Lyophilisation for Pharmaceuticals 2008
Harnessing the freeze-drying process for product
delivery to reduce
overheads and increase profits
3rd- 5th September 2008, BSG Conference Centre,
Hello,
I use LyX [1.5.5, 1.6Beta] on top of a small installation of MiKTeX on Windows.
For all postscript related tasks I use the internal version of ghostscript
(mgs) and it works all the time. However, LyX always install another version of
ghostscript which is redundant in my environment. So
instanton schrieb:
I cannot reproduce this with the English versions of these files. What language version have you used?
I used the Chinese Simplified version, but the documents are all in English.
I cannot help you here as it also works correctly here with simplified Chinese. Have you unins
>I cannot reproduce this with the English versions of these files. What
>language version have you used?
I used the Chinese Simplified version, but the documents are all in English.
> > Another question: I tested every beta release of LyX 1.6 but this time why
> > there is no "standard setup"
fixed at revision 25632:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/25632
The logic was not clear. There is no need to treat jurabib different than japanese etc. I corrected
this and tested that it works as expected:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/25707
If this for a certain reason not correct, ple
Christian Ridderström schrieb:
Maybe I'm the culprit? I've been moving things around in the web backend
as a part of putting it all in SVN.
The file that should contain the credits data is now located here:
/farm/cookbook/LyX/credits.inc
Thanks, for the hint. I have added Michał Fita no
Ramon Flores wrote:
> I have took a look at the new pot file, and I have found some messages that I
> think shouldn't be there, because they shouldn't be translated. The messages
> are:
>
> 2665 Tgif
>
> to
>
> 2679 XPM
>
> And some other messages as:
>
> 2720 LyX 1.3.x
> 2721 LyX 1.4.x
>
Konrad Hofbauer wrote:
> I assume I have to check out the code with:
> svn co svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_5_X lyx-1.5.x
>
> What do I have to change then (so that it configures/compiles in release
> mode, and whatever else might be needed in contrast to a tar-ball)?
http:/
> I installed the Windows version of Beta4 from BerliOS website and got some
> problem in opening some of the standard documentations. For instance the
> documents FAQ.lyx and shortcuts.lyx cannot be open in Beta4. It says that the
> document was prepared by an earlier version of LyX and lyx2lyx f
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Feedback?
As you correctly guessed this looks a bit over engineered :-). I reckon
that a simple Layout parser in python would be enough for the task. The
advantage being of course that we can rely on the already existing
translation teams.
Ok. I suspect (though
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bug #1476 deals with the intermittent problem of a user discovering
that headings defined in layout files (such as "Theorem" or "Lemma" in
the AMS stuff) manifest in English irrespective of the document language.
Am I correct that nobody is currently working on this?
Yes
Bug #1476 deals with the intermittent problem of a user discovering that
headings defined in layout files (such as "Theorem" or "Lemma" in the
AMS stuff) manifest in English irrespective of the document language.
Am I correct that nobody is currently working on this? If so, I have an
idea for h
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
One major thing I'd like to address with 1.5.6 are the Mac issues (screen
redrawing issues) that forced some people to stick with 1.5.4. I hope these
are build problems we can solve this time. In any case, the Mac binaries
should be checked by people who were affected
Em Quinta, 17 de Julho de 2008, o Jürgen Spitzmüller escreveu:
> Since I'll go to vacancies after next week, I'm trying to get 1.5.6 out at
> the end of next week. Therefore we'd need pending translation patches until
> Thursday, July 24. Translators, please let me know if you cannot make it
> unt
more ...
1. You can solve the problem without loading the second document, by
selecting Labels and References in the Outline panel (which appears
to be OK), and then (re)-selecting the TOC. At this point the correct
TOC is available.
2. The problem does not occur in beta3 (June 3 2008).
--
On Friday 18 July 2008 14:30:35 Helge Hafting wrote:
> Also, if a new lyx2lyx turns out to have a fatal bug, reverting
> lyx2lyx alone is less dramatic than reverting LyX, possibly
> loosing other features the users have noticed.
If a given distribution does not update the package during the stabl
José Matos skrev:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 13:44:24 John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
I was thinking that we should encourage lyx2lyx to be distributed in a
separate deb/rpm to lyx. Distributions in general are quite reluctant
to upgrade applications, but may be persuaded to update lyx2lyx. Even
if no
Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are no critical issues left anymore (at least no reproducable ones),
> except for this (patch from Jean-Marc exists and should go in):
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4662
I think I fixed it after all. This is only in branch, trun
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Konrad Hofbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Bennett Helm wrote:
>
>> I won't guess a to what the source of the problem is. For all I know it's
>> a
>> bug in Qt-4.4, but it may well be our build procedure.
>>
>
> You think it IS a Qt-bug? That means you tested
Bennett Helm wrote:
I won't guess a to what the source of the problem is. For all I know it's a
bug in Qt-4.4, but it may well be our build procedure.
You think it IS a Qt-bug? That means you tested compiling with "all the
same, but Qt-4.3" and then it worked for those people ???
/Konrad
Bennett Helm wrote:
The issue was not computer problems for me but rather my upgrading to Mac OS
X 10.5, which using my normal build procedure resulted in a binary that
could not run on other systems. Konrad eventually figured out new settings
that would let me create the binary. But, although th
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bennett Helm wrote:
> > I really have no idea what the problem is or how to fix it, and I really
> > don't have time now to go digging into things I don't understand. Perhaps
> > Konrad has some ideas.
>
> If I recal
Hi,
I think I've now finally gotten all of the backend of the web site in
under SVN. Apologies for all the commit messages I've been generating
lately. Each time I wanted to do a live test I had to deploy the files
indirectly using a commit. Maybe there's a better way than.
Documentation on
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Many thanks. Your star shines in the credits now.
But not yet in the www-user branch and thus not at our webpage.
Maybe I'm the culprit? I've been moving things around in the web backend
as a part of putting it all in SVN.
The file that should contai
> Many thanks. Your star shines in the credits now.
But not yet in the www-user branch and thus not at our webpage.
regards Uwe
Bennett Helm wrote:
> I really have no idea what the problem is or how to fix it, and I really
> don't have time now to go digging into things I don't understand. Perhaps
> Konrad has some ideas.
If I recall correctly, the concerned binary was not built by you, but by
Konrad, due to your computer
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> I tweaked your patch slightly. Attached is my patch against the copy of
> amsmaths.inc that shipped with LyX 1.5.5. I don't have any version of
> 1.6, so I can't patch against that. Can you take care of that and also
> the corresponding patch against trunk?
OK, it's in (b
27 matches
Mail list logo
