On 23/08/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23/08/06, Julien TOUCHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > tony sarendal wrote on 22/08/2006 08:32:
> > > I wrote a script to generate graphs for the queues using python and
> > > rrdtool a while back when I needed it, although it onl
Hi list,
I was wondering is there any way to patch my httpd server without a
compiller? I don't want to add a compiller on my production web server,
but I need to patch httpd (security fix 004). I use OpenBSD 3.9.
Nick Guenther wrote:
(you have 13 or so partitions you can fit into the disklabel).
What am I saying? vnd disks are not connected to wd disks. There
should be no arbitrary restriction.
What would be the reason for disklabels in this case anyway?
I just need a partition which is readable by
Hi Tomas,
> I was wondering is there any way to patch my httpd server without a
> compiller? I don't want to add a compiller on my production web server,
> but I need to patch httpd (security fix 004). I use OpenBSD 3.9.
Set up another, non-production, box with 3.9 and build -stable on that.
Fo
On 8/23/06, Nico Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Set up another, non-production, box with 3.9 and build -stable on that.
Follow `man release` and read the upgrade guide on how to extract the
sets.
Seems a slightly cumbersome way to deal with security issues which may
be urgent, but perhaps th
Hello,
You will need a second box for this.
a) on the build box:
Use nfs, export /usr/src and /usr/obj
cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd
make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper obj
make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper cleandir
make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper depend
make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper
b) on the box where you want to
On 8/23/06, Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Nico Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Set up another, non-production, box with 3.9 and build -stable on that.
Seems a slightly cumbersome way to deal with security issues which may
be urgent, but perhaps that's just me?
Buil
Hi Juha,
> Seems a slightly cumbersome way to deal with security issues which may
> be urgent, but perhaps that's just me?
Maybe. ;-)
I find it easier than reading different patch-instructions and updating
several servers.
I have one procedure to run. After my `make release` I distribute the
se
On 8/23/06, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An alternative may be binpatch (see the archives), but I haven't tried
that piece of software yet. IIRC, quite a few people are happy with
that, so it may be worth your while.
Yeah, binpatch works nicely.
--
Juha
I have the following config for my pf.conf and i noticed that nothing
shows in the queues for incomming:
##BEGIN_QUEUES##
altq on tl0 cbq bandwidth 3000Kb qlimit 200 queue { traffic_out, traffic_in }
queue traffic_out bandwidth 1500Kb qlimit 200 cbq { \
other_out, ssh_out, ftp_data_out,
Thanks all for advises,
I will do Nico's way :) And when I will have more free time I will try
binpatch.
On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:28 AM, Lawrence Horvath wrote:
I have the following config for my pf.conf and i noticed that nothing
shows in the queues for incomming:
at this time i was transfering files into the server and it was not
showing in the incomming queues, not sure why, i know its hard to
"
On 23/08/06, Julien TOUCHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tony sarendal wrote on 22/08/2006 08:32:
> > I wrote a script to generate graphs for the queues using python and
> > rrdtool a while back when I needed it, although it only works with
> > CBQ. http://www.prefixmaster.com/eyeonpf.php
> >
>
>
Juha Saarinen wrote:
On 8/23/06, Nico Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Set up another, non-production, box with 3.9 and build -stable on that.
Follow `man release` and read the upgrade guide on how to extract the
sets.
Seems a slightly cumbersome way to deal with security issues which may
be
Yes it says its only "useful" for outbound, that doesnt mean that it
shoudnt still try to queue inbound, which it does sorta do as per my
pfctl -vvs queue, however it skips on parent queue for some reason
On 8/23/06, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 23, 2006, at 6:28 AM, Lawrence Ho
On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Lawrence Horvath wrote:
Yes it says its only "useful" for outbound, that doesnt mean that it
shoudnt still try to queue inbound, which it does sorta do as per my
pfctl -vvs queue, however it skips on parent queue for some reason
Try reading the entire paragraph.
-
I am having a strange problem with the bsd.mp kernel om my amd64. When i
boot openbsd i get problems with the keyboard. When holding down a key
for say 2 to 3 seconds it hangs and keeps issuing the pressed key. This
leads to all kind of usability problems. This issue seems only related
to the
Is there any way I can invoke automatic disklabeling like when you first
install Openbsd on your system? I can't figure out the correct start and
end sectors after resizing my NTFS/FAT32 partitions using Partition
Magic. I always messed it up after doing manual disklabel in which
afterwards Ope
+--
| On 2006-08-23 13:24:25, Mohd Hisham Mohd Omar wrote:
|
| Is there any way I can invoke automatic disklabeling like when you first
| install Openbsd on your system? I can't figure out the correct start and
| end sec
I got another question, when attaching an encrypted folder the
permissions are always set to 0700. When trying to change that I am
getting the following error:
> chmod: /crypt/root: Operation not permitted
I was hoping that I could make a shared world read and writeable folder
for all users t
Good morning,
Being that I cannot find a list specifically for openbgp I am
going to send it here (to the mics@ list), if anyone knows of a list
more suited to openbgp troubleshooting please let me know.
The issues is dropped neighborships between IBGP peers every 1-2
minutes. One host i
Hello Peter,
Thanks a lot for your answer. It works now.
Best regards,
Alina.
Peter H. Coffin a icrit :
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:52:06AM +0200, Alina Florea wrote:
Hello,
I have a US keyboard but the french one is loaded instead the US. I tape
"a" I have a "q" and so on. I have used
On 21/08/06, Peter H. Coffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[cut]
See also the kbd(8) command. In 3.9 at least, there is a kbd-related
section in /etc/rc:
if [ -f /sbin/kbd -a -f /etc/kbdtype ]; then
kbd `cat /etc/kbdtype`
I wonder if that shouldn't really say
if [ -x /sbin/kbd -a -f /et
On 2006/08/23 06:48, bablam wrote:
> The issues is dropped neighborships between IBGP peers every 1-2
> minutes. One host is a PFsense (FC1) firewall running openbgp version
> 3.72
What is "openbgp version 3.72"?! I see 3.6, 3.7, 3.9
in the ftp directory, no 3.72. I think it's better to run a
I set up a couple of partitions to perform raw I/O to, one on the RAID-5 drive
and one on the RAID-0 drive:
dd to raw device:
RAID-5: 6.4MB/s
RAID-0: 9.1MB/s
There is *no* difference between 3.9 and 4.0-beta.
For kicks, I also tested reading from a raw device:
dd reading from a raw devi
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:48:52AM -0700, bablam wrote:
> Good morning,
> Being that I cannot find a list specifically for openbgp I am
> going to send it here (to the mics@ list), if anyone knows of a list
> more suited to openbgp troubleshooting please let me know.
misc@ is the right place.
On 8/23/06, Robert Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I set up a couple of partitions to perform raw I/O to, one on the RAID-5 drive
and one on the RAID-0 drive:
dd to raw device:
RAID-5: 6.4MB/s
RAID-0: 9.1MB/s
Hmmm, if I'm doing my calculations right I'm getting almost 40MB/s for
RAID-
Thanks Bryan, but I did meant automatic disklabeling or 'automatic
detection of existing foreign partitions' if you will. Forgive me for
not being clear. The FAQ says in 14.16.1 I had to do it manually but I
know Openbsd is much smarter than that, because it did exactly just that
(automatic det
Greg wrote:
> Hmmm, if I'm doing my calculations right I'm getting almost 40MB/s for
> RAID-1 which should be slower than RAID-0, shouldn't it?
I'm not sure what you mean by "my calculations". In your earlier mail you
wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ethant# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd1c bs=64k
Hello Group.
Need some help understanding 3.9 stable
and what it means from a pkg stand point!
I mean does stable give me more options
then the release ver of 3.9!
Dose OpenBSD have a printed manual
like FreeBSD has "The complete FreeBSD 4th Ed"
and also the "The Design and Implementation of the
Hi Bablam,
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, bablam wrote:
Good morning,
The issues is dropped neighborships between IBGP peers every 1-2
minutes. One host is a PFsense (FC1) firewall running openbgp
version 3.72 and the other a Fedora Core 5 box running Quagga
0.98.6. The configs and debugs are be
Hello everybody.
I have a ccd containing two disks:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ cat /etc/ccd.conf
# $OpenBSD: ccd.conf,v 1.1 1996/08/24 20:52:22 deraadt Exp $
# Configuration file for concatenated disk devices
# ccd ileave flags component devices
ccd064 0x8 /dev/wd0e /dev/wd1a
Brian Curtis wrote:
> I was reviewing the changelog for OpenBSD-current and came across the
> following:
>
> "Disable Speedstep and p4tcc setperf mechanisms on SMP systems."
This was done because the current setperf implementation isn't
smp-safe. Fixing this is a rather large undertaking, howeve
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:33:46AM -0700, Jon R H wrote:
> Hello Group.
> Need some help understanding 3.9 stable
> and what it means from a pkg stand point!
> I mean does stable give me more options
> then the release ver of 3.9!
>
> Dose OpenBSD have a printed manual
> like FreeBSD has "The comp
Hi All,
I have pptp lusers who need to connect from my lan network
to external servers. But pf nat breaks pptp traffic from multiple
clients to the same external pptp server. I'm testing with
OpenBSD 3.9 and FreeBSD 6.1 firewalls.
I tried using frickin pptp 1.3 to proxy pptp traffic, but I'm u
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:33:46AM -0700, Jon R H wrote:
> Hello Group.
> Need some help understanding 3.9 stable
> and what it means from a pkg stand point!
> I mean does stable give me more options
> then the release ver of 3.9!
>
> Dose OpenBSD have a printed manual
> like FreeBSD has "The comp
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:33:46AM -0700, Jon R H wrote:
> > Dose OpenBSD have a printed manual like...
>
> Starting with your documentation questions: AFAIK, OpenBSD's official
> documentation is limited to:
>
> * The definitive man pages.
> * The published FAQ
> * The PF User's Guide
>
Can someone help me. I am quite stuck. I have spend hours trying
various combinations in order to get an 3.9 box bring up a tunnel to
a NetScreen 25.
Below is all the information. I have full control over both boxes and
I am willing to try anything at this point.
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As for books, you might consider:
One other that I like:
Mastering FreeBSD and OpenBSD Security (O'Reilly, 2005)
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mfreeopenbsd/
DS
On 8/23/06, Mohd Hisham Mohd Omar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bryan Allen wrote:
> disklabel -E wd0
> man 8 disklabel
>
> Though maybe I am confusing "automatic" for "interactive" in this
> context, as I've never noticed an automatic (best defaults?)
> partition scheme frob in the installer.
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Andreas Maus wrote:
[snip]
> I have a ccd containing two disks: Sometimes after a reboot the system
> is can not build ccd0 because wd1 doesn't have a correcte disklabel. I
> can set it manually (disklabel -E wd1) to: Does anyone knows whats wrong
> or what I should do the fi
On 8/23/06, Andreas Maus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everybody.
I have a ccd containing two disks:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ cat /etc/ccd.conf
# $OpenBSD: ccd.conf,v 1.1 1996/08/24 20:52:22 deraadt Exp $
# Configuration file for concatenated disk devices
# ccd ileave flags component
Jon R H wrote:
Dose OpenBSD have a printed manual
like FreeBSD has "The complete FreeBSD 4th Ed"
and also the "The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating
System"
In addition to what Josh Grosse has already told you, there is a 'No
Starch Press' book titled 'Absolute OpenBSD' (20
At 03:10 PM 8/23/2006 -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 8/23/06, Andreas Maus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everybody.
# disklabel wd1
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 2343763 4.2BSD 0 00 #
Cyl 0*-232512*
c:
On 8/23/06, Kyle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kyle.
> or what I should do the fix this behaviour?
See: http://inglorion.net/documents/tutorials/ccd
See: http://morgenes.shire.sytes.net/~inglorion/documents/tutorials/ccd
Thanks I will take a look at this.
And as far I can see I use ccd0
On 8/23/06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Nick.
> Does anyone knows whats wrong or what I should do the fix this
> behaviour?
My first guess is that something is wiping out the disklabel on wd1.
That is, some boundary is configured wrong and, in the process of
writing to the ccd, s
Ok you all, many thanks to you all!
I am about to get most everthing i need done.
Took me two days to get past the disk tool ! LOL
Man pages drives me nuts some times!
its the formating of them that gets me!
but i will use them with a open mind.
The book list is about the same
as the ones i have
> On the other hand, I could just insert the encrypting script (which
> reads a key from USB stick and cattaches the encraypted folder) into
> .profile and the shared folder gets assigned to the user on login.
This seems to work only partly in my scenario.
Even though I can mount the same encrypte
On 8/23/06, Andreas Maus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Nick.
> > Does anyone knows whats wrong or what I should do the fix this
> > behaviour?
>
> My first guess is that something is wiping out the disklabel on wd1.
> That is, some boundary is
Print the man pages.
OpenBSD is simply the best documented OS. Almost everything you'll ever need
is in the man pages.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:20:04PM -0700, Jon R H wrote:
> Ok you all, many thanks to you all!
>
> I am about to get most everthing i need done.
> Took me two days to get past
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:20:04PM -0700, Jon R H wrote:
> Just seems kinds wild one of the best OS's
> in the world has no printed Manual, ya know ?
Why kill trees?
There are many books around that are just print-outs of manpages
of some unix system with some additional colophon. (I remember my
Thanks everyone for all your replies,
Answers inline
What is "openbgp version 3.72"?..
When I installed this package I did so with the following command
"pkg_add -r openbgpd
Fetching
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/Latest/openbgpd.tbz...";
This link
On 8/23/06, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Print the man pages.
OpenBSD is simply the best documented OS. Almost everything you'll ever need
is in the man pages.
exactly. buy a CD set or two, a shirt, and a poster instead of a book
you don't need and support the project.
On 8/23/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
THEN PUT THE COMPILER ON THE COMPUTER IN QUESTION! Sheesh.
Hmm? What are you ranting about?
"Hi, I just shot myself in the foot, and it really hurts. I don't think
it should be that way" uh..then watch where you store your bullets.
I se
Just did an August 22nd snapshot install in a VM running under the
free VMWare Server product. The host is Windows XP and the guest
is intalled on a scsi disk (LSI Logic chosen during create) in the VM.
During boot there are a number of mpi messsages which do not seem
to have any effect on the ru
On 8/23/06, Jon R H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just seems kinds wild one of the best OS's
in the world has no printed Manual, ya know ?
It's so good it doesn't need one.
-Nick
On 8/23/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:20:04PM -0700, Jon R H wrote:
> Just seems kinds wild one of the best OS's
> in the world has no printed Manual, ya know ?
Why kill trees?
There are many books around that are just print-outs of manpages
of some u
PPS,
The version says it is, in fact, 3.7_2.
Fetching
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/Latest/openbgpd.tbz...
Done.
pkg_add: package 'openbgpd-3.7_2' or its older version already installed
-W
On 8/23/06, bablam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks everyone
On 8/23/06, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, I could just insert the encrypting script (which
> reads a key from USB stick and cattaches the encraypted folder) into
> .profile and the shared folder gets assigned to the user on login.
This seems to work only partly in my sce
Smooth Nick
Vary smooth, I like that way of thanking
Peace out
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OpenBSD-Misc"
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for general info on OpenBSD
On 8/23/06, Jon R H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah this is known and both dlg and I have been meaning to clean this up.
Thanks for the kick in the butt. I'll try to do this on the airplane tomorrow.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:11:09PM -0400, Nick Bender wrote:
> Just did an August 22nd snapshot install in a VM running under the
> free VMWare
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Man pages drives me nuts some times!
> its the formating of them that gets me!
> but i will use them with a open mind.
That's something you'll have to get over - UNIX without the manual pages = 1
dumb admin.
> Just seems kinds wild one of the best OS's
> in the world ha
On 8/23/06, Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> THEN PUT THE COMPILER ON THE COMPUTER IN QUESTION! Sheesh.
Hmm? What are you ranting about?
He's ranting about people naively leaving compilers off of computers
in the interest of making
Rob Sessink wrote:
> I am having a strange problem with the bsd.mp kernel om my amd64. When i
> boot openbsd i get problems with the keyboard. When holding down a key
> for say 2 to 3 seconds it hangs and keeps issuing the pressed key. This
> leads to all kind of usability problems. This issue
One thing that keeps donaters
from giving away there money are people
who are rude in public forums!
The next thing would be a lack
of printed manuals for a good read by donaters!
Put your thinking cap on before you post next time please!
you could be costing openBSD a pile of free money!
But wh
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PPS,
> The version says it is, in fact, 3.7_2.
>
> Fetching
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-rele
> ase/Latest/openbgpd.tbz...
> Done.
> pkg_add: package 'openbgpd-3.7_2' or its older version
> already installed
You're confusing the soft
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Good afternoon all,
> I have just removed openbgpd 3.7_2 from my pfsense box and
> installed 3.9. When I attempt to run bgpd I get the following error;
>
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.7" not found,
> required by "bgpd"
>
> How can I install that
Thanks Darren,
Yes I did get them confused, being somewhat new to the pkg
software distro system and the packages themselves how do I check the
software version? I did not see a switch in the man page to even
allow me to check it. -v, which I would have thought to echo a banner
with version i
Thanks Darren,
Let's call it effecient communication. Sorry you got your
panties in a twist, I will post there and let you have your purist
newsgroup (grin). Seriously, thanks for at least responding.
-W
On 8/23/06, Spruell, Darren-Perot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> But what do i know ?
> I am just some dude in a public forum!
And too overly sensitive. Lay off the estrogen supplements, at least for a
while.
The facts still stand. The dumb admins are the ones that don't read the man
pages.
DS
From: bablam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Yes I did get them confused, being somewhat new to the pkg
> software distro system and the packages themselves how do I check the
> software version? I did not see a switch in the man page to even
> allow me to check it. -v, which I would have thought to
> The facts still stand. The dumb admins are the ones that don't read the
man pages.
Indeed. But to put it more nicely for everyone:
The fact remains that the most important feature of UNIX type operating
systems is the man pages. It's unfortunate that some OS's chose not to keep
accurate or well
I am curious as to if this is possible that the three step of the TCP
connection is bypass somehow, or not completed when it is connecting
directly to the apache server on OpenBSD? I wouldn't think so, but may
be I am missing something or not understanding something here.
I am asking as I have
On 8/23/06, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am curious as to if this is possible that the three step of the TCP
connection is bypass somehow, or not completed when it is connecting
directly to the apache server on OpenBSD? I wouldn't think so, but may
be I am missing something or not
On 8/23/06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No it's not possible to bypass the handshake. These must be zombie
hosts. Compromised Windows boxes go for 5cents, I hear. You should try
to figure out who would want to do this to you.
Additionally I just ran nmap on the address listed in y
L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 03:10 PM 8/23/2006 -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 8/23/06, Andreas Maus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everybody.
# disklabel wd1
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 2343763 4.2BSD 0 00 # Cy
On 8/24/06, Greg Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He was responding to the list. Why are you taking it so personally?
Even if he was directing his rant directly at you who cares, are you
Buddha?
Who cares? You do obviously. Nick's points are fine, but he fired his
rant in the wrong direction.
Nick Guenther wrote:
No it's not possible to bypass the handshake. These must be zombie
hosts. Compromised Windows boxes go for 5cents, I hear. You should try
to figure out who would want to do this to you.
Well finding the source of this as you can imagine is not that easy.
In my database rig
Nick Guenther wrote:
Additionally I just ran nmap on the address listed in your log and
although it didn't identify it positively it says it's a windows box.
So there you go. It has an open port at 1026/tcp and I'll bet that's
the control channel.
Got to love Micro$oft I tell you. If true, they
Good afternoon all,
I have just removed openbgpd 3.7_2 from my pfsense box and
installed 3.9. When I attempt to run bgpd I get the following error;
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.7" not found, required by "bgpd"
How can I install that object? Thanks all.
Wade B
--
Wade
** Reply to message from Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed,
23 Aug 2006 22:05:53 -0400
>In my database right now I am up to 5241 IP's starting at 2PM today only.
>
>I sure can publish it as it's fair game.
>
>But what's interesting to me is the signature.
>
>If I follow this idea, then eve
On 8/23/06, Jon R H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Spruell, Darren-Perot"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for general info on OpenBSD
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Man pages drives me nuts some times!
>> its
Tomas wrote:
> I was wondering is there any way to patch my httpd server without a
> compiller? I don't want to add a compiller on my production web server,
> but I need to patch httpd (security fix 004). I use OpenBSD 3.9.
cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd
cvs up
make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper obj clean
I am running OpenBSD 3.9/i386 and am having trouble with ports, specifically
dsniff (and others including hydra, nmap, fragroute)
The error during make is in libnids, as shown below. If more info is needed
to debug this issue, please let me know.
===> Building for libnids-1.20
cd src ; make st
Hi Zoong,
I had been able to do so in the sendmail.cf
I did this:
O InputMailFilters=rxmilter
Xrxmilter, S=local:/var/spool/milter-regex/sock, T=S:30s;R:2m
O InputMailFilters=clmilter
Xclmilter, S=local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock, F=, T=S:4m;R:4
Where I should:
O InputMailFilters=rxmilter,cl
On 8/24/06, Edward Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am running OpenBSD 3.9/i386 and am having trouble with ports, specifically
dsniff (and others including hydra, nmap, fragroute)
The error during make is in libnids, as shown below. If more info is needed
to debug this issue, please let me know
It has been awhile since I used ports, and have not kept up on the latest
OpenBSD stuff. What and where are packages?
Thank you very much, I think that's the way I will do it :) It's quicker
then compilling all the release... And if it'll proove to be working :)
it'll be the best way to update things in openbsd :) Can I ask you one
more thing? How can I make sure that httpd was patched? Is it enought to
see versi
Tomas wrote:
> How can I make sure that httpd was patched? Is it enought to see
> version of mod_rewrite.c (it should be 1.24.6.1)?
Yes, that should suffice.
# Han
89 matches
Mail list logo
