* Brian D. Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000619 21:18]: > Some mailing list software will rewrite the Reply-To on every message, > assuming that the list subscribers are not competent enough to figure > it out for themselves. [...] > There are much better ways of marking list e-mail as such (see above > and my previous post), and if your filter can't handle something of > the form "Sender: owner-mutt" then you should get a better filter. > If nothing else, the subject tag is a waste of screen space that > could be used to show me more of the message's real subject. Amen! Here is my little summary of why maillist munging is BAD: http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/faq/maillist.html Feedback appreciated! :-) Sven
- Procmail Question Dale Morris
- Re: Procmail Question Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: Procmail Question Brian D. Winters
- Re: Procmail Question Dale Morris
- Re: Procmail Question fred smith
- procmail question Dale Morris
- Re: procmail question Brian D. Winters
- Re: procmail question gauthier . vandemoortele
- Re: procmail question Brian D. Winters
- Re: procmail question Sven Guckes
- Re: procmail question David T-G
- Re: procmail question Mikko Hänninen
- Mutt in ASCII art gauthier . vandemoortele
- Re: Mutt in ASCII art Jeremy Blosser
- Re: Mutt in ASCII a... gauthier . vandemoortele
- Re: Mutt in ASCII a... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: Mutt in ASCII a... Lars Hecking
- Re: Mutt in ASCII a... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: Mutt in ASCII a... David T-G
- Re: Mutt in ASCII a... Jeremy Blosser