Here are 2 frames of my noisy video:
http://www.europephoto.com/info/montage_video/frame.jpg
http://www.europephoto.com/info/montage_video/frame2.jpg
As I can't get any good result with denoising the picture, I choose to
use the highest bitrate possible...
The camcorder is an old Hi8 model. Now,
Steven,
I just used mplex on a video encoded at 9000kbps, and guess what... no
error. You were right! =)
I'll now try different bitrate value in order to find the highest usable
one.
Thank you very much!
Nicolas.
---
This SF.Net email is spons
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas schrieb:
> I don't apply any filter. I spent 2 evenings trying to find good
>
>settings to denoise the video without any success. Each time the result
>was blur. There was far less details on the pictures...
>
>
hmm,...
you could (do you use the CVS version of the denoiser
* Steven M. Schultz on Thursday, April 06, 2006 at 11:03:49 -0700:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> What about -H|--keep-hf ? Supposing I just want highest quality?
>
> I think it would be a good idea to define "highest quality" ;)
Oops, sorry for being so vague.
> The
Hi,
Nicolas schrieb:
>Here are 2 frames of my noisy video:
>http://www.europephoto.com/info/montage_video/frame.jpg
>http://www.europephoto.com/info/montage_video/frame2.jpg
>
>
I have taken frame.jpg scaled it (cubic) to 356x576 and afterwards up
again to 720x576. There was no loss in horizont
Just in case someone might ask/wonder... I did not try to explain, why
we have (601) 720x576 or 720x480 pixels per frame (which mainly is
related to 2,25 MHz and some factor of six...) .. I just wanted to
derive the resolution a HI8-camcorder can have.
cu
Stefan
--
Gnomemeeting/Netmeeting: callt
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
> I just used mplex on a video encoded at 9000kbps, and guess what... no error.
Hurrah!
> You were right! =)
Wow - that's amazing (but it has been known to happen once in a
while)
> I'll now try different bitrate value in order to f
Hello everybody,
The Cinelerra version I use is the "Community Version".
There's a problem with field order with the version I use, and that's
ONLY in batch rendering mode. The field order information of the project
wasn't use correctly when rendering in batch mode. I don't export as
MPEG2 from C
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:03:44AM +0200, Stefan M. Fendt wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas schrieb:
>
> > I don't apply any filter. I spent 2 evenings trying to find good
> >
> >settings to denoise the video without any success. Each time the result
> >was blur. There was far less details on the
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Christian Ebert wrote:
> Ok, let me try to be more specific. The case I had in mind was to
> how to put DV footage (shot and edited by yours truly) on DVD.
Ok - so it's not going thru an analog conversion and does not have
analog noise to worry about.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:54:55PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > In fact, I'm archiving old Hi8 cassettes shot around 10 years ago.
>
> Using a MJPEG (is this the DC30+ that's been mentioned or have I
> confused this thread with a different one) card?
>
> > > There's something
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Nicolas MAUFRAIS wrote:
> Stefan, I thank you for all the information, but... how could I use an
> "horizontal lowpass-filter"? I read all the things you wrote, and even
> if that's probably right, I don't know how to test it.
I think I mentioned 'y4mspatialfilter' in
On Thursday 06 April 2006 17:39, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> megabits/sec. Thus for a 120 (2hr) movie on a 4.38GB DVD-R we have
> 560/120 = 4.666 megabits/sec or "-b 4666". I round up and add a little
This is all I wanted, a magic number (560). I've been using bitrate calculator
(ht
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:54:55PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
>
> > Huh? It's written in the manpage of mplex:
> > -V|--vbr
> > Set variable bit rate multiplexing. This is needed to multiplex
> > variable bit-rate video streams correctly.
>
>
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Delio Pereira Guimaraes wrote:
> On Thursday 06 April 2006 17:39, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > megabits/sec. Thus for a 120 (2hr) movie on a 4.38GB DVD-R we have
> > 560/120 = 4.666 megabits/sec or "-b 4666". I round up and add a little
> This is all I wanted, a ma
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
> Steven,
>
> I'm now running some tests with the filters on, and the parameters you
> suggested. The result is nice. I mean, the video isn't very blurry, and
> the noise is reduced.
Super!
> You asked me why I don't use FinalCutPro? Well, probably
Nicolas MAUFRAIS schrieb:
>Stefan, I thank you for all the information, but... how could I use an
>"horizontal lowpass-filter"? I read all the things you wrote, and even
>if that's probably right, I don't know how to test it.
>
>
OK, so here comes what I would try with this material:
Since the
17 matches
Mail list logo
