the specia
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 12:47:32AM +0200, Mark Weinem wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 11:46:43AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
>
> [Ignoring qmail+procmail questions]
> > 4> In mutt:set check_new=yes
> >set mailbox_type=Maildir
>
> Does "mailbox_type" really work? I u
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000, David T-G wrote:
> That's what *you* use, but do we know what mutt uses? I'm not absolutely
> sure of this position, and I could be wrong, but I vaguely recall this
> going by before and I think that it had to do with how mutt invoked the
> command line you want to run...
A
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 11:46:43AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
[Ignoring qmail+procmail questions]
> 4> In mutt:set check_new=yes
>set mailbox_type=Maildir
Does "mailbox_type" really work? I use "mbox_type".
ciao
--
Mark| PGP-Key available
Weinem
On Tue, Jun 27 2000, at 16:26 -0400, David T-G wrote:
>% I just can't get the hang of verifying a signed cleartext message. In
>% this case it's one I sent to myself.
>If you have this, then you should have an ordinary PGP/MIME signed
>message. When you read it, do you get something like [...]
I
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 03:56:30PM -0400, Howard Arons wrote:
-> I just can't get the hang of verifying a signed cleartext message. In
-> this case it's one I sent to myself.
->
-> First, I cannot access any kind of "PGP menu" in the index or pager,
-> like I can when composing a message. So I ha
> And etiquette requires that if you are fairly newbile
> you send your question to CoolSoftwareNewbies and wait
> a reasonable time before construing the absence of
> answer as an indication that you should send it to
> CoolSoftwareUsers?
Wouldn't they have to read the docs for the lists to get
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 06:09:38PM +, Nollaig MacKenzie wrote:
>
> Has this ever been tried for some Cool Software:
>
> Create two lists:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> And etiquette requires that if you are fairly newbile
> you send your question to CoolSoftware
Charles, et al --
...and then Charles Curley said...
% On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:08:28PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% ->
% -> and occasionally fix systems :-) I would say that this *is* becoming a
% -> FAQ and it's because folks aren't reading the docs.
%
% The docs are user hostile, and not mere
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:08:28PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
-> Hi, everyone in general --
->
-> Without going too far into the whole argument of what's intuitive or not
-> and without condemning too much, I hope, those users who get in our way
-> and keep us from doing what we should be able to do
Hi.
I read a lot about Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To recently (including in
the mutt-users archive) and my conclusion is that:
- Mail-Followup-To is not a standard and is supported by very few MUA's.
- Reply-To should be able to do the right thing, even if some
implementations are forcing peopl
Ken --
...and then Ken W said...
% On Tue, Jun 27, 2000, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > specify -- or perhaps to the shell specified at compile time to *then*
% > hand off to your specified shell -- and the sh derivatives don't know
% > what ~ means.
%
% I use tcsh. The same command, 'vim ~/.signatu
Howard --
...and then Howard Arons said...
% I just can't get the hang of verifying a signed cleartext message. In
% this case it's one I sent to myself.
%
...
%
% Typical header info:
% [-- Attachment #1 --]
% [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable, Size: 0.1K --]
%
% [-- Attachment
At 6:54 AM EDT on June 14 Joachim Weiss sent off:
> Try mail-mode instead of auto-fill-mode. This gives you word wrap and
> it can handle quotations (if you are using font-lock-mode this gives you
> colored quotations, in addition emacs is able to rearrange paragraphs
> (M-q) with quotations in i
At 2:09 PM EDT on June 27 Nollaig MacKenzie sent off:
> Has this ever been tried for some Cool Software:
* see below.
> Create two lists:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> And etiquette requires that if you are fairly newbile you send your question
Newbile? I don't
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000, David T-G wrote:
> % finishes '.signature', yet it opens it as a new file. Is mutt not
> % correctly resolving '~'?
>
> ... but it's the shell that isn't handling that. Call it a bug or a
> feature, but mutt hands off your specified command line to the shell you
> specify
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Ken W [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Sorry if I am missing something obvious, but something seems odd to me
> > with mutt's shell-escape behavior. If I hit '!' and type at the
> > prompt 'vim ~/.signature', it knows it exists because tab completions
>
I just can't get the hang of verifying a signed cleartext message. In
this case it's one I sent to myself.
First, I cannot access any kind of "PGP menu" in the index or pager,
like I can when composing a message. So I have to pipe the signes
message to 'pgpv' and it says that I have a detached si
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
% David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% > I have just discovered that searches do not look inside collapsed
% > threads.
%
% It's considered correct that Mutt treats messages hidden by thread
% collapsing the same way it treats ones hidden by
Ken --
...and then Ken W said...
% Sorry if I am missing something obvious, but something seems odd to me
% with mutt's shell-escape behavior. If I hit '!' and type at the
% prompt 'vim ~/.signature', it knows it exists because tab completions
Yep; mutt is helping you build the command line ...
Ken W [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Sorry if I am missing something obvious, but something seems odd to me
> with mutt's shell-escape behavior. If I hit '!' and type at the
> prompt 'vim ~/.signature', it knows it exists because tab completions
> finishes '.signature', yet it opens it as a new fil
David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I have just discovered that searches do not look inside collapsed
> threads.
It's considered correct that Mutt treats messages hidden by thread
collapsing the same way it treats ones hidden by a 'limit' -- as though
they didn't exist. So if you limit messag
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> > that's the xterm alternate screen (when setup, it's in the termcap
> > ti/te capabilities, hence titeInhibit resource for xterm)
>
> And can be set from .Xdefaults:
>
> XTerm.VT100.titeInhibit: true
XTerm*VT100.titeInhibit: true
is preferable.
Sorry if I am missing something obvious, but something seems odd to me
with mutt's shell-escape behavior. If I hit '!' and type at the
prompt 'vim ~/.signature', it knows it exists because tab completions
finishes '.signature', yet it opens it as a new file. Is mutt not
correctly resolving '~'?
I just installed Qmail last night and broke my Procmail, but I thought I
had fixed it with setting up where Promail writes to...
Here is what I believe I have to do when I get home.
1> In .procmailrc set DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
do the receipes change???
:0:
* ^TO_mutt-users@.*
mutt
2>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:49:11PM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Ken W wrote:
>
> > Hi there. I know this seems more like a tcsh question than a mutt
> > question, but I only see this behavior in mutt. Anyone know what
> > would make the screen clear after exiting mutt?
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 08:42:35PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 05:32:45PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:47:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > I plan to model the planned mutt for dummies [1] on this page.
> > >
> >
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
% David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% > It seems that mutt is cresting one of those points of explosive growth
% > where we see a massive influx of clueless newbies -- perhaps, due to
...
% >
% > Unfortunately, this translates directly into
On 2000.06.27 12:08:28, you,
the extraordinary David T-G, opined:
>
> It seems that mutt is cresting one of those points of explosive growth
> where we see a massive influx of clueless newbies -- perhaps, due to
> the easy availability of Linux and even other more mainstream *NIX
> distributio
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000, Jason Helfman wrote:
> UmPardon me for forgettingI didn't even bother to read this
> mail, but one thing people must keep in mind is that one can forget, and
> this is the first time I have asked this. I am at work, and don't have
> much time to read through the mutt
David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...and then Jason Helfman said...
> % this is the first time I have asked this. I am at work, and don't have
> % much time to read through the mutt manual.
>
> I won't bother to go into searching and other such fun stuff. If you
> don't have time to read th
Something just went wrong. My mails do not reach [EMAIL PROTECTED] any
more. This is a test.
Marius Gedminas
--
The UNIX philosophy basically involves giving you enough rope to
hang yourself. And then a couple of feet more, just to be sure.
David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> It seems that mutt is cresting one of those points of explosive growth
> where we see a massive influx of clueless newbies -- perhaps, due to
> the easy availability of Linux and even other more mainstream *NIX
> distributions, so new that they don't even kno
Hi, folks --
I have just discovered that searches do not look inside collapsed
threads. At least, it looks like they don't, because I got "Not found"
when I tried to search for some text that was in a message that turned
out to be in a collapsed thread. I knew that it had to be in the folder,
t
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 01:10:09AM -0500, Martin Julian DeMello wrote:
> Going through the mailing list and the documentation on mutt.org, it strikes
> me that what we lack is a 'How do I' FAQ (of the sort perl has). Of course,
> it'd be semiredundant informationwise since it's all there in the ma
Jason, et al --
...and then Jason Helfman said...
% UmPardon me for forgettingI didn't even bother to read this
% mail, but one thing people must keep in mind is that one can forget, and
Well, that could be part of the problem. I know that the list traffic
has gone up recently, but one
UmPardon me for forgettingI didn't even bother to read this
mail, but one thing people must keep in mind is that one can forget, and
this is the first time I have asked this. I am at work, and don't have
much time to read through the mutt manual.
Spare criticism and move on with your day.
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 11:52:49PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > Thanks. Now, is there any way to bind the arrow keys to use the J/K
> > action instead of the j/k action? That would be really nice...
>
> Sure.
>
> bind index previous-entry
> bind index next-entry
>
> You may possibl
Hi, everyone in general --
Without going too far into the whole argument of what's intuitive or not
and without condemning too much, I hope, those users who get in our way
and keep us from doing what we should be able to do (read mail and surf
and occasionally fix systems :-) I would say that thi
On 000627, at 16:07:39, Stewart V. Wright wrote:
> Is this usual behaviour? I have not noticed keys being added
> automatically to my keyring before...
Are you using PGP 5? PGP 5 always imports any key it finds.
--
David Ellement
I've just gotten mutt to work on a new (backup) ISP. (And at least until I
persuade the sysadmin to upgrade, it's mutt 0.95.7i). It took me the
*longest* time to be able to send any mail. Then I finally realized I had
to disable "dsn_notify" and "dsn_return" in my .muttrc in order for any
mail
[I took the liberty of reformatting this. Please reply below what you are
quoting/replying to.]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > How would I go about replying to all
> >
> > Why the heck is this becoming a FAQ? Doesn't anyone RTFM anymore?
>
> Because it's simple yet non-
I recently setup mutt to use PGP 6.5.2, and when I read
a message that is signed, I get message
"Fetching PGP Key...pkspxycwrap not found"
I'm "source"ing the pgp6.rc in my ~/.mutt/muttrc, and the
last command in pgp6.rc is
# fetch keys
set pgp_getkeys_command="pkspxycwrap %r"
I can't find "pk
Stewart V. Wright muttered:
> I just looked at the message sent from "fman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to
> this list (Subject: Re: Reply to all???).
>
> fman included a gpg public key as his(?) signature.
> the stranger thing is that when I viewed the message the key was
> AUTOMATICALLY added to my pg
Telsa Gwynne muttered:
> > > > How would I go about replying to all
> > >
> > > Why the heck is this becoming a FAQ? Doesn't anyone RTFM anymore?
> >
> > Because it's simple yet non-intutive?
>
> It depends where you're coming from.
>
> I have a theory about most people's use of the word
* Dale Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000618 21:23]:
> I may have got my procmail working!! Just opened my mbox folder
> and found new mail in mutt!!! I believe what may have done the
> trick was going into .muttrc and specifying mbox names..
The stup for mutt does not affect the
setup for procmail.
* Brian D. Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000619 21:18]:
> Some mailing list software will rewrite the Reply-To on every message,
> assuming that the list subscribers are not competent enough to figure
> it out for themselves. [...]
> There are much better ways of marking list e-mail as such (see ab
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000627 19:50]:
> % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000627 19:27]:
> % > % The Application/PGP format is very close to that used by Outlook. The
> % > Well, that's a good start :-)
> % Yup, somehow Outlook only understands plain text in PGP..
> Plain text? Does t
Eugene, et al --
...and then Eugene Lee said...
%
% You can fake a "reply to all" function by doing a group-reply, then quit
% your editor, then hit 'E' to edit your message including headers, then
% manually move the "Cc:" addresses to the "To:" addresses.
... by simply replacing the "Cc" with
Shane, et al --
...and then Shane Wegner said...
%
% The Application/PGP format is very close to that used by Outlook. The
Well, that's a good start :-)
% following is a bit of MUTT output.
%
% Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
% Mime-Version: 1.0
% Content-Type: application/pgp; x-action=enc
Gerhard --
...and then Gerhard den Hollander said...
% * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 10:25:22AM -0400)
% > Gerhard --
%
% > ...and then Gerhard den Hollander said...
%
% > % folder-hook muttusers 'set sort=threads; push '
%
% > % threades expanded (not collapsed) ..
%
There are a few parts of the manual that list a "sort oder"? :)
--
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 26 Jun 2000:
> Mutt's group-reply is not the same thing as "reply to all". Mutt
> implements the former by putting the sender's address into the "To:"
> header, then takes all other addresses and puts them into the "Cc:"
> header. Most other email cli
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 10:25:22AM -0400)
> Gerhard --
> ...and then Gerhard den Hollander said...
> % folder-hook muttusers 'set sort=threads; push '
> % now when Im reading such a folder, and new mail comes in (which trhoiugh
> % the blessings of UUCP comes in ba
> > > How would I go about replying to all
> >
> > Why the heck is this becoming a FAQ? Doesn't anyone RTFM anymore?
>
> Because it's simple yet non-intutive?
It depends where you're coming from. I used elm for years before
mutt. It seems blindingly obvious to me that 'g' is for 'group
re
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 06:40:31PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> When I try to open an email in html I receive the following:
>
> [dlm@dhcp232 dlm]$ mutt
> sh: syntax error near unexpected token `openURL(''
> sh: -c: line 1: `netscape -remote openURL('/tmp/muttnbn5pN')'
> Press any key to continue.
74 matches
Mail list logo
