Hi.
I read a lot about Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To recently (including in
the mutt-users archive) and my conclusion is that:
- Mail-Followup-To is not a standard and is supported by very few MUA's.
- Reply-To should be able to do the right thing, even if some
implementations are forcing people to use this field.
I started using the Mail-Followup-To header, but didn't see any change
at all in the volume of emails sent to me directly, which makes me
think that using Reply-To instead would work better.
What about adding a feature to Mutt which would basically put the
information currently put in Mail-Followup-To in the Reply-To header?
An option like followup_in_reply_to would be useful IMHO.
Of course, mailing-lists adding a Reply-To header would break that, but
anyway there is no perfect solution.
Any comments?
--
Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://larve.net/people/hugo/
Je crois ce que je vois, je vois ce que je regarde et je regarde ce que
je veux. -- Blaise Pascal (?)
